From Mandates to Mechanisms: Institutional Vulnerability, Decentralized Governance, and the Challenges of Local Disaster Risk Reduction Implementation

Abstract

Despite the increasing global emphasis on decentralized disaster risk reduction (DRR), the capacity of local institutions to implement effective risk governance strategies remains inconsistent and often inadequate. This study conducted a comparative analysis of institutional vulnerability at the municipal level in two hazard-prone regions: Teziutlán, Mexico, and Tola, Nicaragua. It employed comparative case study methods alongside structured surveys administered to local DRR actors. An integrated analytical framework was used, synthesizing the Pressure and Release model, the Forensic Investigations of Disasters approach, the MOVE framework, and the Institutional Analysis and Development model. The research identified key institutional vulnerabilities, including preparedness, coordination, information access, infrastructure, legal enforcement, climate integration, and informal governance. The findings indicate that the deficiencies within these institutions are not merely technical but are significantly influenced by systemic disparities in power, resource allocation, and political stability. Both municipalities exhibit notable gaps between formal DRR mandates and their operational implementation, reflecting a structural disjunction between institutions articulated in policy (institutions-in-form) and those in practice (institutions-in-use). The study concluded that effectively addressing institutional vulnerability necessitates transitioning from compliance-driven reforms towards integrated strategies that foster institutional learning, enhance cross-sectoral coordination, promote climate adaptation, and acknowledge informal and community-based governance structures. These findings offer policy-relevant insights for national and regional policymakers seeking to strengthen the institutional foundations of local DRR implementation within Latin America and comparable decentralized governance contexts.

Keywords

Decentralized governance / Disaster risk reduction / Institutional vulnerability / Latin America / Local governance / Risk governance

References

[1] Alcántara-Ayala I. Landslides in a changing world. Landslides, 2025, 22: 2851-2865

[2] Alcántara-Ayala I, Geertsema MSarmiento FO. Construction of disaster risk in mountain systems and its integrated management. Montology palimpsest: A primer of mountain geographies, 2023ChamSpringer335-355

[3] Alcántara-Ayala, I., I. Burton, A. Lavell, E. Mansilla, A. Maskrey, A. Oliver-Smith, and F. Ramírez-Gómez. 2021. Root causes and policy dilemmas of the COVID-19 pandemic global disaster. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 52: Article 101892.

[4] Alcántara-Ayala, I., I. Burton, A. Lavell, A. Oliver-Smith, A. Brenes, and T. Dickinson. 2023. Forensic investigations of disasters: Past achievements and new directions. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 15(1): 1–11.

[5] Beccari B. When do local governments reduce risk? Knowledge gaps and a research agenda. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 2020, 35(3): 20-24

[6] Birkmann J, Cardona OD, Carreño ML, Barbat AH, Pelling M, Schneiderbauer S, Kienberger S, Keiler M. et al.. Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards, 2013, 67: 193-211

[7] Birkmann J, Kienberger S, Alexander DAssessment of vulnerability to natural hazards: A European perspective, 2014AmsterdamElsevier

[8] Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner BAt risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2014LondonRoutledge

[9] Cid, A., J.M. Siqueiros-García, M. Mazari-Hiriart, A. Guerra, and A.M. Lerner. 2024. Mobilizing institutional capacities to adapt to climate change: Local government collaboration networks for risk management in Mexico City. npj Climate Action 3(1): Article 20.

[10] Cole DH. Laws, norms, and the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2017, 13(4): 829-847

[11] Garschagen M, Romero-Lankao P. Exploring the relationships between urbanization trends and climate change vulnerability. Climatic Change, 2015, 133: 37-52

[12] Gencer EALocal government powers for disaster risk reduction: A study on local-level authority and capacity for resilience, 2017GenevaUNDRR

[13] Ghorbani A, Siddiki S, Mesdaghi B, Bosch M, Abebe YA. Understanding institutional compliance in flood risk management. International Journal of the Commons, 2024, 18(1): 522-540

[14] Hardoy J, Hernández I, Pacheco JA, Sierra G. Institutionalizing climate change adaptation at municipal and state level in Chetumal and Quintana Roo. Mexico. Environment and Urbanization, 2014, 26(1): 69-85

[15] Kiesling LL. Using the IAD framework to model the political economy of technological change in a regulated industry: The case of transactive energy. Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 2024, 5(4): 523-554

[16] Kirsch-Wood J, Alcántara Ayala I, Pulwarty R, Kelman I, Byatt G, Prados AGAR special report 2024: Forensic insights for future resilience – Learning from past disasters, 2024GenevaUNDRR

[17] Lavell, A. 2003. Local risk management: Concepts and clarifications regarding the concept and practice (La gestión local del riesgo: nociones y precisiones en torno al concepto y la práctica). In Local risk management: Concepts and clarifications regarding the concept and practice (La gestión local del riesgo: Nociones y precisiones en torno al concepto y la práctica), Centro de Coordinación para la Prevención de los Desastres Naturales en América Central (CEPREDENAC), Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD), Guatemala (in Spanish).

[18] Murillo-García FG, Alcántara-Ayala I. Landslide inventory, Teziutlán Municipality, Puebla, México (1942–2015). Journal of Maps, 2017, 13(2): 767-776

[19] Narvéz, L., A. Lavell, and G. Pérez Ortega. 2009. Disaster risk management: A process-based approach (La gestión del riesgo de desastres: un enfoque basado en procesos), Proyecto Apoyo a la Prevención de Desastres en la Comunidad Andina – PREDECAN, Secretaría General de la Comunidad Andina, Perú, 102–102 (in Spanish).

[20] Oliver-Smith, A., I. Alcántara-Ayala, I. Burton, and A. Lavell. 2016. Forensic Investigations of Disasters (FORIN): A conceptual framework and guide to research. Beijing: IRDR.

[21] Oliver-Smith A, Alcántara-Ayala I, Burton I, Lavell A. The social construction of disaster risk: Seeking root causes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 22: 469-474

[22] Ostrom EUnderstanding institutional diversity, 2009PrincetonPrinceton University Press

[23] Ostrom E. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 2011, 39(1): 7-27

[24] Papathoma-Köhle, M., T. Thaler, and S. Fuchs. 2021. An institutional approach to vulnerability: Evidence from natural hazard management in Europe. Environmental Research Letters 16(4): Article 044056.

[25] Renn ORisk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world, 2017LondonRoutledge

[26] UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction)Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, 2015GenevaUnited Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction

[27] Velásquez-Espinoza G, Alcántara-Ayala I. Tropical cyclones in Nicaragua: Historical impact and contemporary exposure to disaster risk. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(4): 579-593

[28] Velásquez-Espinoza, G., and I. Alcántara-Ayala. 2025. Youth and flood risk in rural Nicaragua: Insights for risk communication and DRR policy in the Global South. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 96: Article 105658.

[29] Wisner B, Alcántara-Ayala I, Gaillard JC, Kelman I, Marchezini VUnderstanding and addressing disaster risk: Who speaks? Who suffers?, 2025LondonRoutledge

[30] Wisner B, Gaillard JG, Kelman IHandbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction and management, 2014LondonRoutledge

[31] Yin RKCase study research: Design and methods, 20095Thousand Oaks, CASage

[32] Ziga-Abortta, F.R., and S. Kruse. 2023. What drives vulnerability? Explaining the institutional context of flood disaster risk management in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 97: Article 104054.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)