Dispatch Centers in Crisis? A Case Study of Competing Logics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze how and why contradictions recurrently arise regarding how incoming emergency calls at dispatch centers should be assessed, sorted, and handled. The study is based on data from documents, study visits, and interviews with representatives from dispatch operators in a Swedish context. The results identify competing alarm and healthcare logics that are incompatible, which leads to contradictions between the national and regional approaches and, consequently, makes collaboration more difficult and affects the precision of emergency call assessment. The study also shows that the assessments of emergency calls are governed more by which logic is applied than by the assessor’s formal competence. The study highlights the importance of feedback and subsequent analysis from the health service to the initial call assessment stage, which can improve the alarm logic’s weaknesses with over-triage, without extending the response time. We also focused on the mechanisms required to develop and maintain a long-term sustainable alarm function.

Keywords

Competing logics / Cooperation / Dispatch center / Dispatch operator / Emergency call / Triage

References

[1] Bell E, Bryman A, Harley BBusiness research methods, 20195Oxford, UKOxford University Press

[2] Booker, M.J., A.R.G. Shaw, S. Purdy, and R. Barnes. 2018. “Primary care sensitive” situations that result in an ambulance attendance: A conversation analytic study of UK emergency “999” call recordings. BMJ Open 8: Article e023727.

[3] Carlström E, Jansson M, Karlsson D, Berlin J. Quasi-backsourcing of a call center to public health care – The dilemma of non-separable public services. International Journal of Public Administration, 2023, 46(4): 302-311

[4] Diego Santiago M, de Souza-Junior VD, dos Santos Almeida RG, Guimarães R, Marchi-Alves LM, Mendes C, Amélia I, de Godoy S. How to perform prehospital emergency telephone triage: A systematic review. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 2019, 26(2): 104-110

[5] Eriksson M. Conceptions of emergency calls: Emergency communication in an age of mobile communication and prevalence of anxiety. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2010, 18(3): 165-174

[6] Ferlie E, Ashburner L, Fitzgerald L, Pettigrew AThe new public management in action, 1996Oxford, UKOxford University Press

[7] Freidson EProfession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge, 1988Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press

[8] Freidson EProfessionalism: The third logic, 2001Hoboken, NJJohn Wiley & Sons Inc

[9] Giesen P, Ferwerda R, Tijssen R, Mokkink H, Drijver R, van den Bosch W, Grol R. Safety of telephone triage in general practitioner cooperatives: Do triage nurses correctly estimate urgency?. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2007, 16(3): 181-184

[10] Goodrick E, Reay T. Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 2011, 38(3): 372-416

[11] Hensmans M. Social movement organizations: A metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 2003, 24(3): 355-381

[12] Herr, D., S. Bhatia, F. Breuer, S. Poloczek, C. Pommerenke, and J. Dahmen. 2023. Increasing emergency number utilization is not driven by low acuity calls: An observational study of 1.5 million emergency calls (2018–2021) from Berlin. BMC Medicine 21(1): Article 184.

[13] Holmström IK, Kaminsky E, Lindberg Y, Spangler D, Winblad U. Registered nurses’ experiences of using a clinical decision support system for triage of emergency calls: A qualitative interview study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2020, 76(11): 3104-3112

[14] Hosseini SMR, Maleki M, Gorji HA, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Roudbari M. Factors affecting emergency medical dispatchers’ decision-making: A qualitative study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2018, 22(11): 391-398

[15] Infinger A, Studnek JR, Hawkins E, Bagwel B, Swanson D. Implementation of prehospital dispatch protocols that triage low-acuity patients to advice-line nurses. Prehospital Emergency Care, 2013, 17(4): 481-485

[16] Kaminsky E, Lindberg Y, Spangler D, Winblad U, Holmström I. Registered nurses’ understandings of emergency medical dispatch centre work: A qualitative phenomenographic interview study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 2021, 23(2): 430-438

[17] Kvale SInterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing, 1996LondonSage

[18] Lindström V, Heikkilä K, Bohm K, Castrèn M, Falk AC. Barriers and opportunities in assessing calls to emergency medical communication centre – A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2014, 22(61): 1-9

[19] Lounsbury M. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(2): 289-307

[20] Montandon DS, de Souza-Junior VD, dos Santos Almeida RG, Marchi Alves LM, Costa Mendes IA, de Godoy S. How to perform prehospital emergency telephone triage: A systematic review. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 2019, 26(2): 104-110

[21] Munro S, Joy M, de Coverly R, Salmon M, Williams J, Lyon RM. A novel method of non-clinical dispatch is associated with a higher rate of critical helicopter emergency medical service intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2018, 26(84): 1-7

[22] Patton MQQualitative evaluation and research methods, 19902Newbury Park, CASage

[23] Rawshani A, Rawshani N, Gelang C, Andersson J-O, Larsson A, Bång A, Herlitz J, Gellerstedt M. Emergency medical dispatch priority in chest pain patients due to life threatening conditions: A cohort study examining circadian variations and impact of the education. International Journal of Cardiology, 2017, 236: 43-48

[24] Reay T, Hinings C. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 2009, 30(6): 629-652

[25] Roivainen P, Hoikka MJ, Raatiniemi L, Silfvast T, Ala-Kokko T. Kääriäinen telephone triage performed by nurses reduces non-urgent ambulance missions: A prospective observational pilot study in Finland. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavia, 2020, 64(4): 556-563

[26] Scott WR, Ruef M, Mendel P, Caronna CInstitutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care, 2000Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press

[27] Spangler, D., L. Edmark, U. Winblad, J. Colldén-Benneck, H. Borg, and H. Blomberg. 2020. Using trigger tools to identify triage errors by ambulance dispatch nurses in Sweden: An observational study. BMJ Open 10(3): Article e035004.

[28] Swedish Research Council. 2024. Good research practice. Stockholm: The Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet).

[29] Thornton P, Ocasio WGreenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin-Andersson K. Institutional logics. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2008LondonSage99-129

[30] Torlén Wennlund, K., L. Kurland, K. Olanders, A. Khoshegir, H.A. Kamil, M. Castren, and K. Bohm. 2022. Emergency medical dispatchers’ experiences of managing emergency calls: A qualitative interview study. BMJ Open 12: Article e059803.

[31] Vivier E, Robinson B, Jenkins L, Smit A. Institutional logics and relational shifts: Permeating hierarchies and silos in the healthcare sector. Public Management Review, 2024, 26(10): 2943-2965

[32] Wheeler S, Greenberg ME, Mahlmeister L, Wolfe N. Safety of clinical and non-clinical decision makers in telephone triage: A narrative review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2015, 21(6): 305-322

[33] Yin RKQualitative research from start to finish, 2016New YorkThe Guilford Press

Funding

University West

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)