Flood Risk Assessment Combining Machine Learning with Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Jiangxi Province, China

Abstract

Floods are one of the most frequent natural hazards worldwide. Accurate flood risk mapping is critical for effective flood management in flood-prone areas. In this study, we employed the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method to develop a flood risk map that combines flood susceptibility and vulnerability factors. Three machine learning models—random forest (RF), XGBoost, and LightGBM—were selected as the basic classifiers for creating flood susceptibility maps. Historical flood data and 13 flood-influencing factors were extracted for machine learning training. Model performance was assessed using precision, recall, accuracy, F1-score, and AUC through 5-fold cross-validation. All three models performed well, but RF slightly outperformed the other two according to the evaluation results. We used the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to combine the flood susceptibility map generated by the RF model with flood vulnerability indicators to produce a flood risk map. Our findings demonstrate that integrating advanced machine learning techniques with MCDA method offers an effective approach for flood risk assessment, providing a robust foundation for decision making in flood risk management.

Keywords

Flood risk / Jiangxi Province / Machine learning / Multi-criteria decision analysis

References

[1] Abedi R, Costache R, Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Pham QB. Flash-flood susceptibility mapping based on XGBoost, random forest and boosted regression trees. Geocarto International, 2022, 37(19): 5479-5496.

[2] Afshari S, Tavakoly AA, Rajib MA, Zheng X, Follum ML, Omranian E, Fekete BM. Comparison of new generation low-complexity flood inundation mapping tools with a hydrodynamic model. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 556: 539-556.

[3] Ahmadlou M, Karimi M, Alizadeh S, Shirzadi A, Parvinnejhad D, Shahabi H, Panahi M. Flood susceptibility assessment using integration of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) and BAT algorithms (BA). Geocarto International, 2019, 34(11): 1252-1272.

[4] Arnell NW, Gosling SN. The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change, 2016, 134(3): 387-401.

[5] Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32.

[6] Bui DT, Ngo P-TT, Pham TD, Jaafari A, Minh NQ, Hoa PV, Samui P. A novel hybrid approach based on a swarm intelligence optimized extreme learning machine for flash flood susceptibility mapping. CATENA, 2019, 179: 184-196.

[7] Chen AS, Evans B, Djordjević S, Savić DA. Multi-layered coarse grid modelling in 2D urban flood simulations. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 470: 1-11

[8] Chen, W., Y. Li, W. Xue, H. Shahabi, S. Li, H. Hong, X. Wang, H. Bian, et al. 2020. Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve Bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods. Science of the Total Environment 701: Article 134979.

[9] Chu, H., W. Wu, Q.J. Wang, R. Nathan, and J. Wei. 2020. An ANN-based emulation modelling framework for flood inundation modelling: Application, challenges and future directions. Environmental Modelling & Software 124: Article 104587.

[10] Costache, R., Q.B. Pham, M. Avand, N.T. Thuy Linh, M. Vojtek, J. Vojteková, S. Lee, D.N. Khoi, et al. 2020. Novel hybrid models between bivariate statistics, artificial neural networks and boosting algorithms for flood susceptibility assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 265: Article 110485.

[11] Deroliya, P., M. Ghosh, M.P. Mohanty, S. Ghosh, K.H.V.D. Rao, and S. Karmakar. 2022. A novel flood risk mapping approach with machine learning considering geomorphic and socio-economic vulnerability dimensions. Science of the Total Environment 851: Article 158002.

[12] Fang, L., J. Huang, J. Cai, and V. Nitivattananon. 2022. Hybrid approach for flood susceptibility assessment in a flood-prone mountainous catchment in China. Journal of Hydrology 612: Article 128091.

[13] Glenn EP, Morino K, Nagler PL, Murray RS, Pearlstein S, Hultine KR. Roles of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) and capillary rise in salinizing a non-flooding terrace on a flow-regulated desert river. Journal of Arid Environments, 2012, 79: 56-65.

[14] Goetz JN, Brenning A, Petschko H, Leopold P. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Computers & Geosciences, 2015, 81: 1-11.

[15] Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R, Koirala S, Konoshima L, Yamazaki D, Watanabe S, Kim H, Kanae S. Global flood risk under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3(9): 816-821.

[16] Jahangir, M.H., S.M. Mousavi Reineh, and M. Abolghasemi. 2019. Spatial predication of flood zonation mapping in Kan River basin, Iran, using artificial neural network algorithm. Weather and Climate Extremes 25: Article 100215.

[17] Jongman B, Ward PJ, Aerts JCJH. Global exposure to river and coastal flooding: Long term trends and changes. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(4): 823-835.

[18] Khosravi K, Pham BT, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I, Prakash I, Bui DT. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 627: 744-755.

[19] Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Pham BT, Adamowski J, Shirzadi A, Pradhan B, Dou J, Ly HB. et al.. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 573: 311-323.

[20] Liong SY, Sivapragasam C. Flood stage forecasting with support vector machines. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002, 38(1): 173-186.

[21] Lyu, H.M., J. Shen, and A. Arulrajah. 2018. Assessment of geohazards and preventative countermeasures using AHP incorporated with GIS in Lanzhou, China. Sustainability 10(2): Article 304.

[22] Malczewski J. A GIS-based approach to multiple criteria group decision-making. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1996, 10(8): 955-971.

[23] Malczewski J. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2006, 20(7): 703-726.

[24] Masuya A, Dewan A, Corner RJ. Population evacuation: Evaluating spatial distribution of flood shelters and vulnerable residential units in Dhaka with geographic information systems. Natural Hazards, 2015, 78(3): 1859-1882.

[25] Mishra, K., and R. Sinha. 2020. Flood risk assessment in the Kosi Megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis: A hydro-geomorphic approach. Geomorphology 350: Article 106861.

[26] Mudashiru, R.B., N. Sabtu, and I. Abustan. 2021. Quantitative and semi-quantitative methods in flood hazard/susceptibility mapping: A review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14(11): Article 941.

[27] Nobre AD, Cuartas LA, Hodnett M, Rennó CD, Rodrigues G, Silveira A, Waterloo M, Saleska S. Height above the nearest drainage – A hydrologically relevant new terrain model. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 404(1–2): 13-29.

[28] O’Neill E, Brereton F, Shahumyan H, Clinch JP. The impact of perceived flood exposure on flood-risk perception: The role of distance. Risk Analysis, 2016, 36(11): 2158-2186.

[29] Ombadi M, Risser MD, Rhoades AM, Varadharajan C. A warming-induced reduction in snow fraction amplifies rainfall extremes. Nature, 2023, 619(7969): 305-310.

[30] Opella, J.M.A., and A.A. Hernandez. 2019. Developing a flood risk assessment using support vector machine and convolutional neural network: A conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 15th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA), 8–9 March 2019, Penang, Malaysia, 260–265.

[31] Pham, B.T., C. Luu, T.V. Phong, H.D. Nguyen, H.V. Le, T.Q. Tran, H.T. Ta, and I. Prakash. 2021. Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. Journal of Hydrology 592: Article 125815.

[32] Pham, B.T., C. Luu, D.V. Dao, T.V. Phong, H.D. Nguyen, H.V. Le, J. von Meding, and I. Prakash. 2021. Flood risk assessment using deep learning integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 219: Article 106899.

[33] Rana, I.A., A. Jamshed, Z.I. Younas, and S.S. Bhatti. 2020. Characterizing flood risk perception in urban communities of Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 46: Article 101624.

[34] Renschler CS, Wang Z. Multi-source data fusion and modeling to assess and communicate complex flood dynamics to support decision-making for downstream areas of dams: The 2011 Hurricane Irene and Schoharie Creek floods, NY. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2017, 62: 157-173.

[35] Rentschler, J., M. Salhab, and B.A. Jafino. 2022. Flood exposure and poverty in 188 countries. Nature Communications 13(1): Article 3527.

[36] Saaty, T.L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1(1): Article 83.

[37] Sarkar, D., and P. Mondal. 2020. Flood vulnerability mapping using frequency ratio (FR) model: A case study on Kulik River basin, Indo-Bangladesh Barind region. Applied Water Science 10(1): Article 17.

[38] Schoppa, L., M. Disse, and S. Bachmair. 2020. Evaluating the performance of random forest for large-scale flood discharge simulation. Journal of Hydrology 590: Article 125531.

[39] Smith A, Martin D, Cockings S. Spatio-temporal population modelling for enhanced assessment of urban exposure to flood risk. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2016, 9(2): 145-163.

[40] Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 512: 332-343.

[41] Termeh SVR, Kornejady A, Pourghasemi HR, Keesstra S. Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615: 438-451.

[42] Visser H, Petersen AC, Ligtvoet W. On the relation between weather-related disaster impacts, vulnerability and climate change. Climatic Change, 2014, 125(3–4): 461-477.

[43] Wang Z, Lai C, Chen X, Yang B, Zhao S, Bai X. Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 527: 1130-1141.

[44] Winsemius HC, Van Beek LPH, Jongman B, Ward PJ, Bouwman A. A framework for global river flood risk assessments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 17(5): 1871-1892.

[45] Winsemius HC, Aerts JCJH, van Beek LPH, Bierkens MFP, Bouwman A, Jongman B, Kwadijk JCJ, Ligtvoet W. et al.. Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(4): 381-385.

[46] Wu, Y., X. Yin, G. Zhou, L.A. Bruijnzeel, A. Dai, F. Wang, P. Gentine, G. Zhang, et al. 2024. Rising rainfall intensity induces spatially divergent hydrological changes within a large river basin. Nature Communications 15(1): Article 823.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)