Assessing Ripple Effects of Production Capacity Loss from Compound Hazards: A Case Study of Flood and COVID-19 in Enshi, Hubei Province

Xinyu Jiang , Dan Lai , Lijiao Yang , Xinyi Lei , Si Ha

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 636 -651.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 636 -651. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-025-00658-x
Article
research-article

Assessing Ripple Effects of Production Capacity Loss from Compound Hazards: A Case Study of Flood and COVID-19 in Enshi, Hubei Province

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Understanding the impacts of compound hazards on economic systems is essential for integrated disaster risk management. However, quantifying the ripple effects remains challenging, especially as the relative contributions of each hazard are unclear. Compared to the uncertainty of demand-driven impacts, supply-side shocks are more pronounced and quantifiable, providing a practical pathway to separate the effects. This study proposed a supply-side methodological framework for assessing the ripple effects of compound hazards, focusing on the contributions of each hazard to overall economic disruptions. Overall production capacity loss rates (PCLRs) across industries were evaluated using on-site survey data. A time series model, utilizing urban travel intensity big data, was used to estimate the PCLRs attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed multi-regional input–output (mixed-MRIO) model was constructed to assess the ripple effects. The framework was applied to the 17 July 2020 flood in Enshi City, Hubei Province, China, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicate that overall ripple effects exceeded direct production capacity losses. The ratio of production capacity losses attributed to the flood versus the pandemic was approximately 6:4, but it increased to 7:3 for ripple effects. Economic core cities exhibited greater economic stability as evidenced by lower loss rates, while more dependent small- and medium-sized cities were more vulnerable. The secondary industry was sensitive to floods, and the tertiary industry to the pandemic. The study highlights the importance of integrating field surveys and travel intensity big data with economic modeling to evaluate ripple effects, offering new insights into compound hazards impact assessment and management strategies.

Keywords

Flood-pandemic compound hazards / Hubei Province / Mixed multi-regional input–output model / Production capacity loss / Ripple effects

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xinyu Jiang, Dan Lai, Lijiao Yang, Xinyi Lei, Si Ha. Assessing Ripple Effects of Production Capacity Loss from Compound Hazards: A Case Study of Flood and COVID-19 in Enshi, Hubei Province. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2025, 16(4): 636-651 DOI:10.1007/s13753-025-00658-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bevacqua, E., D. Maraun, M.I. Vousdoukas, E. Voukouvalas, M. Vrac, L. Mentaschi, and M. Widmann. 2019. Higher probability of compound flooding from precipitation and storm surge in Europe under anthropogenic climate change. Science Advances 5(9): Article eaaw5531.

[2]

BotzenWW, DeschenesO, SandersM. The economic impacts of natural disasters: A review of models and empirical studies. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2019, 13(2): 167-188.

[3]

ChakrabortyL, ThistlethwaiteJ, MinanoA, HenstraD, ScottD. Leveraging hazard, exposure, and social vulnerability data to assess flood risk to indigenous communities in Canada. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(6): 821-838.

[4]

ChoC. A note on distortions from estimating the regional impacts of exogenous changes in output. Economic Systems Research, 2017, 29(3): 418-429.

[5]

De Ruiter, M.C., A. Couasnon, M.J. van den Homberg, J.E. Daniell, J.C. Gill, and P.J. Ward. 2020. Why we can no longer ignore consecutive disasters. Earth’s Future 8(3): Article e2019EF001425.

[6]

Dulam, R., K. Furuta, and T. Kanno. 2021. Quantitative decision-making model to analyze the post-disaster consumer behavior. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 61: Article 102329.

[7]

GalbuseraL, GiannopoulosG. On input-output economic models in disaster impact assessment. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 30: 186-198.

[8]

Gao, K., S. Li, R. Han, R. Li, Z. Liu, Z. Qi, and Z. Liu. 2020. Study on the propagation law of gas explosion in the space based on the goaf characteristic of coal mine. Safety Science 127: Article 104693.

[9]

GarianoSL, GuzzettiF. Landslides in a changing climate. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 162: 227-252.

[10]

GhoshA. Input-output approach in an allocation system. Economica, 1958, 25(97): 58-64.

[11]

Gori, A., N. Lin, and D. Xi. 2020. Tropical cyclone compound flood hazard assessment: From investigating drivers to quantifying extreme water levels. Earth’s Future 8(12): Article e2020EF001660.

[12]

HallegatteS. An adaptive regional input-output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of Katrina. Risk Analysis, 2008, 28(3): 779-799.

[13]

HeatwoleN, RoseA. A reduced-form rapid economic consequence estimating model: Application to property damage from U.S. earthquakes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2013, 4(1): 20-32.

[14]

HuX, WangM, YeT, ShiP. A new method for resource allocation optimization in disaster reduction and risk governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(2): 138-150.

[15]

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2023. Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Core Writing Team, H. Lee, and J. Romero. Geneva: IPCC.

[16]

JiangX, JiaR, YangL. Assessing the economic ripple effect of flood disasters in light of the recovery process: Insights from an agent-based model. Risk Analysis, 2024, 44(1): 203-228.

[17]

Jiang, X., Y. Lin, and L. Yang. 2023. A simulation-based approach for assessing regional and industrial flood vulnerability using mixed-MRIO model: A case study of Hubei Province, China. Journal of Environmental Management 339: Article 117845.

[18]

JiangX, MoriN, TatanoH, YangL, ShibutaniY. Estimation of property loss and business interruption loss caused by storm surge inundation due to climate change: A case of Typhoon Vera revisit. Natural Hazards, 2016, 84: 35-49.

[19]

JibhakateSM, TimbadiyaPV, PatelPL. Flood hazard assessment for the coastal urban floodplain using 1D/2D coupled hydrodynamic model. Natural Hazards, 2023, 116(2): 1557-1590

[20]

KajitaniY, TatanoH. Estimation of production capacity loss rate after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami in 2011. Economic Systems Research, 2014, 26(1): 13-38.

[21]

KappesMS, KeilerM, von ElverfeldtK, GladeT. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: A review. Natural Hazards, 2012, 64: 1925-1958.

[22]

KoksEE, ThissenM. A multiregional impact assessment model for disaster analysis. Economic Systems Research, 2016, 28(4): 429-449.

[23]

Kumar, S., and A. Sengupta. 2024. Physical model-based landslide susceptibility mapping of Himalayan highways considering the coupled effect of rainfall and earthquake. Natural Hazards Review 25(3): Article 4024013.

[24]

KunzM, MührB, Kunz-PlappT, DaniellJE, KhazaiB, WenzelF, VannieuwenhuyseM, ComesT, et al.. Investigation of superstorm Sandy 2012 in a multi-disciplinary approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 13(10): 2579-2598.

[25]

León, J.A., M. Ordaz, E. Haddad, and I.F. Araújo. 2022. Risk caused by the propagation of earthquake losses through the economy. Nature Communications 13(1): Article 2908.

[26]

LiW, XuB, WenJ. Scenario-based community flood risk assessment: A case study of Taining county town, Fujian Province, China. Natural Hazards, 2016, 82(1): 193-208.

[27]

LiuW, HeS. Dynamic simulation of a mountain disaster chain: Landslides, barrier lakes, and outburst floods. Natural Hazards, 2018, 90: 757-775.

[28]

Liu, M., X. Yang, J. Wen, H. Wang, Y. Feng, J. Lu, H. Chen, J. Wu, and J. Wang. 2023. Drivers of China’s carbon dioxide emissions: Based on the combination model of structural decomposition analysis and input-output subsystem method. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 100: Article 107043.

[29]

Ma, L., L. Yang, X. Jiang, and D. Huang. 2021. Analysis of business interruption risk factors of Chinese enterprises during flood disasters based on social network analysis. Climate Risk Management 33: Article 100353.

[30]

MillerRE, BlairPDInput-output analysis: Foundations and extensions, 2009, Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press. .

[31]

Moosavi, J., A.M. Fathollahi-Fard, and M.A. Dulebenets. 2022. Supply chain disruption during the Covid-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 75: Article 102983.

[32]

OkuyamaYSkidmoreM. A few good models for economic analysis of disasters: Can your model handle the truth?. Handbook on the economics of disasters, 2022, Cheltenham, UK. Edward Elgar Publishing. 3049

[33]

OkuyamaY, ChangSEModeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters, 2004, Berlin. Springer. .

[34]

OkuyamaY, RoseAAdvances in spatial and economic modeling of disaster impacts, 2019, Berlin. Springer. .

[35]

Omar, N.A., M.A. Nazri, M.H. Ali, and S.S. Alam. 2021. The panic buying behavior of consumers during the Covid-19 pandemic: Examining the influences of uncertainty, perceptions of severity, perceptions of scarcity, and anxiety. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 62: Article 102600.

[36]

OosterhavenJ. On the limited usability of the inoperability IO model. Economic Systems Research, 2017, 29(3): 452-461.

[37]

Owolabi, T.A., and M. Sajjad. 2023. A global outlook on multi-hazard risk analysis: A systematic and scientometric review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 92: Article 103727.

[38]

ÖzçelikG, YeniFB, Gürsoy YılmazB, YılmazÖF. A bi-objective robust optimization model to bolster a resilient medical supply chain in case of the ripple effect. Operational Research, 2025, 25(2): 1-42.

[39]

Pak, A., O.A. Adegboye, A.I. Adekunle, K.M. Rahman, E.S. Mcbryde, and D.P. Eisen. 2020. Economic consequences of the Covid-19 outbreak: The need for epidemic preparedness. Frontiers in Public Health 8: Article 241.

[40]

RaySK, KhanAM, MohalikNK, MishraD, MandalS, PandeyJK. Review of preventive and constructive measures for coal mine explosions: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2022, 32(3): 471-485.

[41]

ReisslS, CaianiA, LampertiF, FerraresiT, GhezziL. A regional input-output model of the COVID-19 crisis in Italy: Decomposing demand and supply factors. Economic Systems Research, 2024, 36(1): 100-130.

[42]

RoseA, WeiD. Estimating the economic consequences of a port shutdown: The special role of resilience. Economic Systems Research, 2013, 25(2): 212-232.

[43]

Tanoue, M., R. Taguchi, S. Nakata, S. Watanabe, S. Fujimori, and Y. Hirabayashi. 2020. Estimation of direct and indirect economic losses caused by a flood with long‐lasting inundation: Application to the 2011 Thailand flood. Water Resources Research 56(5): Article e2019WR026092.

[44]

TatanoH, TsuchiyaS. A framework for economic loss estimation due to seismic transportation network disruption: A spatial computable general equilibrium approach. Natural Hazards, 2008, 44: 253-265.

[45]

TonnG, CzajkowskiJ. US tropical cyclone flood risk: Storm surge versus freshwater. Risk Analysis, 2022, 42(12): 2748-2764.

[46]

WiedmannT, LenzenM, TurnerK, BarrettJ. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities – Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(1): 15-26.

[47]

Xu, X., S. Wang, J. Dong, Z. Shen, and S. Xu. 2020. An analysis of the domestic resumption of social production and life under the COVID-19 epidemic. Plos One 15(7): Article e236387.

[48]

YangL, DingX, JiangX. Shutdown and recovery time of enterprises under flood disaster scenario based on survival analysis model: An empirical study on the damaged enterprises in Yuyao City after Typhoon Fitow. Journal of Catastrophology, 2020, 35(3): 110-117

[49]

YangL, KajitaniY, TatanoH, JiangX. A methodology for estimating business interruption loss caused by flood disasters: Insights from business surveys after Tokai Heavy Rain in Japan. Natural Hazards, 2016, 84: 411-430.

[50]

YangL, WeiC, JiangX, YeQ, TatanoH. Estimating the economic effects of the early COVID-19 emergency response in cities using intracity travel intensity data. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(1): 125-138.

[51]

Yılmaz, Ö.F., G. Özçelik, and F.B. Yeni. 2021. Ensuring sustainability in the reverse supply chain in case of the ripple effect: A two-stage stochastic optimization model. Journal of Cleaner Production 282: Article 124548.

[52]

ZhangZ, LiN, WangM, LiuK, HuangC, ZhuangL, LiuF. Economic ripple effects of individual disasters and disaster clusters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(6): 948-961.

[53]

ZscheischlerJ, WestraS, Van Den HurkBJ, SeneviratneSI, WardPJ, PitmanA, AghakouchakA, BreschDN, et al.. Future climate risk from compound events. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(6): 469-477.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

106

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/