Assessing Community Resilience: Validating a Universally Applicable Flood Resilience Measurement Framework and Tool

Abstract

Understanding and strengthening community-level resilience to natural hazard-induced disasters is critical for the management of adverse impacts of such events and the growth of community well-being. A key gap in achieving this is limited standardized and validated disaster resilience measurement frameworks that operate at local levels and are universally applicable. The Flood Resilience Measurement for Communities (FRMC) is a foremost tool for community flood resilience assessment. It follows a structured approach to comprehensively assess community flood resilience across five classes of capacities (capitals) to support strategic investment in resilience strengthening initiatives. The FRMC is a further development of an earlier version (the FRMT, the Flood Resilience Measurement Tool). The FRMT has been developed and applied between 2015 and 2017 in 118 flood prone communities across nine countries. It has been validated in terms of content and face validity as well as in terms of reliability. To reduce redundancy and survey effort, the FRMC holds a lesser number of indicators (44 versus 88) and has now been applied in over 320 communities across 20 countries. We examine the validation for the revised resilience construct and the new community applications and present a comprehensive overview of the statistical and user validation process and outcomes in both practical and scientific terms. The results confirm the validity, reliability as well as usefulness of the FRMC framework and tool. Furthermore, our approach and results provide insights for other resilience measurement approaches and their validation efforts. We also present a comprehensive discussion about the dynamic aspects of flood resilience at community level, and the many validation aspects that need to be incorporated both in terms of quantification efforts as well as usability on the ground.

Keywords

Community resilience / Floods / Resilience measurement / Standardized tool / Universal / Validation

References

[1] AldrichDYanW, GallowayW. The importance of social capital in building community resilience. Rethinking resilience, adaptation and transformation in a time of change, 2017, Cham. Springer. 357364

[2] AldrichD, MeyerM. Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 2015, 59: 254-269

[3] AldrichP, MeyerMMcGeeTK, Penning-RowsellEC. Community level social capital and resilience. Routledge handbook of environmental hazards and society, 2022, New York. Routledge. 201213

[4] AldrichP, KoladeO, McMahonK, SmithR. Social capital’s role in humanitarian crises. Journal of Refugee Studies, 2020, 34(2): 1787-1809

[5] AlexanderDE. Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 13(11): 2707-2716

[6] Campbell, K.A., F. Laurien, J. Czajkowski, A. Keating, S. Hochrainer-Stigler, and M. Montgomery. 2019. First insights from the Flood Resilience Measurement Tool: A large-scale community flood resilience analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 40: Article 101257.

[7] Chapagain, D., L. Bharati, R. Mechler, K.C. Samir, G. Pflug, and C. Borgemeister. 2024b. Understanding the role of climate change in disaster mortality: Empirical evidence from Nepal. Climate Risk Management 46: Article 100669.

[8] Chapagain, D., S. Hochrainer-Stigler, S. Velev, A. Keating, J.H. Hyun, N. Rubenstein, and R. Mechler. 2024a. A taxonomy-based understanding of community flood resilience. Ecology and Society 29(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-15654-290436.

[9] Chapagain, D., S. Hochrainer-Stigler, S. Velev, A. Keating, and R. Mechler. 2025. Realized resilience after community flood events: A global empirical study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 118: Article 105246.

[10] Cutter, S.L., C.G. Burton, and C.T. Emrich. 2010. Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1732.

[11] DFID (Department for International Development). 1999. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID, UK.

[12] DuW, FitzGeraldGJ, ClarkM, HouX-Y. Health impacts of floods. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2010, 25(3): 265-272

[13] Gaisie, E., S. Han, and H. Kim. 2021. Complexity of resilience capacities: Household capitals and resilience outcomes on the disaster cycle in informal settlements. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 60: Article 102292.

[14] Hochrainer-Stigler, S., F. Laurien, S. Velev, A. Keating, and R. Mechler. 2020. Standardized disaster and climate resilience grading: A global scale empirical analysis of community flood resilience. Journal of Environmental Management 276: Article 111332.

[15] Hochrainer-Stigler, S., S. Velev, F. Laurien, K. Campbell, J. Czajkowski, A. Keating, and R. Mechler. 2021. Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe. Scientific Reports 11(1): Article 17625.

[16] Keating, A., and S. Hanger-Kopp. 2020. Practitioner perspectives of disaster resilience in international development. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 42: Article 101355.

[17] KeatingA, CampbellK, SzoenyiM, McquistanC, NashD, BurerM. Development and testing of a community flood resilience measurement tool. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2017, 17(1): 77-101

[18] Keating, A., S. Hochrainer-Stiger, R. Mechler, F. Laurien, N. Rubenstein, T. Deubelli, S. Velev, M. Szoenyi, and D. Nash. 2025. Reflections on the large-scale application of a community resilience measurement framework across the globe. Climate Services 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2025.100562.

[19] KelmanIDisaster by choice: How our actions turn natural hazards into catastrophes, 2020, Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press.

[20] KerrSEZommersZ, AlversonK. Social capital as a determinant of resilience: Implications for adaptation policy. Resilience: The science of adaptation to climate change, 2018, Amsterdam. Elsevier. 267275

[21] Laurien, F., S. Hochrainer-Stigler, A. Keating, K. Campbell, R. Mechler, and J. Czajkowski. 2020. A typology of community flood resilience. Regional Environmental Change 20(1): Article 24.

[22] Lewis, J., and I. Kelman. 2010. Places, people and perpetuity: Community capacities in ecologies of catastrophe. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 9(2): 191–220.

[23] MacGillivrayB. Beyond social capital: The norms, belief systems, and agency embedded in social networks shape resilience to climatic and geophysical hazards. Environmental Science and Policy, 2018, 89(2018): 116-125

[24] NardoM, SaisanaM, SaltelliA, TarantolaS, HoffmanA, GiovanniniEHandbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, 2005, Paris. OECD.

[25] NorrisFH, StevensSP, PfefferbaumB, WycheKF, PfefferbaumRL. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2008, 41: 127-150

[26] Paszkowski, A., F. Laurien, R. Mechler, and J. Hall. 2024. Quantifying community resilience to riverine hazards in Bangladesh. Global Environmental Change 84: Article 102778.

[27] PatersonDL, WrightH, HarrisPNA. Health risks of flood disasters. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2018, 67(9): 1450-1454

[28] Van LandinghamM, BuiB, AbramsonD, FriedmanS, CisnerosRHunterLM, GrayC, VéronJ. Health and mortality consequences of natural disasters. International handbook of population and environment, 2022, Cham. Springer International Publishing. 331345

[29] World BankNatural hazards, unnatural disasters: The economics of effective prevention, 2010, Washington, DC. World Bank.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.