Assessing the Drought Vulnerability of Rice in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River from Physical and Social Dimensions
Junyao Wang , Xiaolan Wen , Yu Liu , Tao Lin , Chuanmei Cheng , Degen Lin , Qinou Liang , Hao Guo
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 496 -512.
Assessing the Drought Vulnerability of Rice in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River from Physical and Social Dimensions
The middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River are key rice-producing regions in China. Conducting vulnerability assessments on rice production is beneficial for reducing agricultural disaster losses and improving China’s disaster prevention and control capabilities. This study used a crop growth model to fit hazard-loss rate curves (HLC) representing crop sensitivity to drought, employed an integrated index method to assess the adaptability and coping capacity, and developed a comprehensive vulnerability assessment framework from both physical and social vulnerability dimensions. The results suggest that, high adaptability is concentrated in Jiangsu and northern Zhejiang Provinces, while low adaptability is observed in western Hubei, Hunan, and Anhui Provinces. Approximately 25% of the areas exhibit relatively low coping capacity. Sensitivity levels exceeding 0.4 are primarily found in high-altitude regions, with a general trend of lower sensitivity in the north and higher sensitivity in the south. Comprehensive vulnerability is significantly greater south of the Yangtze River compared to the north, with a positive correlation between altitude and comprehensive vulnerability. Implementing targeted countermeasures based on vulnerability assessments can reduce rice losses in the region and ensure food security.
Drought / Hazard-loss rate curve / Middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River / Physical vulnerability / Rice production / Social vulnerability
| [1] |
Beatrice, M., B. Iolanda, B. Brunella, and M. Martina. 2022. Developing stage-specific drought vulnerability curves for maize: The case study of the Po River Basin. Agricultural Water Management 269: Article107713. |
| [2] |
Chen, Y.Y., L.H. Duo, D.X. Zhao, Y. Zeng, and X.F. Guo. 2023. The response of ecosystem vulnerability to climate change and human activities in the Poyang Lake city group, China. Environmental Research 224: Article 116473. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Chen, Y.L., S.L. Shen, and A.N. Zhou. 2022. Assessment of red tide risk by integrating CRITIC weight method, TOPSIS-ASSETS method, and Monte Carlo simulation. Environmental pollution 314(1): Article 120254. |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Cutter, S. 2009. Review of natural disaster analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk assessment, economic impacts and social implications. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 6(1): Article 26. |
| [7] |
Dash, S.S., B. Sahoo, and N.S. Raghuwanshi. 2023. An integrated reservoir operation framework for enhanced water resources planning. Scientific Reports 13(1): Article 21720. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Efio, S., E.A. Sogbohossou, Y.Z. Magnon, B. Hamaide, R.C. Tossou, and B.A. Sinsin. 2024. Vulnerability of agricultural households to human-wildlife conflicts around Pendjari Biosphere Reserve in northern Benin. Land 13(9): Article 1473. |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Guo, H., Y.Y. Wu, Y.R. Shang, H. Yu, and J.A. Wang. 2019. Quantifying farmers’ initiatives and capacity to cope with drought: A case study of Xinghe County in semi-arid China. Sustainability 11(7): Article 1848. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Iglesias, A., M. Moneo, and S. Quiroga. 2009. Methods for evaluating social vulnerability to drought. In Coping with drought risk in agriculture and water supply systems, ed. A. Iglesias, A. Cancelliere, D.A. Wilhite, L. Garrote, and F. Cubillo, 153–159. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. |
| [20] |
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Climate change 2014: Impact, adaptation, and vulnerability, 2014 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press |
| [21] |
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Chemistry International, 2021, 43: 22-23 |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Li, A., P.W. Zhu, D.Y. Kong, L. Wang, A.N. Zhang, Y. Liu, X.Q. Yu, and L.J. Luo. 2024. Using marker-assisted selection to develop a drought-tolerant rice line with enhanced resistance to blast and brown planthopper. Agronomy 14(11): Article 2566. |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Monteleone, B., I. Borzí, M. Arosio, L. Cesarini, B. Bonaccorso, and M. Martina. 2023. Modelling the response of wheat yield to stage-specific water stress in the Po Plain. Agricultural Water Management 287: Article 108444. |
| [30] |
Mourato, S., P. Fernandez, L.G. Pereirag, and M. Moreira. 2023. Assessing vulnerability in flood prone areas using analytic hierarchy process group decision making and geographic information system: A case study in Portugal. Applied Sciences 13(8): Article 4915. |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Savari, M., H.E. Damaneh, and H.E. Damaneh. 2022. Drought vulnerability assessment: Solution for risk alleviation and drought management among Iranian farmers. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 67: Article 102654. |
| [39] |
Schumacher, I., and E. Strobl. 2011. Economic development and losses due to natural disasters: The role of hazard exposure. Ecological Economics 72: Article 97. |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
Su, P., A. Zhang, J.A. Wang, and W. Xu. 2023. Plausible maize planting distribution under future global change scenarios. Field Crop Research 302: Article 109079. |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Tanir, T., E. Yildirim, C.M. Ferreira, and I. Demir. 2024. Social vulnerability and climate risk assessment for agricultural communities in the United States. Science of the Total Environment 908: Article 168346. |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Verdi, M.T., M. Nunez-del-Prado, N. Leonova, and J. Rentschler. 2023. Measuring accessibility to public services and infrastructure criticality for disasters risk management. Scientific Reports 13: Article 1569. |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
Wei, S.C., Y.T. Yang, K.W. Li, Y. Guo, and J.Q. Zhang. 2022. Three-dimensional vulnerability assessment of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) based on comprehensive drought index and vulnerability surface: A case study of Shandong Province, China. Remote Sensing 14(21): Article 5359. |
| [53] |
White, G.F., and J.E. Edinger. Choice of adjustment to floods. 1964. Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA. |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
Xu, W.F., W.P. Yuan, Y. Zhang, R.Q. Shen, X.S. Xia, P. Ciais, and J.X. Liu. 2024. Impacts of record-breaking compound heatwave and drought events in 2022 China on vegetation growth. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 344: Article 109799. |
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
Yang, H.B., Z.L. Li, Q.Y. Du, and Z. Duan. 2023. Winter wheat drought risk assessment by coupling improved moisture-sensitive crop model and gridded vulnerability curve. Remote Sensing 15(12): Article 3197. |
| [59] |
Yazdanpanah, M., T. Zobeidi, L.A. Warner, and T. Azizi-Khalkheili. 2019. Assessing vulnerability to climate change among farmers in northwestern Iran: A multi-dimensional approach. Environmental Development 26: Article 100474. |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |