The Roles of Companion Animals in the Relationship Between Disaster Risk Perception and Willingness to Evacuate

Parth Bansal , Szymon Parzniewski , Siyu Ru , Sherry Chen , Haorui Wu

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 333 -345.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 333 -345. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-025-00648-z
Article

The Roles of Companion Animals in the Relationship Between Disaster Risk Perception and Willingness to Evacuate

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Companion animals are becoming increasingly common, and as natural hazards grow in frequency and severity, they play a critical role in guardians’ decision making about evacuation and shelter during disasters. Although many studies have explored the relationship between risk perception and willingness to evacuate, it remains unclear whether companion animals play a role in this relationship. This study investigated whether companion animal guardians exhibit a distinct risk perception-willingness to evacuate relationship compared to non-guardians during Category 1–2 and Category 3+ hurricanes. It also explored how guardianship characteristics, such as the number of animals or their dual role as support animals, influence this relationship. The findings indicate that being a guardian and the number of animals significantly affect willingness to evacuate and its connection to risk perception. For Category 3+ hurricanes, the presence of chronically ill animals further influences this relationship. Probability plots reveal that guardians have similar evacuation willingness as non-guardians at lower levels of perceived risk, but at higher levels of perceived risk, guardians show a significantly greater willingness to evacuate. Additionally, guardians with more animals are more likely to evacuate at a lower perceived risk but less likely at a higher perceived risk. For Category 3+ hurricanes, guardians of healthy animals show a higher evacuation willingness at lower levels of perceived risk than those with sick animals. These findings highlight the complex nonlinear role that companion animals play in evacuation decisions and provide insights into some of the contradictory evacuation behaviors by guardians reported in the literature.

Keywords

Companion animals / Disaster preparedness / Evacuation / Hurricanes / Risk perception

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Parth Bansal, Szymon Parzniewski, Siyu Ru, Sherry Chen, Haorui Wu. The Roles of Companion Animals in the Relationship Between Disaster Risk Perception and Willingness to Evacuate. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2025, 16(3): 333-345 DOI:10.1007/s13753-025-00648-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AiC, NortonEC. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 2003, 80(1): 123-129

[2]

AlmeidaLS, GoerlandtF, PelotR HuangC, NivolianitouZ. Effects of major hurricanes in Atlantic Canada from 2003 to 2018. Risk analysis based on data and crisis response beyond knowledge, 2019 London CRC Press 390-396

[3]

ArdayaAB, EversM, RibbeL. What influences disaster risk perception? Intervention measures, flood and landslide risk perception of the population living in flood risk areas in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 25: 227-237

[4]

ArlikattiS, LindellMK, PraterCS, ZhangY. Risk area accuracy and hurricane evacuation expectations of coastal residents. Environment and Behavior, 2006, 38(2): 226-247

[5]

BatemanJ, EdwardsB. Gender and evacuation: A closer look at why women are more likely to evacuate for hurricanes. Natural Hazards Review, 2002, 3(3): 107-117

[6]

BlendonRJ, BensonJM, DesRochesCM, Lyon-DanielK, MitchellEW, PollardWE. The public’s preparedness for hurricanes in four affected regions. Public Health Reports, 2007, 122(2): 167-176

[7]

Bodas, M., K. Peleg, N. Stolero, and B. Adini. 2022. Risk perception of natural and human-made disasters – Cross sectional study in eight countries in Europe and beyond. Frontiers in Public Health 10: Article 825985

[8]

BrownS, PartonH, DriverC, NormanC. Evacuation during Hurricane Sandy: Data from a rapid community assessment. PLoS Currents, 2016

[9]

ChanEY, KimJH, LinC, CheungEY, LeePP. Is previous disaster experience a good predictor for disaster preparedness in extreme poverty households in remote Muslim minority based community in China?. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2014, 16: 466-472

[10]

CharnkolT, TanaboriboonY. Tsunami evacuation behavior analysis: One step of transportation disaster response. IATSS Research, 2006, 30(2): 83-96

[11]

ChristiansenSB, KristensenAT, SandøeP, LassenJ. Looking after chronically ill dogs: Impacts on the caregiver’s life. Anthrozoös, 2013, 26(4): 519-533

[12]

DayAM. Companion animals and natural disasters: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 24: 81-90

[13]

DixitVV, PandeA, RadwanE, Abdel-AtyM. Understanding the impact of a recent hurricane on mobilization time during a subsequent hurricane. Transportation Research Record, 2008, 2041(1): 49-57

[14]

DowK, CutterSL. Public orders and personal opinions: Household strategies for hurricane risk assessment. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 2000, 2(4): 143-155

[15]

DužíB, VikhrovD, KelmanI, StojanovR, JuřičkaD. Household measures for river flood risk reduction in the Czech Republic. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2017, 10(2): 253-266

[16]

Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2018. Canadian Hurricane Centre: Frequently asked questions. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/hurricane-forecasts-facts/frequently-asked-questions.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2025.

[17]

FarmerAK, DeYoungSE. The pets of Hurricane Matthew: Evacuation and sheltering with companion animals. Anthrozoös, 2019, 32(3): 419-433

[18]

FarmerAK, DeYoungSE, WachtendorfT. Pets and evacuation: An ongoing challenge in disasters. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2016, 13(4): 1-13

[19]

GrimmP ShethJ, MalhotraN. Social desirability bias. Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing, Part 2. Marketing research, 2010 Hoboken Wiley

[20]

HanZ, WuG. Why do people not prepare for disasters? A national survey from China. npj Natural Hazards, 2024, 1(1): 1-7

[21]

HeathSE, VoeksSK, GlickmanLT. Epidemiologic features of pet evacuation failure in a rapid-onset disaster. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2001, 218(12): 1898-1904

[22]

HesterbergUW, HuertasG, ApplebyMC. Perceptions of pet owners in urban Latin America on protection of their animals during disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2012, 21(1): 37-50

[23]

HorneyJA, MacDonaldPDM, Van WilligenM, BerkePR, KaufmanJS. Individual actual or perceived property flood risk: Did it predict evacuation from Hurricane Isabel in North Carolina, 2003?. Risk Analysis, 2010, 30(3): 501-511

[24]

HuntM, BogueK, RohrbaughN. Pet ownership and evacuation prior to Hurricane Irene. Animals, 2012, 2(4): 529-539

[25]

KakimotoR, YamadaF. Autonomous evacuation and local community. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 2016, 7(4): 374-387

[26]

KellensW, ZaalbergR, NeutensT, VanneuvilleW, De MaeyerP. An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast. Risk Analysis, 2011, 31(7): 1055-1068

[27]

KelmanI. Categorising animals and habitats in disaster-related activities. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 2021, 36(3): 57-62

[28]

KrasovskaiaI, GottschalkL, SælthunNR, BergH. Perception of the risk of flooding: The case of the 1995 flood in Norway. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2001, 46(6): 855-868

[29]

KusenbachM, SimmsJL, TobinGA. Disaster vulnerability and evacuation readiness: Coastal mobile home residents in Florida. Natural Hazards, 2010, 52(1): 79-95

[30]

KwongMJ, BartholomewK. “Not just a dog”: An attachment perspective on relationships with assistance dogs. Attachment & Human Development, 2011, 13(5): 421-436

[31]

Lantos, T. 2006. Pets evacuation and transportation standards act. https://www.congress.gov/109/plaws/publ308/PLAW-109publ308.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2024.

[32]

Lee, D., S. Yoon, E.-S. Park, Y. Kim, and D.K. Yoon. 2018. Factors contributing to disaster evacuation: The case of South Korea. Sustainability 10(10): Article 3818

[33]

LindellMK, PerryRW. The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 2012, 32(4): 616-632

[34]

LongJS, FreeseJ Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2006 College Station Stata Press

[35]

MatyasC, SrinivasanS, CahyantoI, ThapaB, Pennington-GrayL, VillegasJ. Risk perception and evacuation decisions of Florida tourists under hurricane threats: A stated preference analysis. Natural Hazards, 2011, 59: 871-890

[36]

McCarthyM, BigelowJ, TaylorM. Emergency preparedness and planning for animals: A case study in the Blue Mountains. NSW. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 2018, 33(4): 50-56

[37]

NagelkerkeNJ. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 1991, 78(3): 691-692

[38]

PaekH-J, HoveT PaekH-J, HoveT. Risk perceptions and risk characteristics. Oxford research encyclopedia of communication, 2017 Oxford Oxford University Press

[39]

PereiraZ, CardosoL, CoelhoAC. Differences in disaster preparedness among dog and other pet owners in Oporto, Portugal. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2022, 16(4): 1490-1495

[40]

PerrinT. The business of urban animals survey: The facts and statistics on companion animals in Canada. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 2009, 50(1): 48-52

[41]

PetroliaDR, BhattacharjeeS. Why don’t coastal residents choose to evacuate for hurricanes?. Coastal Management, 2010, 38(2): 97-112

[42]

ReiningerBM, RajaSA, CarrascoAS, ChenZ, AdamsB, McCormickJ, RahbarMH. Intention to comply with mandatory hurricane evacuation orders among persons living along a coastal area. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2013, 7(1): 46-54

[43]

Roy, K.C., S. Hasan, O.I. Abdul-Aziz, and P. Mozumder. 2022. Understanding the influence of multiple information sources on risk perception dynamics and evacuation decisions: An agent-based modeling approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 82: Article 103328

[44]

SandersC Understanding dogs: Living and working with canine companions, 1999 Philadelphia Temple University Press

[45]

SiebeneckLK, CovaTJ. Spatial and temporal variation in evacuee risk perception throughout the evacuation and return-entry process. Risk Analysis, 2012, 32(9): 1468-1480

[46]

SiegristM, GutscherH. Flooding risks: A comparison of lay people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland. Risk Analysis, 2006, 26(4): 971-979

[47]

SpitznagelMB, JacobsonDM, CoxMD, CarlsonMD. Caregiver burden in owners of a sick companion animal: A cross-sectional observational study. Veterinary Record, 2017, 181(12): 321-321

[48]

TaylorHT, WardB, WillisM, ZaleskiW The Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale, 2010 Miami National Hurricane Center

[49]

TerpstraT. Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: Affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 2011, 31(10): 1658-1675

[50]

ThompsonK. Save me, save my dog: Increasing natural disaster preparedness and survival by addressing human-animal relationships. Australian Journal of Communication, 2013, 40(1): 123-136

[51]

ThompsonC, BrommerD, Sherman-MorrisK. Pet ownership and the spatial and temporal dimensions of evacuation decisions. Southeastern Geographer, 2012, 52(3): 253-266

[52]

ThompsonK, EveryD, RainbirdS, CornellV, SmithB, TriggJ. No pet or their person left behind: Increasing the disaster resilience of vulnerable groups through animal attachment, activities and networks. Animals, 2014, 4(2): 214-240

[53]

ThompsonR, GarfinDR, SilverRC. Evacuation from natural disasters: A systematic review of the literature. Risk Analysis, 2017, 37(4): 812-839

[54]

TobinGA, WhitefordLM, JonesEC, MurphyAD, GarrenSJ, PadrosCV. The role of individual well-being in risk perception and evacuation for chronic vs. acute natural hazards in Mexico. Applied Geography, 2011, 31(2): 700-711

[55]

TraversC, DegelingC, RockM. Companion animals in natural disasters: A scoping review of scholarly sources. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2017, 20(4): 324-343

[56]

TriggJ, ThompsonK, SmithB, BennettP. Engaging pet owners in disaster risk and preparedness communications: Simplifying complex human-animal relations with archetypes. Environmental Hazards, 2015, 14(3): 236-251

[57]

TriggJ, ThompsonK, SmithB, BennettP. A moveable beast: Subjective influence of human-animal relationships on risk perception, and risk behaviour during bushfire threat. Qualitative Report, 2016, 21(10): 1881-1903

[58]

TriggJ, ThompsonK, SmithB, BennettP. Exploring risk propensity through pet-attachment diversity in natural hazard contexts. Human-Animal Interaction Bulletin, 2016, 4(1): 54-81

[59]

TrivediJ, WachtendorfT. Evacuating pets and people: Time, decisions, and resources. Practicing Anthropology, 2023, 45(4): 3-8

[60]

VillegasJ, MatyasC, SrinivasanS, CahyantoI, ThapaB, Pennington-GrayL. Cognitive and affective responses of Florida tourists after exposure to hurricane warning messages. Natural Hazards, 2013, 66(1): 97-116

[61]

ViscusiWK. Natural disaster risks: An introduction. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2006, 33: 5-11

[62]

WilliamsR AtkinsonP, DelamontS, CernatA, SakshaugJW, WilliamsRA. Ordinal independent variables. Research methods foundations, 2020 London SAGE Publications

[63]

WittnichC, BelangerM. How is animal welfare addressed in Canada’s emergency response plans?. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2008, 11(2): 125-132

[64]

Wu, H., L.K. Heyland, M. Yung, and M. Schneider. 2023. Human–Animal Interactions in Disaster Settings: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 14(3): 369–381.

[65]

Xu, D., C. Qing, X. Deng, Z. Yong, W. Zhou, and Z. Ma. 2020. Disaster risk perception, sense of pace, evacuation willingness, and relocation willingness of rural households in earthquake-stricken areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(2): Article 602

[66]

Xu, D., L. Zhuang, X. Deng, C. Qing, and Z. Yong. 2020. Media exposure, disaster experience, and risk perception of rural households in earthquake-stricken areas: Evidence from rural China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(9): Article 3246

[67]

XuD, ZhouW, DengX, MaZ, YongZ, QinC. Information credibility, disaster risk perception and evacuation willingness of rural households in China. Natural Hazards, 2020, 103(3): 2865-2882

[68]

Yin, Q., G. Ntim-Amo, D. Xu, V.K. Gamboc, R. Ran, J. Hu, and H. Tang. 2022. Flood disaster risk perception and evacuation willingness of urban households: The case of Accra, Ghana. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 78: Article 103126

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

310

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/