Evolving Interconnections: Themes and Trends in Sustainable Built Environment Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the way the sustainable built environment—encompassing buildings, infrastructure, and other physical structures—is designed, managed, and utilized, as societal responses to the pandemic may have contributed to shifts in priorities and practices in these areas. Research has predominantly focused on the pandemic’s impacts on enhancing the resilience of the built environment and its role in supporting health protocols, such as reducing transmission risks. However, a critical gap persists in understanding the evolving relationship between the various stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and the sustainable built environment. Accordingly, this systematic literature review (SLR) aims to explore the major themes and trends in sustainable built environment responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and identify gaps in existing studies. The authors employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method to systematically search four databases for English-language journal articles published between 2020 and 2023. A total of 331 articles were analyzed using descriptive and thematic methods. The findings reveal that research priorities shifted during different stages of the pandemic, with particular attention given to key areas of the sustainable built environment: healthy outdoor spaces, such as urban green spaces (UGS); energy efficiency and urban planning; and urban mobility and transportation. This SLR contributes to advancing risk reduction strategies that address the intricate interdependencies between major health emergencies and long-term sustainability imperatives for the built environment.

Keywords

COVID-19 pandemic / Health protocols / Resilience / Sustainable built environment / Systematic literature review / Urban green spaces (UGS) / Medical and Health Sciences / Public Health and Health Services

References

[1] AbdelfattahL, DeponteD, FossaG. The 15-minute city: Interpreting the model to bring out urban resiliencies. Transportation Research Procedia, 2022, 60: 330-337.

[2] AbdelkaderMM, KhalifaM, ElshaterA. Lessons from COVID-19 outbreaks for spaces between buildings using tactical urbanism. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 2023, 70: Article 5.

[3] AddasA, MaghrabiA. How did the COVID-19 pandemic impact urban green spaces? A multi-scale assessment of Jeddah megacity (Saudi Arabia). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2022, 69: Article 127493.

[4] AldossaryNA, AlQahtanyAM, AlyamiSH. Locality of residential areas in COVID-19 pandemic conditions: analysis of neighborhoods and housing design in Saudi Arabia. Infrastructure, 2023, 8: 9.

[5] AlidadiM, SharifiA. Effects of the built environment and human factors on the spread of COVID-19: A systematic literature review. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 850: Article 158056.

[6] Allen-CoghlanM, McQuinnKM. The potential impact of Covid-19 on the Irish housing sector. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 2021, 144636-651.

[7] AppauMW, Attakora-AmaniampongE, TannorO. Student housing design implications for single-room occupancy during COVID-19 in Ghana. Open House International, 2023, 482356-380.

[8] BarathM, SchmidtDA. Offices after the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in perception of flexible office space. Sustainability, 2022, 14: Article 11158.

[9] BenitaF. Human mobility behaviour in COVID-19: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 70: Article 102916.

[10] Berdejo-EspinolaV, Suárez-CastroAF, AmanoT, FieldingKS, OhRRY, FullerRA. Urban green space use during a time of stress: A case study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brisbane, Australia. People Nature, 2021, 3: 597-609.

[11] BettaiebDM, AlsabbanR. Emerging living styles post-COVID-19: Housing flexibility as a fundamental requirement for apartments in Jeddah. Archnet-IJAR, 2021, 15128-50.

[12] BojovícM, RajkovícI, PerovícSK. Towards resilient residential buildings and neighborhoods in light of COVID-19 pandemic—The scenario of Podgorica, Montenegro. Sustainability, 2022, 14: Article 1302.

[13] Borowska-StefánskaM, DulebenetsMA, KowalskiM, TurobósF, WísniewskiS. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on daily mobility of the elderly living in small cities in Lodz Province. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 209Article 5752.

[14] BoströmM. A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2012, 813-14

[15] BoulangerSOM. The roadmap to smart cities: A bibliometric literature review on smart cities’ trends before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Energies, 2022, 15: Article 9326.

[16] BristoweA, HeckertM. How the COVID-19 pandemic changed patterns of green infrastructure use: A scoping review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2023, 81: Article 127848.

[17] BurnettH, OlsenJR, MitchellR. Green space visits and barriers to visiting during the COVID-19 pandemic: A three-wave nationally representative cross-sectional study of UK adults. Land, 2022, 11: Article 503.

[18] Buehler, R., and J. Pucher. 2022. Cycling through the COVID-19 Pandemic to a more sustainable transport future: Evidence from case studies of 14 large bicycle-friendly cities in Europe and North America. Sustainability 14(12): Article 7293.

[19] CaiS, GouZ. Impact of COVID-19 on the energy consumption of commercial buildings: A case study in Singapore. Energy and Built Environment, 2022, 53364-373.

[20] ChaloeytoyK, InkarojritV, ThanachareonkitA. Electricity consumption in higher education buildings in Thailand during the COVID-19 pandemic. Buildings, 2022, 12: Article 1532.

[21] ChenY, DuffyVGStephanidisC, DuffyVG, KrömkerH, NahFF, SiauK, SalvendyG, WeiJ. A systematic literature review on the interaction between COVID-19 and transportation. HCI International 2021—Late breaking papers: HCI applications in health, transport, and industry, 2021ChamSpringer261-277

[22] ChenC, HaupertSR, ZimmermannL, ShiX, FritscheLG, MukherjeeB. Global prevalence of post-Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition or long COVID: A meta-analysis and systematic review. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2022, 22691593-1607.

[23] Coyle, N. 2020. Planning for place making and tactical urbanism in the post-COVID city. https://thisbigcity.net/planning-placemaking-tactical-urbanism-post-covid-city/. Accessed 24 Mar 2025.

[24] DeissBM, HerishkoM, WrightL, MaliborskaM, AbulenciaJP. Analysis of energy consumption in commercial and residential buildings in New York City before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 2021, 13: Article 11586.

[25] DempseyN, BramleyG, PowerS, BrownC. The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 2011, 195289-300.

[26] DianimMR, HasibuanHS, SundaraDM. Rethinking housing in Indonesia after the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 2022, 17215-45.

[27] DinnieE, BrownKM, MorrisS. Reprint of Community, cooperation and conflict: Negotiating the social well-being benefits of urban greenspace experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 118: 103-111.

[28] DuarteCC, CortiçosND. The energy efficiency post-COVID-19 in China’s office buildings. Clean Technologies, 2022, 4: 174-233.

[29] Fallah-AliabadiS, FatemiF, HeydariA, KhajehaminianMR, LotfiMH, MirzaeiM, SarsangiA. Social vulnerability indicators in pandemics focusing on COVID-19: A systematic literature review. Public Health Nursing, 2022, 39: 1142-1155.

[30] FettersMD, CurryLA, CreswellJW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 2013, 486 Pt 22134-2156.

[31] GallentN, MadedduM. Covid-19 and London’s decentralising housing market—What are the planning implications?. Planning Practice & Research, 2021, 365567-577.

[32] GaoS, ZhaiW, FuX. Green space justice amid COVID-19: Unequal access to public green space across American neighborhoods. Frontiers in Public Health, 2023, 11: Article 1055720.

[33] GengDC, InnesJ, WuW, WangG. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: A global analysis. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32: 553-567.

[34] GianfrediV, BuffoliM, RebecchiA, CrociR, Oradini-AlacreuA, StirparoG, MarinoA, OdoneA, et al. . Urban green spaces and public health outcomes: A systematic review of literature. European Journal of Public Health, 2021.

[35] GkiotsalitisK, CatsO. Public transport planning adaption under the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: Literature review of research needs and directions. Transport Reviews, 2021, 413374-392.

[36] GlavanLO, NikolícN, FolícB, VitoševícB, MitrovícA, KosanovícS. COVID-19 and city space: Impact and perspectives. Sustainability, 2022, 14: Article 1885.

[37] GubićI, WolffM. Use and design of public green spaces in Serbian cities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Habitat International, 2022, 128: Article 102651.

[38] GungatL, DehDR, PutriEE. Effects of COVID-19 on transportation services and travel behaviour in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2023, 1173: Article 012046

[39] HaqSMA. Urban green spaces and an integrative approach to sustainable environment. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2011, 2: 601-608.

[40] HasslerU, KohlerN. Resilience in the built environment. Building Research & Information, 2014, 422119-129.

[41] HernándezJRE, MoghadamST, SharifiA, LombardiP. Cities in the times of COVID-19: Trends, impacts, and challenges for urban sustainability and resilience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 432: Article 139735.

[42] HoernkeK. A socially just recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action on the social determinants of urban health inequalities. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2020, 11312482-484.

[43] HuertaCM, CafaginaG. Snapshot of the use of urban green spaces in Mexico City during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18: Article 4304.

[44] HunterRF, GarciaL, de SaTH, Zapata-DiomediB, MillettC, WoodcockJ, PentlandA, MoroE. Effect of COVID-19 response policies on walking behavior in US cities. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: Article 3652.

[45] ItoH, KawazoeN. Examining transportation mode changes during COVID-19 in Toyama, Japan. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2023, 101253-272.

[46] JacobyS, AlonsoL. Home use and experience during COVID-19 in London: Problems of housing quality and design. Sustainability, 2022, 14: Article 5355.

[47] JardimB, de Castro NetoM. Walkability indicators in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Sustainability, 2022, 14: Article 10933.

[48] JevticM, MatkovicV, PautKusturicaM, BoulandC. Build healthier: Post-COVID-19 urban requirements for healthy and sustainable living. Sustainability, 2022, 14: Article 9274.

[49] KarataşZ, UzunK, TagayO. Relationships between the life satisfaction, meaning in life, hope and COVID-19 fear for Turkish adults during the COVID-19 outbreak. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021.

[50] KashyapN, RuppJ, HomJK, GombergS. Maintaining safety standards while building an urban alternate care facility in a global pandemic. Population Health Management, 2021, 242166-173.

[51] KazimS, Al-KindyS, AbboodA. Urban street space after Covid-19: (Indicators of safe and healthy urban street space). Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 2021, 12124452-4463

[52] KhalilnezhadMR, UgoliniF, MassettiL. Attitudes and behaviors toward the use of public and private green space during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iran. Land, 2021, 10: Article 1085.

[53] KhanijahaniA, IezadiS, GholipourK, Azami-AghdashS, NaghibiD. A systematic review of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19. International Journal for Equity in Health, 2021, 201Article 248.

[54] KhatibiH, WilkinsonS, BaghersadM, DianatH, RamliH, SuhatrilM, JavanmardiA, GhaediK. The resilient—Smart city development: A literature review and novel frameworks exploration. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2021, 114493-510.

[55] KimJ, KoY, KimW, KimG, LeeJ, EymanOTG, ChowdhuryS, AdiwalJ, et al. . Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the perception and use of urban green spaces in Korea. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20: Article 3018.

[56] Kleinschroth, F., S. Savilaakso, I. Kowarik, P. Martinez, Y. Chang, K. Jakstis, and L. Fischer. 2023. Effects of the COVID pandemic on the use of urban green spaces: A systematic review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3269809/v1.

[57] KojimaM, SaitoT. COVID-19 triggered residential behavioral changes and electricity consumption of detached houses in Japan. Energy and Buildings, 2023, 290: Article 113082.

[58] LeeKS, EomJK. Systematic literature review on impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding measures on mobility. Transportation, 2023, 51: 1907-1961.

[59] LiS, MaS, ZhangJ. Association of built environment attributes with the spread of COVID-19 at its initial stage in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 67: Article 102752.

[60] LiuH, LeeJ. Contributing factors to the changes in public and private transportation mode choice after the COVID-19 outbreak in urban areas of China. Sustainability, 2023, 15: Article 048

[61] LoAYH, JimCY. Differential community effects on perception and use of urban greenspaces. Cities, 2010, 27: 430-442.

[62] LoftnessVLoftnessV, HaaseD. Sustainable built environment, Introduction. Sustainable built environments, 2013New YorkSpringer620-633.

[63] LuoS, XieJ, FuruyaK. We need such a space: Residents’ motives for visiting urban green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 2021, 13: Article 6806.

[64] LüdtkeDU, LuetkemeierR, SchneemannM, LiehrS. Increase in daily household water demand during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. Water, 2021, 13: Article 260.

[65] MahimaM, ShanthiPriyaR, RajagopalP, PradeepaC. Impact of Covid-19 on the built environment. Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment, 2022, 2269-80.

[66] MalpezziS. Housing affordability and responses during times of stress: A preliminary look during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2023, 4119-40.

[67] MarchL, LehrerU. Common areas, common causes: Public space in high-rise buildings during Covid-19. Urban Planning, 2022, 74352-363.

[68] MarconiPL, PerelmanPE, SalgadoVG. Green in times of COVID-19: Urban green space relevance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Buenos Aires City. Urban Ecosystems, 2022, 25: 941-953.

[69] Maury-MoraM, Gómez-VillarinoMT, Varela-MartínezC. Urban green spaces and stress during COVID-19 lockdown: A case study for the city of Madrid. Urban For Urban Green, 2022, 69: Article 127492.

[70] McClellandAG, JordanR, ParzniewskiS, ShawD, O’GradyN, PowellD. Post-COVID recovery and renewal through whole-of-society resilience in cities. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 2022, 33222-228.

[71] MonnoV, ConteE. Sustainability in the built environment: Integrating scales of action and evaluation. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2015, 4251-60.

[72] Monzón-ChavarríasM, Guillén-LambeaS, García-PérezS, Montealegre-GraciaAL, Sierra-PérezJ. Heating energy consumption and environmental implications due to the change in daily habits in residential buildings derived from COVID-19 crisis: The case of Barcelona. Spain. Sustainability, 2021, 13: Article 918.

[73] MouratidisK. How COVID-19 reshaped quality of life in cities: A synthesis and implications for urban planning. Land Use Policy, 2021, 111: Article 105772.

[74] MellI, WhittenM. Access to nature in a post covid-19 world: Opportunities for green infrastructure financing, distribution and equitability in urban planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 184Article 1527.

[75] NavaratnamS, NguyenK, SelvaranjanK, ZhangG, MendisP, AyeL. Designing post COVID-19 buildings: Approaches for achieving healthy buildings. Buildings, 2022, 12: Article 74.

[76] NoszczykT, GorzelanyJ, Kukulska-KoziełA, HernikJ. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the importance of urban green spaces to the public. Land Use Policy, 2022, 113: Article 105925.

[77] Nowell, L.S., J.M. Norris, D.E. White, and N.J. Moules. 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.

[78] O’GradyN, ShawD, ParzniewskiS. People in a pandemic: Rethinking the role of “Community” in community resilience practices. Geoforum, 2022, 132: 32-41.

[79] OhHJ, GimTHT. The choice of urban spaces in the COVID-19 era. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 2021, 9450-66.

[80] OladiranO, HallamP, ElliottL. The COVID-19 pandemic and office space demand dynamics. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 2023, 27135-49.

[81] OlayodeIO, SeverinoAG, CampisiT, TartibuLK. Comprehensive literature review on the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on public road transportation system: Challenges and solutions. Sustainability, 2022, 14: Article 9586.

[82] OzbilenB, WangK, AkarG. Revisiting the impacts of virtual mobility on travel behavior: An exploration of daily travel time expenditures. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 145C49-62

[83] PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, BoutronI, HoffmannTC, MulrowCD, ShamseerL, TetzlaffJM, et al. . The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 2021, 88: Article 105906.

[84] ParivarP, SotoudehA, MazloomshahZ. Developing strategies to improve the urban environmental structure resiliency during and after Corona pandemic: A literature review. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 2022, 7: 128-136.

[85] ParkB, ChoJ. Older adults’ avoidance of public transportation after the outbreak of COVID-19: Korean subway evidence. Healthcare, 2021, 9: Article 448.

[86] PhapantP, DuttaA, ChavalparitO. COVID-19 experience transforming the protective environment of office buildings and spaces. Sustainability, 2021, 13: Article 13636.

[87] PinheiroMD, LuísNC. COVID-19 could leverage a sustainable built environment. Sustainability, 2020, 1214Article 5863.

[88] Rathje, E., C. Dawson, J.E. Padgett, J.-P. Pinelli, D. Stanzione, A. Adair, P. Arduino, S.J. Brandenberg, et al. 2017. DesignSafe: A new cyberinfrastructure for natural hazards engineering. ASCE Natural Hazards Review 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000246.

[89] Rojas-RuedaD, Morales-ZamoraE, AlsufyaniWA, HerbstCH, AlBalawiSM, AlsukaitR, AlomranM. Environmental risk factors and health: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 182Article 704.

[90] SahuS, ShankerS, KamatA, BarveA. India’s public transportation system: The repercussions of COVID-19. Public Transport, 2023, 15: 435-478.

[91] SakinaB, SetiawanD. Housing satisfaction and preferences towards indoor quality related to the environmental factors in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2023, 1169: Article 012076

[92] SalonenN, AhonenM, SirénK, MäkinenR, AnttilaVJ, KivisaariM, SalonenK, Pelto-HuikkoA, LatvaM. Methods for infection prevention in the built environment—A mini-review. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2023, 9: Article 1212920.

[93] SanesiG, ChiarelloF. Residents and urban green spaces: The case of Bari. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2006, 43–4125-134.

[94] SchipperijnJ, StigsdotterUK, RandrupTB, TroelsenJ. Influences on the use of urban green space—A case study in Odense, Denmark. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2010, 9: 25-32.

[95] SempewoJI, MushomiJ, TumutungireMD, EkyalimpaR, KisaakyeP. The impact of COVID-19 on households’ water use in Uganda. Water Supply, 2021, 2152489-2504.

[96] SetiowatiR, MizunoK, HasibuanHS, KoestoerRH. Urban green spaces for support healthiness in Jakarta during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quantitative study. Environmental Engineering Research, 2023, 282Article 210598.

[97] ShamailehAA. Responding to COVID-19 pandemic: Interior designs’ trends of houses in Jordan. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 2022, 152137-150.

[98] SharifiA. An overview and thematic analysis of research on cities and the COVID-19 pandemic: Toward just, resilient, and sustainable urban planning and design. IScience, 2022, 2511Article 105297.

[99] SharifiA, Khavarian-GarmsirAR. The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 749: Article 142391.

[100] ShiraziMR, KeivaniR. Critical reflections on the theory and practice of social sustainability in the built environment—A meta-analysis. Local Environment, 2017, 22121526-1545.

[101] SogbeE. The evolving impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on public transportation in Ghana. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2021, 941607-1614.

[102] SpennemannDHR. Exercising under COVID-2x: Conceptualizing future green spaces in Australia’s neighborhoods. Urban Science, 2021, 5: Article 93.

[103] SreetheranM. Exploring the urban park use, preference and behaviours among the residents of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2017, 25: 85-93.

[104] SwapanMSH, AktarS, MaherJ. Revisiting spatial justice and urban parks in the post-COVID-19 era: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 2024, 16: Article 3929.

[105] TaghipourA, RamezaniM, KhazaeiM, RoohparvarV, HassannayebiE. Smart transportation behavior through the COVID-19 pandemic: A ride-hailing system in Iran. Sustainability, 2023, 15: Artile 4178.

[106] TolacSS, ErkanI, GokaslanA, SahinA, KayhanAM, SanlıM, DemirET. Architectural space changes during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 2022, 13184-95

[107] UchiyamaY, KohsakaR. Access and use of green areas during the COVID-19 pandemic: Green infrastructure management in the “new normal”. Sustainability, 2020, 1223Article 9842.

[108] UgoliniF, MassettiL, Calaza-MartínezP, CarinanosP, DobbsC, OstoícSK, MarinAM, PearlmutterD, et al. . Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: An international exploratory study. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2020, 56: Article 126888.

[109] VenterZS, BartonDN, GundersenV, FigariH, NowellM. Urban nature in a time of crisis: Recreational use of green space increases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo. Norway. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 1510Article 104075.

[110] WangS, LiA. Impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on use and perception of urban green spaces and demographic group differences. Land, 2022, 11: Article 2005.

[111] WangJ, WuX, WangR, HeD, LiD, YangL, YangY, LuY. Review of associations between built environment characteristics and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection risk. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18: Article 7561.

[112] XiaoW, WeiYD, WuY. Neighborhood, built environment and resilience in transportation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2022, 110: Article 103428.

[113] XieX, RamakrishnaS, ManganelliM. Smart building technologies in response to COVID-19. Energies, 2022, 15: Article 5488.

[114] XuY, JuanYK. Design strategies for multi-unit residential buildings during the post-pandemic era in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 2021, 129Article 761614.

[115] YamazakiT, IidaA, HinoK, MurayamaA, HiroiU, TeradaT, KoizumiH, YokohariM. Use of urban green spaces in the context of lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tokyo. Sustainability, 2021, 13: Article 9817.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)