Mapping Seismic Hazard: A Comparison by Using Delineated Source Model and Spatially Smoothed Seismic Source Model

Chao Feng , H.P. Hong , Weijin Xu

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› : 1 -19.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› : 1 -19. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-025-00629-2
Article

Mapping Seismic Hazard: A Comparison by Using Delineated Source Model and Spatially Smoothed Seismic Source Model

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The fifth-generation seismic hazard map for China’s mainland (CSHM5) was developed based on the delineated seismic source models and the ground motion models (GMMs) for the peak ground acceleration (PGA) for four different seismic regions. In the present study, we developed a new set of GMMs as functions of the rupture distance or the closest distance to the projection of the rupture plane. The development of the GMMs is based on the projection method and GMMs from the NGA-West2 project. We then estimated, mapped, and compared the seismic hazard in terms of PGA and pseudo-spectral acceleration by using the new set of GMMs and other relevant GMMs, and two seismic source models—one used in developing CSHM5, which includes the fault orientation characterization and the other based on a spatially smoothed source model. The comparison of the estimated seismic hazard indicates that CSHM5 may significantly underestimate the seismic hazard. Part of this is likely due to the inclusion of an additional 15 km focal depth in the original GMM that is adopted for CSHM5. The comparison of the obtained standardized uniform hazard spectra (UHS) to the standardized response spectrum implemented in the current structural design code shows that the value of the latter is greater than that of the former for the natural vibration period less than about 0.1 s or greater than 0.4 s and this is reversed for the natural vibration period around 0.2 s. It is recommended that the use of UHS for design code making should be seriously considered, or at least, the shape of the current implemented standardized design spectrum could be improved.

Keywords

Exceedance probability / Ground motion models / Seismic hazard mapping / Spectral acceleration / Uniform hazard spectrum / Earth Sciences / Geophysics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chao Feng, H.P. Hong, Weijin Xu. Mapping Seismic Hazard: A Comparison by Using Delineated Source Model and Spatially Smoothed Seismic Source Model. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 1-19 DOI:10.1007/s13753-025-00629-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AbrahamsonNA, SilvaWJ, KamaiR. Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 3031025-1055

[2]

AlbarelloD, CamassiR, RebezA. Detection of space and time heterogeneity in the completeness of a seismic catalog by a statistical approach: An application to the Italian area. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2001, 9161694-1703

[3]

BooreDM, StewartJP, SeyhanE, AtkinsonGM. NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 3031057-1085

[4]

CampbellKW, BozorginaY. NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 3031087-1115

[5]

ChengJ, RongY, MagistraleH, ChenG, XuX. Earthquake rupture scaling relations for mainland China. Seismological Research Letters, 2020, 911248-261

[6]

ChiouBS-J, YoungsR. Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal components of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 3031117-1153

[7]

CornellCA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1968, 5851583-1606

[8]

DangkuaDT, RongY, MagistraleH. Evaluation of NGA-West2 and Chinese ground-motion prediction equations for developing seismic hazard maps of mainland China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2018, 1085A2422-2443

[9]

EkströmG, DziewonskiAM. Evidence of bias in estimation of earthquake size. Nature, 1988, 332: 319-324

[10]

Feng, C., and H.P. Hong. 2021. Projecting sets of ground-motion models and their use to evaluate seismic hazard and uniform hazard spectrum for mainland China. Natural Hazards Review 22(3): Article 04021014.

[11]

FengC, LiuTJ, HongHP. Seismic hazard assessment for mainland China based on spatially smoothed seismicity. Journal of Seismology, 2020, 24: 613-633

[12]

FrankelA. Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United State. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1995, 6648-21

[13]

GaoMT, LiXJ, XuXW, WeiKB, YuYX, ZhouBG, ZhaoFX, PanH, et al. GB18306-2015: Introduction to the seismic hazard map of China, 2015BeijingStandards Press of Chinain Chinese

[14]

GodaK, HongHP, AtkinsonGM. Impact of using updated seismic information on seismic hazard in Western Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2010, 374562-575

[15]

Goda, K., and H.P. Hong. 2006. Optimal seismic design for limited planning time horizon with detailed seismic hazard information. Structural Safety 28(3): 247–260.

[16]

Gu, G.X., T.H. Lin, Z.L. Shi, Q. Li, S.D., Lu, H.T. Chen, H.Y. Wu, Y.L. Yang, and S.Y.Wang. 1983. Catalog of Chinese earthquakes 1831 B.C.–1969 A.D. Academia Sinica, Beijing: Scientific Publishing House.

[17]

HongHP. An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1998, 593261-267

[18]

HongHP, FengC. On the ground-motion models for Chinese seismic hazard mapping. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2019, 10952106-2124

[19]

HongHP, GodaK, DavenportAG. Seismic hazard analysis: A comparative study. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2006, 3391156-1171

[20]

Hong, H.P., and P. Hong. 2007. Assessment of ductility demand and reliability of bilinear single-degree-of-freedom systems under earthquake loading. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 34(12): 1606–1615.

[21]

HowellBF, SchultzTR. Attenuation of modified Mercalli intensity with distance from the epicenter. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1975, 653651-665

[22]

HuYX, ZhangMZ. A method of predicting ground motion parameters for regions with poor ground motion data. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1984, 411-11in Chinese

[23]

HuYX, ZhouKS, YanXJ. A method for evaluation of ground motion in regions with few acceleration observation data. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1996, 1632-10in Chinese

[24]

HuanWL, WangSY, SongZY. The characteristics of tectonic stress field about strike slip earthquake-generating structure in the Chinese mainland. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1994, 74567-575

[25]

HuoJR, HuYX, FengQM. Study on estimation of ground motion from seismic intensity. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1992, 1231-15in Chinese

[26]

IdrissIM. An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 3031155-1177

[27]

KaklamanosJ, BaiseLG, BooreDM. Technical note: Estimating unknown input parameters when implementing the NGA ground motion prediction equations in engineering practice. Earthquake Spectra, 2011, 2741219-1235

[28]

KanamoriH. The energy release in great earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1977, 82202981-2987

[29]

Liu, H.X. 1987. On the seismic zoning map China. In Proceedings of International Seminar on Seismic Zonation, 610 December, Guangzhou, China, 3542 (in Chinese).

[30]

LiuRF, ChenYT, RenX, XuZG, SunL, YangH, LiangJH, RenKX. Comparison between different earthquake magnitudes determined by China seismograph network. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2006, 295467-476

[31]

HS, ZhaoFX. Site coefficients suitable to China site category. Acta Seismologica. Sinica, 2007, 29171-79

[32]

McGuire, R.K. 2004. Seismic hazard and risk analysis. EERI Monograph MNO-10. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

[33]

MilneWG, DavenportAG. Distribution of earthquake risk in Canada. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1969, 592729-754

[34]

MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2010. GB50011-2010. Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: MOHURD (in Chinese).

[35]

National Seismic Standardization Technical Committee. 2015. GB18306-2015. Seismic ground motion parameters zonation map of China. Beijing: National Seismic Standardization Technical Committee (in Chinese).

[36]

RosenbluethE. Point estimates for probability moments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1975, 72103812-3814

[37]

Vere-Jones, D. 1992. Statistical methods for the description and display of earthquake catalogs. In Statistics in environmental and Earth sciences. London: Edward Arnold.

[38]

WooG. Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modeling. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1996, 862353-362

[39]

XuWJ, GaoMT. Seismic hazard estimate using spatially smoothed seismicity model as spatial distribution function. Acta Seismological Sinica, 2012, 344526-536in Chinese

[40]

XuWJ, GaoMT, ZuoHQ. Generation of a stochastic seismic event set based on a new seismicity model in China’s earthquake catastrophe model. Seismological Research Letters, 2021, 92: 2308-2320

[41]

YuYX, LiSY, XiaoL. Development of ground motion attenuation relations for the new seismic hazard map of China. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2013, 8124-33in Chinese

[42]

ZhouBG, ChenGX, GaoZW. The technical highlights in identifying the potential seismic sources for the update of national seismic zoning map of China. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2013, 82113-124in Chinese

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

148

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/