Improving Complex Problem-Solving in Emergency Response: A Study of the Fire and Rescue Service in Sweden

Abstract

This study explored how the Swedish Fire and Rescue Service identifies problems and implements necessary actions during complex problem-solving in emergencies, aiming to increase our understanding of this process. Primary and secondary data from large-scale fire events were analyzed, including semistructured interviews and incident reports. The concept of “possibility space” is applied to identify factors affecting complex problem-solving. This refers to the scope of action available at a specific point in time for a particular operation. The study identified eight factors, including problem identification, incident development, capability, collaboration, management, legal framework, logistics, and time available, that could either decrease or increase the scope of action. The findings contribute to an increased understanding of complex problem-solving in real-world environments and suggest that the possibility space could be a valuable tool for practitioners in enhancing problem-solving during emergency response.

References

[1] AlbaneseJ, PaturasJ. The importance of critical thinking skills in disaster management. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 2018, 11(4): 326-334

[2] Andersson, I., and C. Uhr. 2019. What can we do now? The boundaries of the oppertunity space and its potential in civil-military cooperation (Vad kan vi göra nu? Möjlighetsrummets avgränsningar och dess potential vid civil-militär samverkan) Management and collaboration in crisis and war: Final report 2016–2018 (Ledning och samverkan i kris och krig: slutrapport 2016–2018). Stockholm: The Swedish National Defence University (Försvarshögskolan) (in Swedish).

[3] BaerM, DirksKT, NickersonJA. Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(2): 197-214

[4] BasadurM, EllspermannSJ, EvansGW. A new methodology for formulating ill-structured problems. Omega, 1994, 22(6): 627-645

[5] BrehmerB. Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta Psychologica, 1992, 81(3): 211-241

[6] BrehmerB. Management is really about creating effects (Ledning handlar väl om att åstadkomma effekter). Kungl. Krigsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar och Tidskrift, 2006, 6(64): 70 (in Swedish)

[7] Brehmer, B. 2013. Response management: Management science helps point you in the right direction (Insatsledning: Ledningsvetenskap hjälper dig peka åt rätt håll). Technical report, Swedish National Defence College, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).

[8] BüyükdamgacıG. Process of organizational problem definition: How to evaluate and how to improve. Omega, 2003, 31(4): 327-338

[9] CampbellL, Knox ClarkeP. Making operational decisions in humanitarian response: A literature review, 2018 London ALNAP/ODI

[10] Cohen-HattonSR, ButlerPC, HoneyRC. An investigation of operational decision making in situ: Incident command in the UK fire and rescue service. Human Factors, 2015, 57(5): 793-804

[11] DenscombeM. The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects, 2017 New York Open University Press

[12] DunckerK, LeesLS. On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 1945, 58(5): i-113

[13] Ekman, O., and C. Uhr. 2015. Global model for direction and coordination in multi-actor crisis management. In Proceedings of the 20th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 23–25 June 2015, Monterey, CA, USA.

[14] EndsleyMR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 1995, 37(1): 32-64

[15] FischerA, GreiffS, FunkeJ. The process of solving complex problems. Journal of Problem Solving, 2011, 4(1): 19-42

[16] FrykmerT. “What’s the problem?”—Toward a framework for collective problem representation in emergency response management. Journal of Emergency Management, 2020, 18(6): 511-524

[17] FrykmerT. Improving emergency and disaster response management performance: A problem-solving perspective, 2021 Lund, Sweden Lund University

[18] FrykmerT, UhrC, TehlerH. On collective improvisation in crisis management—A scoping study analysis. Safety Science, 2018, 110: 100-109

[19] GrallaE, GoentzelJ, FineC. Problem formulation and solution mechanisms: A behavioral study of humanitarian transportation planning. Production and Operations Management, 2016, 25(1): 22-35

[20] GreiffS, WustenbergS, StenbergS, FunkeJ. Dynamic problem solving: A new assessment perspective. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012, 36(3): 189-213

[21] GustavssonJ, CarlssonG, McNameeMS. Barriers and facilitators for implementation of individualized fire safety (IFS) in Sweden. Fire Technology, 2021, 57(5): 2707-2736

[22] HeadBW, AlfordJ. Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 2015, 47(6): 711-739

[23] Idh, I. 2021. Response evaluation—Forest land fire in Finsjö 2021-06-18, evaluation of the fire and rescue service’s actions during the first hour of the response (Insatsutvärdering- Skogs-markbranden i Finsjö 2021-06-18, värdering av räddningstjänstens agerande under första timmen av insatsen). https://rib.msb.se/Filer/pdf/30351.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2024.

[24] KahnemanD. Thinking, fast and slow, 2011 New York Farrar, Strauss and Giroux

[25] KahnemanD, TverskyA. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 363-391

[26] KahnemanD, SibonyO, SunsteinCR. Noise, 2021 New York Harper Collins Publishers

[27] KleinGA. A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, 1993, 5(4): 138-147

[28] KleinGA. Sources of power: How people make decisions, 1998 Cambridge, MA MIT Press

[29] KleinG. Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors, 2008, 50(3): 456-460

[30] KvaleS, BrinkmannS. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 2009 London Sage

[31] LagadecP. RodríguezH, QuarantelliEL, DynesRR. Crisis management in the twenty-first century: “Unthinkable” events in “inconceivable” contexts. Handbook of disaster research, 2007 New York Springer 489-507

[32] LylesMA. Organizational learning, knowledge creation, problem formulation and innovation in messy problems. European Management Journal, 2014, 32(1): 132-136

[33] LylesMA, MitroffII. Organizational problem formulation: An empirical study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 25(1): 102-119

[34] MasseyAP, WallaceWA. Understanding and facilitating group problem structuring and formulation: Mental representations, interaction, and representation aids. Decision Support Systems, 1996, 17(4): 253-274

[35] MayerRE. Thinking, problem solving, cognition, 1992 Washington, DC American Psychological Association

[36] MishraJ, AllenD, PearmanA. Information seeking, use, and decision making. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(4): 662-673

[37] MitroffI, LinstoneH. The unbounded mind, 1992 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press

[38] MSB (Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency). 2022a. Swedish regulations on investigation report after municipal rescue operation (Föreskrifter om undersökningsrapport efter kommunal räddningsinsats). https://www.msb.se/sv/regler/gallande-regler/skydd-mot-olyckor/msbfs-20215/. Accessed 22 feb 2024.

[39] MSB (Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency). 2022b. Accident investigation—Explosion and fire in apartment building in Gothenburg, 28 September 2021 (Olycksutredning—Explosion och brand i flerbostadshus Göteborg, 28 september 2021) (MSB1931). https://rib.msb.se/filer/pdf/29921.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2023.

[40] MuhrenWJ, van de WalleBA. Sense-making and information management in emergency response. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 36(5): 30-33

[41] NewellA, SimonHA. Human problem solving, 1972 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall

[42] NiedermanF, DeSanctisG. The impact of a structured-argument approach on group problem formulation. Decision Sciences, 1995, 26(4): 451-474

[43] PaturasJL, SmithSR, AlbaneseJ, WaiteG. Inter-organisational response to disasters. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 2016, 9(4): 346-358

[44] QuarantelliEL. Disaster crisis management: A summary of research findings. Journal of Management Studies, 1988, 25(4): 373-385

[45] QuarantelliEL. Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. Disasters, 1997, 21(1): 39-56

[46] QuarantelliEL, BoinA, LagadecP. HitlinS, DromiSM, LuftA. Studying future disasters and crises: A heuristic approach. Handbooks of sociology and social research, 2018 New York Springer 61-83

[47] QuarantelliEL, LagadecP, BoinA. HitlinS, DromiSM, LuftA. A heuristic approach to future disasters and crises: New, old, and in-between types. Handbooks of sociology and social research, 2007 New York Springer 16-41

[48] RakeEL, NjåO. Perceptions and performances of experienced incident commanders. Journal of Risk Research, 2009, 12(5): 665-685

[49] ReitmanWR. Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the structure of ill-defined problems. Human Judgments and Optimality, 1964, 282: 283-315

[50] RittelHW, WebberMM. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 1973, 4(2): 155-169

[51] RSG (Räddningstjänsten Storgöteborg). 2022. Incident investigation: Fire and explosion in building, apartment building Övre Husargatan, Gothenburg 2021-09-28 (Olycksutredning: Brand och explosion i byggnad, flerfamiljshus Övre Husargatan, Göteborg 2021-09-28). https://www.rsgbg.se/globalassets/dokument/om-oss/olycksutredning-2022-02-23.pdf. Accessed 3 Mars 2023.

[52] Government Office. 2003. SFS 2003:778. Swedish law: Civil protection act (Skydd mot olyckor). Effective 1 January 2004. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2003778-om-skydd-mot-olyckor_sfs-2003-778/. Accessed 15 May 2024.

[53] SimonHA. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 1973, 4(3–4): 181-201

[54] SimonHA. The sciences of the artificial, 1996 3 Cambridge, MA MIT Press

[55] SmithGF. Defining managerial problems: A framework for prescriptive theorizing. Management Science, 1989, 35(8): 963-981

[56] SmithGF. Towards a theory of managerial problem solving. Decision Support Systems, 1992, 8(1): 29-40

[57] SmithEA. Effects based operations: Applying network centric warfare in peace, crisis, and war, 2002 Washington, DC Dod-Ccrp

[58] SteenR, HaakonsenG, PatriarcaR. “Samhandling”: On the nuances of resilience through case study research in emergency response operations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2022, 30(3): 257-269

[59] SäfstenK, GustavssonM. Research methodology: For engineers and other problem-solvers, 2020 Lund, Sweden Studentlitteratur AB

[60] ‘t HartP, BoinA. RosenthalU, BoinA, ComfortL. Between crisis and normalcy: The long shadow of post-crisis politics. Managing crises: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities, 2001 Washington, DC U.S. Department of Justice 28-46

[61] van de WalleB, BrugghemansB, ComesT. Improving situation awareness in crisis response teams: An experimental analysis of enriched information and centralized coordination. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2016, 95: 66-79

[62] WaughWL Jr, StreibG. Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 2006, 66: 131-140

[63] WolbersJ, KuipersS, BoinA. A systematic review of 20 years of crisis and disaster research: Trends and progress. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2021, 12(4): 374-392

[64] YinRK. Case study research and applications, 2018 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)