Effectiveness of Decentralization of Disaster Risk Management in Borana and South-West Shawa Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia

Terefe Tolessa , Chalchisa Fana , Deressa Gadissa , Ermiayas Takela , Gutu Tesso

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› : 1 -14.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› : 1 -14. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-024-00599-x
Article

Effectiveness of Decentralization of Disaster Risk Management in Borana and South-West Shawa Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study was designed with the aim of assessing the effectiveness of decentralization of disaster risk management in Borana zone and South-West Shawa zone of Oromia region. A mixed research approach was used to collect data from federal, regional, zonal, district (woreda), and ward (kebele) representatives. Focus group discussions and key informant interviews were the qualitative methods used to collect data, while survey questionnaires were distributed to experts to collect quantitative data. The qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis whereas the quantitative data were analyzed using STATA software version 14. The findings of the research have shown that, the actors are aware of Busa Gonofa as a new indigenous self-help institution. The policy on decentralization of disaster risk reduction was better understood at the federal, regional, and zonal levels of the government tiers than at the woreda and kebele levels. Administrative decentralization was found to be more effective than fiscal and political decentralization. The decentralization of Ethiopian disaster risk reduction is incomplete with limited effectiveness. There exists significant difference between Borana and South-West Shawa zones in decentralization of disaster risk management. The implementation of decentralization was constrained by training, technology, collaboration, financial resources, skill and knowledge, institutional arrangement, and local capacity. Hence, there is a need to address these challenges and make continuous efforts to focus on local-level capacity building in terms of empowerment of actors through training, technology, and financial resources for adaptation and mitigation to drought in Borana and flood in South-West Shawa zones respectively.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Terefe Tolessa, Chalchisa Fana, Deressa Gadissa, Ermiayas Takela, Gutu Tesso. Effectiveness of Decentralization of Disaster Risk Management in Borana and South-West Shawa Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 1-14 DOI:10.1007/s13753-024-00599-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AbebeM. Emerging trends in disaster management and the Ethiopian experience: Genesis, reform and transformation. Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 2009, 1(2): 60-89

[2]

AinuddinS, AldrichDP, RoutrayJK, AinuddinS, AchkazaiA. The need for local involvement: Decentralization of disaster management institutions in Baluchistan, Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2013, 6: 50-58

[3]

ArendsH. The dangers of fiscal decentralization and public service delivery: A review of arguments. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 2020, 61(3): 599-622

[4]

BaeY, JooYM, WonSY. Decentralization and collaborative disaster governance: Evidence from South Korea. Habitat International, 2016, 52: 50-56

[5]

BarterSJ. The dangers of decentralization: Clientelism, the state, and nature in a democratic Indonesia. Federal Governance, 2008, 5(1): 1-15

[6]

BlackburnS. The politics of scale and disaster risk governance: Barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica. Geoforum, 2014, 52: 101-112

[7]

BusayoET, KalumbaAM, AfuyeGA, EkundayoOY, OrimoloyeIR. Assessment of the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction studies since 2015. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 50: Article 101906

[8]

ChauVN, HollandJ, CassellsS. Institutional structures underpinning flood management in Vietnam. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2014, 10: 341-348

[9]

De VriesMS. The rise and fall of decentralization: A comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 2000, 38(2): 193-224

[10]

DewaO, MakokaD, Ayo-YusufOA. Assessing capacity and implementation status of the disaster risk management strategy for health and community disaster resilience in Malawi. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(5): 673-688

[11]

Dick-SagoeC. Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 2020, 8(1): Article 1804036

[12]

EDRMC (Ethiopian Disaster Risk Management Commission). The midterm review of the implementation of the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Ethiopian voluntary national report, 2022 Addis Ababa EDRMC

[13]

EscalerasM, RegisterCA. Fiscal decentralization and natural hazard risks. Public Choice, 2012, 151: 165-183

[14]

FaguetJP. Decentralization and governance. World Development, 2014, 53: 2-13

[15]

FaguetJ-P, KhanQ, KanthDP. Decentralization’s effects on education and health: Evidence from Ethiopia Social protection and jobs. Discussion paper No. 1934, 2019 Washington The World Bank Group

[16]

Falleti, T.G. 2004. A sequential theory of decentralization and its effects on the intergovernmental balance of power: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. https://kellogg.nd.edu/sites/default/files/old_files/documents/314_0.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2024.

[17]

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Building resilience to climate change-related and other disasters in Ethiopia – Challenges, lessons and the way forward, 2022 Rome FAO

[18]

FDRE (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia). 1995. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopian Constitution. Federal Negarit Gazeta No. 1, 21 August 1995.

[19]

Follosco-AspirasK, SantiagoAD. DickE, GaesingK, InkoomD, KauselT. Assessing the effectiveness of the decentralisation policy on disaster risk reduction and management: The case of Hagonoy, Bulacan, Philippines. Decentralisation and regional development: Experiences and lessons from four continents over three decades, 2016 Cham Springer 131-153

[20]

GabrielAG, SantiagoPNM, CasimiroRR. Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in comprehensive development planning of the cities in Nueva Ecija in the Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(3): 367-380

[21]

GarschagenM. Decentralizing urban disaster risk management in a centralized system? Agendas, actors and contentions in Vietnam. Habitat International, 2016, 52: 43-49

[22]

GetenetB, WaganewW, KeneyD, YesufA. Knowledge, attitude and practices of frontline health care workers to disaster risk management in private general hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Multicenter cross-sectional study. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 2023, 33(5): 795-804

[23]

GoelRK, MazharU, NelsonMA, RamR. Different forms of decentralization and their impact on government performance: Micro-level evidence from 113 countries. Economic Modelling, 2017, 62: 171-183

[24]

GradyA, MakarigakisA, GersoniusB. Optimisation of decentralisation for effective disaster risk reduction (DRR) through the case study of Indonesia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2015, 3(9): 5511-5546

[25]

HailuR, TolossaD. Multi-stakeholder platforms: Institutional options to achieve water security in the Awash Basin of Ethiopia. World Development Perspectives, 2020, 19: Article 100213

[26]

HajitoKW, GesesewHA, BayuNB, TsehayYE. Community awareness and perception on hazards in Southwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, 13: 350-357

[27]

HammondL, MaxwellD. The Ethiopian crisis of 1999–2000: Lessons learned, questions unanswered. Disasters, 2002, 26(3): 262-279

[28]

HermanssonH. Challenges to decentralization of disaster management in Turkey: The role of political-administrative context. International Journal of Public Administration, 2019, 42(5): 417-431

[29]

HutchinsonP, LaFondA. Monitoring and evaluation of decentralization reforms in developing country health sectors, 2004 Bethesda Partners for Health Reformplus Abt Associates

[30]

IqbalK, AhmedM. Are decentralised governments more effective in mitigating disaster risks?. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 2015, 38(3): 1-24

[31]

MekonnenTM, MitikuAB, WoldemichaelAT. Flood hazard zoning of Upper Awash River Basin, Ethiopia, using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as compared to sensitivity analysis. The Scientific World Journal, 2023

[32]

MuneneMB. Sendai framework: A catalyst for the transformation of disaster risk reduction through adaptive governance?, 2016 Stockholm Stockholm Environment Institute

[33]

MuriukiZK, KeR, MuchiriJM. Level of awareness on disaster risk preparedness in informal settlements of Nyeri Town, Nyeri County Kenya. International Journal of Health Sciences, 2022, 5(3): 41-63

[34]

NyandikoNO. Devolution and disaster risk reduction in Kenya: Progress, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 51: Article 101832

[35]

Prud’HommeR. The dangers of decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer, 1995, 10(2): 201-220

[36]

QuaderMA, KhanAU, MalakMA, KervynM. Mainstreaming decentralization and collaboration in disaster risk management: Insights from coastal Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(3): 382-397

[37]

RaikesJ, SmithTF, JacobsonC, BaldwinC. Pre-disaster planning and preparedness for floods and droughts: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2019, 38: Article 101207

[38]

Rondinelli, D.A., J.R. Nellis, and G.S. Cheema. 1983. Decentralization in developing countries. World Bank staff working paper No. 581. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

[39]

RumbachA. Decentralization and small cities: Towards more effective urban disaster governance?. Habitat International, 2015, 52: 35-42

[40]

SchneiderA. Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, 2003, 38: 32-56

[41]

ScottZ, TarazonaM. Study on disaster risk reduction, decentralization and political economy, 2011 Geneva United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction

[42]

ShortenA, SmithJ. Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evidence-Based Nursing, 2017, 20(3): 74-75

[43]

TadesseL, ArdalanA. Health sector initiatives for disaster risk management in Ethiopia: A narrative review. PLoS Currents Disasters, 2014

[44]

TaoS, HuiL, YeerkenW. Decentralization and collaborative disaster governance for the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Current trends and implications. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2023, 14(5): 974-982

[45]

TesfayA. The extent and impacts of decentralization reforms in Ethiopia. Doctoral dissertation, 2015 Boston Boston University

[46]

TofuDA, FanaC, DilbatoT, DirbabaNB, TessoG. Pastoralists’ and agro-pastoralists’ livelihood resilience to climate change-induced risks in the Borana zone, south Ethiopia: Using resilience index measurement approach. Pastoralism, 2023, 13(1): Article 4

[47]

TreismanD. The architecture of government: Rethinking political decentralization, 2007 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

[48]

Vaillancourt, A. 2013. Government decentralization and disaster impact, an exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Building Resilience, 17–19 September 2013, University of Salford, Ahungalla.

[49]

WamslerC, JohannessenÅ. Meeting at the crossroads? Developing national strategies for disaster risk reduction and resilience: Relevance, scope for, and challenges to, integration. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 45: Artilce 101452

[50]

WilkinsonE. Transforming disaster risk management: A political economy approach, 2012 London Overseas Development Institute

[51]

ZewdeB, PausewangS. Ethiopia: The challenge of democracy from below, 2002 Uppsala Nordic Africa Institute

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

172

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/