Use of Standard Operating Procedures for Supporting Cross-Organizational Emergency Management: Challenges and Opportunities Identified from a Tabletop Exercise
Kristine Steen-Tveit , Bjørn Erik Munkvold , Kjetil Rustenberg
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 673 -687.
Use of Standard Operating Procedures for Supporting Cross-Organizational Emergency Management: Challenges and Opportunities Identified from a Tabletop Exercise
This study investigated the crucial role of formulating and applying standard operating procedures (SOPs) in the context of emergency planning and response. The effective application of SOPs during operations is essential in order to address challenges that surpass individual organizational capacities. A specific focus on fostering efficient information sharing and executing specified actions maximizes the prospect of success. To explore the collective functionality of SOPs across organizations, we conducted a comprehensive tabletop exercise involving 10 organizations spanning tactical, operational, and strategic levels. Our analysis identified six key challenges, primarily related to the structures for information sharing, communication pathways, and the complex integration and application of common SOPs within these diverse organizational contexts. This research contributes insights into the use of SOPs in large-scale, cross-organizational scenarios.
Cross-organizational emergency management / Standard operating procedures / Tabletop exercise / Team situational awareness
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Australian Fire Authority Council. 2004. The Australian inter-service incident management system: A management system for any emergency. East Melbourne Victoria, Australia: AFAC. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/1130047. Accessed 13 Feb 2024. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
DSB (Directorate for Community Security and Emergency Preparedness). 2018a. DSB’s guidelines for notification and reporting via the coordination channel. https://www.dsb.no/lover/risiko-sarbarhet-og-beredskap/andre-dok/retningslinjer-for-varsling-og-rapportering-pa-samordningskanal/#situasjonsrapportering-pa-samordningskanal. Accessed 10 Jan 2019. |
| [13] |
DSB (Directorate for Community Security and Emergency Preparedness). 2018b. Common rules for the use of Norwegian Public Safety Network. https://www.politiet.no/globalassets/05-om-oss/03-strategier-og-planer/sambandsreglement-for-nodetatene.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2021. |
| [14] |
Edzén, S. 2014. Table-top exercises for emergency management: Tame solutions for wicked problems. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa, 6–9 January, 1978–1985. IEEE. |
| [15] |
Elvegård, R., and N. Andreassen. 2024. Exercise design for interagency collaboration training: The case of maritime nuclear emergency management tabletop exercises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 32(1): Article e12517. |
| [16] |
Elverum, T.A., and P.H. Lauritzen. 2017. Operational leadership structure Fire and Rescue Services. Bachelor’s thesis. Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Endsley, M.R. 1999. Situation awareness and human error: Designing to support human performance. In Proceedings of the High Consequence Systems Surety Conference, 20–22 September 1999, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 2–9. |
| [19] |
Fracker, M.L. 1991. Measures of situation awareness: Review and future directions. Armstrong Laboratory, US Air Force Systems Command. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA262672. Accessed 12 Dec 2019. |
| [20] |
Gasaway, R. 2013. Situational awareness for emergency response. Fire Engineering. Oklahoma, USA: PennWell Corporation. |
| [21] |
Harwood, S. 2017. Adaptive standard operating procedures for complex disasters. Master’s thesis. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
JRCC (Joint Rescue Coordination Centre). 2018a. The rescue handbook for the emergency services in Norway. https://www.hovedredningssentralen.no/redningshandboken-er-endelig-her/. Accessed 24 Mar 2022. |
| [27] |
JRCC (Joint Rescue Coordination Centre). 2018b. National guidelines for planning and coordination in emergency services. https://www.hovedredningssentralen.no/nasjonal-veileder-for-planverk-og-samvirke-i-redningstjenesten/. Accessed 24 Mar 2022. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Kato, T., J.J. Wang, and N.Y. Tsai. 2022. Elements of standard operating procedures and flexibility issues in emergency management: A Japan-Taiwan comparison. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 71: Article 102813. |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Munkvold, B.E. 2023. Supporting inter-agency collaboration in emergency management: Recurring challenges relevant for CSCW. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 5–9 June 2023, Trondheim, Norway. |
| [38] |
Munkvold, B.E., T. Opach, S. Pilemalm, J. Radianti, J.K. Rød, and M. Snaprud. 2019. Sharing information for common situational understanding in emergency response. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 8–14 June 2019, Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden. |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Norri-Sederholm, T., M. Joensuu, and A.-M. Huhtinen. 2017. Ensuring information flow and the situation picture in public safety organisation’ situation centres. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, 29–30 June 2017, University College Dublin, Ireland. |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Rustenberg, K., K. Steen-Tveit, B.E. Munkvold, and J. Radianti. 2024. Collaborative evaluation: Mapping socio-technical patterns in an emergency exercise. In Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM) Conference, 25–29 May 2024, Münster, Germany. |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Schraagen, J.M., M.H.I.T. Veld, and L. De Koning. 2010. Information sharing during crisis management in hierarchical vs. network teams. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 18(2): 117–127. |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
Steen-Tveit, K., and B.E. Munkvold. 2021. From common operational picture to common situational understanding: An analysis based on practitioner perspectives. Safety Science 142: Article 105381. |
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
Wang, L., N. Zhao, and D. Liu. 2020. Complex disaster management: A dynamic game among the government, enterprises, and residents. Journal of Cleaner Production 266: Article 122091. |
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
WHO (World Health Organization). 2017. Simulation exercise manual. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-WHE-CPI-2017.10. Accessed 11 Oct 2021. |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |