Reasoning Disaster Chains with Bayesian Network Estimated Under Expert Prior Knowledge

Lida Huang , Tao Chen , Qing Deng , Yuli Zhou

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2023, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) : 1011 -1028.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2023, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) : 1011 -1028. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-023-00530-w
Article

Reasoning Disaster Chains with Bayesian Network Estimated Under Expert Prior Knowledge

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

With the acceleration of global climate change and urbanization, disaster chains are always connected to artificial systems like critical infrastructure. The complexity and uncertainty of the disaster chain development process and the severity of the consequences have brought great challenges to emergency decision makers. The Bayesian network (BN) was applied in this study to reason about disaster chain scenarios to support the choice of appropriate response strategies. To capture the interacting relationships among different factors, a scenario representation model of disaster chains was developed, followed by the determination of the BN structure. In deriving the conditional probability tables of the BN model, we found that, due to the lack of data and the significant uncertainty of disaster chains, parameter learning methodologies based on data or expert knowledge alone are insufficient. By integrating both sample data and expert knowledge with the maximum entropy principle, we proposed a parameter estimation algorithm under expert prior knowledge (PEUK). Taking the rainstorm disaster chain as an example, we demonstrated the superiority of the PEUK-built BN model over the traditional maximum a posterior (MAP) algorithm and the direct expert opinion elicitation method. The results also demonstrate the potential of our BN scenario reasoning paradigm to assist real-world disaster decisions.

Keywords

Bayesian network / Expert prior knowledge / Parameter learning / Rainstorm disaster chain / Scenario reasoning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lida Huang, Tao Chen, Qing Deng, Yuli Zhou. Reasoning Disaster Chains with Bayesian Network Estimated Under Expert Prior Knowledge. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(6): 1011-1028 DOI:10.1007/s13753-023-00530-w

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alexander D. Lopez-Carresi A, Fordham M, Wisner B, Kelman I, Gaillard JC. Emergency and disaster planning. Disaster management: International lessons in risk reduction, response and recovery, 2013, London: Routledge 125-141.

[2]

Balbi S, Villa F, Mojtahed V, Hegetschweiler KT, Giupponi C. A spatial Bayesian network model to assess the benefits of early warning for urban flood risk to people. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 16(6): 1323-1337

[3]

Berger A, Della S, Della V. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 1996, 22(1): 39-71.

[4]

de Campos, C., and Q. Ji. 2008. Improving Bayesian network parameter learning using constraints. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 8–11 December 2008, Tampa, Florida, USA.

[5]

Chang, R., and W. Wang. 2010. Novel algorithm for Bayesian network parameter learning with informative prior constraints. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 18–23 July 2010, Barcelona, Spain.

[6]

Chen S, Pollino C. Good practice in Bayesian network modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2012, 37: 134-145

[7]

Comes T, Hiete M, Wijngaards N, Schultmann F. Decision maps: A framework for multi-criteria decision support under severe uncertainty. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 52(1): 108-118

[8]

Comes T, Wijngaards N, Van de Walle B. Exploring the future: Runtime scenario selection for complex and time-bound decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 97: 29-46

[9]

Fan WC, Liu Y, Weng WG, Shen SF. An introduction to public safety science, 2013, Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)

[10]

Han LN, Zhang JQ, Zhang YC, Ma Q, Alu S, Lang QL. Hazard assessment of earthquake disaster chains based on a Bayesian network model and ArcGIS. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 8(5): Article 210

[11]

Hosseini S, Ivanov D. Bayesian networks for supply chain risk, resilience and ripple effect analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 161: Article 113649

[12]

Hou YY, Zheng ER, Guo WQ, Xiao QK, Xu ZW. Learning Bayesian network parameters with small data set: A parameter extension under constraints method. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 24979-24989

[13]

Koller D, Friedman N. Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques, 2009, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

[14]

Liu ZQ, Nadim F, Vangelsten B, Eidsvig U, Kalsnes B. Sassa K, Canuti P, Yin Y. Quantitative multi-risk modelling and management using Bayesian networks. Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment, 2014, Cham: Springer 773-779

[15]

Liu C, Qian J, Guo DH, Liu Y. A spatio-temporal scenario model for emergency decision. GeoInformatica, 2018, 22(2): 411-433

[16]

Moehrle S, Raskob W. Structuring and reusing knowledge from historical events for supporting nuclear emergency and remediation management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 46: 303-311

[17]

Niculescu R, Mitchell T, Rao R. Bayesian network learning with parameter constraints. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006, 7: 1357-1383.

[18]

Qiu JN, Wang ZQ, Ye X, Liu LL, Dong LL. Modeling method of cascading crisis events based on merging Bayesian network. Decision Support Systems, 2014, 62: 94-105

[19]

Rohmer J. Uncertainties in conditional probability tables of discrete Bayesian belief networks: A comprehensive review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 88: Article 103384

[20]

Sakahira F, Hiroi U. Designing cascading disaster networks by means of natural language processing. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 66: Article 102623

[21]

Shi PJ. Theory and practice of disaster study. Journal of Natural Disasters, 1996, 5(4): 6-17 (in Chinese)

[22]

Wu CG, Xu X, Zhang BK, Na YL. Domain ontology for scenario-based hazard evaluation. Safety Science, 2013, 60: 21-34

[23]

Yu F, Fan B, Li XY. Improving emergency preparedness to cascading disasters: A case-driven risk ontology modelling. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2020, 28(3): 194-214

[24]

Yu F, Fan B, Qin CS, Chen Y. A scenario-driven fault-control decision support model for disaster preparedness using case-based reasoning. Natural Hazards Review, 2023

[25]

Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353

[26]

Zhang H, Liu Y. Key problems on fundamental science and technology integration in “scenario-response” based national emergency response platform system. System Engineering – Theory & Practice, 2012, 32(5): 947-953 (in Chinese)

[27]

Zhong SB, Fang ZX, Zhu M, Huang QY. A geo-ontology-based approach to decision-making in emergency management of meteorological disasters. Natural Hazards, 2017, 89(2): 531-554

[28]

Zhou Y, Fenton N, Zhu C. An empirical study of Bayesian network parameter learning with monotonic influence constraints. Decision Support Systems, 2016, 87: 69-79

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

184

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/