Community Insights: Citizen Participation in Kamaishi Unosumai Decade-Long Recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake

Nombulelo Kitsepile Ngulube , Hirokazu Tatano , Subhajyoti Samaddar

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2023, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) : 886 -897.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2023, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) : 886 -897. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-023-00527-5
Article

Community Insights: Citizen Participation in Kamaishi Unosumai Decade-Long Recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Numerous scholars and researchers have long advocated for citizen engagement in post-disaster recovery and reconstruction initiatives, although unique opportunities and challenges in effectively implementing citizen engagement still exist. It has been 12 years since the Great East Japan Earthquake, where the government called for a citizen-centered recovery and reconstruction process, and reconstruction in most areas in the Tohoku region has almost been concluded. Using qualitative data acquired through interviews with the residents, field observations during the World Bosai Walk, and questionnaire and archival research, this study aimed to discuss the overall reconstruction of Unosumai in Iwate Prefecture, giving the residents’ perspective on the benefits and challenges they faced in participating in recovery planning and reconstruction and how the community has been able to strengthen their participation in disaster reduction initiatives since the earthquake and tsunami. This discussion is crucial as it would effectively offer lessons on engaging residents in post-disaster recovery and reconstruction after mega-disasters.

Keywords

Community participation / Community perspective / Japan / Post-disaster / Reconstruction / Recovery planning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Nombulelo Kitsepile Ngulube, Hirokazu Tatano, Subhajyoti Samaddar. Community Insights: Citizen Participation in Kamaishi Unosumai Decade-Long Recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(6): 886-897 DOI:10.1007/s13753-023-00527-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Allen KM. Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: Local capacity-building in the Philippines. Disasters, 2006, 30(1): 81-101

[2]

Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1969, 35(4): 216-224.

[3]

Barenstein J. The role of communities in post-disaster reconstruction. A call for owner-driven approaches. Tafter Journal, 2012, 50: 1-12.

[4]

Baum HS. Smelser NJ, Baltes PB. Citizen participation. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2001, Amsterdam: Elsevier 1840-1846

[5]

Boano C, Marisol G. Lost in translation? The challenges of an equitable post-disaster reconstruction process: Lessons from Chile. Environmental Hazards, 2011, 10(3): 293-309

[6]

Bongo P, Chipangura P, Sithole M, Moyo F. A rights-based analysis of disaster risk reduction framework in Zimbabwe and its implications for policy and practice. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 2013

[7]

Buckland J, Rahman M. Community-based disaster management during the 1997 Red River Flood in Canada. Disasters, 2019, 23(2): 174-191

[8]

Chandrasekhar D. Digging deeper: Participation and non-participation in post-disaster community recovery. Community Development, 2012, 43(5): 614-629

[9]

Cheek W. The paradox of community involvement: Rebuilding Minamisanriku. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2020, 29(6): 893-907

[10]

Cho A. Post-tsunami recovery and reconstruction: Governance issues and implications of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Disasters, 2014

[11]

Kamaishi City. 2019. Kamaishi City report. Hard-copy booklet

[12]

Davidson CH, Johnson C, Lizarralde G, Dikmen N, Sliwinski A. Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International, 2007, 31(1): 100-115

[13]

Dube, E. 2020. The build-back-better concept as a disaster risk reduction strategy for positive reconstruction and sustainable development in Zimbabwe: A literature study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 43: Article 101401

[14]

Edgington DW. Restructuring Kobe: The geography of crisis and opportunity, 2010, Vancouver: UBC Press

[15]

Ganapati NE, Ganapati S. Enabling participatory planning after disasters. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2009, 75(1): 41-59

[16]

Guo Y. Urban resilience in post-disaster reconstruction: Towards a resilient development in Sichuan, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2012, 3(1): 45-55

[17]

Hamideh, S. 2020. Opportunities and challenges of public participation in post-disaster recovery planning: Lessons from Galveston, TX. Natural Hazards 21(4): Article 05020009

[18]

Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F. Top-down reconstruction and the failure to “build back better” resilient communities after disaster: Lessons from the 2009 L’Aquila Italy Earthquake. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2020, 29(4): 541-555

[19]

Iuchi, K., and J. Mutter. 2020. Governing community relocation after major disasters: An analysis of three different approaches and its outcomes in Asia. Progress in Disaster Science 6: Article 100071

[20]

Japan Times. 2020. A decade on, real challenges lie ahead for communities devasted by the March 2011 disaster. www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/03/06/national/tohoku-challenges-quake-anniversary. Accessed 21 Dec 2021

[21]

Krieken, V., U. Kulatunga, and C. Pathirage. 2017. Importance of community participation in disaster recovery. University of Salford Institutional Repository. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/43859/. Accessed 29 May 2022

[22]

Layder D. Understanding social theory, 1994, London: Sage Publications

[23]

Lu Y, Xu D, Wang Q, Xu J. Multi-stakeholder collaboration in community post-disaster reconstruction: A case study from the Longmen Shan Fault area in China. Environmental Hazards, 2018, 17(2): 85-106

[24]

Lyons M. Building back better: The large-scale impact of small-scale approaches to reconstruction. World Development, 2009, 37(2): 385-398

[25]

Maly E. Building back better with people-centered housing recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 29: 84-93

[26]

Mannakkara S, Wilkinson S. Re-conceptualising “building back better” to improve post-disaster recovery. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2014, 7(3): 327-341

[27]

Mannakkara S, Wilkinson S, Potangaroa R. Resilient post disaster recovery through building back better, 2019 1 New York: Routledge

[28]

McNamara, C. 2022. General guidelines for conducting research interviews, adapted from the field guide to consulting and organizational development. Free Management Library 2–4. https://managementhelp.org/businessresearch/interviews.htm. Accessed 25 May 2022

[29]

Moon K, Blackman D. A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology, 2014, 28: 1167-1177

[30]

Murphy R, Pelling M, Adams H, DiVicenz S, Visman E. Survivor-led response: Local recommendations to operationalise building back better. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 31: 135-142

[31]

Mwita K. Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 2022, 11(6): 618-625.

[32]

Nakatani H. Population ageing in Japan: Policy transformation, sustainable development goals, universal health coverage, and social determinates of health. Global Health & Medicine, 2019, 1(1): 3-10

[33]

Pandey B, Okazaki K. Communiy based disaster managament: Empowering communities to cope with disaster risks. Reginal Development Dialogue, 2005, 26(2): 52

[34]

Pelling M. Learning from others: The scope and challenges for participatory disaster risk assessment. Disasters, 2007, 31(4): 373-385

[35]

Posio P. Reconstruction machizukuri and negotiating safety in post-311 community recovery in Yamamoto. Contemporary Japan, 2019, 31(1): 40-60

[36]

Iwate Prefecture. 2019. Moving toward reconstruction (Issue August). http://iwate-archive.pref.iwate.jp/. Accessed 10 May 2022

[37]

Iwate Prefecture. 2021. Moving toward reconstruction (Issue August). http://iwate-archive.pref.iwate.jp/. Accessed 10 May 2022

[38]

Ranghieri F, Ishiwatari M. Learning from mega disasters: Lessons from the great east Japan earthquake, 2014, Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development

[39]

Ray-Bennett NS, Clarke K, Mendez D. Sendai framework’s global targets A and B: Opinions from the global platform for disaster risk reduction’s ignite stage 2019. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(5): 651-663

[40]

Reconstruction Agency. 2016. Great East Japan Earthquake. Tokyo, Japan: Reconstruction Agency. https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/english/topics/GEJE/index.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2022

[41]

Ritchie LA. Individual stress, collective trauma, and social capital in the wake of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Sociological Inquiry, 2012, 82(2): 187-211

[42]

Rosenberg, H., N.A. Errett, and D.P. Eisenman. 2022. Working with disaster-affected communities to envision healthier futures: A trauma-informed approach to post-disaster recovery planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(3): Article 1723

[43]

Rowlands A. Disaster recovery management in Australia and the contribution of social work. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 2013, 12: 19-38

[44]

Sacramento NJJE, Geges DB. Community livelihood recovery: Experiences from 2006 guimaras oil spill in the Philippines. Journal of Human Ecology, 2019, 8: 50-67.

[45]

Sadiqi Z, Trigunarsyah B, Coffey V. A framework for community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction projects: A case of Afghanistan. International Journal of Project Management, 2016, 35(5): 900-912

[46]

Samaddar S, Yokomatsu M, Dayour F, Oteng-Ababio M, Dzivenu T, Adams M, Ishikawa H. Evaluating effective public participation in disaster management and climate change adaptation: Insights from northern Ghana through a user-based approach. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2015, 6(1): 117-143

[47]

Samaddar S, Okada N, Choi J, Tatano H. What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in Rural Gujarat. India. Natural Hazards, 2017, 85(1): 111-138

[48]

Cabinet Secretariat. 2011. The reconstruction design council in response to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. https://japan.kantei.go.jp/kan/actions/201106/25KAIGI. Accessed 10 May 2022

[49]

Shafique K, Warren CMJ. Empowerment and legitimisation of affected communities in post-disaster reconstruction. Procedia Engineering, 2018, 212: 1171-1178

[50]

Shafique, K. 2016. Success of post-natural disaster reconstruction projects: Significance of community perspective. International Journal of Business and Management 11(9): Article 69

[51]

Shaw R. Shaw R. Overview of community-based disaster risk reduction. Community-based disaster risk reduction, 2012, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited 3-17

[52]

Tsuji T. Waugh WL, Han Z. Citizen participation in the disaster reconstruction process: Lessons from the great east Japan earthquake. Community, environment and disaster risk management, 2017, Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited 105-126.

[53]

Ubaura M, Akiyama S. Planning processes for reconstruction with citizen participation after large-scale disasters: A case study of reconstruction study meetings in Miyako City after the great east Japan earthquake. Journal of Disaster Research, 2016, 11(3): 486-495

[54]

Vallance S. Disaster recovery as participation: Lessons from the shaky isles. Natural Hazards, 2015, 75(2): 1287-1301

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

228

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/