A Systematic Review of Forensic Approaches to Disasters: Gaps and Challenges

Abstract

Disaster forensic approaches aim to identify the causes of disasters to support disaster risk management. However, few studies have conducted a systematic literature review of scientific articles that labeled themselves as a forensic approach to disasters. This article provides a qualitative analysis of these forensic studies, focusing on five main issues: (1) the methodologies applied; (2) the forensic approaches used in the disaster risk management phases; (3) the hazards addressed; (4) if the methodologies involve social participation, and using what types of participation; and (5) if there are references to urban planning in the scientific studies analyzed. Our results showed a predominance of the Forensic Investigations of Disasters (FORIN) and Post-Event Review Capability (PERC) methodologies used in isolation or combination. There is a need for methodologies that engage people in participatory FORIN, fostering the co-production of knowledge and action research approaches.

Keywords

Dynamic pressures / Forensic investigation / Participatory research / Risk drivers / Root causes

References

[1] Albagli, S., and A.Y. Iwama. 2022. Citizen science and the right to research: Building local knowledge of climate change impacts. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications 9(1): Article 39.

[2] Alcántara-Ayala I, Oliver-Smith A. ICL Latin-American network: On the road to landslide reduction capacity building. Landslides, 2014, 11(2): 315-318

[3] Alcántara-Ayala, I., O. Altan, D.N. Baker, S. Briceño, S.L. Cutter, H. Gupta, A. Holloway, A. Ismail-Zadeh, et al. 2015. Disaster risks research and assessment to promote risk reduction and management. Paris: ICSU-ISSC.

[4] Alcántara-Ayala I. Time in a bottle: Challenges to disaster studies in Latin America and the Caribbean. Disasters, 2019, 43(S1): S18-S27

[5] Alcántara-Ayala I, Oliver-Smith A. Early warning systems: Lost in translation or late by definition? A FORIN approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2019, 10(3): 317-331

[6] Amaral GC, Ferreira AM, de Souza Sardinha D, Menezes PHBJ, Marchezini V, de Oliveira Tiezzi R. Official and unofficial data supporting disaster risk management in medium-sized cities. Natural Hazards Research, 2023, 3(1): 89-96

[7] Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4): 216-224

[8] Atanga, R.A. 2020. The role of local community leaders in flood disaster risk management strategy making in Accra. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 43: Article 101358.

[9] Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 1994, New York: Routledge

[10] Bosher L, Chmutina K, van Niekerk D. Stop going around in circles: Towards a reconceptualisation of disaster risk management phases. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2021, 30(4/5): 525-537

[11] Bronstert A, Agarwal A, Boessenkool B, Crisologo I, Fischer M, Heistermann M, Köhn-Reich L, López-Tarazón JA Forensic hydro-meteorological analysis of an extreme flash flood: The 2016–05-29 event in Braunsbach, SW Germany. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630: 977-991

[12] Bubb, J., and L. Le Dé. 2022. Participation as a requirement: Towards more inclusion or further exclusion? The community disaster and climate change committees in Vanuatu as a case study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 76: Article 102992.

[13] Burton, I. 2010. Forensic disaster investigations in depth: A new case study model. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 52(5): 36–41.

[14] Carvalho CM, Luiz Giatti L, Fagerholm N, Bedran-Martins AM, Kytta M. Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS) to assess water, energy, and food availability in a vulnerable community in Guarulhos (Brazil). International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 2021, 13(3): 516-529

[15] Castro-Díaz, R., L.E. Delgado, A. Langle-Flores, M. Perevochtchikova, and V.H. Marín. 2022. A systematic review of social participation in ecosystem services studies in Latin America from a transdisciplinary perspective, 1996–2020. Science of the Total Environment 828: Article 154523.

[16] CEDIM (Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology). 2013. CEDIM Annual research report 2012—Focus on forensic disaster analysis in near real time. Potsdam, Germany: CEDIM.

[17] CEDIM (Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology). 2020. CEDIM Research report 2017–2020. Potsdam, Germany: CEDIM.

[18] Chadegani, A.A., H. Salehi, M.M. Yunus, H. Farhadi, M. Fooladi, M. Farhadi, and N.A. Ebrahim. 2013. A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science 9(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18.

[19] Davis I. Shelter after disaster, 1978, Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic Press

[20] Davis I. Safe shelter within unsafe cities: Disaster vulnerability and rapid urbanization. Open House International, 1987, 12(3): 5-15.

[21] Davis I. Davis I. The vulnerability challenges. Disaster risk management in Asia and the Pacific, 2015, London: Routledge 65-108.

[22] DKKV (German Committee for Disaster Reduction). 2012. Detecting disaster root causes—A framework and an analytic tool for practitioners 2021. DKKV Publication Series 48. Bonn, Germany: DKKV.

[23] Doggett AM. Root cause analysis: A framework for tool selection. Quality Management Journal, 2005, 12(4): 34-45

[24] Dominguez, L., C. Bonadonna, C. Frischknecht, S. Menoni, and A. Garcia. 2021. Integrative post-event impact assessment framework for volcanic eruptions: A disaster forensic investigation of the 2011–2012 eruption of the Cordón Caulle volcano (Chile). Frontiers in Earth Science 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.645945.

[25] Dyball R, Brown VA, Keen M. Wals AEJ. Towards sustainability: Five strands of social learning. Social learning towards a sustainable world: Principles, perspectives, and praxis, 2009, Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers 181-194.

[26] Ensor JE, Park SE, Attwood SJ, Kaminski AM, Johnson JE. Can community-based adaptation increase resilience?. Climate and Development, 2018, 10(2): 134-151

[27] Fraser, A., S. Paterson, and M. Pelling. 2016. Developing frameworks to understand disaster causation: From forensic disaster investigation to risk root cause analysis. Journal of Extreme Events 3(2): Article 1650008.

[28] Fraser, A., M. Pelling, A. Scolobig, and S. Mavrogenis. 2020. Relating root causes to local risk conditions: A comparative study of the institutional pathways to small-scale disasters in three urban flood contexts. Global Environmental Change 63: Article 102102.

[29] French, A., R. Mechler, M. Arestegui, K. MacClune, and A. Cisneros. 2020. Root causes of recurrent catastrophe: The political ecology of El Niño-related disasters in Peru. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 47: Article 101539.

[30] Frigo B, Bartelt P, Chiaia B, Chiambretti I, Maggioni M. A reverse dynamical investigation of the catastrophic wood-snow avalanche of 18 January 2017 at Rigopiano, Gran Sasso National Park, Italy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(1): 40-55

[31] Geekiyanage, D., T. Fernando, and K. Keraminiyage. 2020. Assessing the state of the art in community engagement for participatory decision-making in disaster risk-sensitive urban development. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 51: Article 101847.

[32] Girard T, Wenzel F, Khazai B, Kunz-Plapp T, Daniell JE, Brink SA. Near-real-time analysis of publicly communicated disaster response information. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2014, 5(2): 165-175

[33] Huxley M, Inch A. Kitchin R, Thrift N. Urban planning. International encyclopedia of human geography, 2020, Amsterdam: Elsevier 87-92

[34] IRDR (Integrated Research on Disaster Risk). 2011. Forensic investigations of disasters: The FORIN Project. IRDR – FORIN Publication No. 1. Beijing: IRDR.

[35] Jiménez, M., and P. Mujica. 2003. Citizen participation and social cohesion (Participación Ciudadana y Cohesión Social). Santiago, Chile: Corporación PARTICIPA. http://www.participa.cl/archivos/participacionycohesion.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2021.

[36] Keating A, Venkateswaran K, Szoenyi M, MacClune K, Mechler R. From event analysis to global lessons: Disaster forensics for building resilience. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 16(7): 1603-1616

[37] Kitchenham, B., and S. Charters. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report EBSE-2007-001. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.

[38] Kwazu GC, Chang-Richards A. A tool to assess livelihood preparedness for disasters: A study of Kaikōura Earthquake in New Zealand. Natural Hazards, 2022, 113(1): 745-766

[39] Loli, M., S.A. Mitoulis, A. Tsatsis, J. Manousakis, R. Kourkoulis, and D. Zekkos. 2022. Flood characterization based on forensic analysis of bridge collapse using UAV reconnaissance and CFD simulations. Science of the Total Environment 822: Article 153661.

[40] Marchezini, V., F.E.A. Horita, P.M. Matsuo, R. Trajber, M.A. Trejo-Rangel, and D. Olivato. 2018. A review of studies on participatory early warning systems (P-EWS): Pathways to support citizen science initiatives. Frontiers in Earth Science 6: Article 184.

[41] McDermott, R., A. Fraser, J. Ensor, and H. Seddighi. 2022. The role of forensic investigation in systemic risk enquiry: Reflections from case studies of disasters in Istanbul, Kathmandu, Nairobi, and Quito. Progress in Disaster Science 16: Article 100262.

[42] McKinley J. The application of Geographic Information System (GIS) in forensics geoscience. Episodes, 2017, 40(2): 166-171

[43] Mendoza, M., and R. Schwarze. 2019. Sequential disaster forensics: A case study on direct and Socio-economic impacts. Sustainability 11(21): Article 5898.

[44] Mendoza, M.T. 2019. Forensic investigation of post-flood damage data to support spatial planning. https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/145774. Accessed 6 Nov 2021.

[45] Menoni S, Molinari D, Ballio F, Minucci G, Mejri O, Atun F, Berni N, Pandolfo C. Flood damage: A model for consistent, complete and multipurpose scenarios. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 16(12): 2783-2797

[46] Nakasu T, Ono Y, Pothisiri W. Forensic investigation of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami disaster: A case study of Rikuzentakata. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2017, 26(3): 298-313

[47] Nakasu T, Ono Y, Pothisiri W. Why did Rikuzentakata have a high death toll in the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami disaster? Finding the devastating disaster’s root causes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 27: 21-36

[48] Nakasu T, Miyamoto M, Bhula-or R, Mokkhamakkul T, Anantsuksomsri S, Amornkitvikai Y, Duangkaew S, Okazumi T. Finding the devastating economic disaster’s root causes of the 2011 flood in Thailand: Why did supply chains make the disaster worse?. Journal of Disaster Research, 2020, 15(5): 556-570

[49] Newmiller J, Walker W, Fleenor WE, Pinter N. Case study: Reconstructing the 2015 Dulcepamba River flood disaster. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 2020, 26(4): 393-404

[50] Oliver-Smith, A., I. Alcántara-Ayala, I. Burton, and A. Lavell. 2016. Forensic investigation of disasters (FORIN): A conceptual framework and guide to research. IRDR FORIN Publication No. 2. Beijing: Integrated Research on Disaster Risk.

[51] Oliver-Smith A, Alcántara-Ayala I, Burton I, Lavell A. The social construction of disaster risk: Seeking root causes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 22: 469-474

[52] Payo, A., R. Arnhardt, A.C.R. Galindo, P. Van Dong, M.A.L.G. Guzman, Y.O. Hatta, A. Bevan, and J.C.N. Monje. 2022. Developing an open database to support forensic investigation of disasters in South East Asia: FORINSEA v1.0. Frontiers in Earth Science 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.833599.

[53] Powell KR, Peterson SR. Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics. Nursing Outlook, 2017, 65(5): 572-578

[54] Prizzia R. Masys A. Climate change and disaster forensics. Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications, 2016, Berlin: Springer 223-247.

[55] Rana, I.A., M. Asim, A.B. Aslam, and A. Jamshed. 2021. Disaster management cycle and its application for flood risk reduction in urban areas of Pakistan. Urban Climate 38: Article 100893.

[56] Sawalha IH. A contemporary perspective on the disaster management cycle. Foresight, 2020, 22(4): 469-482

[57] Stolle, J., T. Takabatake, T. Mikami, T. Shibayama, N. Goseberg, I. Nistor, and E. Petriu. 2017. Experimental investigation of debris-induced loading in tsunami-like flood events. Geosciences 7(3): Article 74.

[58] Trajber R, Walker C, Marchezini V, Kraftl P, Olivato D, Hadfield-Hill S, Zara C, Fernandes Monteiro S. Promoting climate change transformation with young people in Brazil: Participatory action research through a looping approach. Action Research, 2019, 17(1): 87-107

[59] UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). n.d. Terminology. https://www.undrr.org/terminology. Accessed 10 Feb 2023.

[60] Venkateswaran, K., K. MacClune, A. Keating, and M. Szönyi. 2015. The PERC manual: Learning from disasters to build resilience: A simple guide to conducting a post event review. Zurich, Switzerland: Zurich Insurance Group.

[61] Venkateswaran, K., K. MacClune, A. Keating, and M. Szönyi. 2020. The PERC manual: Learning from disasters to build resilience: A guide to conducting a Post-Event Review 2020. https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/perc-manual-learning-disasters-build-resilience-guide-conducting-post-event-review-2020. Accessed 5 Oct 2023.

[62] Wenzel, D., F. Comes, F. Fortier, J. Geldermann, and T. Müller (eds.). 2013. Near real-time forensic disaster analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, May 2013, Baden-Baden, Germany.

[63] Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2004, London: Routledge

[64] Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I. Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I. Framing disaster: Theories and stories seeking to understand hazards, vulnerability and risk. The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction, 2012, London: Routledge 18-34

[65] Yuan F, Liu R. Crowdsourcing for forensic disaster investigations: Hurricane Harvey case study. Natural Hazards, 2018, 93(3): 1529-1546