Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Demographic Composition on Disaster Mortality: Community-Level Analysis for the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami

Abstract

On 11 March 2011, the Tohoku tsunami hit the northeastern region of Japan, causing massive damage to people and property. The tsunami was bigger than any other in Japan’s recorded history, but the damage varied by community. This research addressed the effects of socioeconomic status and demographic composition on mortality in the 2011 Tohoku tsunami using community-level data. These effects were estimated using regression analysis, taking into account a variety of potential contributing aspects at the community level, including strength of the tsunami, population characteristics, gender, age, education, household composition, evacuation methods, and occupation. It was found that the height of the tsunami and the shares of three-generation households and employees in the manufacturing industry are all positively correlated with tsunami mortality. The impacts of these factors on mortality are particularly large for the older adults.

Keywords

2011 Tohoku tsunami / Community-level analysis / Demographic composition / Disaster risk reduction / Mortality / Socioeconomic status

References

[1] Aida, J., H. Hikichi, Y. Matsuyama, Y. Sato, T. Tsuboya, T. Tabuchi, S. Koyama, S.V. Subramanian, et al. 2017. Risk of mortality during and after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami among older coastal residents. Science Reports 7: Article 16591.

[2] Aldrich DP, Sawada Y. The physical and social determinants of mortality in the 3.11 tsunami. Social Science & Medicine, 2015, 124: 66-75

[3] Cabinet Office. 2011a. Community-level survey on the evacuation from the Great East Japan Earthquake. http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/tsunami/hinan/pdf/20121221_chousa3_1.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2021 (in Japanese).

[4] Cabinet Office. 2011b. Report on the evacuation from the Great East Japan Earthquake. http://www.bousai.go.jp/kaigirep/chousakai/tohokukyokun/7/pdf/1.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2021 (in Japanese).

[5] Cabinet Office. 2011c. Web survey on the evacuation from the Great East Japan Earthquake: Cross tabulation results. http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/tsunami/hinan/pdf/20121221_chousa4_4.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2021 (in Japanese).

[6] Donner W, Rodríguez H. Population composition, migration and inequality: The influence of demographic changes on disaster risk and vulnerability. Social Forces, 2008, 87(2): 1089-1114

[7] Ear, J. 2017. Women’s role in disaster management and implications for national security. Honolulu, HI: Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep14031. Accessed 1 Aug 2021.

[8] Fackler, M. 2011. Tsunami warnings, written in stone. The New York Times, 20 April 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/world/asia/21stones.html. Accessed 24 Oct 2022.

[9] Frankenberg E, Gillespie T, Preston S, Sikoki B, Thomas D. Mortality, the family, and the Indian Ocean tsunami. Economic Journal, 2011, 121(554): F162-F182

[10] Frankenberg, E., B. Sikoki, C. Sumantri, W. Suriastini, and D. Thomas. 2013. Education, vulnerability, and resilience after a natural disaster. Ecology and Society 18(2): Article 16.

[11] Hashimoto A. The gift of generations: Japanese and American perspectives on aging and the social contract, 1996, New York: Cambridge University Press

[12] Ishiwatari, M., and M. Arakida. 2012. Knowledge note 2-6: Evacuation. In Knowledge notes, cluster 2: Nonstructural measures. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

[13] Kahn M. The death toll from natural disasters: The role of income, geography, and institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005, 87: 271-284

[14] KC, S. 2013. Community vulnerability to floods and landslides in Nepal. Ecology and Society 18(1): Article 8.

[15] King D. You’re on your own: Community vulnerability and the need for awareness and education for predictable natural disasters. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2000, 8(4): 223-228

[16] Koyano W. Filial piety and intergenerational solidarity in Japan. Australian Journal on Ageing, 1996, 15: 51-56

[17] Latcharote P, Leelawat N, Suppasri A, Thamarux P, Imamura F. Estimation of fatality ratios and investigation of influential factors in the 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 29: 37-54

[18] MacDonald R. How women were affected by the tsunami: A perspective from Oxfam. PLoS Medicine, 2005, 2(6): 474-475

[19] Martin M. Child participation in disaster risk reduction: The case of flood-affected children in Bangladesh. Third World Quarterly, 2010, 31(8): 1357-1375

[20] Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare White paper: Annual report on health and welfare, 2000, Tokyo: Gyosei

[21] Murosaki Y, Koda K. Cavitation phenomenon of disaster prevention by municipal merger, 2013, Tokyo: Minerva Shobo in Japanese

[22] Muttarak, R., and W. Lutz. 2014. Is education a key to reducing vulnerability to natural disasters and hence unavoidable climate change? Ecology and Society 19(1): Article 42.

[23] Plümper T, Quiroz Flores A, Neumayer E. The double-edged sword of learning from disasters: Mortality in the Tohoku tsunami. Global Environmental Change, 2017, 44: 49-56

[24] Rofi A, Doocy S, Robinson C. Tsunami mortality and displacement in Aceh Province Indonesia. Disasters, 2006, 30(3): 340-350

[25] Rodríguez, H., and C.N. Russell. 2006. Understanding disasters: Vulnerability, sustainable development, and resiliency. In Public sociologies reader, ed. J. Blau, and K. lyall-Smith, 193–212. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

[26] Seek P. Links between natural disasters, humanitarian assistance and disaster risk reduction: A critical perspective. Human Development Report 2007–2008, 2007, New York: United Nations Development Programme

[27] Sendai. 2012. Survey on the Great East Japan Earthquake. https://www.city.sendai.jp/kekaku/kurashi/anzen/saigaitaisaku/kanren/documents/houkokusyo3.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2021 (in Japanese).

[28] Shaw, R., M. Ishiwatari, and M. Arnold. 2012a. Knowledge note 2-1: Community-based disaster risk management. In Knowledge notes, cluster 2: Nonstructural measures. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

[29] Shaw, R., Y. Takeuchi, M. Arnold, and M. Arakida. 2012b. Knowledge note 2-3: The education sector. In Knowledge notes, cluster 2: Nonstructural measures. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

[30] Slovic P. Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics and sciences: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. The perception of risk, 2000, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd. 390-412.

[31] Suppasri, A., S. Koshimura, K. Imai, E. Mas, H. Gokon, A. Muhari, and F. Imamura. 2012. Damage characteristic and field survey of the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami in Miyagi Prefecture. Coastal Engineering Journal 54(1): Article 1250005.

[32] Takagi E, Silverstein M, Crimmins E. Intergenerational coresidence of older adults in Japan: Conditions for cultural plasticity. Journal of Gerontology, 2007, 62B(5): S330-S339

[33] TTJS (The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Joint Survey) Group Nationwide field survey of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake tsunami. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 2011, 67(1): 63-66.

[34] Wachtendorf T, Brown B, Nickle MC. Big bird, disaster masters, and students taking charge: The social capacities of children in disaster education. Children, Youth and Environments, 2008, 18(1): 456-469.

[35] Whitman S, Good G, Donoghue E, Benbow N, Shou W, Mou S. Mortality in Chicago attributed to the July 1995 heat wave. American Journal of Public Health, 1997, 87(9): 1515-1518

[36] Wisner B. Marginality and vulnerability: Why the homeless of Tokyo don’t “count” in disaster preparations. Applied Geography, 1998, 18(1): 25-33

[37] Ye, M., and D.P. Aldrich. 2019. Substitute or complement? How social capital, age and socioeconomic status interacted to impact mortality in Japan’s 3/11 tsunami. SSM Population Health 7: Article 100403.

[38] Yeh H. Gender and age factors in tsunami casualties. Natural Hazards Review, 2010, 11(1): 29-34