Disaster Risk Governance as Assemblage: The Chilean Framework of the 1985 San Antonio Earthquake

Daniela P. González

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6) : 878 -889.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6) : 878 -889. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-022-00453-y
Article

Disaster Risk Governance as Assemblage: The Chilean Framework of the 1985 San Antonio Earthquake

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze disaster risk governance through assemblage theory, identifying how—during the altered political context of a military regime with a centralized disaster risk management as in the case of Chile in 1985—new actors emerge during the disaster response phase as a de/reterritorialization effect that is influenced by their agencies and relationships, disfiguring the edges of the assemblage. Based on this conceptualization, it is possible to investigate the interactions between the different actors, their power relations, and their reconfigurations in the governance exercise. For this purpose, we reviewed the response phase of the 1985 San Antonio earthquake that affected the central zone of Chile, where strategic functions, institutions, and forms of power are concentrated. To describe and visualize the actors during the response phase in the disaster risk governance framework, a map of actors was developed that identifies the existing relationships and their different weights. The central scale proved to be dominant and occupied a political space that was transfigured by its overrepresentation—enforced by allies such as the banking system and business associations—enhancing a neoliberal agenda. The leaps in scale from the central scale to the local scale cancel agency of the last, destabilizing its capacity to deal with the effects of the earthquake and isolating it from the decision-making processes. Consequently, delays in providing aid demonstrate that authoritarian governments do not provide better management in the disaster response phase.

Keywords

Assemblage / Chile / Disaster response phase / Disaster risk governance / San Antonio earthquake

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Daniela P. González. Disaster Risk Governance as Assemblage: The Chilean Framework of the 1985 San Antonio Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(6): 878-889 DOI:10.1007/s13753-022-00453-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adey P, Anderson B, Graham S. Introduction: Governing emergencies: Beyond exceptionality. Theory, Culture & Society, 2015, 32(2): 3-17

[2]

Adger WN. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 268-281

[3]

Agamben G. State of exception (Estado de Excepción), 2005, Buenos Aires: AdrianaHidalgoeditora in Spanish

[4]

Albris K, Lauta KC, Raju E. Disaster knowledge gaps: Exploring the interface between science and policy for disaster risk reduction in Europe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(1): 1-12

[5]

Aldrich DP. Challenges to coordination: Understanding intergovernmental friction during disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2019, 10(3): 306-316

[6]

Allen J. The whereabouts of power: Politics, government and space. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 2004, 86(1): 19-32

[7]

Allen J, Cochrane A. Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antípode, 2010, 42(5): 1071-1089.

[8]

Anderson B, McFarlane C. Assemblage and geography. Area, 2011, 43(2): 124-127

[9]

Angell E. Assembling disaster: Earthquakes and urban politics in Istanbul. City, 2014, 18(6): 667-678

[10]

Baker T, McGuirk P. Assemblage thinking as methodology: Commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance, 2017, 5(4): 425-442

[11]

Blackburn S. The politics of scale and disaster risk governance: Barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica. Geoforum, 2014, 52: 101-112

[12]

Brenner N. Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 1999, 36(3): 431-451

[13]

Briassoulis H. Response assemblages and their socioecological fit: Conceptualizing human responses to environmental degradation. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2017, 7(2): 166-185

[14]

Cutter SL. Cutter S. Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Hazards, vulnerability and environmental justice, 2012, London: Routledge 71-82

[15]

DeLanda M. A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity, 2006, London: Continuum

[16]

Deleuze G, Guattari F. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (Mil Mesetas. Capitalismo y Ezquizofrenia), 1987, Valencia: Pre-textos in Spanish

[17]

Donovan A. Geopower: Reflections on the critical geography of disasters. Progress in Human Geography, 2017, 41(1): 44-67

[18]

Donovan A. When the vertical becomes horizontal: Experiencing exploding mountains in borderlands. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2020, 110(4): 1040-1058

[19]

Drury AC, Olson RS. Disasters and political unrest: An empirical investigation. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1998, 6(3): 153-161

[20]

Duda PI, Kelman I, Glick N. Informal disaster governance. Politics and Governance, 2020, 8(4): 375-385

[21]

Farías I. The politics of urban assemblages. City, 2011, 15(3–4): 365-374

[22]

Farías I. Misrecognizing tsunamis: Ontological politics and cosmopolitical challenges in early warning systems. The Sociological Review, 2014, 62(S1): 61-87

[23]

Farías I, Flores P. A different state of exception: Governing urban reconstruction in post-27F Chile. Urban Studies, 2017, 54(5): 1108-1125

[24]

Feely M. Assemblage analysis: An experimental new-materialist method for analysing narrative data. Qualitative Research, 2020, 20(2): 174-193

[25]

Forino G, Bonati S, Calandra LM. Forino G, Bonati S, Calandra LM. Governing risks, hazards and disasters in theory and practice: An introduction and overview of the book. Governance of risk, hazards and disasters: Trends in theory and practice, 2018 1 London: Routledge 1-7

[26]

Fuentes L, Orellana A. Metropolitan governance in Bogota and Santiago: Divergent institutionality, convergent outcomes (Gobernabilidad Metropolitana En Bogotá y Santiago: Institucionalidad Divergente, Resultados Convergentes). Ciudad y Territorio, 2013, 50(175): 113-128 in Spanish

[27]

Gaillard JC, Mercer J. From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 2013, 37(1): 93-114

[28]

Greenhough B. On the agencement of the academic geographer. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2012, 2(2): 202-206

[29]

Grove KJ. From emergency management to managing emergence: A genealogy of disaster management in Jamaica. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2013, 103(3): 570-588

[30]

Grove K. Agency, affect, and the immunological politics of disaster resilience. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2014, 32(2): 240-256

[31]

Guggenheim M. Introduction: Disasters as politics—Politics as disasters. Sociological Review, 2014, 62(1_suppl): 1-16

[32]

Hardt M, Negri A. Empire, 2000, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

[33]

Harvey D. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism and geography. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 1989, 71(1): 3-17

[34]

Harvey D. Spaces of capital. Towards a critical geography (Espacios Del Capital Hacia Una Geografía Crítica), 2007, Madrid: Ediciones Akal S.A. in Spanish

[35]

Jasanoff S. Epistemic subsidiarity—Coexistence, cosmopolitanism, constitutionalism. Transnational Risks and Multilevel Regulation, 2013, 4(2): 133-141

[36]

Jessop B. The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2000, 24(2): 323-360

[37]

Jessop B. Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antípode, 2002, 34(3): 452-472.

[38]

Jones S, Oven K, Manyena B, Aryal K. Governance struggles and policy processes in disaster risk reduction: A case study from Nepal. Geoforum, 2014, 57: 78-90

[39]

Jovita HD, Nurmandi A, Mutiarin D, Purnomo EP. Why does network governance fail in managing post-disaster conditions in the Philippines?. Jamba Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 2018, 10(1): 1-11.

[40]

Lawner M. Cares C, Imilan WA, Vergara P. Architects, from one earthquake to the next (Los Arquitectos, de Terremoto En Terremoto). Reconstruction(s) civil society (Reconstrucción(Es) Sociedad Civil), 2011, Punjab: INVI 127-150 in Spanish

[41]

Li TM. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 2007, 36(2): 263-293

[42]

McFarlane C. Rethinking informality: Politics, crisis, and the city. Planning, Theory & Practice, 2012, 13(1): 89-108

[43]

McFarlane C, Silver J. Navigating the city: Dialectics of everyday urbanism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2017, 42(3): 458-471

[44]

McGowran P, Donovan A. Assemblage theory and disaster risk management. Progress in Human Geography, 2021, 45(6): 1601-1624

[45]

Meriläinen, E. 2020. Urban disaster governance: Resilience and rights in the unequal city. Doctoral thesis, Hanken School of Economics. Helsinki.

[46]

Meriläinen ES, Fougère M, Piotrowicz W. Refocusing urban disaster governance on marginalised urban people through right to the city. Environmental Hazards, 2020, 19(2): 187-208

[47]

Nail T. What is an assemblage?. Sub-Stance, 2017, 46(1): 21-37.

[48]

Navarro A. The Chilean press system under military rule (El Sistema de Prensa En Chile Bajo El Gobierno Militar (1973–1984)), 1985 1 Santiago: CENECA in Spanish

[49]

Neisser FM. “Riskscapes” and risk management—Review and synthesis of an actor-network theory approach. Risk Management, 2014, 16(2): 88-120

[50]

Ong A. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty, 2006, Durham: Duke University Press

[51]

Peck J, Theodore N, Brenner N. Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 2009, 29(1): 49-66

[52]

Pelling M, Dill K. “Natural” disasters as catalysts of political action. ISP/NSC briefing paper 06/01, 2006, London: Chatham House

[53]

Pelling M, Dill K. Disaster politics: Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Progress in Human Geography, 2010, 34(1): 21-37

[54]

Pierre J. Models of urban governance: The institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 1999, 34(3): 17-20

[55]

Quezada, J., K. Bataille, and G. González. 2005. The effect of subduction earthquakes on the coastal configuration of northern Chile. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics (ISAG 2005), Barcelona, 578–581.

[56]

Renn O. Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world, 2008, London: Earthscan

[57]

Rodríguez J. Evolution of the population of Greater Santiago: Trends, perspectives and consequences (Evolución de La Población Del Gran Santiago: Tendencias, Perspectivas y Consecuencias). Notas de Población, 1993, 58: 95-184 in Spanish

[58]

Sandoval V, Sarmiento JP. A neglected issue: Informal settlements, urban development, and disaster risk reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2020, 29(5): 731-745

[59]

Sandoval V, Voss M. Disaster governance and vulnerability: The case of Chile. Politics and Governance, 2016, 4(4): 107-116

[60]

Sandoval V, Voss M. Forino G, Bonati S, Calandra LM. Multi-scalar disaster governance and vulnerability in Chile. Governance of risk, hazards and disasters, 2018, London: Routledge 27-42

[61]

Sandoval V, Gonzalez-Muzzio C, Villalobos C, Sarmiento JP, Hoberman G. Assessing disaster capitalism in post-disaster processes in Chile: Neoliberal reforms and the role of the corporate class. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2020, 29(6): 831-847

[62]

Sandoval V, Wisner B, Voss M. Miao Q. Natural hazards governance in Chile. Oxford research encyclopedia of natural hazard science, 2021, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[63]

Siddiqi A, Canuday JJP. Stories from the frontlines: Decolonising social contracts for disasters. Disasters, 2018, 42(S2): S215-S238

[64]

Stoker G. Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 1998, 68(227–228): 15-24.

[65]

Swyngedouw E, Moulaert F, Rodríguez A. Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 2002, 34(3): 542-577

[66]

Tierney K. Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2012, 37: 341-363

[67]

Tironi M. Atmospheres of indagation: Disasters and the politics of excessiveness. The Sociological Review, 2014, 62(1): 114-134

[68]

Van Wezemael J. The contribution of assemblage theory and minor politics for democratic network governance. Planning Theory, 2008, 7(2): 165-185

[69]

Walker J, Cooper M. Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 2011, 42(2): 143-160

[70]

Wanner MST. Drivers of change in national disaster governance under the Hyogo Framework for Action. Politics and Governance, 2020, 8(4): 256-269

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

174

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/