Toward Interoperable Multi-hazard Modeling: A Disaster Management System for Disaster Model Service Chain
Wenyu Jiang , Fei Wang , Xiaocui Zheng , Xinxin Zheng , Xiaohui Qiao , Xin Li , Qingxiang Meng
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6) : 862 -877.
Toward Interoperable Multi-hazard Modeling: A Disaster Management System for Disaster Model Service Chain
A natural hazard-related disaster event often causes a series of secondary disasters, forming a disaster chain. Modeling the evolution of disaster chains in multi-hazard scenarios is crucial for risk governance and urban resilience. However, existing multi-hazard models are limited by complex model design and fixed disaster types, making it impossible to ensure flexible reactions to complex and diverse scenarios. This study presents a disaster management system for disaster model service chain (DMSC) to implement interoperable multi-hazard modeling. To achieve efficient model interaction in the DMSC, a management module is designed to normalize heterogeneous single-hazard models based on disaster system theory and the Open Geospatial Consortium standards, enabling them to be accessible, reusable, and interoperable. The normalized models are then adaptively orchestrated through an orchestration module to establish optimal executable DMSCs for different multi-hazard scenarios. Taking an earthquake disaster chain as a case study, we demonstrate that the disaster management system shows stable and flexible performance for multi-hazard modeling.
Disaster management / Disaster chain / Model interoperability / Multi-hazard modeling / Service orchestration
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Chisty, M.A., M. Muhtasim, F.J. Biva, S.E.A. Dola, and N.A. Khan. 2022. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction (SFDRR) and disaster management policies in Bangladesh: How far we have come to make communities resilient? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 76: Article 103039. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Ding, Y. 2016. Hydrological changes driven storm flood disaster simulation method. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 45(2): Article 252. |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Gao, S.S., C.M. Sperberg-McQueen, and H. Thompson. 2012. W3C XML schema definition language (XSD) 1.1 part 1: Structures. https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/. Accessed 7 Oct 2022. |
| [12] |
Gui, Z., H. Wu, W. Liu, and Y. Chen. 2009. The research on QoS assessment and optimization for geospatial service chain. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics (Geoinformatics 2009), 12–14 August 2009, Fairfax, Virginia, USA. |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
Jiang, W., F. Wang, L. Fang, X. Zheng, X. Qiao, Z. Li, and Q. Meng. 2021. Modelling of wildland-urban interface fire spread with the heterogeneous cellular automata model. Environmental Modelling & Software 135: Article 104895. |
| [16] |
Jiang, W., F. Wang, Q. Meng, Z. Li, B. Liu, and X. Zheng. 2018. Improving the interoperability of disaster models: A case study of proposing FireML for forest fire model. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-3: 673–677. |
| [17] |
Jonatan, H., B. Carl, H. Joakim, and H. Hugo. 2021. Locust. https://www.locust.io/. Accessed 24 Jun 2021. |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Murata, A. 2021. Cultural aspects as a root cause of organizational failure in risk and crisis management in the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Safety Science 135: Article 105091. |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Purwar, D., R. Sliuzas, and J. Flacke. 2020. Assessment of cascading effects of typhoons on water and sanitation services: A case study of informal settlements in Malabon, Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 51: Article 101755. |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Sakahira, F., and U. Hiroi. 2021. Designing cascading disaster networks by means of natural language processing. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 66: Article 102623. |
| [30] |
Samadzadegan, F., M. Saber, H. Zahmatkesh, and J.G. Khanlou. 2013. An architecture for automated fire detection early warning system based on geoprocessing service composition. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-1/W3: 351–355. |
| [31] |
Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., J. Godwin, T. Pfaff, R. Ying, J. Leskovec, and P.W. Battaglia. 2020. Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2020), 13–18 July 2020, Vienna, Austria. |
| [32] |
Shakeri, E., B. Vizvari, and R. Nazerian. 2021. Comparative analysis of disaster management between India and Nigeria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 63: Article 102448. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Skilodimou, H.D., G.D. Bathrellos, K. Chousianitis, A.M. Youssef, and B. Pradhan. 2019. Multi-hazard assessment modeling via multi-criteria analysis and GIS: A case study. Environmental Earth Sciences 78(2): Article 47. |
| [39] |
Stollberg, B, and A. Zipf. 2007. OGC web processing service interface for web service orchestration aggregating geo-processing services in a bomb threat scenario. In Proceedings of Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems: 7th International Symposium, 28–29 November 2007, Cardiff, UK. |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Yang, M., S. Xiong, Y. Cao, Z. Ling, Y. Liu, and Y. Xie. 2020. Landslide hazard evaluation based on linear rupture plane method. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2019), 20–22 December 2019, Guilin, China. |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |