On the Meaning of Impact in Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract

This article offers a discussion of the meaning, assessment, and measurement of impact in disaster risk reduction. It begins with a historical perspective on the impact of learned work in times when orthodoxy posed severe limits on the impact of new thinking. Regarding the modern age, the article explains why impact is considered important and how it might be recognized when it occurs, including a tentative classification of types of impact. The question of whether impact can truly be measured remains pending, as the answer is diffuse and dependent on many different circumstances. Further sections consider the relationship between impact and mainstreaming and the question of whether a piece of work should be regarded as having impact if its effects are negative rather than positive. Next, impact is considered in terms of whom it benefits. Given the large number of possible reservations about the concept, the question is raised as to whether too much emphasis is given to the impact of research and scholarship. Finally, some suggestions are offered regarding how to obtain a better indication of what the impact of an academic study actually is.

Keywords

Assessing impact / Disaster risk reduction / Disruptive thinking / Impact of research / Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction / Measuring impact

References

[1] Abrahamson E. Necessary conditions for the study of fads and fashions in science. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2009, 25(2): 235-239

[2] ADPC/USAID (Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre / US Agency for International Development) Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction, 2010, Bangkok and Washington, DC: ADPC/USAID

[3] Affatigato, C. 2019. A closer look to Leonardo Da Vinci’s mirror writing. Auralcrave, 5 March 2019. https://auralcrave.com/en/2019/03/05/a-closer-look-to-leonardo-da-vincis-mirror-writing/ . Accessed 8 Sept 2022.

[4] Aitsi-Selmi A, Murray V, Wannous C, Dickinson C, Johnston D, Kawasaki A, Stevance A-S, Yeung T. Reflections on a science and technology agenda for 21st century disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(1): 1-29

[5] Aldrich DP. Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery, 2012, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[6] Alexander, D. 2020. Building emergency planning scenarios for viral pandemics: UCL-IRDR Covid-19 observatory. Working paper 2020-01. London: Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London.

[7] Aronsson-Storrier M. Sendai five years on: Reflections on the role of international law in the creation and reduction of disaster risk. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(2): 230-238

[8] Benson C, Twigg J, Rossetto T. Tools for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction: Guidance notes for development organisations, 2007, Geneva: ProVention Consortium

[9] Bird A. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and its significance: An essay review of the fiftieth anniversary. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 2012, 63(4): 859-883

[10] Boonmee C, Arimura M, Asada T. Facility location optimization model for emergency humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 24: 485-498

[11] Burton, I. 2018. A world of disasters: Knowing more and losing more. Research Counts, 10 June 2018. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Centre, University of Colorado. https://hazards.colorado.edu/news/research-counts/a-world-of-disasters-knowing-more-and-losing-more. Accessed 29 Jun 2022.

[12] Casadevall A, Fang FC. Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania. mio, 2014, 5(2): Article 00064-14

[13] Currie A, Ó hÉigeartaigh A. Working together to face humanity’s greatest threats: Introduction to the future of research on catastrophic and existential risk. Futures, 2018, 102: 1-5

[14] Derrida J. Spectres of Marx: State of the debt, the work of mourning and the new international, 1994, Abingdon: Routledge

[15] du Maurier D. The “Rebecca” notebook: And other memories, 1981, New York: Little, Brown

[16] Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man, 1992, New York: Free Press

[17] Haynes, P. 2009. Before going any further with social capital: Eight key criticisms to address. Ingenio Working Paper no. 2009/02. Ingenio (CSIC-UPV). Valencia, Spain: Polytechnic University of Valencia.

[18] Herries Davies GL. Tinkler K. On the nature of geo-history, with reflections on the historiography of geomorphology. The history of geomorphology: From Hutton to Hack, Binghamton Symposia in Geomorphology, International Series no. 19, 1989, London: Routledge 1-10.

[19] Hewitt K. Hewitt K. The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology, 1983, London: Unwin-Hyman 3-32.

[20] Horton R. The Covid-19 catastrophe: What’s gone wrong and how to stop it happening again, 2021 2 CambridgeUK: Polity Press

[21] Huntington S. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order, 1996, New York: Simon and Schuster

[22] Keating A, Hanger-Kopp S. Practitioner perspectives of disaster resilience in international development. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 42: Article 01355

[23] Kemp M. Leonardo da Vinci: The marvellous works of nature and man, 2007, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[24] Laville, S. 2021. G7 nations committing billions more to fossil fuel than green energy. The Guardian, 2 June 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/02/g7-nations-committing-billions-more-to-fossil-fuel-than-green-energy. Accessed 17 Aug 2022.

[25] Lewis J, Kelman I. The good, the bad and the ugly: Disaster risk reduction (DRR) versus disaster risk creation (DRC). PloS Currents, 2012, 4: Article e4f8d4eaec6af8

[26] Lo B, Field MJ. Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice, 2009, Washington, DC: National Academies Press

[27] Mayr E. When is historiography Whiggish?. Journal of the History of Ideas, 1990, 51(2): 301-309

[28] Nigg W. The heretics: Heresy through the ages, 1990, New York: Hippocrene Books

[29] Pedretti C. Leonardo da Vinci: The complete works, 2006, Newton Abbott: David and Charles

[30] Quarantelli EL. Problematical aspects of the information/communication revolution for disaster planning and research: Ten non-technical issues and questions. Disaster Prevention and Management, 1997, 6(2): 94-106

[31] Quintavalla A, Heine K. Priorities and human rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 2019, 23(4): 679-697

[32] Schenkerman S. Inducement of nonexistent order by the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Sciences, 2007, 28(2): 475-482

[33] Sen AK. Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy, 1999, 10(3): 3-17

[34] Shrady N. The last day: Wrath, ruin, and reason in the Great Lisbon Earthquake of 1755, 2009, London: Viking Penguin

[35] Sikorav J. The utility of scientific papers. Scientometrics, 1991, 21(1): 49-68

[36] Stock B. Antiqui and moderni as “giants” and “dwarfs”: A reflection of popular culture?. Modern Philology, 1979, 76(4): 370-374

[37] Sudmeier-Rieux KI. Resilience: An emerging paradigm of danger or of hope?. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2014, 23(1): 67-80

[38] Tacitus C. The histories, 2009, Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics

[39] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, 2015, Geneva: UNISDR

[40] Vollmer H. The sociology of disruption, disaster and social change: Punctuated cooperation, 2013, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[41] Whitmarsh L. Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 2011, 21(2): 690-700

[42] Wilson PH. The thirty years war: Europe’s tragedy, 2011, Cambridge: Belknap Press

[43] Woodcock BA. “The scientific method” as myth and ideal. Science and Education, 2014, 23(10): 2069-2093