Is Being Funny a Useful Policy? How Local Governments’ Humorous Crisis Response Strategies and Crisis Responsibilities Influence Trust, Emotions, and Behavioral Intentions

Abstract

This study is the first to investigate how a local government’s humorously framed response strategy on social media to a low-severity crisis influences people’s trust in the local government and their crisis-related behavioral intentions, specifically when considering the government’s responsibility for the crisis. Based on the situational crisis communication theory, we examined the mediating role of experienced positive or negative affect on people’s responses to a local government’s crisis communication strategy. Further, we exploratorily examined the predictive power and moderating role of demographics, sense of humor, disposition to trust, and the respective crisis scenarios. A total of 517 people participated in an online experiment in which they were confronted with three randomly presented fictive crisis scenarios where the local government’s crisis responsibility (high versus low) and the framing of their crisis response strategy (in form of humorous versus rational Twitter posts) were systematically varied between subjects. First, the results mostly corroborate earlier findings about the degree of crisis responsibility (that is, when a government’s crisis responsibility is high, people have less trust and behavioral intentions) and about the mediating role of experienced affect. Second, we found that humorously framed strategies negatively influence trust and positive affect (but not behavioral intentions). In contrast to earlier findings, the crisis responsibility × framing interaction was not significant. Altogether, the results advise against using humor in crisis communications on social media, even in low-severity crisis. Exploratory analyses indicate that further investigations should focus on specific crisis characteristics and potential moderators.

Keywords

Affect / Crisis communication / Crisis responsibility / Humor / Situational crisis communication theory / Social media

References

[1] Avidar R. How a politician can successfully use self-humor and apply public relations principles online: An Israeli case study. Israeli Journal of Human Research, 2012, 1: 1-16.

[2] Bakker MH, van Bommel M, Kerstholt JH, Giebels E. The influence of accountability for the crisis and type of crisis communication on people’s behavior, feelings and relationship with the government. Public Relations Review, 2018, 44(2): 277-286

[3] Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Funder DC. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2007, 2(4): 396-403

[4] Beierlein C, Kemper C, Kovaleva AJ, Rammstedt B. Interpersonal trust (Interpersonales Vertrauen) (KUSIV3). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS), 2014

[5] Bitterly TB. Humor and power. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2022, 43: 125-128

[6] Choi Y, Lin Y-H. Consumer responses to Mattel product recalls posted on online bulletin boards: Exploring two types of emotion. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2009, 21(2): 198-207

[7] Choudhary A, Hendrix W, Lee K, Palsetia D, Liao W-K. Social media evolution of the Egyptian revolution. Communications of the ACM, 2012, 55(5): 74-80

[8] Claeys A-S, Opgenhaffen M. Why practitioners do (not) apply crisis communication theory in practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2016, 28(5–6): 232-247

[9] Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 1988 2 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

[10] Coombs WT. An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 1998, 10(3): 177-191

[11] Coombs WT. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding, 1999, Los Angeles, CA: Sage

[12] Coombs WT. Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 2007, 10(3): 163-176

[13] Coombs WT, Holladay SJ. Ashkanasy NM, Zerbe WJ, Härtel CEJ. An exploratory study of stakeholder emotions: Affect and crises. Research on emotion in organizations, 2005, Emerald: Bingley 263-280.

[14] Coombs WT, Holladay SJ. The negative communication dynamic: Exploring the impact of stakeholder affect on behavioral intentions. Journal of Communication Management, 2007, 11(4): 300-312

[15] Coombs WT, Holladay JS. The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Review, 2012, 38(3): 408-415

[16] Eisend M. A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2009, 37(2): 191-203

[17] Eisend M. How humor in advertising works: A meta-analytic test of alternative models. Marketing Letters, 2011, 22(2): 115-132

[18] Fearn-Banks K. Crisis communications, 2002 2 Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

[19] Fraustino JD, Ma L. CDC’s use of social media and humor in a risk campaign—“Preparedness 101: Zombie apocalypse”. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 2015, 43(2): 222-241

[20] Fredrickson BL, Tugade MM, Waugh CE, Larkin GR. What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 84(2): 365-376

[21] Grappi S, Romani S. Company post-crisis communication strategies and the psychological mechanism underlying consumer reactions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2015, 27(1): 22-45

[22] Gulas CS, Weinberger MG. Humor in advertising: A comprehensive analysis, 2006, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe

[23] Hirschfeld G, Thielsch M. Impact of crisis communication strategies on people’s attitudes toward behavioral guidelines regarding COVID-19 and on their trust in local officials. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022

[24] Honisch SV, Más Manchón L. The effects of paracrisis origin and response strategy on Facebook audience’s perceived organisational reputation and behavioural intentions. Corporate Reputation Review, 2020, 23(3): 133-144

[25] Jahng MR, Hong S. How should you tweet? The effect of crisis response voices, strategy, and prior brand attitude in social media crisis communication. Corporate Reputation Review, 2017, 20(2): 147-157

[26] Kelleher T. Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 2009, 59(1): 172-188

[27] Kim HK, Niederdeppe J. The role of emotional response during an H1N1 influenza pandemic on a college campus. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2013, 25(1): 30-50

[28] Kim S, Zhang XA, Zhang BW. Self-mocking crisis strategy on social media: Focusing on Alibaba chairman Jack Ma in China. Public Relations Review, 2016, 42(5): 903-912

[29] Lee BK. Audience-oriented approach to crisis communication: A study of Hong Kong consumers’ evaluation of an organizational crisis. Communication Research, 2004, 31(5): 600-618

[30] Liu BF, Jin Y, Austin LL. The tendency to tell: Understanding publics’ communicative responses to crisis information form and source. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2013, 25(1): 51-67

[31] Liu BF, Jin Y, Briones R, Kuch B. Managing turbulence in the blogosphere: Evaluating the blog-mediated crisis communication model with the American Red Cross. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2012, 24(4): 353-370

[32] Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 2001, 127(2): 267-286

[33] Ma L, Zhan M. Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2016, 28(2): 102-119

[34] Martin RA. The psychology of humor: An integrative approach, 2007 1 Burlington, MA: Elsevier

[35] Martin RA, Puhlik-Doris P, Larsen G, Gray J, Weir K. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 2003, 37(1): 48-75

[36] Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 709-734

[37] McDonald LM, Sparks B, Glendon AI. Stakeholder reactions to company crisis communication and causes. Public Relations Review, 2010, 36(3): 263-271

[38] Meade AW, Craig SB. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 2012, 17(3): 437-455

[39] Moyer-Gusé E, Mahood C, Brookes S. Entertainment-education in the context of humor: Effects on safer sex intentions and risk perceptions. Health Communication, 2011, 26(8): 765-774

[40] Nabi RL, Moyer-Gusé E, Byrne S. All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 2007, 74(1): 29-54

[41] NSW Police Force. n.d. Tweets [Twitter profile]. https://twitter.com/nswpolice/?lang=en. Accessed 29 May 2022.

[42] Olsson E-K. Crisis communication in public organisations: Dimensions of crisis communication revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2014, 22(2): 113-125

[43] Park, J., M. Cha, H. Kim, and J. Jeong. 2012. Managing bad news in social media: A case study on Domino’s pizza crisis. In Proceedings of the Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 4–7 June 2012, Dublin, Ireland.

[44] Pearson CM, Clair JA. Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(1): 59-76

[45] Questback GmbH EFS survey, version summer 2017, 2017, Köln: Questback GmbH

[46] Raghunathan R, Pham MT, Corfman KP. Informational properties of anxiety and sadness, and displaced coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 2006, 32(4): 596-601

[47] Randler C, Weber V. Positive and negative affect during the school day and its relationship to morningness-eveningness. Biological Rhythm Research, 2015, 46(5): 683-690

[48] Rasmussen J. “Welcome to Twitter, @CIA: Better late than never”: Communication professionals’ views of social media humour and implications for organizational identity. Discourse & Communication, 2017, 11(1): 89-110

[49] Rubin GJ, Amlot R, Page L, Wessely S. Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: Cross sectional telephone survey. BMJ, 2009, 339: Article b2651

[50] Schultz F, Utz S, Göritz A. Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via Twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 2011, 37(1): 20-27

[51] Skurka C, Niederdeppe J, Romero-Canyas R, Acup D. Pathways of influence in emotional appeals: Benefits and tradeoffs of using fear or humor to promote climate change-related intentions and risk perceptions. Journal of Communication, 2018, 68(1): 169-193

[52] Steelman TA, McCaffrey S. Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management. Natural Hazards, 2013, 65(1): 683-705

[53] Sturges DL. Communicating through crisis: A strategy for organizational survival. Management Communication Quarterly, 1994, 7(3): 297-316

[54] Svebak S. The sense of humor questionnaire: Conceptualization and review of 40 years of findings in empirical research. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 2010, 6(3): 288-310

[55] Svebak S, Martin RA, Holmen J. The prevalence of sense of humor in a large, unselected county population in Norway: Relations with age, sex, and some health indicators. Humor—International Journal of Humor Research, 2004, 17(1–2): 121-134.

[56] Thielsch MT, Kirsch J, Thölking H, Tangelder L, Lamers C. Fight or flight? Behaviour and experiences of laypersons in the face of an incipient fire. Ergonomics, 2021, 64(2): 149-170

[57] Thompson ER. Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2007, 38(2): 227-242

[58] Tropicana. 2020. Twitter, 16 December 2020. https://twitter.com/Tropicana/status/1339006804022456321?s=20&t=eI_gQyKXycUVAG37-VC4lg. Accessed 6 Jun 2022.

[59] Utz S, Schultz F, Glocka S. Crisis communication online: How medium, crisis type and emotions affected public reactions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Public Relations Review, 2013, 39(1): 40-46

[60] Vigsø O. Ironic crisis communication?. Nordicom Review, 2013, 34(2): 123-134

[61] Wang Y, Wanjek L. How to fix a lie? The formation of Volkswagen’s post-crisis reputation among the German public. Corporate Reputation Review, 2018, 21(2): 84-100

[62] Warren C, McGraw AP. Opinion: What makes things humorous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(23): 7105-7106

[63] Weyrich P, Scolobig A, Walther F, Patt A. Responses to severe weather warnings and affective decision-making. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020, 20(10): 2811-2821

[64] Xiao Y, Cauberghe V, Hudders L. Humour as a double-edged sword in response to crises versus rumours: The effectiveness of humorously framed crisis response messages on social media. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2018, 26(2): 247-260

[65] Yoon HJ, Tinkham SF. Humorous threat persuasion in advertising: The effects of humor, threat intensity, and issue involvement. Journal of Advertising, 2013, 42(1): 30-41