Status and Social Capital: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Investigation of Flood Survivors in South Punjab, Pakistan

Muhammad Siddique Akbar , Muhammad Rizwan Safdar , Farhan Navid Yousaf , Daniel P. Aldrich

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 549 -560.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 549 -560. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-022-00427-0
Article

Status and Social Capital: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Investigation of Flood Survivors in South Punjab, Pakistan

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A growing body of evidence underscores that social capital mitigates the impact of natural hazards such as floods. But we know less about the distribution of social ties in developing countries regularly hit by shocks. Our study examined the differences between demographic groups in South Punjab, Pakistan affected by the 2010 floods, comparing respondents’ levels of social capital measured through proxies such as received social support, perceived community cohesion, accessibility to leadership, and general level of trust. We carried out univariate and multivariate analyses of factors including gender, education, occupation, landholding, family size, annual income, number of livestock, and home stability. Using data collected in face-to-face interviews with 450 flood survivors, our analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the flood victims’ scores on all four scales based on gender and family size. However, education, occupation, landholding, annual income, and home stability statistically correlated with levels of social capital. Respondents with high levels of education, high levels of land, higher home stability, and a government job typically had higher scores in all four measurements of social ties. Our results show strong inequality in the distribution of social capital, with better connections and assistance coming to those who already have better socioeconomic positions in society.

Keywords

Flood survivors / Pakistan / Social capital / South Punjab

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Muhammad Siddique Akbar, Muhammad Rizwan Safdar, Farhan Navid Yousaf, Daniel P. Aldrich. Status and Social Capital: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Investigation of Flood Survivors in South Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(4): 549-560 DOI:10.1007/s13753-022-00427-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abdul-Hakim R, Abdul-Razak NA, Ismail R. Does social capital reduce poverty? A case study of rural households in Terengganu, Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2010, 14(4): 556-566.

[2]

Abramson DM, Stehling-Ariza T, Park YS, Walsh L, Culp D. Measuring individual disaster recovery: A socioecological framework. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2010, 4(S1): S56-S54

[3]

Adger WN. Social and ecological resilience: Are they related?. Progress in Human Geography, 2000, 24(3): 347-364

[4]

Adler FK. Natural disasters as a catalyst for social capital: A study of the 500-year flood in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 2008, Lanham, MD: University Press of America

[5]

Akbar MS, Aldrich DP. Flood damage and victims’ perceptions about political leadership. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2016, 6(4): 329-343

[6]

Akbar MS, Aldrich DP. Determinants of post-flood social and institutional trust among disaster victims. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2017, 25(4): 279-288

[7]

Akbar MS, Aldrich DP. Social capital’s role in recovery: Evidence from communities affected by the 2010 Pakistan floods. Disasters, 2018, 42(3): 475-497

[8]

Akbar MS, Bhutta MH, Hashmi N, Khan AM, Afzaal A. Flood experience and victims’ perceptions about community cohesion. International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 2020, 11(1): 2181-2195.

[9]

Akram, S., and O. Aijazi. 2010. Rapid assessment report of flood-affected communities in Muzaffargarh District, Punjab, Pakistan. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/24E2D643A00C38E34925778600836155-Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.

[10]

Alam-Chowdhary, M.J. 2011. Social cohesion and natural disaster loss recovery of households: Experience from Bangladesh. https://www.oecd.org/dev/pgd/46988916.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2013.

[11]

Albrecht F. Natural hazard events and social capital: The social impact of natural disasters. Disasters, 2018, 42(2): 336-360

[12]

Aldrich DP. Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery, 2012, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[13]

Aldrich DP. Black wave: How networks and governance shaped Japan’s 3/11 disasters, 2019, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[14]

Aldrich DP, Meyer MA. Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 2015, 59(2): 254-269

[15]

Aldrich DP, Meyer MA, Page-Tan CM. Aldrich DP, Meyer MA. Social capital and natural hazards governance. Oxford research encyclopedia, 2018, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[16]

Beckett, J.V., S. Wilkinson, and P. Potangaroa. 2010. Post-disaster recovery: Multiagency leadership and coordination. Paper presented at the 2010 Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, 2–3 September 2010, Paris, France.

[17]

Bourdieu P. Richardson JG. The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, 1986, Westport, CT: Greenwood 241-258.

[18]

Casagrande DG, McIlvaine-Newsad H, Jones EC. Social networks of help-seeking in different types of disaster responses to the 2008 Mississippi river floods. Human Organization, 2015, 74(4): 351-361

[19]

Calo-Blanco, A., J. Kovářík, F. Mengel, and J.G. Romero. 2017. Natural disasters and indicators of social cohesion. PLoS ONE 12 (6): Article e0176885.

[20]

Chua V, Ng IY. Unequal returns to social capital: The study of Malays in Singapore through a network lens. Asian Ethnicity, 2015, 16(4): 480-497

[21]

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 1988 2 New York: Academic Press

[22]

Daubon RE, Saunders HH. Operationalizing social capital: A strategy to enhance communities’ “capacity to concert”. International Studies Perspectives, 2002, 3(2): 176-191

[23]

District Police Office. 2015. Muzaffargarh District Overview. https://dpomzg.punjabpolice.gov.pk/district_overview. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.

[24]

Elliott JR, Sams-Abiodun P. Limits to social capital: Comparing network assistance in two New Orleans neighborhoods devastated by hurricane Katrina. Sociological Quarterly, 2010, 51: 624-648

[25]

Farid S, Abbasi S-U-R. Structure of Punjab and social reproduction: Role of capital. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 2019, 39(4): 1811-1822.

[26]

Farid S, Abbasi S-U-R, Akram MB. An assessment of class reproduction theory in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 2020, 14(1): 15-27.

[27]

Farid S, Abbasi SURS, Mahmood QK. Modelling Bourdieusian social reproduction theory. Social Indicators Research, 2021, 157(1): 297-333

[28]

FFC (Federal Flood Commission). 2010. Annual flood report 2010. https://mowr.gov.pk/SiteImage/Misc/files/2010%20Annual%20Flood%20Report%20of%20FFC(1).pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.

[29]

Fluker WE. Needed: Ethical leadership in the aftermath of Katrina. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 2005, 22(17): 33-35.

[30]

Gould, E.D., and A. Hijzen. 2016. Growing apart, losing trust? The Impact of Inequality on Social Capital. IMF Working paper 16/176. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

[31]

Griffin, C. 2009. Gender and social capital: Social networks post-disaster. Working paper. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.458.5202&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.

[32]

Han Z, Wang H, Du Q, Zeng Y. Natural hazards preparedness in Taiwan: A comparison between households with and without disabled members. Health Security, 2017, 15(6): 575-581

[33]

Haq R, Ali A. Development disparities and peculiarities: An empirical investigation. Social Indicators Research, 2014, 115(2): 715-729

[34]

Hudson, P., M. Pham, L. Hagedoorn, A. Thieken, R. Lasage, and P. Bubeck. 2021. Self‐stated recovery from flooding: Empirical results from a survey in Central Vietnam. Journal of Flood Risk Management 14 (1): Article e12680.

[35]

Inaba Y. Social capital and income-wealth gap: An empirical analysis in Japan. The Nonprofit Review, 2008, 8(1): 1-12.

[36]

Irshad H, Mumtaz Z, Levay A. Long-term gendered consequences of permanent disabilities caused by the 2005 Pakistan earthquake. Disasters, 2012, 36(3): 452-464

[37]

Joshi A, Aoki M. The role of social capital and public policy in disaster recovery: A case study of Tamil Nadu State, India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2013, 7: 100-108

[38]

Jovita HD, Nashir H, Mutiarin D, Moner Y, Nurmandi A. Social capital and disasters: How does social capital shape post-disaster conditions in the Philippines?. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2019, 29(4): 519-534

[39]

Kaniasty K. Predicting social psychological well-being following trauma: The role of postdisaster social support. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 2012, 4(1): 22-33

[40]

Kaniasty K, Norris FH. Mobilization and deterioration of social support following natural disasters. Current Directions in Psychological Research, 1995, 4(3): 94-98

[41]

Kaniasty K, Norris FH. Help-seeking comfort and receiving social support: The role of ethnicity and context of need. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2000, 28(4): 545-581

[42]

Kaniasty K, Norris FH. Ursano RJ, Norwood AE, Fullerton CS. Social support in the aftermath of disasters, catastrophes, and acts of terrorism: Altruistic, overwhelmed, uncertain, antagonistic, and patriotic communities. Bioterrorism: Psychological and public health interventions, 2004, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 200-229.

[43]

Kelly M. Leading in a crisis. Executive Excellence, 2004, 21(10): 4-4.

[44]

Krishna A. Understanding, measuring and utilizing social capital: Clarifying concepts and presenting a field application from India. Agricultural Systems, 2004, 82(3): 291-305

[45]

Kweit MG, Kweit RW. Citizen participation and citizen evaluation in disaster recovery. American Review of Public Administration, 2004, 34(4): 354-373

[46]

F, Tracy M, Norris FH, Galea S. Displacement, county social cohesion, and depression after a large-scale traumatic event. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2013, 48(11): 1729-1741

[47]

Lin N. Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 2000, 29(6): 785-795

[48]

Lin N. Castiglione D, van Deth JW, Wolleb G. A network theory of social capital. The handbook of social capital, 2005, New York: Oxford University Press 50-69.

[49]

Mahmood S, Rahman AU, Sajjad A. Assessment of 2010 flood disaster causes and damages in district Muzaffargarh, Central Indus Basin, Pakistan. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019, 78(3): 1-11

[50]

Mahmood S, Sajjad A, Rahman AU. Cause and damage analysis of 2010 flood disaster in district Muzaffar Garh, Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 2021, 107(2): 1681-1692

[51]

Miller DS. Public trust in the aftermath of natural and na-technological disasters: Hurricane Katrina and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear incident. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2016, 36(5/6): 410-431

[52]

Nakagawa Y, Shaw R. Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 2004, 22(1): 5-34.

[53]

Nicholls K, Picou JS. The impact of Hurricane Katrina on trust in government. Social Science Quarterly, 2013, 94(2): 344-361

[54]

Norris FH, Murphy A, Kaniasty K, Perilla J, Ortis DC. Postdisaster social support in the U.S. and Mexico: Conceptual and contextual considerations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2001, 23(4): 469-497

[55]

Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2008, 41(1–2): 127-150

[56]

Nunnally JC. Wolman BB. An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders, 1978, New York: Springer 97-146

[57]

Oyane J. Reflections on the concepts of social capital and resilience in sociological disaster research. The Senshu Social Capital Review, 2010, 1: 105-138.

[58]

PDMA (Provincial Disaster Management Authority). 2011. Muzaffargarh. https://pdma.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/Muzaffargarh.pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.

[59]

Putnam RD. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospects, 1993, 4(13): 35-42.

[60]

Putnam RD. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 1995, 6(1): 65-78

[61]

Putnam RD. Turning in, turning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 1995, 28(4): 664-683

[62]

Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, 1993, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

[63]

Scanlon TJ. Winners and losers: Some thoughts about the political economy of disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1988, 6(1): 47-63.

[64]

Seidenberg, J. 2006. Cultural competency in disaster recovery: Lessons learned from the Hurricane Katrina experience for better serving marginalized communities. https://www.law.berkeley.edu/library/resources/disasters/Seidenberg.pdf. Accessed 8 Jul 2022.

[65]

Shadi Y, Lotfi MH, Nedjat S, Amini Rarani M, Khedmati Morasae E. Explaining unequal levels of social capital in Tehran. Social Indicators Research, 2018, 140(1): 243-265

[66]

Shareef F, Chaudhry IS, Azid T. Transmission of social capital through gender lens: A case study of Multan District. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 2015, 35(1): 11-23.

[67]

Smith, N. 2006. There’s no such thing as a natural disaster. https://items.ssrc.org/understanding-katrina/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-natural-disaster/. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.

[68]

Sørensen BR, Albris K. Dahlberg R, Rubin O, Thanning M. The social life of disasters: An anthropological approach. Disaster research: Multidisciplinary and international perspective, 2015, London: Routledge 80-95.

[69]

Sweet S. The effect of a natural disaster on social cohesion: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disaster, 1998, 16(3): 321-331.

[70]

Tobin GA, Whiteford LM. Community resilience and volcano hazard: The eruption of Tungurahua and evacuation of Faldas in Ecuador. Disasters, 2002, 26(1): 28-48

[71]

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction, 2020, Geneva: UNDRR

[72]

Uphoff N. Dasgupta P, Serageldin I. Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of the participation. Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, 2000, Washington, DC: World Bank 215-249.

[73]

Uslaner, E.M. 2016. Disasters, trust, and social cohesion. Ritsumeikan Language Culture Study 28(1). http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/re/k-rsc/lcs/kiyou/pdf_28-1/RitsIILCS_28.1pp.183-191USLANER.pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.

[74]

Vickery J. Using an intersectional approach to advance understanding of homeless persons’ vulnerability to disaster. Environmental Sociology, 2018, 4(1): 136-147

[75]

Walters V, Gaillard JC. Disaster risk at the margins: Homelessness, vulnerability and hazards. Habitat International, 2014, 44: 211-219

[76]

Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. At risk– natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2003 2 London: Routledge

[77]

Woolcock M, Narayan D. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Observer, 2000, 15(2): 225-249

[78]

World Food Program. 2010. Pakistan flood impact assessment. https://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/ena/wfp225987.pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.

[79]

Yamane T. Statistics: An introductory analysis, 1967 2 New York: Harper and Row

[80]

You Y, Huang Y, Zhuang Y. Natural disaster and political trust: A natural experiment study of the impact of the Wenchuan Earthquake. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2020, 6(1): 140-165

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

288

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/