Status and Social Capital: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Investigation of Flood Survivors in South Punjab, Pakistan
Muhammad Siddique Akbar , Muhammad Rizwan Safdar , Farhan Navid Yousaf , Daniel P. Aldrich
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 549 -560.
A growing body of evidence underscores that social capital mitigates the impact of natural hazards such as floods. But we know less about the distribution of social ties in developing countries regularly hit by shocks. Our study examined the differences between demographic groups in South Punjab, Pakistan affected by the 2010 floods, comparing respondents’ levels of social capital measured through proxies such as received social support, perceived community cohesion, accessibility to leadership, and general level of trust. We carried out univariate and multivariate analyses of factors including gender, education, occupation, landholding, family size, annual income, number of livestock, and home stability. Using data collected in face-to-face interviews with 450 flood survivors, our analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the flood victims’ scores on all four scales based on gender and family size. However, education, occupation, landholding, annual income, and home stability statistically correlated with levels of social capital. Respondents with high levels of education, high levels of land, higher home stability, and a government job typically had higher scores in all four measurements of social ties. Our results show strong inequality in the distribution of social capital, with better connections and assistance coming to those who already have better socioeconomic positions in society.
Flood survivors / Pakistan / Social capital / South Punjab
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Akram, S., and O. Aijazi. 2010. Rapid assessment report of flood-affected communities in Muzaffargarh District, Punjab, Pakistan. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/24E2D643A00C38E34925778600836155-Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022. |
| [10] |
Alam-Chowdhary, M.J. 2011. Social cohesion and natural disaster loss recovery of households: Experience from Bangladesh. https://www.oecd.org/dev/pgd/46988916.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2013. |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Beckett, J.V., S. Wilkinson, and P. Potangaroa. 2010. Post-disaster recovery: Multiagency leadership and coordination. Paper presented at the 2010 Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, 2–3 September 2010, Paris, France. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Calo-Blanco, A., J. Kovářík, F. Mengel, and J.G. Romero. 2017. Natural disasters and indicators of social cohesion. PLoS ONE 12 (6): Article e0176885. |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
District Police Office. 2015. Muzaffargarh District Overview. https://dpomzg.punjabpolice.gov.pk/district_overview. Accessed 12 Jul 2022. |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
FFC (Federal Flood Commission). 2010. Annual flood report 2010. https://mowr.gov.pk/SiteImage/Misc/files/2010%20Annual%20Flood%20Report%20of%20FFC(1).pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022. |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Gould, E.D., and A. Hijzen. 2016. Growing apart, losing trust? The Impact of Inequality on Social Capital. IMF Working paper 16/176. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. |
| [31] |
Griffin, C. 2009. Gender and social capital: Social networks post-disaster. Working paper. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.458.5202&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022. |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Hudson, P., M. Pham, L. Hagedoorn, A. Thieken, R. Lasage, and P. Bubeck. 2021. Self‐stated recovery from flooding: Empirical results from a survey in Central Vietnam. Journal of Flood Risk Management 14 (1): Article e12680. |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
PDMA (Provincial Disaster Management Authority). 2011. Muzaffargarh. https://pdma.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/Muzaffargarh.pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022. |
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
Seidenberg, J. 2006. Cultural competency in disaster recovery: Lessons learned from the Hurricane Katrina experience for better serving marginalized communities. https://www.law.berkeley.edu/library/resources/disasters/Seidenberg.pdf. Accessed 8 Jul 2022. |
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
Smith, N. 2006. There’s no such thing as a natural disaster. https://items.ssrc.org/understanding-katrina/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-natural-disaster/. Accessed 12 Jul 2022. |
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction, 2020, Geneva: UNDRR |
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
Uslaner, E.M. 2016. Disasters, trust, and social cohesion. Ritsumeikan Language Culture Study 28(1). http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/re/k-rsc/lcs/kiyou/pdf_28-1/RitsIILCS_28.1pp.183-191USLANER.pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022. |
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
World Food Program. 2010. Pakistan flood impact assessment. https://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/ena/wfp225987.pdf. Accessed 12 Jul 2022. |
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |