Simulation Performance Evaluation and Uncertainty Analysis on a Coupled Inundation Model Combining SWMM and WCA2D

Zhaoyang Zeng , Zhaoli Wang , Chengguang Lai

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 448 -464.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 448 -464. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-022-00416-3
Article

Simulation Performance Evaluation and Uncertainty Analysis on a Coupled Inundation Model Combining SWMM and WCA2D

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Urban floods are becoming increasingly more frequent, which has led to tremendous economic losses. The application of inundation modeling to predict and simulate urban flooding is an effective approach for disaster prevention and risk reduction, while also addressing the uncertainty problem in the model is always a challenging task. In this study, a cellular automaton (CA)-based model combining a storm water management model (SWMM) and a weighted cellular automata 2D inundation model was applied and a physical-based model (LISFLOOD-FP) was also coupled with SWMM for comparison. The simulation performance and the uncertainty factors of the coupled model were systematically discussed. The results show that the CA-based model can achieve sufficient accuracy and higher computational efficiency than can a physical-based model. The resolution of terrain and rainstorm data had a strong influence on the performance of the CA-based model, and the simulations would be less creditable when using the input data with a terrain resolution lower than 15 m and a recorded interval of rainfall greater than 30 min. The roughness value and model type showed limited impacts on the change of inundation depth and occurrence of the peak inundation area. Generally, the CA-based coupled model demonstrated laudable applicability and can be recommended for fast simulation of urban flood episodes. This study also can provide references and implications for reducing uncertainty when constructing a CA-based coupled model.

Keywords

Guangzhou / LISFLOOD-FP / Uncertainty analysis / Urban flood / WCA2D

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhaoyang Zeng, Zhaoli Wang, Chengguang Lai. Simulation Performance Evaluation and Uncertainty Analysis on a Coupled Inundation Model Combining SWMM and WCA2D. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(3): 448-464 DOI:10.1007/s13753-022-00416-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abebe YA, Ghorbani A, Nikolic I, Vojinovic Z, Sanchez A. A coupled flood-agent-institution modelling (CLAIM) framework for urban flood risk management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2019, 111: 483-492

[2]

Bates PD, Horritt MS, Fewtrell TJ. A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 387(1–2): 33-45

[3]

Bruni G, Reinoso R, van de Giesen NC, Clemens FHLR, ten Veldhuis JAE. On the sensitivity of urban hydrodynamic modelling to rainfall spatial and temporal resolution. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2015, 19(2): 691-709

[4]

Chen AS, Evans B, Djordjevi S, Savić DA. A coarse-grid approach to representing building blockage effects in 2D urban flood modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 426: 1-16.

[5]

Chen B, Shi F, Lin T, Shi P, Zheng J. Intensive versus extensive events? Insights from cumulative flood-induced mortality over the globe, 1976–2016. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(4): 441-451

[6]

Chen W, Huang G, Zhang H, Wang W. Urban inundation response to rainstorm patterns with a coupled hydrodynamic model: A case study in Haidian island, China. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 564: 1022-1035

[7]

Donat MG, Lowry AL, Alexander LV, O’Gorman PA, Maher N. More extreme precipitation in the world's dry and wet regions. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(2): 154-158

[8]

Dottori F, Todini E. Developments of a flood inundation model based on the cellular automata approach: Testing different methods to improve model performance. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2011, 36(7–8): 266-280

[9]

Dung NV, Merz B, Bárdossy A, Thang TD, Apel H. Multi-objective automatic calibration of hydrodynamic models utilizing inundation maps and gauge data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2010, 15(4): 1339-1354

[10]

Ghimire B, Chen AS, Guidolin M, Keedwell EC, Djordjević S, Savić DA. Formulation of a fast 2d urban pluvial flood model using a cellular automata approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2013, 15(3): 676-686

[11]

Gires A, Onof C, Maksimovic C, Schertzer D, Tchiguirinskaia I, Simoes N. Quantifying the impact of small scale unmeasured rainfall variability on urban runoff through multifractal downscaling: A case study. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 442–443: 117-128

[12]

Glenis V, Kutija V, Kilsby CG. A fully hydrodynamic urban flood modelling system representing buildings, green space and interventions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018, 109: 272-292

[13]

Guidolin M, Chen AS, Ghimire B, Keedwell EC, Djordjević S, Savić DA. A weighted cellular automata 2D inundation model for rapid flood analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 84: 378-394

[14]

Güneralp B, Güneralp İ, Liu Y. Changing global patterns of urban exposure to flood and drought hazards. Global Environmental Change, 2015, 31: 217-225

[15]

Hou J, Liang Q, Zhang H, Hinkelmann R. An efficient unstructured MUSCL scheme for solving the 2D shallow water equations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2015, 66: 131-152

[16]

Hu X, Wang M, Liu K, Gong D, Kantz H. Using climate factors to estimate flood economic loss risk. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(5): 731-744

[17]

Jamali B, Bach PM, Cunningham L, Deletic A. A cellular automata fast flood evaluation (CA-ffé) model. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(6): 4936-4953

[18]

Karamouz M, Fereshtehpour M. Modeling DEM errors in coastal flood inundation and damages: A spatial nonstationary approach. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(8): 6606-6624

[19]

Lai C, Chen X, Wang Z, Yu H, Bai X. Flood risk assessment and regionalization from past and future perspectives at basin scale. Risk Analysis, 2020, 40: 1399-1417

[20]

Lai C, Shao Q, Chen X, Wang Z, Zhou X, Yang B, Zhang L. Flood risk zoning using a rule mining based on ant colony algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 542: 268-280

[21]

Leitão JP, de Sousa LM. Towards the optimal fusion of high-resolution Digital Elevation Models for detailed urban flood assessment. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 561: 651-661

[22]

Li, Q., Q. Liang, & X. Xia. 2020a. A novel 1D-2D coupled model for hydrodynamic simulation of flows in drainage networks. Advances in Water Resources 137: Article 103519.

[23]

Li, S., Z. Wang, C. Lai, and G. Lin. 2020b. Quantitative assessment of the relative impacts of climate change and human activity on flood susceptibility based on a cloud model. Journal of Hydrology 588: Article 125051.

[24]

Li, S., Z. Wang, X. Wu, Z. Zeng, P. Shen and C. Lai. 2022. A novel spatial optimization approach for the cost-effectiveness improvement of LID practices based on SWMM-FTC. Journal of Environmental Management 307: Article 114574.

[25]

Li, Y., Z. Zhang, S. Gong, M. Liu, and Y. Zhao. 2020c. Risk assessment of rainstorm disasters under different return periods: A case study of Bohai Rim, China. Ocean and Coastal Management 187: Article 105107.

[26]

Liu, J., W. Shao, C. Xiang, C. Mei, and Z. Li. 2020. Uncertainties of urban flood modeling: Influence of parameters for different underlying surfaces. Environmental Research 182: Article 108929.

[27]

Noh SJ, Lee J-H, Lee S, Kawaike K, Seo D-J. Hyper-resolution 1D–2D urban flood modelling using LiDAR data and hybrid parallelization. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018, 103: 131-145

[28]

Ochoa-Rodriguez S, Wang L-P, Gires A, Pina RD, Reinoso-Rondinel R, Bruni G, Ichiba A, Gaitan S Impact of spatial and temporal resolution of rainfall inputs on urban hydrodynamic modelling outputs: A multi-catchment investigation. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 531(2): 389-407

[29]

Ozdemir H, Sampson CC, de Almeida GAM, Bates PD. Evaluating scale and roughness effects in urban flood modelling using terrestrial lidar data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 17(10): 4015-4030

[30]

Sanders BF, Schubert JE, Detwiler RL. ParBreZo: A parallel, unstructured grid, Godunov-type, shallow-water code for high-resolution flood inundation modeling at the regional scale. Advances in Water Resources, 2010, 33(12): 1456-1467

[31]

Smith BK, Smith JA, Baeck ML, Villarini G, Wright DB. Spectrum of storm event hydrologic response in urban watersheds. Water Resources Research, 2013, 49(5): 2649-2663

[32]

Smith LS, Liang Q. Towards a generalised GPU/CPU shallow-flow modelling tool. Computers & Fluids, 2013, 88: 334-343

[33]

Swain DL, Langenbrunner B, Neelin JD, Hall A. Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first-century California. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(5): 427-433

[34]

Tanaka T, Tachikawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Yorozu K. An automatic domain updating method for fast 2-dimensional flood-inundation modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2019, 116: 110-118

[35]

Teng J, Jakeman AJ, Vaze J, Croke BFW, Dutta D, Kim S. Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2017, 90: 201-216

[36]

Tsubaki R, Kawahara Y. The uncertainty of local flow parameters during inundation flow over complex topographies with elevation errors. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 486: 71-87

[37]

Vacondio R, Aureli F, Ferrari A, Mignosa P, Palù AD. Simulation of the January 2014 flood on the Secchia River using a fast and high-resolution 2D parallel shallow-water numerical scheme. Natural Hazards, 2016, 80(1): 103-125

[38]

Wang L-P, Ochoa-Rodríguez S, Assel JV, Pina RD, Pessemier M, Kroll S, Willems P, Onof C. Enhancement of radar rainfall estimates for urban hydrology through optical flow temporal interpolation and Bayesian gauge-based adjustment. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 531(Part 2): 408-426.

[39]

Wang Z, Lai C, Chen X, Yang B, Zhao S, Bai X. Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 527: 1130-1141

[40]

Wang Z, Zeng Z, Lai C, Lin W, Wu X, Chen X. A regional frequency analysis of precipitation extremes in Mainland China with fuzzy c-means and L-moments approaches. International Journal of Climatology, 2017, 37(S1): 429-444

[41]

Wang Y, Chen AS, Fu G, Djordvević S, Zhang C, Savić DA. An integrated framework for high-resolution urban flood modelling considering multiple information sources and urban features. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018, 107: 85-95

[42]

Wildemeersch S, Goderniaux P, Orban Ph, Brouyère S, Dassargues A. Assessing the effects of spatial discretization on large-scale flow model performance and prediction uncertainty. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 510: 10-25

[43]

Willis, T., N. Wright, and A. Sleigh. 2019. Systematic analysis of uncertainty in 2D flood inundation models. Environmental Modelling & Software 122: Article 104520.

[44]

Wu X, Wang Z, Guo S, Liao W, Zeng Z, Chen X. Scenario-based projections of future urban inundation within a coupled hydrodynamic model framework: A case study in Dongguan city, China. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 547: 428-442

[45]

Wu X, Wang Z, Guo S, Lai C, Chen X. A simplified approach for flood modeling in urban environments. Hydrology Research, 2018, 49(6): 1804-1816

[46]

Xing Y, Liang Q, Wang G, Ming X, Xia X. City-scale hydrodynamic modelling of urban flash floods: The issues of scale and resolution. Natural Hazards, 2019, 96(1): 473-496

[47]

Xu K, Fang J, Fang Y, Sun Q, Wu C, Liu M. The importance of Digital Elevation Model selection in flood simulation and a proposed method to reduce DEM errors: A case study in Shanghai. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(6): 890-902

[48]

Yang L, Smith JA, Baeck ML, Zhang Y. Flash flooding in small urban watersheds: Storm event hydrologic response. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52(6): 4571-4589

[49]

Yin, D., B. Evans, Q. Wang, Z. Chen, H. Jia, A.S. Chen, G. Fu, S. Ahmad, and L. Leng. 2020. Integrated 1D and 2D model for better assessing runoff quantity control of low impact development facilities on community scale. Science of the Total Environment 597: Article 137630.

[50]

Yin J, Lin N, Yu D. Coupled modeling of storm surge and coastal inundation: A case study in New York City during Hurricane Sandy. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52(11): 8685-8699

[51]

Yu D. Parallelization of a two-dimensional flood inundation model based on domain decomposition. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2010, 25(8): 935-945

[52]

Yu D, Coulthard TJ. Evaluating the importance of catchment hydrological parameters for urban surface water flood modelling using a simple hydro-inundation model. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 524: 385-400

[53]

Yu, D., J. Yin, and M. Liu. 2016. Validating city-scale surface water flood modelling using crowd-sourced data. Environmental Research Letters 11(12): Article 124011.

[54]

Zhang, M., M. Xu, Z. Wang, and C. Lai. 2021. Assessment of the vulnerability of road networks to urban waterlogging based on a coupled hydrodynamic model. Journal of Hydrology 603(Part C): Article 127105.

[55]

Zhang Q, Gu X, Singh VP, Shi P, Sun P. More frequent flooding? Changes in flood frequency in Pearl River basin, China since 1951 and over the past 1000 years. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2018, 22(5): 2637-2653

[56]

Zhang W, Villarini G, Vecchi GA, Smith JA. Urbanization exacerbated the rainfall and flooding caused by hurricane Harvey in Houston. Nature, 2018, 563(7731): 384-388

[57]

Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Li G, Wan H, Cannon AJ. Complexity in estimating past and future extreme short-duration rainfall. Nature Geoscience, 2017, 10(4): 255-259

[58]

Zhao G, Xu Z, Pang B, Tu T, Xu L, Du L. An enhanced inundation method for urban flood hazard mapping at the large catchment scale. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 571: 873-882

[59]

Zhou Y, Shen D, Huang N, Guo Y, Zhang T, Zhang Y. Urban flood risk assessment using storm characteristic parameters sensitive to catchment-specific drainage system. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 659: 1362-1369

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

191

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/