How Participatory is Participatory Flood Risk Mapping? Voices from the Flood Prone Dharavi Slum in Mumbai

Abstract

Participatory flood risk mapping (PFRM) is a well-recognized and widely implemented tool for meaningful community involvement in disaster risk reduction (DRR). The effectiveness of PFRM remains anecdotal. The PFRM exercise has rarely been applied identically in two different places by two different organizations, which produces varied and uncertain outcomes. In the absence of any agreed and comprehensive framework for participatory DRR, existing studies struggle to provide a scientific account of how the structure, design, and process of PFRM ensure the effective participation of local communities. This study, examines what factors and methods make PFRM an effective participatory DRR tool. In this study, we first identified the process-based criteria of participation. Then we briefly introduced a participatory flood risk mapping exercise conducted in a flood-prone informal settlement in Dharavi, Mumbai. The exercise was carefully designed to meet the process criteria of effective participation. Finally, using qualitative research methods, we evaluated the effectiveness of our PFRM from the local community perspective. The findings show that ensuring community livelihood security and true involvement of marginalized groups, preparing an action plan, and incorporating fun and cultural connotations into the facilitation process are critical components that enhance community participation through PFRM in DRR.

Keywords

Dharavi / Evaluation / Mumbai flood / Participatory disaster risk reduction / Participatory flood risk mapping / Process-based criteria of participation

References

[1] Aalst MK, van Cannon T, Burton I. Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 2008, 18(1): 165-179

[2] Amendola A, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Okada N, Shi P. Towards integrated disaster risk management: Case studies and trends from Asia. Natural Hazards, 2008, 44(2): 163-168

[3] Ardaya AB, Evers M, Ribbe L. Participatory approaches for disaster risk governance? Exploring participatory mechanisms and mapping to close the communication gap between population living in flood risk areas and authorities in Nova Friburgo Municipality, RJ. Brazil. Land Use Policy, 2019, 88: 104103

[4] Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4): 216-224

[5] Bajek R, Matsuda Y, Okada N. Japan’s Jishu-bosai-soshiki community activities: Analysis of its role in participatory community disaster risk management. Natural Hazards, 2008, 44(2): 281-292

[6] Bardhan R, Sarkar D, Jana A, Velaga NR. Mumbai slums since independence: Evaluating the policy outcomes. Habitat International, 2015, 50: 1-11

[7] Bhagat RB, Guha M, Chattopadhyay A. Mumbai after 26/7 deluge: Issues and concerns in urban planning. Population and Environment, 2006, 27(4): 337-349

[8] Blackstock KL, Kelly G, Horsey B. Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 2007, 60(4): 726-742

[9] Blahna DJ, Yonts-Shepard S. Public involvement in resource planning: Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation. Society & Natural Resources, 1989, 2(1): 209-227

[10] Boyd E, Ghosh A, Boykoff M. Johnson C, Toly N, Schroeder H. Climate change adaptation in Mumbai, India. The urban climate challenge: Rethinking the role of cities in the global climate regime, 2015, New York: Routledge 139-155.

[11] Butsch C, Kraas F, Namperumal S, Peters G. Risk governance in the megacity Mumbai/India: A complex adaptive system perspective. Habitat International, 2016, 54(2): 100-111

[12] Cadag JRD, Gaillard JC. Integrating knowledge and actions in disaster risk reduction: The contribution of participatory mapping. Area, 2012, 44(1): 100-109

[13] Cappucci, M. 2020. Devastating monsoon flooding strikes Mumbai, a city gripped by the coronavirus pandemic. The Washington Post, 7 August 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/08/07/mumbai-india-monsoon/. Accessed 20 Feb 2022.

[14] Carr G, Blöschl G, Loucks DP. Evaluating participation in water resource management: A review. Water Resources Research, 2012, 48(11): W11401

[15] Chase LC, Decker DJ, Lauber TB. Public participation in wildlife management: What do stakeholders want?. Society and Natural Resources, 2004, 17(7): 629-639

[16] Chatterjee M. Slum dwellers response to flooding events in the megacities of India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2010, 15(4): 337-353

[17] Chatterjee M. Brauch HG, Spring UO, Mesjasz C, Grin J, Kameri-Mbote P, Chourou B, Dunay P, Birkmann J. Flood loss redistribution in a third world megacity: The case of Mumbai. Coping with global environmental change, disasters and security: Threats, challenges, vulnerabilities and risks, 2011, Berlin: Springer 603-612

[18] Chess C, Purcell K. Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works?. Environmental Science & Technology, 1999, 33(16): 2685-2692

[19] Chingombe W, Pedzisai E, Manatsa D, Mukwada G, Taru P. A participatory approach in GIS data collection for flood risk management, Muzarabani district Zimbabwe. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2015, 8(2): 1029-1040

[20] de Sherbinin A, Bardy G. Social vulnerability to floods in two coastal megacities: New York City and Mumbai. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2015, 13: 131-165.

[21] Deshpande, T. 2020. Mumbai flood breaches new frontiers. Mongabay, 12 August 2020. https://india.mongabay.com/2020/08/mumbai-flood-breaches-new-frontiers/. Accessed 20 Feb 2022.

[22] Fazey IRA, Kesby M, Evely A, Latham I, Wagatora D, Hagasua J-E, Reed MS, Christie M. A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(4): 713-728

[23] Gaillard J-C, Maceda EA. Participatory three-dimensional mapping for disaster risk reduction. Participatory Learning and Action, 2009, 60: 109-118.

[24] Ganapati NE, Ganapati S. Enabling participatory planning after disasters: A case study of the World Bank’s housing reconstruction in Turkey. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2008, 75(1): 41-59

[25] Gladfelter S. The politics of participation in community-based early warning systems: Building resilience or precarity through local roles in disseminating disaster information?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 30: 120-131

[26] Glucker AN, Driessen PP, Kolhoff A, Runhaar HAC. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: Why, who and how?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013, 43: 104-111

[27] Gopalakrishnan C, Okada N. Designing new institutions for implementing integrated disaster risk management: Key elements and future directions. Disasters, 2007, 31(4): 353-372

[28] Gupta K. Urban flood resilience planning and management and lessons for the future: A case study of Mumbai India. Urban Water Journal, 2007, 4(3): 183-194

[29] Hochrainer-Stigler S, Colon C, Boza G, Poledna S, Rovenskaya E, Dieckmann U. Enhancing resilience of systems to individual and systemic risk: Steps toward an integrative framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 51: 101868

[30] Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 1998, 19(1): 173-202

[31] Laurian L, Shaw MM. Evaluation of public participation: The practices of certified planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2009, 28(3): 293-309

[32] Liu W, Dugar S, McCallum I, Thapa G, See L, Khadka P, Budhathoki N, Brown S Integrated participatory and collaborative risk mapping for enhancing disaster resilience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2018, 7(2): 68

[33] Luyet V, Schlaepfer R, Parlange MB, Buttler A. A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 111: 213-219

[34] Maskrey SA, Priest S, Mount NJ. Towards evaluation criteria in participatory flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2019, 12(2): e12462

[35] Mercer J, Kelman I, Lloyd K, Suchet-Pearson S. Reflections on use of participatory research for disaster risk reduction. Area, 2008, 40(2): 172-183

[36] McCool SF, Guthrie K. Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations. Society & Natural Resources, 2001, 14(4): 309-323

[37] Minucci G, Molinari D, Gemini G, Pezzoli S. Enhancing flood risk maps by a participatory and collaborative design process. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 50: 101747

[38] Moore SA. Defining “successful” environmental dispute resolution: Case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1996, 16(3): 151-169

[39] Na JI, Okada N, Fang L. A collaborative action development approach to improving community disaster reduction using the Yonmenkaigi system. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 2008, 30(2): 57-69

[40] Okada N, Na J, Fang L, Teratani A. The Yonmenkaigi System Method: An implementation oriented group decision support approach. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22(1): 53-67

[41] Osti R, Tanaka S, Tokioka T. Flood hazard mapping in developing countries: Problems and prospects. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2008, 17(1): 104-113

[42] Parthasarathy D. Hunters, gatherers and foragers in a metropolis: Commonising the private and public in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly, 2011, 46(50): 54-63.

[43] Parthasarathy D. Informality, resilience, and the political implications of disaster governance. Pacific Affairs, 2015, 88(3): 551-575

[44] Parthasarathy D. Decentralization, pluralization, balkanization? Challenges for disaster mitigation and governance in Mumbai. Habitat International, 2016, 52(8): 26-34

[45] Patankar, A.M. 2015. The exposure, vulnerability, and ability to respond of poor households to recurrent floods in Mumbai. Policy Research Working Paper: 7481. Washington, DC: World Bank.

[46] Patankar A, Patwardhan A. Estimating the uninsured losses due to extreme weather events and implications for informal sector vulnerability: A case study of Mumbai India. Natural Hazards, 2016, 80(1): 285-310

[47] Pathak S, Liu M, Jato-Espino D, Zevenbergen C. Social, economic and environmental assessment of urban sub-catchment flood risks using a multi-criteria approach: A case study in Mumbai City India. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 591(4): 125216

[48] Reed MS. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(10): 2417-2431

[49] Reichel C, Frömming UU. Participatory mapping of local disaster risk reduction knowledge: An example from Switzerland. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2014, 5(1): 41-54

[50] Rollason E, Bracken LJ, Hardy RJ, Large ARG. Rethinking flood risk communication. Natural Hazards, 2018, 92(3): 1665-1686

[51] Rowe G, Frewer LJ. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 2000, 25(1): 3-29

[52] Rowe G, Frewer LJ. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 2005, 30(2): 251-290

[53] Sadiqi Z, Trigunarsyah B, Coffey V. A framework for community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction projects: A case of Afghanistan. International Journal of Project Management, 2017, 35(5): 900-912

[54] Samaddar S, Okada N. Participatory approach for post-earthquake reconstruction in the villages of Kachchh, India. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, 2006, 49: 197-205.

[55] Samaddar S, Tatano H. Where do individuals seek opinions for evacuation? A case study from landslide-prone slum communities in Mumbai. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 2015, 36(1): 13-24

[56] Samaddar S, Misra BA, Chatterjee R, Tatano H. Participatory risk mapping for identifying spatial risks in flood-prone slum areas, Mumbai. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, 2011, 54: 137-146.

[57] Samaddar S, Misra BA, Chatterjee R, Tatano H. Understanding community’s evacuation intention development process in a flood prone micro-hotspot, Mumbai. Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management, 2012, 2(2): 89-107

[58] Samaddar S, Chatterjee R, Misra B, Tatano H. Outcome-expectancy and self-efficacy: Reasons or results of flood preparedness intention?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2014, 8: 91-99

[59] Samaddar S, Choi J, Misra BA, Tatano H. Insights on social learning and collaborative action plan development for flood risks mitigation: Practicing Yonmenkaigi System Method (YSM) in flood prone Mumbai. Natural Hazards, 2015, 75(2): 1531-1554

[60] Samaddar S, Yokomatsu M, Dzivenu T, Oteng-Ababio M, Adams MR, Dayour F, Ishikawa H. Evaluating effective public participation in disaster management and climate change adaptation: Insights from northern Ghana through a user-based approach. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2015, 6(1): 117-143

[61] Samaddar S, Okada N, Choi J, Tatano H. What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat India. Natural Hazards, 2017, 85(1): 111-138

[62] Samaddar S, Ayaribilla AJ, Oteng-Ababio M, Dayour F, Yokomatsu M. Sarkar A, Sensarma SR, van Loon GW. Stakeholders’ perceptions on effective community participation in climate change adaptation. Sustainable solutions for food security: Combating climate change by adaptation, 2019, Cham: Springer 355-379

[63] Samaddar S, Oteng-Ababio M, Dayour F, Ayaribila A, Obeng FK, Ziem R, Yokomatsu M. Successful community participation in climate change adaptation programs: On whose terms?. Environmental Management, 2021, 67(4): 747-762

[64] Scolobig A, Thompson M, Linnerooth-Bayer J. Compromise not consensus: Designing a participatory process for landslide risk mitigation. Natural Hazards, 2016, 81(1): 45-68

[65] Sharma K. Rediscovering Dharavi: Stories from Asia’s largest slum, 2000, New Delhi: Penguin Books India

[66] Sherly MA, Karmakar S, Parthasarathy D, Chan T, Rau C. Disaster vulnerability mapping for a densely populated coastal urban area: An application to Mumbai, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2015, 105(6): 1198-1220

[67] Sheng YK. Community participation in low-income housing projects: Problems and prospects. Community Development Journal, 1990, 25(1): 56-65

[68] Surjan A, Shaw R. Enhancing disaster resilience through local environment management: Case of Mumbai, India. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2009, 18(4): 418-433

[69] Thakadu OT. Success factors in community-based natural resources management in northern Botswana: Lessons from practice. Natural Resources Forum, 2005, 29(3): 199-212

[70] Tozier de la Poterie A, Baudoin M-A. From Yokohama to Sendai: Approaches to participation in international disaster risk reduction frameworks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(2): 128-139

[71] Tuler S, Webler T. Voices from the forest: What participants expect of a public participation process. Society & Natural Resources, 1999, 12(5): 437-453

[72] Vallance S. Disaster recovery as participation: Lessons from the Shaky Isles. Natural Hazards, 2015, 75(2): 1287-1301

[73] Van Aalst MK, Cannon T, Burton I. Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 2008, 18(1): 165-179

[74] Webler T, Tuler S. Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making: Combined results from 10 case studies. Policy Studies Journal, 2006, 34(4): 699-722

[75] Webler T, Tuler S, Krueger ROB. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 2001, 27(3): 435-450.

[76] White I, Kingston R, Barker A. Participatory geographic information systems and public engagement within flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2010, 3(4): 337-346

[77] Yamori K. Action research on disaster reduction education: Building a “community of practice” through a gaming approach. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 2009, 30(2): 83-96