When It Strikes, Are We Ready? Lessons Identified at the 7th Planetary Defense Conference in Preparing for a Near-Earth Object Impact Scenario

Abstract

Near-Earth object (NEO) impact is one of the examples of high impact and low probability (HILP) event, same as the Covid-19 pandemic the world faces since the beginning of 2020. The 7th Planetary Defense Conference held by the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) in April 2021 included an exercise on a hypothetical NEO impact event, allowing the planetary defense community to discuss potential responses. Over the span of the 4-day conference this exercise connected disaster response and management professionals to participate in a series of panels, providing feedback and perspective on the unfolding crisis scenario. The hypothetical but realistic asteroid threat scenario illustrated how such a short-warning threat might evolve. The scenario utilized during the conference indicates a need to prepare now for what might come in the future, because even with advance notice, preparation time might be minimal. This scenario chose Europe for the impact, which may likely cope with such a disaster, through the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and other solidarity and support mechanisms within the European Union (EU), as well as with potential support from international partners. This short article raises concern about other areas in the world on how they may access NEO impact information and cope with such disasters. It also provides an idea on vast scale of such disaster vis-à-vis the current capacity of response systems to cope with a larger event in Europe or elsewhere. This scenario showed that planetary defense is a global endeavor. Constant engagement of the planetary defense and disaster response communities is essential in order to keep the world safe from potential disasters caused by NEO impacts.

Keywords

Asteroid threats / Disaster risk reduction / Planetary defense / Risk management and prevention

References

[1] Casajus Valles, A., M. Marin Ferrer, K. Poljanšek, and I. Clark (eds.). 2021. Science for disaster risk management 2020: Acting today, protecting tomorrow. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/438998. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[2] Centre for Health Security. 2019. Event 201, a global pandemic exercise. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[3] ESA (European Space Agency). 2021. Lessons learnt from simulated strike. https://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Lessons_learnt_from_simulated_strike. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[4] ESA (European Space Agency). n.d.a. DART—Double Asteroid Redirect Test. https://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Hera/DART. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[5] ESA (European Space Agency). n.d.b. RescEU: Factsheet. https://ec.europa.eu/echo/what/civil-protection/resceu_en. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[6] FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2014. Preparedness in America—Research insights to increase individual, organizational, and community action. https://www.ready.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/Preparedness_in_America_August_2014.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[7] Fishkin JS, Luskin RC. Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica, 2005, 40(3): 284-298

[8] Grothmann T, Reusswig F. People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 2006, 38(1): 101-120

[9] van der Linden S. Countering science denial. Nature Human Behaviour, 2019, 3(9): 889-890

[10] Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 2001, 127(2): 267-286

[11] NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2014. NASA’s efforts to identify near-Earth objects and mitigate hazards. https://oig.nasa.gov/audits/reports/FY14/IG-14-030.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[12] Poljansek, K. 2021. Recommendations for national risk assessment for disaster risk management in EU: Where science and policy meet: Version 1. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2760/80545. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[13] Public Health England. 2017. Exercise Cygnus report. Tier one command post exercise pandemic influenza. 18 to 20 October 2016. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/927770/exercise-cygnus-report.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[14] Scherzer, S., P. Lujala, and J.K. Rød. 2019. A community resilience index for Norway: An adaptation of the baseline resilience indicators for communities (BRIC). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 36: Article 101107.

[15] Spialek ML, Houston JB. The influence of citizen disaster communication on perceptions of neighborhood belonging and community resilience. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 2019, 47(1): 1-23

[16] Taubenberger JK, Morens DM. 1918 influenza: The mother of all pandemics. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2006, 12(1): 15-22

[17] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015−2030. Geneva: UNISDR. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[18] UNOOSA (United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs). n.d.a. IAWN—International Asteroid Warning Network. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/topics/neos/iawn.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[19] UNOOSA (United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs). n.d.b. SMPAG—Space Mission Planning Advisory Group. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/topics/neos/smpag.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

[20] Wood MM, Mileti DS, Bean H, Liu BF, Sutton J, Madden S. Milling and public warnings. Environment and Behavior, 2018, 50(5): 535-566