A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas

Abstract

Urbanization can be a challenge and an opportunity for earthquake risk mitigation. However, little is known about the changes in exposure (for example, population and urban land) to earthquakes in the context of global urbanization, and their impacts on fatalities in earthquake-prone areas. We present a global analysis of the changes in population size and urban land area in earthquake-prone areas from 1990 to 2015, and their impacts on earthquake-related fatalities. We found that more than two thirds of population growth (or 70% of total population in 2015) and nearly three quarters of earthquake-related deaths (or 307,918 deaths) in global earthquake-prone areas occurred in developing countries with an urbanization ratio (percentage of urban population to total population) between 20 and 60%. Holding other factors constant, population size was significantly and positively associated with earthquake fatalities, while the area of urban land was negatively related. The results suggest that fatalities increase for areas where the urbanization ratio is low, but after a ratio between 40 and 50% occurs, earthquake fatalities decline. This finding suggests that the resistance of building and infrastructure is greater in countries with higher urbanization ratios and highlights the need for further investigation. Our quantitative analysis is extended into the future using Shared Socioeconomic Pathways to reveal that by 2050, more than 50% of the population increase in global earthquake-prone areas will take place in a few developing countries (Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh) that are particularly vulnerable to earthquakes. To reduce earthquake-induced fatalities, enhanced resilience of buildings and urban infrastructure generally in these few countries should be a priority.

Keywords

Earthquake risk / Global South / Risk governance / Urbanization ratio / Urban sustainability

References

[1] Abramson DB, Qi Y. “Urban-rural integration” in the earthquake zone: Sichuan’s post-disaster reconstruction and the expansion of the Chengdu Metropole. Pacific Affairs, 2011, 84(3): 495-523.

[2] Aitsi-Selmi A, Egawa S, Sasaki H, Wannous C, Murray V. The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: Renewing the global commitment to people’s resilience, health, and well-being. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(2): 164-176.

[3] Alçada-Almeida L, Tralhao L, Santos L, Coutinho-Rodrigues J. A multiobjective approach to locate emergency shelters and identify evacuation routes in urban areas. Geographical Analysis, 2009, 41(1): 9-29.

[4] Alirol E, Laurent G, Beat S, François C, Louis L. Urbanisation and infectious diseases in a globalised world. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2011, 11(2): 131-141.

[5] Allen TI, Marano KD, Earle PS, Wald DJ. PAGER-CAT: A composite earthquake catalog for calibrating global fatality models. Seismological Research Letters, 2009, 80(1): 57-62.

[6] Ambraseys N, Bilham R. Corruption kills. Nature, 2011, 469(7329): 153-155.

[7] Bai X, McPhearson T, Cleugh H, Nagendra H, Tong X, Zhu T, Zhu YG. Linking urbanization and the environment: Conceptual and empirical advances. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2017, 42(1): 215-240.

[8] Bilham R. Millions at risk as big cities grow space in earthquake zones. Nature, 1999, 401(6755): 738-738.

[9] Bilham R. Urban earthquake fatalities: A safer world, or worse to come?. Seismological Research Letters, 2004, 75(6): 706-712.

[10] Bilham R. The seismic future of cities. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 7(4): 839-887.

[11] Bilham R. Shroder JF, Wyss M. Aggravated earthquake risk in South Asia: Engineering versus human nature. Earthquake hazard, risk and disasters, 2014, Boston: Academic Press 103-141.

[12] Bilham R, Gaur V. Buildings as weapons of mass destruction. Science, 2013, 341(6146): 618-619.

[13] Bloom DE, Canning D, Fink G. Urbanization and the wealth of nations. Science, 2008, 319(5864): 772-775.

[14] Boke-Olén N, Abdi A, Hall O, Lehsten V. High-resolution African population projections from radiative forcing and socio-economic models, 2000 to 2100. Scientific Data, 2017, 4(1): 1-9.

[15] Chen, G., X. Li, X. Liu, Y. Chen, X. Liang, J. Leng, X. Xu, W. Liao, et al. 2020a. Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nature Communications 11: Article 537.

[16] Chen Y, Guo F, Wang J, Cai W, Wang C, Wang K. Provincial and gridded population projection for China under shared socioeconomic pathways from 2010 to 2100. Scientific Data, 2020, 7(1): 1-13.

[17] Chen, Y., X. Li, K. Huang, M. Luo, and M. Gao. 2020c. High‐resolution gridded population projections for China under the shared socioeconomic pathways. Earth’s Future 8(6): Article e2020EF001491.

[18] Crowley K, Elliott JR. Earthquake disasters and resilience in the global North: Lessons from New Zealand and Japan. The Geographical Journal, 2012, 178(3): 208-215.

[19] Daniell JE, Khazai B, Wenzel F, Vervaeck A. The CATDAT damaging earthquakes database. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2011, 11(8): 2235-2251.

[20] Daniell, J.E., A.M. Schaefer, and F. Wenzel. 2017. Losses associated with secondary effects in earthquakes. Frontiers in Built Environment 3: Article 30

[21] Daniell, J.E., F. Wenzel, B. Khazai, J.G. Santiago, and A. Schaefer. 2014. A worldwide seismic code index, country-by-country global building practice factor and socioeconomic vulnerability indices for use in earthquake loss estimation. In Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 25–29 August 2014, Istanbul, Turkey.

[22] de Ruiter MC, Ward PJ, Daniell JE, Aerts JCJH. Review article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2017, 17(7): 1231-1251.

[23] Djordjević M, Radivojević A, Dragović R, Filipović I. Exposure to earthquakes-distribution and change of the world’s population with regard to disposition of seismic activities. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijic” SASA, 2016, 66(3): 353-370.

[24] Doberstein B, Stager H. Towards guidelines for post-disaster vulnerability reduction in informal settlements. Disasters, 2013, 37(1): 28-47.

[25] Doocy, S., M. Cherewick, and T. Kirsch. 2013a. Mortality following the Haitian earthquake of 2010: A stratified cluster survey. Population Health Metrics 11: Article 5.

[26] Doocy S, Daniels A, Packer C, Dick A, Kirsch TD. The human impact of earthquakes: A historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents Disasters, 2013

[27] Dou, Y., Q. Huang, C. He, S. Meng, and Q. Zhang. 2018. Rapid population growth throughout Asia’s earthquake-prone areas: A multiscale analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(9): Article 1893.

[28] EM-DAT. 2018. The Emergency Events Database. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). www.emdat.be. Accessed 16 Nov 2021.

[29] England P, Jackson J. Uncharted seismic risk. Nature Geoscience, 2011, 4(6): 348-349.

[30] Frolking, S., T. Milliman, K.C. Seto, and M.A. Friedl. 2013. A global fingerprint of macro-scale changes in urban structure from 1999 to 2009. Environmental Research Letters 8(2): Article 024004.

[31] Gerstenberger, M.C., W. Marzocchi, T. Allen, M. Pagani, J. Adams, L. Danciu, E.H. Field, H. Fujiwara, et al. 2020. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis at regional and national scale: State of the art and future challenges. Reviews of Geophysics 58(2): Article e2019RG000653.

[32] Goldewijk, K.K. 2016. A historical land use data set for the Holocene; HYDE 3.2 (replaced). The Hague: Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

[33] Green R. Bosher L. Informal settlements and natural hazard vulnerability in rapid growth cities. Hazards and the built environment: Attaining built-in resilience, 2008, London and New York: Routledge 218-237.

[34] Güneralp, B., M. Reba, B.U. Hales, E.A. Wentz, and K.C. Seto. 2020. Trends in urban land expansion, density, and land transitions from 1970 to 2010: A global synthesis. Environmental Research Letters 15(4): Article 044015.

[35] He, C., Q. Huang, Y. Dou, W. Tu, and J. Liu. 2016. The population in China’s earthquake-prone areas has increased by over 32 million along with rapid urbanization. Environmental Research Letters 11(7): Article 074028.

[36] He, X., J. Wu, C. Wang, and M. Ye. 2018. Historical earthquakes and their socioeconomic consequences in China: 1950–2017. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(12): Article 2728.

[37] Henderson JV, Venables AJ, Regan T, Samsonov I. Building functional cities. Science, 2016, 352(6288): 946-947.

[38] Holzer TL, Savage JC. Global earthquake fatalities and population. Earthquake Spectra, 2013, 29(1): 155-175.

[39] Huang Q, Meng S, He C, Dou Y, Zhang Q. Rapid urban land expansion in earthquake-prone areas of China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 10(1): 43-56.

[40] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2018. Summary for policymakers. In Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above preindustrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, ed. V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, et al., 3–24. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.

[41] Ishibe T, Shimazaki K. Characteristic earthquake model and seismicity around late quaternary active faults in Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2012, 102(3): 1041-1058.

[42] Jackson J. Fatal attraction: Living with earthquakes, the growth of villages into megacities, and earthquake vulnerability in the modern world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2006, 364(1845): 1911-1925.

[43] Jaiswal K, Wald D. An empirical model for global earthquake fatality estimation. Earthquake Spectra, 2010, 26(4): 1017-1037.

[44] Jaiswal K, David W, Dina D. Developing empirical collapse fragility functions for global building types. Earthquake Spectra, 2011, 27(3): 775-795.

[45] Jaiswal KS, Wald DJ, Earle PS, Porter KA, Hearne M. Spence R, So E, Scawthorn C. Earthquake casualty models within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) system. Human casualties in earthquakes, 2011, Dordrecht: Springer 83-94.

[46] Jiang L, O’Neill BC. Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global Environmental Change, 2017, 42: 193-199.

[47] Lankao RP, Qin H. Conceptualizing urban vulnerability to global climate and environmental change. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability, 2011, 3(3): 142-149.

[48] Lavell, A., M.D. Oppenheimer, J. Hess, R. Lempert, J. Li, R. Muir-Wood, and S. Myeong. 2012. Climate change: New dimensions in disaster risk, exposure, vulnerability, and resilience. In Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation, ed. C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, et al., 25–64. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

[49] Leyk S, Gaughan AE, Adamo SB, de Sherbinin A, Balk D, Freire S, Rose A, Stevens FR The spatial allocation of population: A review of large-scale gridded population data products and their fitness for use. Earth System Science Data, 2019, 11(3): 1385-1409.

[50] Li, M., Z. Zou, G. Xu, and P. Shi. 2015. Mapping earthquake risk of the world. In World atlas of natural disaster risk, ed. P. Shi, and R. Kasperson, 25–39. IHDP/Future Earth-Integrated Risk Governance Project Series. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.

[51] Liu M, Stein S. Mid-continental earthquakes: Spatiotemporal occurrences, causes, and hazards. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 162: 364-386.

[52] Martins VN, Cabral P, Sousa D. Urban modeling for seismic prone areas: The case study of Vila Franca do Campo (Azores Archipelago, Portugal). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012, 12(9): 2731-2741.

[53] Merkens J-L, Reimann L, Hinkel J, Vafeidis A. Gridded population projections for the coastal zone under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global and Planetary Change, 2016, 145: 57-66.

[54] Motamedi MHK, Sagafinia M, Ebrahimi A, Shams E, Motamedi MK. Major earthquakes of the past decade (2000–2010): A comparative review of various aspects of management. Trauma Monthly, 2012, 17(1): 219-229.

[55] Montgomery MR. The urban transformation of the developing world. Science, 2008, 319(5864): 761-764.

[56] Mulligan GF. Revisiting the urbanization curve. Cities, 2013, 32: 113-122.

[57] Munich Re. 2009. Globe of Natural Disasters, MRNATHAN DVD. Munich Reinsurance Company.

[58] Nagendra H, Bai X, Brondizio ES, Lwasa S. The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1(7): 341-349.

[59] NGDC/WDS (National Geophysical Data Center/World Data Service). 2018. Significant earthquake database. Boulder, CO: National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA.

[60] Northam RM. Urban geography, 1979 2 New York: John Wiley & Sons

[61] O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Ebi KL, Kemp-Benedict E, Riahi K, Rothman DS, van Ruijven BJ, van Vuuren DP The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change, 2017, 42: 169-180.

[62] O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Riahi K, Ebi KL, Hallegatte S, Carter TR, Mathur R, van Vuuren DP. A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change, 2014, 122(3): 387-400.

[63] Oteng-Ababio M. Neglected vulnerabilities in a rapidly urbanizing city: Reflections on earthquake risks in Accra. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 2012, 27(2): 187-205.

[64] Pagani, M., J. Garcia-Pelaez, R. Gee, K. Johnson, V. Poggi, R. Styron, G. Weatherill, M. Simionato, et al. 2018. Global Earthquake Model (GEM) seismic hazard map (version 2018.1 – December 2018). https://maps.openquake.org/map/global-seismic-hazard-map/#3/32.00/-2.00. Accessed 20 Nov 2021

[65] Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G, Danciu L, Crowley H, Silva V, Henshaw P, Butler L OpenQuake engine: An open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismological Research Letters, 2014, 85(3): 692-702.

[66] Panza GF, Bela J. NDSHA: A new paradigm for reliable seismic hazard assessment. Engineering Geology, 2020, 275: 105403

[67] Peduzzi P, Dao H, Herold C, Mouton F. Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: The disaster risk index. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2009, 9(4): 1149-1159.

[68] Pesaresi, M., D. Ehrlich, T. Kemper, A. Siragusa, A.J. Florczyk, S. Freire, and C. Corbane. 2017. Atlas of the human planet 2017: Global exposure to natural hazards. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC106292. Accessed 20 Nov 2021.

[69] Potere D, Schneider A. A critical look at representations of urban areas in global maps. GeoJournal, 2007, 69(1–2): 55-80.

[70] Ravallion M, van de Walle D. Urban-rural cost-of-living differentials in a developing economy. Journal of Urban Economics, 1991, 29(1): 113-127.

[71] Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O’Neill BC, Fujimori S, Bauer N, Calvin K The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 2017, 42: 153-168.

[72] Samaddar S, Okada N, Choi J, Tatano H. What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat, India. Natural Hazards, 2017, 85(1): 111-138.

[73] Sarris A, Loupasakis C, Soupios P, Trigkas V, Vallianatos F. Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of urban areas in high seismic regions: Application to Chania City, Crete Island, Greece. Natural Hazards, 2010, 54(2): 395-412.

[74] Shucksmith M, Cameron S, Merridew T, Pichler F. Urban–rural differences in quality of life across the European Union. Regional Studies, 2009, 43(10): 1275-1289.

[75] Spence R. Saving lives in earthquakes: Successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 5(2): 139-251.

[76] Suárez G, Novelo D, Mansilla E. Performance evaluation of the seismic alert system (SAS) in Mexico City: A seismological and a social perspective. Seismological Research Letters, 2009, 80(5): 707-716.

[77] Takeuchi Y, Shaw R. Shaw R. New insights of education sector from East Japan earthquake and tsunami. Disaster recovery, 2014, Tokyo: Springer 147-164.

[78] Uitto JI, Shaw R. Uitto JI, Shaw R. Sustainable development and disaster risk reduction: Introduction. Sustainable development and disaster risk reduction, 2016, Tokyo: Springer 1-12.

[79] UN (United Nations) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, 2015, New York: United Nations

[80] UN (United Nations) World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision, 2019, New York: United Nations Publications

[81] UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) 2018 statistical update: Human development indices and indicators, 2018, New York: UNDP

[82] UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees). 2014. Global strategy for settlement and shelter. http://www.unhcr.org/530f13aa9.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018.

[83] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2017. GAR atlas: Unveiling global disaster risk. Geneva: UNISDR.

[84] Utsu, T. 2004. Catalog of damaging earthquakes in the world (through 2002). Tokyo: Tokyo University and International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. https://iisee.kenken.go.jp/utsu/index_eng.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2021.

[85] van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, O’Neill BC, Ebi KL, Riahi K, Carter TR, Edmonds J, Hallegatte S A new scenario framework for climate change research: Scenario matrix architecture. Climatic Change, 2014, 122(3): 373-386.

[86] Vink K, Takeuchi K. International comparison of measures taken for vulnerable people in disaster risk management laws. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2013, 4: 63-70.

[87] Ward PJ, Blauhut V, Bloemendaal N, Daniell JE, de Ruiter MC, Duncan MJ, Emberson R, Jenkins SF Review article: Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020, 20(4): 1069-1096.

[88] Wyss M. Testing the basic assumption for probabilistic seismic-hazard assessment: 11 failures. Seismological Research Letters, 2015, 86(5): 1405-1411.

[89] Wyss M. Rural populations suffer most in great earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89(6): 1991-1997.

[90] York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(3): 351-365.