Mobile Alert and Warning in the United States and Japan: Confronting the Challenges of International Harmonization

Hamilton Bean , Ana Maria Cruz , Mika Shimizu , Keri K. Stephens , Matthew McGlone , Sharon Strover

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6) : 928 -934.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6) : 928 -934. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-021-00380-4
Conference Report

Mobile Alert and Warning in the United States and Japan: Confronting the Challenges of International Harmonization

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A U.S.-Japan expert workshop on mobile alert and warning was held online 8–10 September 2021. Funded by the Japan Foundation’s Center for Global Partnership (CGP) and responding to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, the workshop compared U.S. and Japanese mobile alert and warning contexts, systems, policies, and messages to investigate possibilities for international harmonization of mobile device-based early warning. The workshop’s sessions revealed two interrelated issues that repeatedly surfaced among workshop participants: culture and policy. The workshop illuminated several possibilities and problems confronting U.S., Japanese, and global stakeholders as they develop, deploy, and seek to improve the effectiveness of mobile alert and warning systems and messages.

Keywords

Alerts / Disasters / Warning / Japan / Mobile technology / United States

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hamilton Bean, Ana Maria Cruz, Mika Shimizu, Keri K. Stephens, Matthew McGlone, Sharon Strover. Mobile Alert and Warning in the United States and Japan: Confronting the Challenges of International Harmonization. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(6): 928-934 DOI:10.1007/s13753-021-00380-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahn, A.Y., H. Takikawa, E. Maly, A. Bostrom, S. Kuriyama, H. Matsubara, T. Izumi, T. Torayashiki, et al. 2021. Perception of earthquake risks and disaster prevention awareness: A comparison of resident surveys in Sendai, Japan and Seattle, WA, USA. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 66: Article 102624.

[2]

Brehm JW. A theory of psychological reactance, 1966, New York: Academic Press

[3]

Claeys AS, De Waele A, Koppen E. Informing the public matters: A field experiment during an ongoing health crisis in Belgium. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2021

[4]

Gulevich O, Sarieva I, Nevruev A, Yagiyayev I. How do social beliefs affect political action motivation?. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2017, 20(3): 382-395

[5]

Hall ET. The silent language, 1959, New York: Anchor Books

[6]

Hu HH, Lin J, Cui W. Cultural differences and collective action: A social network based perspective. Complexity, 2014, 20(4): 68-77

[7]

Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-292

[8]

Kelman, I., and C. Fearnley. 2021. Warnings as a social process. https://www.anticipation-hub.org/news/warnings-as-social-processes. Accessed 25 Oct 2021.

[9]

Kitagawa K. Disaster preparedness, adaptive politics and lifelong learning: A case of Japan. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 2016, 35(6): 629-647

[10]

McGlone MS, Bell RA, McGlynn J, Zaitchik S. Don’t let the flu catch you: Grammatical agency assignment in printed educational materials about the H1N1 influenza virus and vaccine. Journal of Health Communication, 2012, 18(6): 740-756

[11]

Mileti, D.S. 2018. Modernizing public warning messaging. https://youtu.be/oYya009bc2M. Accessed 25 Oct 2021.

[12]

Nakayachi K, Becker JS, Potter SH, Dixon M. Residents’ reactions to earthquake early warnings in Japan. Risk Analysis, 2019, 39(8): 1723-1740

[13]

Neußner, O. 2021. Early warning alerts for extreme natural hazard events: A review of worldwide practices. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 60: Article 102295.

[14]

NHK. 2021. Atami mudslide. https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20210818/k10013207691000.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2021 (in Japanese).

[15]

Ozaki T, Nakayachi K. A pitfall of nudging by descriptive norms on disaster preparedness. Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis, 2020, 30(2): 101-110.

[16]

PreventionWeb. 2021. Sendai framework indicators. https://www.preventionweb.net/sendai-framework/sendai-framework-indicators. Accessed 25 Oct 2021.

[17]

Stephens, K.K., and W. Boettner. 2020. Collaborating our way to a successful community-wide wildfire drill in Texas. Fire Magazine, April 2020, 38–39. United Kingdom.

[18]

Sutton J, Fischer L, Wood MM. Tornado warning guidance and graphics: Implications of the inclusion of protective action information on perceptions and efficacy. Weather, Climate, and Society., 2021

[19]

Takenouchi K, Yamori K. Synergistic integration of detailed meteorological and community information for evacuation from weather-related disasters: Proposal of a “disaster response switch”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(6): 762-775

[20]

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030. Accessed 25 Oct 2021.

[21]

Yamori K, Sugiyama T. Development and social implementation of smartphone app Nige-Tore for improving tsunami evacuation drills: Synergistic effects between commitment and contingency. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(6): 751-761

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

219

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/