A Critical Review of Social Resilience Properties and Pathways in Disaster Management
A. M. Aslam Saja , Melissa Teo , Ashantha Goonetilleke , Abdul M. Ziyath
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6) : 790 -804.
A Critical Review of Social Resilience Properties and Pathways in Disaster Management
Resilience as a concept is multi-faceted with complex dimensions. In a disaster context, there is lack of consistency in conceptualizing social resilience. This results in ambiguity of its definition, properties, and pathways for assessment. A number of key research gaps exist for critically reviewing social resilience conceptualization, projecting resilience properties in a disaster-development continuum, and delineating a resilience trajectory in a multiple disaster timeline. This review addressed these research gaps by critically reviewing social resilience definitions, properties, and pathways. The review found four variations in social resilience definitions, which recognize the importance of abilities of social systems and processes in disaster phases at different levels. A review of resilience properties and pathways in the disaster resilience literature suggested new resilience properties—“risk-sensitivity” and “regenerative” in the timeline of two consecutive disasters. This review highlights a causal pathway for social resilience to better understand the resilience status in a multi-shock scenario by depicting inherent and adaptive resilience for consecutive disaster scenarios and a historical case study for a resilience trajectory in a multiple disaster timeline. The review findings will assist disaster management policymakers and practitioners to formulate appropriate resilience enhancement strategies within a holistic framework in a multi-disaster timeline.
Community resilience / Disaster resilience / Resilience assessment / Resilience measurement / Resilience properties
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Bahadur, A.V., K. Peters, E. Wilkinson, F. Pichon, K. Gray, and T. Tanner. 2015. The 3As: Tracking resilience across BRACED. London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/9812.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2018. |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Béné, C., T. Frankenberger, and S. Nelson. 2015. Design, monitoring and evaluation of resilience interventions: Conceptual and empirical considerations. IDS Working Paper No. 459. Brighton, UK: Institue of Development Studies. |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Chambers, K.F., A.C. Baker, S.K. McKay, and H. Morgan. 2019. Retrospective sustainability and resilience: Complementary concepts for managing systems. Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Constas, M., T. Frankenberger, J. Hoddinott, N. Mock, D. Romano, C. Béné, and D. Maxwell. 2014. A common analytical model for resilience measurement: Causal framework and methodological options. In Food Security Information Network Resilience Measurement Technical Working Group. https://www.fsnnetwork.org/resource/common-analytical-model-resilience-measurement-causal-framework-and-methodological-options. Accessed 10 Sept 2018. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
ESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific) Risk-sensitive development in Asia and the Pacific, 2015, Bangkok: ESCAP Committee on Disaster Risk Reduction, United Nations |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
Frankenberger, T., M. Langworthy, T. Spangler, S. Nelson, J. Campbell, and J. Njoka. 2012. Enhancing resilience to food security shocks. https://www.fsnnetwork.org/sites/default/files/discussion_paper_usaid_dfid_wb_nov._8_2012.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2021. |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Mayunga, J.S. 2007. Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach. A draft working paper prepared for the Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability and Resilience Building, 22–28 July 2007, Munich, Germany. |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Oliver, A., I. Thomas, and M.M. Thompson. 2013. Resilient and regenerative design in New Orleans: The case of the Make It Right project. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society 6(1). http://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/1610. |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Perera, A. 2012. Between drought and floods – A year of extremes in Sri Lanka. Inter Press Service News Agency, 30 December 2012. http://www.ipsnews.net/2012/12/between-drought-and-floods-a-year-of-extremes-in-sri-lanka/. Accessed 25 Sept 2019. |
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction, 2019, Geneva: UNDRR |
| [65] |
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) 2009 UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction, 2009, Geneva: UNISDR |
| [66] |
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Proposed updated terminology on disaster risk reduction: A technical review, 2015, Geneva: UNISDR |
| [67] |
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, 2015, Geneva: UNISDR |
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |