The Importance of Digital Elevation Model Selection in Flood Simulation and a Proposed Method to Reduce DEM Errors: A Case Study in Shanghai
Kepeng Xu , Jiayi Fang , Yongqiang Fang , Qinke Sun , Chengbo Wu , Min Liu
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6) : 890 -902.
The Importance of Digital Elevation Model Selection in Flood Simulation and a Proposed Method to Reduce DEM Errors: A Case Study in Shanghai
Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) play a critical role in hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. Flood inundation mapping is highly dependent on the accuracy of DEMs. Various vertical differences exist among open access DEMs as they use various observation satellites and algorithms. The problem is particularly acute in small, flat coastal cities. Thus, it is necessary to assess the differences of the input of DEMs in flood simulation and to reduce anomalous errors of DEMs. In this study, we first conducted urban flood simulation in the Huangpu River Basin in Shanghai by using the LISFLOOD-FP hydrodynamic model and six open-access DEMs (SRTM, MERIT, CoastalDEM, GDEM, NASADEM, and AW3D30), and analyzed the differences in the results of the flood inundation simulations. Then, we processed the DEMs by using two statistically based methods and compared the results with those using the original DEMs. The results show that: (1) the flood inundation mappings using the six original DEMs are significantly different under the same simulation conditions—this indicates that only using a single DEM dataset may lead to bias of flood mapping and is not adequate for high confidence analysis of exposure and flood management; and (2) the accuracy of a DEM corrected by the Dixon criterion for predicting inundation extent is improved, in addition to reducing errors in extreme water depths—this indicates that the corrected datasets have some performance improvement in the accuracy of flood simulation. A freely available, accurate, high-resolution DEM is needed to support robust flood mapping. Flood-related researchers, practitioners, and other stakeholders should pay attention to the uncertainty caused by DEM quality.
Digital elevation models / Dixon criterion / Hydraulic modeling / Shanghai / Urban flooding
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Crippen, R., S. Buckley, P. Agram, E. Belz, E. Gurrola, S. Hensley, M. Kobrick, M. Lavalle, et al. 2016. NASADEM global elevation model: Methods and progress. ISPRS – International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLI–B4: 125–128. |
| [11] |
Dang, Y., L. Chen, W. Zhang, D. Zheng, and D. Zhan. 2020. How does growing city size affect residents’ happiness in urban China? A case study of the Bohai rim area. Habitat International 97: Article 102120. |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Fang, J., D. Lincke, S. Brown, R. Nicholls, C. Wolff, J. Merkens, J. Hinkel, A. Vafeidis, et al. 2020. Coastal flood risks in China through the 21st century – An application of DIVA. Science of the Total Environment 704: Article 135311. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Gallant, J. 2011. Adaptive smoothing for noisy DEMs. Geomorphometry 2011, 07–11 September 2011, Redlands, California. https://gis-lab.info/docs/gallant2011_adaptive_smoothing_for_noisy_dems.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2021. |
| [22] |
Gesch, D. 2018. Best practices for elevation-based assessments of sea-level rise and coastal flooding exposure. Frontiers in Earth Science 6: Article 230. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Hawker, L., P. Bates, J. Neal, and J. Rougier. 2018. Perspectives on Digital Elevation Model (DEM) simulation for flood modeling in the absence of a high-accuracy open access global DEM. Frontiers in Earth Science 6: Article 233. |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Karamuz, E., R. Romanowicz, and J. Doroszkiewicz. 2020. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles in flood hazard assessment. Journal of Flood Risk Management 13(4): Article e12622. |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Kim, Y., Y. Tak, M. Park, and B. Kang. 2020. Improvement of urban flood damage estimation using a high-resolution digital terrain. Journal of Flood Risk Management 13(S1): Article e12575. |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Kulp, S., and B. Strauss. 2019. New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding. Nature Communications 10(1): Article 4844. |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Lin, N., R.E. Kopp, B.P. Horton, and J.P. Donnelly. 2016. Hurricane Sandy’s flood frequency increasing from year 1800 to 2100. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(43): Article 12071. |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Sampson, C., A. Smith, P. Bates, J. Neal, and M. Trigg. 2016. Perspectives on open access high resolution Digital Elevation Models to produce global flood hazard layers. Frontiers in Earth Science 3: Article 85. |
| [47] |
SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation). 2008. Statistical interpretation of data – Detection and treatment of outliers in the normal sample. Beijing: SAMR. (in Chinese). |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Schumann, G., and P. Bates. 2018. The need for a high-accuracy, open-access global DEM. Frontiers in Earth Science 6: Article 225. |
| [51] |
SMSB (Shanghai Municipal Statistics Bureau) Shanghai statistical yearbook 2020, 2020, Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese) |
| [52] |
Soille, P., J. Vogt, and R. Colombo. 2003. Carving and adaptive drainage enforcement of grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 39(12): Article 1366. |
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
Surjan, A., G.A. Parvin, Atta-ur-Rahman, and R. Shaw. 2016. Expanding coastal cities: An increasing risk. In Urban disasters and resilience in Asia, ed. R. Shaw, Atta-ur-Rahman, A. Surjan, and G.A. Parvin, 79–90. Amsterdam: Elsevier. |
| [55] |
Tachikawa, T., M. Hato, M. Kaku, and A. Iwasaki. 2011. Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 24–29 July, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3657–3660. |
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
Tadono, T., H. Ishida, F. Oda, S. Naito, K. Minakawa, and H. Iwamoto. 2014. Precise global DEM generation by ALOS PRISM. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences II–4: 71–76. |
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Takaku, J., T. Tadono, K. Tsutsui, and M. Ichikawa. 2016. Validation of "AW3D" global DSM generated from ALOS PRISM. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences III–4: 25–31. |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
Wong, W., S. Tsuyuki, K. Ioki, and M. Phua. 2014. Accuracy assessment of global topographic data (SRTM & ASTER GDEM) in comparison with lidar for tropical montane forest. In Proceedings of the 35th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2014, 27–31 October 2014, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, 722–727. |
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
Yin, J., D. Yu, and B. Liao. 2020. A city-scale assessment of emergency response accessibility to vulnerable populations and facilities under normal and pluvial flood conditions for Shanghai, China. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320971304. |
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
Zhao, G., P. Bates, and J. Neal. 2020. The impact of dams on design floods in the conterminous US. Water Resources Research 56(3): e2019WR025380. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |