A River Flood and Earthquake Risk Assessment of Railway Assets along the Belt and Road

Qianzhi Wang , Kai Liu , Ming Wang , Elco E. Koks

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4) : 553 -567.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4) : 553 -567. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-021-00358-2
Article

A River Flood and Earthquake Risk Assessment of Railway Assets along the Belt and Road

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Mitigating the disaster risk of transportation infrastructure networks along the Belt and Road is crucial to realizing the area’s high trade potential in the future. This study assessed the exposure and risk of existing and planned railway assets to river flooding and earthquakes. We found that about 9.3% of these railway assets are exposed to a one in 100 year flood event, and 22.3% are exposed to a one in 475 year earthquake event. The combined flood and earthquake risk of physical damage to railway assets, expressed by expected annual damage (EAD), is estimated at USD 1438 (between 966 and 2026) million. Floods contribute the majority of the risk (96%). China has the highest EAD for both floods and earthquakes (between USD 240 and 525 million in total). Laos and Cambodia are the countries with the highest EAD per km from flooding (USD 66,125–112,154 and USD 31,954–56,844 per km, respectively), while Italy and Myanmar have the highest EAD per km from earthquakes (USD 1000–3057 and USD 893–3019 per km, respectively). For the newly built and planned projects along the Belt and Road, the EAD is estimated at USD 271 (between 205 and 357) million. The China–Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor and China–Pakistan Economic Corridor have the highest absolute EAD and EAD per km, with EADs reaching USD 95 and USD 67 million, and USD 18 and USD 17 thousand per km, on average, respectively. For railway segments with high risks, we found that if the required adaptation cost within 20 years to realize a 10% increase of the railway quality is below 8.4% of the replacement cost, the benefits are positive.

Keywords

Belt and Road / Cost-benefit analysis / Disaster risk / Railway assets

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qianzhi Wang, Kai Liu, Ming Wang, Elco E. Koks. A River Flood and Earthquake Risk Assessment of Railway Assets along the Belt and Road. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(4): 553-567 DOI:10.1007/s13753-021-00358-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alfieri L, Bisselink B, Dottori F, Naumann G, de Roo A, Salamon P, Wyser K, Feyen L. Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world. Earth’s Future, 2017, 5(2): 171-182

[2]

ARCADIS International construction cost report: What will it mean for 2015, 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ARCADIS

[3]

Attinà M, Basilico A, Botta M, Brancatello I, Gargani F, Gori V, Wilhelm F, Menting M Assessment of unit costs (standard prices) of rail projects (CAPital EXpenditure), 2018, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union

[4]

Bach C, Gupta AK, Nair SS, Birkmann J. Critical infrastructures and disaster risk reduction, 2013, New Delhi: National Institute of Disaster Management and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)

[5]

Bird JF, Bommer JJ. Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Engineering Geology, 2004, 75(2): 147-179

[6]

Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saltelli A. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007, 22(10): 1509-1518

[7]

Chai D, Wang M, Liu K. Driving factors of natural disasters in Belt and Road countries. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 51: 101774

[8]

CIMNE (Centro Internacional de Métodos Numéricos en Ingeniería) and INGENIAR (Ingeniería para el Análisis del Riesgo Ingenieros Consultores). 2015. Update on the probabilistic modelling of natural risks at global level: Global risk model. Background paper. Prepared for the 2015 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Barcelona, Spain and Bogotá, Colombia: CIMNE and INGENIAR.

[9]

Cui, P., A.D. Regmi, Q. Zou, L. Yu, X.Q. Chen, and D.Q. Cheng. 2017. Natural hazards and disaster risk in One Belt One Road corridors. In Proceedings of the Workshop on World Landslide Forum 2017: Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides, ed. M. Mikos, B. Tiwari, Y. Yin, and K. Sassa, 1155–1164. Heidelberg: Springer.

[10]

De Bruijn, K., D. Wagenaar, K. Slager, M. de Bel, and A. Burzel. 2015. Updated and improved method for flood damage assessment: SSM2015 (version 2). Delft, The Netherlands: Deltares, 2015.

[11]

de Moel H, Aerts J. Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Natural Hazards, 2011, 58(1): 407-425

[12]

de Moel H, Asselman N, Aerts J. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of coastal flood damage estimates in the west of the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012, 12(4): 1045-1058

[13]

Edwin. 2014. Bridges and viaducts. Hot Rails, 8 September 2014. hotrails.net/2014/09/bridges_and_viaducts/. Accessed 29 Aug 2020.

[14]

Espinet, X., J. Rozenberg, K.S. Rao, and S. Ogita. 2018. Piloting the use of network analysis and decision-making under uncertainty in transport operations: Preparation and appraisal of a rural roads project in Mozambique under changing flood risk and other deep uncertainties. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8490. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

[15]

Feyen L, Dankers R, Bódis K, Salamon P, Barredo JI. Fluvial flood risk in Europe in present and future climates. Climatic Change, 2012, 112(1): 47-62

[16]

Gürlük S. Daniels JA. Diagnostic of high social discount rate in developing countries and low social discount rate in developed countries. Advances in environmental research, 2016, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers 129-140.

[17]

Han J. China railway yearbook, 2016, Beijing: China Railway Publishing House (in Chinese)

[18]

Helsingsen, H., B. Milligan, M. Dailey, and N. Bhagabati. 2018. Greening China’s Belt and Road initiative in Myanmar: Rapid assessment of opportunities and risks for Myanmar’s natural capital. Myanmar: WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature). https://www.wwf.org.mm/en/news_room/publications/?uNewsID=318715. Accessed 29 Sept 2020.

[19]

Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R, Koirala S, Konoshima L, Yamazaki D, Watanabe S, Kim H, Kanae S. Global flood risk under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3(9): 816-821

[20]

Kameshwar S, Padgett JE. Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards. Engineering Structures, 2014, 78: 154-166

[21]

Kellermann P, Schöbel A, Kundela G, Thieken AH. Estimating flood damage to railway infrastructure—The case study of the March River flood in 2006 at the Austrian Northern Railway. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2015, 15(11): 2485-2496

[22]

Khan A, Chenggang Y, Khan G, Muhammad F. The dilemma of natural disasters: Impact on economy, fiscal position, and foreign direct investment alongside Belt and Road initiative countries. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 743: 140578

[23]

Koks EE, Jongman B, Husby TG, Botzen WJW. Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management. Environmental Science & Policy, 2015, 47: 42-52

[24]

Koks EE, Rozenberg J, Zorn C, Tariverdi M, Vousdoukas M, Fraser S, Hall J, Hallegatte S. A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 2677

[25]

Kreibich H, Piroth K, Seifert I, Maiwald H, Kunert U, Schwarz J, Merz B, Thieken AH. Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling?. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2009, 9(5): 1679-1692

[26]

Kyriazis, P., A. Sotiris, K. Kalliopi, C. Helen, and T. Fabio. 2013. Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk analysis for buildings, lifeline networks and infrastructures safety gain. SYNER-G synthetic document. Luxembourg: Joint Research Centre, European Commission.

[27]

Lagadec L-R, Moulin L, Braud I, Chazelle B, Breil P. A surface runoff mapping method for optimizing risk assessment on railways. Safety Science, 2018, 110(Part B): 253-267

[28]

Mao XZ, Liu J, Li T, Qiu H. Spatio-temporal patterns of natural disasters in countries along the Belt and Road. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2018, 27(1): 1-8 (in Chinese)

[29]

Miyamoto. 2019. Overview of engineering options for increasing infrastructure resilience: Final Report. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/474111560527161937/final-report. Accessed 30 Jul 2020.

[30]

Moran AP, Thieken AH, Schöbel A, Rachoy C. Düh J, Hufnagl H, Juritsch E, Pfliegl R, Schimany H-K, Schönegger H. Documentation of flood damage on railway infrastructure. Data and mobility, 2010, Heidelberg: Springer 61-70

[31]

Morris MD. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 1991, 33(1): 161-174

[32]

NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission) and NRA (National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China) China Railway Express construction and development plan (2016–2020), 2016, Beijing: National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese)

[33]

Ollivier, G., J. Sondhi, and N. Zhou. 2014. High-speed railways in China: A look at construction costs. China Transport Topics No. 9. Beijing: World Bank.

[34]

PICC (The People’s Insurance Company [Group] of China). 2014. Internal report of PICC. Beijing: PICC (in Chinese).

[35]

Refinitiv. 2020. BRI connect: The numbers behind the Belt and Road initiative. Amman, Jordan: Refinitiv. https https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/o1dLPVAd0Jbe2zWBm9K-IA. Accessed 30 Sept 2020.

[36]

Scawthorn C, Flores P, Blais N, Seligson H, Tate E, Chang S, Mifflin E, Thomas W HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment. Natural Hazards Review, 2006, 7: 72-81

[37]

Schwab K, Sala-i-Martín X, Samans R. The global competitiveness report 2017–2018, 2017, Geneva: World Economic Forum

[38]

Scussolini P, Aerts JCJH, Jongman B, Bouwer LM, Winsemius HC, de Moel H, Ward PJ. FLOPROS: An evolving global database of flood protection standards. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 16(5): 1049-1061

[39]

Tsubaki R, Bricker JD, Ichii K, Kawahara Y. Development of fragility curves for railway embankment and ballast scour due to overtopping flood flow. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 16(12): 2455-2472

[40]

Wang, C., X. Wu, and L. Zhou. 2018. Analysis of associated economic loss of meteorological disasters among the Belt and Road Typical Countries—Taking the China’s Typhoon Rammasun in 2014 as an example. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of Risk Analysis Council of China Association for Disaster Prevention, 20–21 October 2018, Xi’an, China, 198–204. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Atlantis Press.

[41]

Ward PJ, Jongman B, Aerts JC, Bates PD, Botzen WJ, Loaiza AD, Hallegatte S, Kind JM A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(9): 642-646

[42]

Ward PJ, Jongman B, Weiland FS, Bouwman A, van Beek R, Bierkens MF, Ligtvoet W, Winsemius HC. Assessing flood risk at the global scale: Model setup, results, and sensitivity. Environmental Research Letters, 2013, 8(4): 044019

[43]

Warusawitharana M. The social discount rate in developing countries, 2014, Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)

[44]

Winsemius H, Van Beek L, Jongman B, Ward P, Bouwman A. A framework for global river flood risk assessments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 17(5): 1871-1892

[45]

Winsemius HC, Aerts JC, Van Beek LP, Bierkens MF, Bouwman A, Jongman B, Kwadijk JC, Ligtvoet W Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(4): 381-385

[46]

Worden, C.B., D.J. Wald, J. Sanborn, and E.M. Thompson. 2015. Development of an open-source hybrid global Vs30 model. In Proceedings of the Seismological Society of America 2015 Annual Meeting, 21–23 April 2015, Pasadena, California, USA. https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/vs30-models-and-data?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects. Accessed 30 Sept 2020.

[47]

World Bank Belt and Road economics: Opportunities and risks of transport corridors, 2019, Washington, DC: World Bank

[48]

Wu R. The risks and prevention of China’s railway “going global” – Based on Mombasa Nairobi Railway, 2019, Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University (in Chinese)

[49]

Xi P, Liu W. Ancient and modern silk road: Panoramic map of the Belt and Road initiative, 2017, Beijing: Sinomap Press (in Chinese)

[50]

Yu L, Cui P, Regmi AD, Murray V, Pasuto A, Titti G, Shafique M. An international program on Silk Road Disaster Risk Reduction—A Belt and Road initiative (2016–2020). Journal of Mountain Science, 2018, 15(4): 1383-1396

[51]

Yu X, Yu X, Li C, Ji Z. Information diffusion-based risk assessment of natural disasters along the silk road economic belt in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 244: 118744

[52]

Zhu J, Baise LG, Thompson EM. An updated Geospatial Liquefaction Model for global application. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2017, 107(3): 1365-1385

[53]

Zorn, C., and E. Koks. 2019. Global liquefaction susceptibility map. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2583746. Accessed 30 May 2020.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

303

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/