An Input–Output Ex Ante Regional Model to Assess the Short-Term Net Effects of the 16 April 2016 Earthquake in Ecuador

Abstract

The 16 April 2016 earthquake in Ecuador exposed the significant weaknesses concerning the methodological designs to compute—from an economic standpoint—the consequences of a natural hazard-related disaster for productive exchanges and the accumulation of capital in Ecuador. This study addressed one of these challenges with an innovative ex ante model to measure the partial and net short-term effects of a natural hazard-related catastrophe from an interregional perspective, with the 16 April 2016 earthquake serving as a case study. In general, the specified and estimated model follows the approach of the extended Miyazawa model, which endogenizes consumption demand in a standard input–output model with the subnational interrelations and resulting multipliers. Due to the country’s limitations in its regional account records the input–output matrices for each province of Ecuador had to be estimated, which then allowed transactions carried out between any two sectors within or outside a given province to be identified by means of the RAS method. The estimations provide evidence that the net short-term impact on the national accounts was not significant, and under some of the simulated scenarios, based on the official information with respect to earthquake management, the impact may even have had a positive effect on the growth of the national product during 2016.

Keywords

Earthquake impact / Ecuador / Input–output / RAS method / Regional model

References

[1] Albala-Bertrand J. Natural disaster situations and growth: A macroeconomic model for sudden disaster impacts. World Development, 1993, 21(9): 1417-1434

[2] Avelino A. Disaggregating input–output tables in time: The temporal input–output framework. Economic Systems Research, 2017, 29(3): 313-334

[3] Avelino, A., and G. Hewings. 2017. The challenge of estimating the impact of disasters: Many approaches, many limitations and a compromise. The Regional Economics Applications Laboratory. REAL 17-T-1. http://real.illinois.edu/d-paper/17/17-T-1.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2021.

[4] Beauval C, Yepes H, Bakun W, Egred J, Alvarado A, Singaucho J. Locations and magnitudes of historical earthquakes in the Sierra of Ecuador (1587–1996). Geophysical Journal International, 2010, 181(3): 1613-1633.

[5] Bitrán D. Methodology for the evaluation of socioeconomic impact of disasters (Metodología para la evaluación del impacto socioeconómico de los desastres). Serie Estudios y Perspectivas, 2009, 108: 33 (in Spanish)

[6] Bolton P. The March 5, 1987, Ecuador Earthquakes: Mass wasting and socioeconomic effects, 1991, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

[7] Carrión, A., I. Giunta, A. Mancero, and G. Jiménez (eds.). 2017. Post-earthquake, risk management and international cooperation: Ecuador (Pos-terremoto, gestión de riesgos y cooperación internacional: Ecuador). Ecuador: Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales (IAEN) (in Spanish).

[8] CBE (Central Bank of Ecuador). 2020. System of national accounts. https://www.bce.fin.ec/index.php/informacioneconomica/sector-real. Accessed 9 May 2021 (in Spanish).

[9] CRPER (Committee for Reconstruction and Productive and Employment Reactivation). 2016. Rebuild Ecuador Plan − Quarterly Report (Plan reconstruye Ecuador − Informe Trimestral). https://www.reconstruyoecuador.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/10/Informe-Asamblea_SeTec-Reconstrucci%C3%B3n_20160830.pdf. Accessed 07 May 2021 (in Spanish).

[10] Chang, S. 2000. Economic impacts. In The Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake of September 21, 1999: Reconnaissance report, technical report MCEER-00-0003, ed. G.C. Lee, and L. Chin-Hsiung, 101–114. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.

[11] Chunga, K., M. Mulas, and M.F. Quiñonez. 2016. Geomorphologic and stratigraphic relationships as indicators of geologic hazard and paleoseismicity, central coast of Ecuador. In Proceedings of the 7th International INQUA Meeting on Paleoseismology, Active Tectonics and Archeoseismology (PATA), 30 May–3 June 2016, 59−62. Crestone, Colorado, USA. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Angelo-Constantine/publication/332330569_Geomorphology_and_Stratigraphic_relationships_as_indicators_of_Geologic_Hazard_and_Paleoseismicity_central_coast_of_Ecuador/links/5cae1798299bf120975c3ef3/Geomorphology-and-Stratigraphic-relationships-as-indicators-of-Geologic-Hazard-and-Paleoseismicity-central-coast-of-Ecuador.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2021.

[12] Cochrane, H. 1974. Social science perspectives on the coming San Francisco Earthquake: Economic impact, prediction, and reconstruction. Natural Hazard Research Working Paper No. 25. Boulder. CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

[13] Dacy D, Kunreuther H. The economics of natural disasters, 1969, New York: The Free Press

[14] ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 1973. Report on the damage and repercussions of the earthquake in the city of Managua on the Nicaraguan economy (Informe sobre los daños y repercusiones del terremoto de la ciudad de Managua en la economía Nicaragüense). E/CN.12/AC.64/2/Rev.1. Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (in Spanish).

[15] El Comercio. 2016. Government creates a committee for the reconstruction and reactivation of production (Crean comité de reconstrucción y reactivación productiva). https://www.elcomercio.com/actualidad/comitedereconstruccion-terremoto-ecuador-rafaelcorrea.html#:~:text=El%20presidente%20Rafael%20Correa%20firm%C3%B3,dej%C3%B3%20m%C3%A1s%20de%20600%20fallecidos. Accessed 7 May 2021 (in Spanish).

[16] El Telégrafo. 2016. The crisis due to the earthquake enters the second phase (La crisis por el sismo entra en segunda fase). https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/ecuador/1/la-crisis-por-el-sismo-entra-en-segunda-fase. Accessed 19 Apr 2021 (in Spanish).

[17] Ellison R, Milliman J, Roberts R. Measuring the regional economic effects of earthquakes and earthquake predictions. Journal of Regional Science, 1984, 24(4): 559-579

[18] Friesma HP, Caporaso J, Goldstein G, Linberry R, McCleary R. Aftermath: Communities after natural disasters, 1979, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

[19] Galbusera L, Giannopoulos G. On input–output economic models in disaster impact assessment. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 30: 186-198

[20] Haas E, Kates R, Bowden M. Reconstruction following disaster, 1977, Cambridge: MIT Press

[21] La Hora. 2016. VAT goes up to 14% for one year (El IVA sube al 14% por un año), https://lahora.com.ec/noticia/1101937134/noticia. Accessed 19 Apr 2021 (in Spanish).

[22] Loayza N, Olaberría E, Rigolini J, Christiaensen L. Natural disasters and growth: Going beyond the averages. World Development, 2012, 40(7): 1317-1336

[23] Meli, R., D. Bitrán, and S. Santa Cruz. 2005. The Impact of Natural Disasters on Development: Basic Methodological Document for National Case Studies (El Impacto de los Desastres Naturales en el Desarrollo: Documento Metodológico Básico para Estudios Nacionales de Caso). New York and Santiago de Chile: United Nations and Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (in Spanish).

[24] Munroe T, Ballard P. Modeling the economic disruption of a major earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area: Impact on California. The Annals of Regional Science, 1983, 17(3): 23-40

[25] National Academy of Sciences Earthquake prediction and public policy, 1975, Washington, DC: Printing and Publishing Office, National Academy of Sciences

[26] National Research Council Committee on assessing the costs of natural disasters, the impacts of natural disasters: A framework for loss estimation, 1999, Washington, DC: National Academy Press

[27] National Secretariat for Planning and Development (Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo). 2016. Evaluation of the reconstruction costs (Evaluación de los costos de reconstrucción) (in Spanish).

[28] Okuyama Y. Modeling spatial economic impacts of an earthquake: Input–output approaches. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2004, 13(4): 297-306

[29] Okuyama, Y. 2008. A critical review of methodologies on disaster impact estimation. Graduate School of International Relations, International University of Japan, Niigata, Japan. https://www.coursehero.com/file/71545967/Okuyama-Critical-Reviewpdf/. Accessed 7 May 2021.

[30] Okuyama Y, Chang S. Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters, 2004, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media

[31] Okuyama Y, Sonis M, Hewings GJD. Hewings GJD, Sonis M, Madden M, Kimura Y. Economic impacts of an unscheduled, disruptive event: A Miyazawa multiplier analysis. Understanding and interpreting economic structure, 1999, Heidelberg: Springer 113-143

[32] Oosterhaven J, Bouwmeester M. A new approach to modeling the impact of disruptive events. Journal of Regional Science, 2016, 56(4): 583-595

[33] Rose A. Okuyama Y, Chang SE. Economic principles, issues, and research priorities in hazard loss estimation. Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters, 2004, New York: Springer 13-36

[34] Rose A, Liao S. Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: A computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. Journal of Regional Science, 2005, 45(1): 75-112

[35] Scawthorn, C., B. Lashkari, and A. Naseer. 1997. What happened in Kobe and what if it happened here? In Economic consequences of earthquakes: Preparing for the unexpected, ed. B.G. Jones, 15–49. Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.

[36] Skidmore M, Toya H. Do natural disasters promote long-run growth?. Economic Inquiry, 2002, 40(4): 664-687

[37] Stone R, Brown J. Output and investment for exponential growth in consumption. Review of Economic Studies, 1962, 29(3): 241-245

[38] Tol R, Leek F. Downing T, Olsthoorn A, Tol R. Economic analysis of natural disasters. Climate change and risk, 1999, London: Routledge 308-327.

[39] Toulkeridis T, Chunga K, Renteria W. The 7.8 Mw Earthquake and Tsunami of the 16th April 2016 in Ecuador: Seismic evaluation, geological field survey and economic implications. Science of Tsunami Hazards, 2017, 36(4): 197-242.

[40] Wright J, Rossi P, Wright S, Weber-Burdin E. After the clean-up: Long-range effects of natural disasters, 1979, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

[41] Wright JD, Rossi PH. Social science and natural hazards, 1981, Cambridge, MA: Abt Books

[42] Wu J, Li N, Hallegatte S, Shi P, Hu A, Liu X. Regional indirect economic impact evaluation of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 65(1): 161-172

[43] Ye L, Kanamori H, Avouac J, Linyan L, Cheung K, Lay T. The 16 April 2016, M_W 7.8 (M_S 7.5) Ecuador earthquake: A quasi-repeat of the 1942 M_S 7.5 earthquake and partial re-rupture of the 1906 M_S 8.6 Colombia-Ecuador earthquake. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2016, 454: 248-258

[44] Yu, K.D.S., R.R. Tan, and J.R. Santos. 2013. Impact estimation of flooding in Manila: An inoperability input–output approach. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 26 April 2013, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA, 47–51.

[45] Zapata, R., R. Caballero, E. Jarquín, J. Perfit, and S. Mora. 2000. A matter of development: How to reduce vulnerability in the face of natural disasters. Washington, DC and Santiago de Chile: Inter-American Development Bank and Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.