Establishment of the Psychometric Properties of a Disaster Resilience Measuring Tool for Healthcare Rescuers in China: A Cross-Sectional Study
Xiaorong Mao , Kang Chen , Xiuying Hu , Xianxiu Wen , Alice Yuen Loke
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 381 -393.
Establishment of the Psychometric Properties of a Disaster Resilience Measuring Tool for Healthcare Rescuers in China: A Cross-Sectional Study
The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of a tool for measuring the disaster resilience of healthcare disaster rescuers. A cross-sectional study involving 936 healthcare disaster rescuers of the Sichuan Disaster Response Team was conducted to establish the psychometric properties of the disaster resilience measuring tool (DRMT). Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation analysis were adopted to analyze the data. Item analysis showed that all but three items had the critical ratio over 3, which indicates adequate discriminability for inclusion in the measuring tool. The exploratory factor analysis showed that 65.93% of the total variance was explained by four factors—self-efficacy, social support, positive growth, and altruism. The confirmatory factor analysis showed goodness of fit for the four-factor model: CMIN/DF (2.846), GFI (0.916 ≥ 0.90), CFI (0.949 ≥ 0.90), AGFI (0.891 ≥ 0.80), and RMSEA (0.063 ≤ 0.08). Criterion validity demonstrated significant associations of the DRMT and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (P < 0.01, r = 0.566). Convergent validity was established by correlation with stress (P < 0.05, r = − 0.095), depression (P < 0.01, r = − 0.127), posttraumatic stress disorder-PCL-C (P < 0.05, r = − 0.100), compassion satisfaction (P < 0.01, r = 0.536), and burnout (P < 0.01, r = − 0.330). The DRMT demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.84) and stability over the two-week study period (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.85), and a cut-off point of 61 was suggested. The disaster resilience measuring tool has satisfactory psychometric properties and is a valid, reliable, and valuable instrument for assessing disaster resilience in healthcare rescue workers. The scale needs to be tested further among other populations and those from other cultures.
China / Disaster resilience measuring tool / Healthcare rescuers / Factor analysis / Psychometrics
| [1] |
Ali-Abadi, T., S. Talepasand, C. Boyle, and H.S. Nia. 2020. Psychometric properties of the Baruth Protective Factors Inventory among nursing students. PLoS ONE 15(6): Article e0233760. |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Britton, M., L. LaLonde, A. Oshio, and K. Taku. 2019. Relationships among optimism, pessimism, and posttraumatic growth in the US and Japan: Focusing on varying patterns of perceived stressfulness. Personality and Individual Differences 151: Article 109513. |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Ferketich, S. 1991. Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing & Health 14(2): 165–168. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Iwasa, H., N. Moriyama, Y. Kuroda, C. Nakayama, M. Orui, T. Horiuchi, T. Nakayama, M. Sugita, et al. 2019. Recovery from radiation anxiety and posttraumatic growth among community dwellers after the nuclear disaster in Fukushima. Cogent Psychology 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1602970. |
| [21] |
Javali, S.B., N.V. Gudaganavar, and S.M. Raj. 2011. Effect of varying sample size in estimation of coefficients of internal consistency. WebmedCentral 2(2): Article WMC001649. |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Kiliç, N., and N. Şimşek. 2019. The effects of psychological first aid training on disaster preparedness perception and self-efficacy. Nurse Education Today 83: Article 104203. |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Malik, U.R., N. Atif, F.K. Hashmi, F. Saleem, H. Saeed, M. Islam, M. Jiang, M. Zhao, et al. 2020. Knowledge, attitude, and practices of healthcare professionals on COVID-19 and risk assessment to prevent the epidemic spread: A multicenter cross-sectional study from Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(17): Article 6395. |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Mao, X., A.Y. Loke, O.W.M. Fung, and X. Hu. 2019. What it takes to be resilient: The views of disaster healthcare rescuers. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 36: Article 101112. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Mao, X., Z. Wang, X. Hu, and A.Y. Loke. 2020. A scoping review of resilience scales of adults to develop a prototype disaster resilience tool for healthcare rescuers. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 49: Article 101678. |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Masten, A.S. 2001. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist 56(3): Article 227. |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Moss, M., V.S. Good, D. Gozal, R. Kleinpell, and C.N. Sessler. 2016. A critical care societies collaborative statement: Burnout syndrome in critical care health-care professionals. A call for action. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 194(1): 106–113. |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Stamm, B.H. 2009. Professional quality of life: Compassion satisfaction and fatigue version 5 (ProQOL). https://proqol.org/. Accessed 2 Apr 2020. |
| [49] |
Stein, D.J., W.T. Chiu, I. Hwang, R.C. Kessler, N. Sampson, J. Alonso, G. Borges, E. Bromet, et al. 2010. Cross-national analysis of the associations between traumatic events and suicidal behavior: Findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. PLoS ONE 5(5): Article e10574. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
Tang, B., Y. Ge, Z. Liu, X. Liu, P. Kang, Y. Liu, and L. Zhang. 2015. Health-related quality of life for medical rescuers one month after Ludian earthquake. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 13(1): Article 88. |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2019. Global platform preparatory days / World reconstruction conference. https://www.unisdr.org/conference/2019/globalplatform/home. Accessed 18 May 2019 |
| [55] |
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. https://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2019. |
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |