“How Do We Actually Do Convergence” for Disaster Resilience? Cases from Australia and the United States

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing emphasis on achieving convergence in disaster research, policy, and programs to reduce disaster losses and enhance social well-being. However, there remain considerable gaps in understanding “how do we actually do convergence?” In this article, we present three case studies from across geographies—New South Wales in Australia, and North Carolina and Oregon in the United States; and sectors of work—community, environmental, and urban resilience, to critically examine what convergence entails and how it can enable diverse disciplines, people, and institutions to reduce vulnerability to systemic risks in the twenty-first century. We identify key successes, challenges, and barriers to convergence. We build on current discussions around the need for convergence research to be problem-focused and solutions-based, by also considering the need to approach convergence as ethic, method, and outcome. We reflect on how convergence can be approached as an ethic that motivates a higher order alignment on “why” we come together; as a method that foregrounds “how” we come together in inclusive ways; and as an outcome that highlights “what” must be done to successfully translate research findings into the policy and public domains.

Keywords

Convergence research / Disaster resilience / Disaster risk reduction / Research ethics

References

[1] Aitsi-Selmi A, Murrary V, Wannous C, Dickinson C, Johnston D, Kawasaki A, Stevance A, Yeung T. Reflections on a science and technology agenda for 21st century disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(1): 1-29

[2] Chang SE. Socio-economic impacts of infrastructure disruptions. Natural Hazard Science, 2016

[3] Cunningham, N. 2019. Oil rush: How Portland has become a crucial hub for fossil-fuel exports despite opposition from city government and the local community. Oregon Business, 17 December 2019. https://www.oregonbusiness.com/article/energy-environment/item/18932-oil-rush. Accessed 22 Sep 2020.

[4] Davidson RA. Integrating disciplinary contributions to achieve community resilience to natural disasters. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 2015, 32(1–2): 55-67

[5] DOGAMI (Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries). 2012. Earthquake risk study for Oregon’s critical energy infrastructure hub: Final report to Oregon Department of Energy and Oregon Public Utility Commission. https://www.oregongeology.org/earthquakes/CEI-Hub-report.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2020.

[6] Ellis, G. 2018. Refugees help the NSW State Emergency Service and their community as liaison officers. Illawarra Mercury, 7 November 2018. https://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/5744452/refugees-help-the-ses-and-their-community-as-liaison-officers/. Accessed 20 Sep 2020.

[7] Esnard AM, Lai B. Interdisciplinary approaches to examining post-disaster school recovery. Risk Analysis, 2018

[8] Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Carlisle C. Public support for earthquake risk mitigation in Portland. Oregon Risk Analysis, 1999, 19(2): 205-216

[9] Fritz CE, Mathewson JH. Convergence behavior in disaster: A problem in social control, 1957, Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences

[10] Gaillard JC, Peek L. Disaster-zone research needs a code of conduct. Nature, 2019, 575(7783): 440-442

[11] Gaillard, J.C. et al. 2019. Online petition. Power, prestige and forgotten values: A disaster studies manifesto. https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/power-prestige-forgotten-values-a-disaster. Accessed 18 Aug 2020.

[12] Goldstein BE, Wessells AT, Lejano RP, Butler WH. Narrating resilience: Transforming cities through collaborative storytelling. Urban Studies, 2014, 52(7): 1285-1303

[13] Greenberg M, Lowrie K. Celebrating three decades of public policy-oriented interdisciplinary research. Risk Analysis, 2011, 31(1): 7-11

[14] Kendra J, Wachtendorf T. Clarke L. Reconsidering convergence and converger legitimacy in response to the World Trade Center disaster. Terrorism and disaster: New threats, new ideas, 2003, Bingley, UK: Emerald 92-122.

[15] Kendra J, Knowles S, Wachtendorf T. Disaster research and the second environmental crisis. Assessing the challenges ahead, 2019, Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature

[16] Lakhina, S.J. 2018a. Co-learning disaster resilience toolkit: A person-centred approach to engaging with refugee narratives and practices of safety. University of Wollongong, Australia. https://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/57379. Accessed 14 Aug 2020.

[17] Lakhina, S.J. 2018b. Resilient together: Engaging the knowledge and capacities of refugees for a disaster-resilient Illawarra. University of Wollongong, Australia. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/57379_resilienttogetherkeyfindingsinfogra.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2020.

[18] Lakhina, S.J. 2019. Co-learning disaster resilience: A person-centred approach to understanding experiences of refuge and practices of safety. PhD dissertation. University of Wollongong, Australia.

[19] Lakhina SJ, Eriksen C, Thompson J, Aldunate R, McLaren J, Reddy S. People from refugee backgrounds contribute to a disaster-resilient Illawarra. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 2019, 34(2): 19-20.

[20] Miller, H.L. 2020. Is forest park a fire hazard? Street Roots Magazine, 19 September 2020. https://www.streetroots.org/news/2020/09/19/what-if-forest-park-catches-fire. Accessed 22 Sep 2020.

[21] Mitsova D. Integrative interdisciplinary approaches to critical infrastructure interdependency analysis. Risk Analysis, 2018

[22] Mostafavi, A., and N.M. Ganapati. 2019. Towards convergence disaster research: Building integrative theories using simulation. Risk Analysis. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uow.edu.au/https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13303.

[23] National Research Council. 2012. Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13457/disaster-resilience-a-national-imperative. Accessed 27 Jul 2020.

[24] National Research Council Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond, 2014, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

[25] National Science and Technology Council. 2005. Grand challenges for disaster reduction: National Science and Technology Council Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. A report of the subcommittee on disaster reduction. https://www.sdr.gov/docs/SDRGrandChallengesforDisasterReduction.pdf. Accessed 27 Jul 2020.

[26] NSF (National Science Foundation). 2018. Building the future: Investing in discovery and innovation. NSF strategic plan for fiscal years 2018–2022. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18045/nsf18045.pdf. Accessed 27 Jul 2020.

[27] Olson, R.S., N.M. Ganapati, V.T. Gawronksi, R.A. Olson, E. Salna, and J.P. Sarmiento. 2020. From disaster risk reduction to policy studies: Bridging research communities. Natural Hazards Review 21(2): Article 04020014.

[28] Oregon Solutions. 2019. Critical energy infrastructure hub: Assessment findings. Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA. http://orsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CEI-Hub-final-5-6-19.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2020.

[29] OSSPAC (Oregon Seismic Safety Policy Advisory Commission). 2013. Oregon resilience plan: Reducing risk and improving recovery for the next Cascadia earthquake and tsunami, report to 77th legislative assembly. https://www.oregon.gov/gov/policy/orr/Documents/Oregon_Resilience_Plan_Final.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2020.

[30] OSSPAC (Oregon Seismic Safety Policy Advisory Commission). 2019. CEI hub mitigation strategies: Increasing fuel resilience to survive Cascadia. https://www.oregon.gov/oem/Documents/OSSPAC_CEI-Hub_report_122019.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2020.

[31] Pacific Northwest Waterways Association. 2019. Columbia Snake River System facts. https://www.pnwa.net/wp-content/uploads/CSRS.pdf . Accessed 21 May 2020.

[32] Peek, L. 2019. Closing comments from the 2019 Natural Hazards Workshop. Director’s Corner, 22 July 2019. https://hazards.colorado.edu/news/director/closing-comments-from-the-2019-natural-hazards-workshop. Accessed 27 Jul 2020.

[33] Peek, L., J. Tobin, R. Adams, H. Wu, and M.C. Mathews. 2020. A framework for convergence research in the hazards and disaster field: The natural hazards engineering research infrastructure CONVERGE facility. Frontiers in Built Environment 6: Article 110.

[34] Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability. 2019. Multnomah County 2017 carbon emissions and trends. City of Portland. https://multco.us/sustainability/news/new-report-multnomah-county-2017-carbon-emissions-and-trends. Accessed 21 May 2020.

[35] Portland State University Liquid storage tanks at the critical energy infrastructure (CEI) hub; seismic assessment of tank inventory, 2019, City of Portland, USA: Portland Bureau of Emergency Management

[36] Reilly AC, Dillon RL, Guikema SD. Agent-based models as an integrating boundary object for interdisciplinary research. Risk Analysis, 2018

[37] Roco MC. Bainbridge WS, Roco MC. Principles and methods that facilitate convergence. Handbook of convergence in science and technology, 2016, New York: Springer 17-42

[38] Roco MC, Bainbridge WS. Converging technologies for improving human performance, 2003, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer

[39] Roco, M.C., and W.S. Bainbridge. 2013. The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: Convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. Journal Nanoparticle Research 15: Article 1946.

[40] Shaw R, Izumi T, Shi P. Perspectives of science and technology in disaster risk reduction of Asia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(3): 329-342

[41] Spangler MB. The role of interdisciplinary analysis in bridging the gap between the technical and human sides of risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 1982, 2(2): 101-114

[42] State of Oregon. 2018. Resiliency 2025: Improving our readiness for the Cascadia earthquake and tsunami. https://www.oregon.gov/gov/policy/Documents/resiliency-policy-agenda.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2020.

[43] Subba, R., and T. Bui. 2017. Online convergence behavior, social media communications, and crisis response: An empirical study of the 2015 Nepal earthquake police twitter project. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4–7 January 2017, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA, ed. T. Bui, and R. Sprague, 284–293.

[44] Sutley, E.J., M. Dillard, and J.W. van de Lindt. (eds.). 2021. The Lumberton, North Carolina Flood of 2016, Wave 2: A community recovery-focused technical investigation. NIST Special Publication (in Press).

[45] Sutley, E.J., S. Hamideh, M.K. Dillard, D. Gu, K. Seong, and J.W. van de Lindt. 2019. Integrative modeling of housing recovery as a physical, economic, and social process. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP13, 26–30 May 2019, Seoul, South Korea.

[46] Tierney K. Effective strategies for hazard assessment and loss reduction: The importance of multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches, 2005, Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center

[47] Tierney K. The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience, 2014, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

[48] United Nations. 2009. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Risk and poverty in a changing climate. Geneva: United Nations.

[49] United Nations Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, 2015, Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction

[50] University of Wollongong. 2018. Minority groups can provide major help in the face of disasters. Media release. https://www.uow.edu.au/media/2018/minority-groups-can-provide-major-help-in-the-face-of-disasters.php. Accessed 27 Jul 2020.

[51] Van de Lindt, J.W., W.G. Peacock, J. Mitrani-Reiser, N. Rosenheim, D. Deniz, M. Dillard, V. Tomiczek, M. Koliou, et al. 2020. Community resilience-focused technical investigation of the 2016 Lumberton, North Carolina Flood: An interdisciplinary approach. Natural Hazards Review 21(3): Article 04020029.

[52] Watson, M., Y. Xiao, J. Helgeson, and M. Dillard. 2020. Importance of households in business disaster recovery. Natural Hazards Review 21(4): Article 04020014.

[53] Wilson, J. 2019. CEI hub Google Earth flyover. Cascadia Living. Blog, 21 October 2019. https://srpntn.com/2019/10/21/cei-hub-google-earth-flyover/. Accessed 22 Sep 2020.