Potential Linkages Between Social Capital, Flood Risk Perceptions, and Self-Efficacy

Abstract

A growing focus is being placed on both individuals and communities to adapt to flooding as part of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Adaptation to flooding requires sufficient social capital (linkages between members of society), risk perceptions (understanding of risk), and self-efficacy (self-perceived ability to limit disaster impacts) to be effective. However, there is limited understanding of how social capital, risk perceptions, and self-efficacy interact. We seek to explore how social capital interacts with variables known to increase the likelihood of successful adaptation. To study these linkages we analyze survey data of 1010 respondents across two communities in Thua Tien-Hue Province in central Vietnam, using ordered probit models. We find positive correlations between social capital, risk perceptions, and self-efficacy overall. This is a partly contrary finding to what was found in previous studies linking these concepts in Europe, which may be a result from the difference in risk context. The absence of an overall negative exchange between these factors has positive implications for proactive flood risk adaptation.

Keywords

Flood risk / Protection motivation theory / Risk perceptions / Social capital / Self-efficacy / Vietnam

References

[1] Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW, Clarke KC, Cutter SL, Hall JW, Merz B, Michel-Kerjan E, Mysiak J Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8: 193-199

[2] Arthurton RS. Marine-related physical natural hazards affecting coastal megacities of the Asia-Pacific region – Awareness and mitigation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 1998, 40(1): 65-85

[3] Aven T, Kristensen V. Perspectives on risk: Review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005, 90(1): 1-14

[4] Babcicky P, Seebauer S. The two faces of social capital in private flood mitigation: Opposing effects on risk perception, self-efficacy, and coping capacity. Journal of Risk Research, 2017, 20(8): 1017-1037

[5] Ball N. The myth of the natural disaster. The Ecologist, 1975, 5(10): 368-369.

[6] Bamberg S, Masson T, Brewitt K, Nemetschek N. Threat, coping and flood prevention—A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2017, 54: 116-126

[7] Botzen WJW, Kunreuther H, Michel-Kerjan E. Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City. Judgment and Decision Making, 2015, 10(4): 365-385.

[8] Bourdieu P. Outline of a theory of practice, 1977, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

[9] Bourdieu P. Richardson JG. The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, 1986, New York: Greenwood Press 241-258.

[10] Bubeck P, Botzen WJW, Suu LTT, Aerts JCJH. Do flood risk perceptions provide useful insights for flood risk management? Findings from central Vietnam. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2012, 5(4): 295-302

[11] Bubeck P, Thieken AH. What helps people recover from floods? Insights from a survey among flood-affected residents in Germany. Regional Environmental Change, 2018, 18(1): 287-296

[12] Buckland J, Rahman M. Community-based disaster management during the 1997 Red River flood in Canada. Disasters, 1999, 23(2): 174-191

[13] Chinh DT, Bubeck P, Dung NV, Kreibich H. The 2011 flood event in the Mekong Delta: Preparedness, response, damage and recovery of private households and small businesses. Disasters, 2016, 40(4): 753-778

[14] Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94: 95-120

[15] CSRD (Centre for Social Research and Development). 2015. Gender needs and roles in building climate resilience in the city of Hue, Vietnam. Asian cities climate resilience working paper series 33. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.

[16] Cutter SL. The forgotten casualties redux: Women, children, and disaster risk. Global Environmental Change, 2017, 42: 117-121

[17] DKKV (German Committee for Disaster Reduction) Strong roots, strong women: Women and ecosystem-based adaptation to flood risk in Central Vietnam, 2019, Bonn: German Committee for Disaster Reduction

[18] Działek J, Biernacki W, Bokwa A. Challenges to social capacity building in flood-affected areas of southern Poland. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 13(10): 2555-2566

[19] Fields A. Discovering Statistics using SPSS, 2009 3 London: SAGE

[20] Fischhoff BP, Slovic S, Lichtenstein S Read, Combs B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 1978, 9(2): 127-152

[21] Gamper CD, Turcanu C. Can public participation help managing risks from natural hazards. Safety Science, 2009, 47(4): 522-528

[22] Gebrehiwot T, van der Veen A. Farmers prone to drought risk: Why some farmers undertake farm-level risk-reduction measures while others not?. Environmental Management, 2015, 55(3): 588-602

[23] Grothmann T, Patt A. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15(3): 199-213

[24] Grothmann T, Reusswig F. People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 2006, 38(1–2): 101-120

[25] Hagedoorn LC, Brander LM, van Beukering PJH, Dijkstra HM, Franco C, Hughes L, Gilders I, Segal B. Community-based adaptation to climate change in small island developing states: An analysis of the role of social capital. Climate and Development, 2019, 11(8): 723-734

[26] Hanifan, L.J. 1916. The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 67(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/000271621606700118.

[27] Hartmann T, Driessen P. The flood risk management plan: Towards spatial water governance. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2017, 10(2): 145-154

[28] Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010, 33(2–3): 61-83

[29] Hudson P, Botzen WJW, Poussin JK, Aerts JCJH. The impacts of flooding and flood preparedness on happiness: A monetisation of the tangible and intangible subjective well-being impacts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2019, 20(2): 665-682

[30] Hudson P, Pham M, Bubeck P. An evaluation and monetary assessment of the impact of flooding on subjective well-being across genders in Vietnam. Climate and Development, 2019, 11(7): 632-637

[31] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. R. Pachauri, and L. Meyer. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

[32] Keshavarz M, Karami E. Farmers’ pro-environmental behavior under drought: Application of protection motivation theory. Journal of Arid Environments, 2016, 127: 128-136

[33] Kline P. A handbook of psycological testing, 1999 2 London: Routledge

[34] Kraus NN, Slovic P. Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: Modeling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains. Risk Analysis, 1988, 8(3): 435-455

[35] Lo AY. The role of social norms in climate adaptation: Mediating risk perception and flood insurance purchase. Global Environmental Change, 2013, 23(5): 1249-1257

[36] Lo AY, Chan F. Preparing for flooding in England and Wales: The role of risk perception and the social context in driving individual action. Natural Hazards, 2017, 88(1): 367-387

[37] Lo AY, Xu B, Chan FKS, Su R. Social capital and community preparation for urban flooding in China. Applied Geography, 2015, 64: 1-11

[38] Maddux JE, Rogers RW. Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1983, 19(5): 469-479

[39] Mohan G, Mohan J. Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography, 2002, 26(2): 191-210

[40] Nguyen TT, Pittock J, Nguyen BH. Integration of ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change policies in Viet Nam. Climatic Change, 2017, 142(1): 97-111

[41] Norris FH, Smith T, Kaniasty K. Revisiting the experience–behavior hypothesis: The effects of hurricane Hugo on hazard preparedness and other self-protective acts. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1999, 21(1): 37-47.

[42] Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL. Community resilience as a metaphore, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster prepardness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2009, 41(1–2): 127-150.

[43] O’Keefe P, Westgate K, Wisner B. Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 1976, 260(5552): 566-567

[44] Onyx J, Bullen P. Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 2000, 36(1): 23-42

[45] Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 2009, 325(5939): 419-422

[46] Ostrom E, Ahn T. Svendsen GT, Svendsen GLH. The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics, 2009, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 17-35.

[47] Pelling M, High C. Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15(4): 308-319

[48] Perry RW, Lindell MK. Predicting long-term adjustment to Volcano hazard. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1990, 8(2): 117-136.

[49] Poussin JK, Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH. Stimulating flood damage mitigation through insurance: An assessment of the French CatNat system. Environmental Hazards, 2013, 12(3–4): 258-277

[50] Pretty J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 2003, 302(5652): 1912-1914

[51] Putnam RD. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 1995, 6(1): 65-78

[52] Putnam RD. Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2001, 2(1): 41-51.

[53] Reid H. Ecosystem- and community-based adaptation: Learning from community-based natural resource management. Climate and Development, 2016, 8(1): 4-9

[54] Renn O. The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1998, 59(1): 49-62

[55] Riad JK, Norris FH, Ruback RB. Predicting evacuation in two major disasters: Risk perception, social influence, and access to resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1999, 29(5): 918-934

[56] Rogers RW. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology, 1975, 91(1): 93-114

[57] Rogers RW. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook, 1983, New York: Guilford Press 157-176.

[58] Schwandt TA. Denzin NK, Lincon YS. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. The landscape of qualitative research, 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 118-137.

[59] Scolobig A, De Marchi B, Borga M. The missing link between flood risk awareness and preparedness: Findings from case studies in an Alpine Region. Natural Hazards, 2012, 63(2): 499-520

[60] Scussolini P, Aerts JCJH, Jongman B, Bouwer L, Winsemius HC, de Moel H, Ward PJ. FLOPROS: An evolving global database of flood protection standards. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 16: 1049-1061

[61] Siegrist M, Gutscher H. Flooding risks: A comparison of lay people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland. Risk Analysis, 2006, 26(4): 971-979

[62] Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science, 1987, 236(4799): 280-285

[63] Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 1993, 13(6): 675-682

[64] Slovic P. The risk game. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1998, 59(1): 73-77

[65] Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychologica, 1984, 56(1): 183-203

[66] Snape D, Spencer L. Ritchie J, Lewis J. The foundations of qualitative research: A guide for social science students and researchers. Qualitative research practice, 2003, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 1-23.

[67] Soane E, Schubert I, Challenor P, Lunn R, Narendran S, Pollard S. Flood perception and mitigation: The role of severity, agency, and experience in the purchase of flood protection, and the communication of flood information. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2010, 42(12): 3023-3038

[68] Terpstra T, Lindell MK, Gutteling JM. Does communicating (flood) risk affect (flood) risk perceptions? Results of a quasi-experimental study. Risk Analysis, 2009, 29(8): 1141-1155

[69] Tran P, Marincioni F, Shaw R, Sarti M, An LV. Flood risk management in Central Viet Nam: Challenges and potentials. Natural Hazards, 2008, 46(1): 119-138

[70] Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 5(2): 207-232

[71] Valeriano OCS, Koike T, Yang D, Nyunt CT, Khand DV, Chau NL. Flood simulation using different sources of rainfall in the Huong River, Vietnam/Simulation d’inondation à l’aide de différentes sources d’information pluviométrique dans le bassin de la Rivière Huong. Vietnam. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2009, 54(5): 909-917

[72] van Valkengoed AM, Steg L. Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 2019, 9(2): 158-163

[73] Vu TT, Ranzi R. Flood risk assessment and coping capacity of floods in central Vietnam. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 2017, 14: 44-60

[74] Ward, P.J., B. Jongman, S.F. Weiland, A. Bouwman, R. van Beek, M.F.P. Bierkens, W. Ligtvoet, and H.C. Winsemius. 2013. Assessing flood risk at the global scale: Model setup, results, and sensitivity. Environmental Research Letters 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044019.

[75] Weber E, Hsee C. Cross-cultural differences in risk perception but simular attitudes toward perceived risk. Management Science, 1998, 44(9): 1205-1217

[76] Weinstein ND. Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1989, 105(1): 31-50

[77] White, G.F. 1945. Human adjustment to floods: A geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. University of Chicago. Department of Geography, Research Paper No. 29. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

[78] Windham, G.O., E.I. Possey, P. Ross, and B. Spencer. 1977. Reactions to storm threat during hurricane Eloise. Social Science Research Center, Report 51. State College, MS: Mississippi State University.

[79] Winsemius HC, van Beek LPH, Jongman B, Ward PJ, Bouwman A. A framework for global river flood risk assessments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 17(5): 1871-1892

[80] Wolf J, Ader WN, Lorenzoni I, Abrahamson V, Raine R. Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: An empirical study of two UK cities. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(1): 44-52

[81] World Bank Weather the storm: Options for diaster risk financing in Vietnam, 2010, Washington, DC: World Bank

[82] Zheng Y, Dallimer M. What motivates rural households to adapt to climate change?. Climate and Development, 2016, 8(2): 110-121