Surrogate Measures to Assess Mobility of People as a Resilience Indicator in Disaster Management: An Exploratory Study in Southeastern Sri Lanka

Abstract

Understanding social resilience can assist in the formulation of disaster management policies to help communities better prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. However, direct social resilience measurement methods such as household surveys are not always a practical option as they are a time- and resource-exhaustive process. Existing measures mainly utilize publicly available census data, which often provide a poor and outdated assessment of current social resilience status. Another limitation includes a failure to capture multiple facets of indicators that are process-oriented and dynamic in nature such as mobility of people. These challenges can be addressed by employing a surrogate approach. Surrogates are alternative measures to depict the target indicator. The surrogate approach can capture key facets of a target indicator, which can be used as potential measures for the target indicator. A framework to conceptualize the surrogate approach is presented, and operationalized using a case study approach on the southeastern coast of Sri Lanka to identify surrogates to measure mobility of people as a resilience indicator. Six higher-order themes were identified as potential surrogates to measure mobility of people in a disaster context. The approach proposed to methodically identify potential surrogates and their measurement protocols can help to improve the current knowledge base and understanding of complex interrelationships of social resilience.

Keywords

Community resilience / Resilience characteristics / Resilience indicators / Resilience measurements / Social resilience / Sri Lanka

References

[1] Angus D, Rintel S, Wiles J. Making sense of big text: A visual-first approach for analysing text data using Leximancer and Discursis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2013, 16(3): 261-267.

[2] Axinn WG, Pearce LD. Mixed method data collection strategies, 2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[3] Bahadur, A.V., M. Ibrahim, and T. Tanner. 2010. The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters. SCR discussion paper 1. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08b1ce5274a27b2000973/SCR-DiscussionPaper1-resilience-renaissance.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2020.

[4] Barton PS, Pierson JC, Westgate MJ, Lane PW, Lindenmayer DB. Learning from clinical medicine to improve the use of surrogates in ecology. Oikos, 2015, 124(4): 391-398.

[5] Beccari B. A comparative analysis of disaster risk, vulnerability and resilience composite indicators. PLoS Currents, 2016

[6] Becker D, Schneiderbauer S, Forrester JM, Pedoth L. Guidelines for development of indicators, indicator systems and provide challenges, 2015, Louvain, Belgium: CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters)

[7] Birkmann J. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, 2006, Tokyo: United Nations University Press

[8] Boeije H. Analysis in qualitative research, 2009, London: Sage Publications

[9] Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O’Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM, Shinozuka M, Tierney K, Wallace WA, von Winterfeldt D. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752.

[10] Burton CG. A validation of metrics for community resilience to natural hazards and disasters using the recovery from Hurricane Katrina as a case study. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2015, 105(1): 67-86.

[11] Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2011 3 London: Sage Publications

[12] Cruzes DS, Dybå T, Runeson P, Höst M. Case studies synthesis: A thematic, cross-case, and narrative synthesis worked example. Empirical Software Engineering, 2015, 20(6): 1634-1665.

[13] Cutter SL. The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural Hazards, 2016, 80(2): 741-758.

[14] Cutter S.L., and S. Derakhshan. 2019. Implementing disaster policy: Exploring scale and measurement schemes for disaster resilience. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 16(3): Article 20180029.

[15] Cutter SL, Ash KD, Emrich CT. The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 29: 65-77.

[16] Cutter, S.L., C.G. Burton, and C.T. Emrich. 2010. Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7(1): Article 51.

[17] De Leeuw E. The SAGE handbook of social research methods, 2008, London: Sage Publications

[18] De Ruyter K. Focus versus nominal group interviews: A comparative analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 1996, 14(6): 44-50.

[19] Doorn N. Resilience indicators: Opportunities for including distributive justice concerns in disaster management. Journal of Risk Research, 2017, 20(6): 711-731.

[20] Eckstein, D. 2018. Global climate risk index 2018. https://germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/files/publication/20432.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2020.

[21] Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research, 2014 5 London: Sage Publications

[22] Frey JH, Fontana A. The group interview in social research. The Social Science Journal, 1991, 28(2): 175-187.

[23] Gaillard, J.C., and R. Jigyasu. 2016. Measurement and evidence: Whose resilience for whom? Resilience Development Initiative. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/50932_50932wpnov2016gaillardjigyasu.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2020.

[24] Grayson RB, Finlayson BL, Gippel CJ, Hart BT. The potential of field turbidity measurements for the computation of total phosphorus and suspended solids loads. Journal of Environmental Management, 1996, 47(3): 257-267.

[25] Gregorowski, R., A. Dorgan, and C. Hutchings. 2017. Resilience measurement—MEL Approaches in practice. Challenges and lessons in operationalizing resilience measurement frameworks—Experience and lessons from CoP stakeholders. Hove, England: ITAD Ltd.

[26] Johnson JM, Rowlands T. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2012, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

[27] Konrad, C.P. 2003. Effects of urban development on floods. Fact sheet 076-03. Tacoma: United States Geological Survey.

[28] Kotzee I, Reyers B. Piloting a social-ecological index for measuring flood resilience: A composite index approach. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60: 45-53.

[29] Kulig JC, Edge DS, Townshend I, Lightfoot N, Reimer W. Community resiliency: Emerging theoretical insights. Journal of Community Psychology, 2013, 41(6): 758-775.

[30] Kusumastuti RD, Viverita ZA, Husodo L Suardi, Danarsari DN. Developing a resilience index towards natural disasters in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2014, 10(Part A): 327-340.

[31] Kwok AH, Doyle EEH, Becker J, Johnston D, Paton D. What is ‘social resilience’? Perspectives of disaster researchers, emergency management practitioners, and policymakers in New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2016, 19: 197-211.

[32] Leximancer. 2017. Leximancer User Guide Release 4.5. https://www.coursehero.com/file/41515975/LeximancerManualpdf/. Accessed 15 Jul 2017.

[33] Lindenmayer D, Pierson J, Barton P, Beger M, Branquinho C, Calhoun A, Caro T, Greig H A new framework for selecting environmental surrogates. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 538: 1029-1038.

[34] Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research, 2014 5 London: Sage Publications

[35] Mayunga, J.S. 2007. Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach. Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability and Resilience Building 1: Article 16.

[36] Mellin Camille, Delean Steve, Caley Julian, Edgar Graham, Meekan Mark, Pitcher Roland, Przeslawski Rachel, Williams Alan, Bradshaw Corey. Effectiveness of Biological Surrogates for Predicting Patterns of Marine Biodiversity: A Global Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(6): e20141

[37] Miguntanna NS, Egodawatta P, Kokot S, Goonetilleke A. Determination of a set of surrogate parameters to assess urban stormwater quality. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(24): 6251-6259.

[38] Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 1990, London: Sage Publications

[39] Peacock, W.G., S.D. Brody, W.A. Seitz, W.J. Merrell, A. Vedlitz, S. Zahran, R.C. Harris, and R. Stickney. 2010. Advancing the resilience of coastal localities: Developing, implementing, and sustaining the use of coastal resilience indicators: A final report. Galveston: The Center for Texas Beaches and Shores (CTBS), Texas A&M University at Galveston.

[40] Penn-Edwards S. Computer aided phenomenography: The role of Leximancer computer software in phenomenographic investigation. The Qualitative Report, 2010, 15(2): 252-267.

[41] Peters K, Bahadur A, Tanner T, Langston L. ‘Resilience’across the post-2015 frameworks: Towards coherence?, 2016, London: Overseas Development Institute

[42] Qasim S, Qasim M, Shrestha RP, Khan AN, Tun K. Community resilience to flood hazards in Khyber Pukhthunkhwa province of Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2016, 18: 100-106.

[43] Rockström J. Resilience building and water demand management for drought mitigation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2003, 28(20): 869-877.

[44] Rodrigues ASL, Brooks TM. Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2007, 38: 713-737.

[45] Saja A.M. Aslam, Goonetilleke Ashantha, Teo Melissa, Ziyath Abdul M.. A critical review of social resilience assessment frameworks in disaster management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2019, 35: 101096

[46] Saja AMA, Teo M, Goonetilleke A, Ziyath AM. An inclusive and adaptive framework for measuring social resilience to disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 28: 862-873.

[47] Schoch-Spana, M., K. Gill, D. Hosangadi, C. Slemp, R. Burhans, J. Zeis, E.G. Carbone, and J. Links. 2019. The COPEWELL rubric: A self-assessment toolkit to strengthen community resilience to disasters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(13): Article 2372.

[48] Sharifi A. A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 69: 629-647.

[49] Sotiriadou P, Brouwers J, Le T-A. Choosing a qualitative data analysis tool: a comparison of NVivo and Leximancer. Annals of Leisure Research, 2014, 17(2): 218-234.

[50] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, 2015, Geneva: UNISDR

[51] Yamamoto L, Serraglio DA, Cavedon-Capdeville FDS. Human mobility in the context of climate change and disasters: A South American approach. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 2018, 10(1): 65-85.

[52] Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods, 2013, London: Sage Publications

[53] Ziyath, A.M., M. Teo, and A. Goonetilleke. 2013. Surrogate indicators for assessing community resilience. In Proceedings of the international conference on building resilience, 17–19 September 2013, Ahungalla, Sri Lanka. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/63404/1/Surrogate_indicators_for_assessing_community_resilience.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.

[54] Zubair L, Ralapanawe V, Tennakoon U, Yahiya Z, Perera R. Arnold M, Chen RS, Deichmann U, Dilley M, Lerner-Lam AL, Pullen RE, Trohanis Z. Natural disaster risks in Sri Lanka: Mapping hazards and risk hotspots. Natural disaster hotspots case studies, 2006, Washington, DC: World Bank 109-136.