Disaster Knowledge Gaps: Exploring the Interface Between Science and Policy for Disaster Risk Reduction in Europe

Abstract

Expert scientific knowledge is fast becoming an integral part of disaster management, and, in the process, is changing the role of science for the reduction of disaster risks at the policy level. Yet science and policy operate in different domains between which there are often competing interests and modes of valuing knowledge. Based on research done as part of the research project Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO), we discuss three major issues facing European Union member states with respect to the interface between science and policy for disaster risk reduction: knowledge transfer, disaster expertise, and risk awareness. In doing so, we hone in on three gaps: an epistemological gap, an institutional gap, and a strategic gap. We argue that these gaps can help explain underlying systematic challenges for the integration between science and policy for disaster risk reduction. These gaps need to be addressed by focusing on changes at the governance level.

Keywords

Disaster governance / Disaster risk reduction / Europe / Knowledge sharing / Risk expertise / Science-policy interface

References

[1] Albris K. The switchboard mechanism: How social media connected citizens during the 2013 floods in Dresden. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2018, 26(3): 350-357.

[2] Alexander D. Confronting catastrophe: New perspectives on natural disasters, 2000, Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press

[3] Alexander D. Communicating earthquake risk to the public: The trial of the “L’Aquila Seven”. Natural Hazards, 2014, 72(2): 1159-1173.

[4] Amaratunga, D., R. Haigh, N. Dias, and K. Hemachandra. 2017a. Synthesis report of legal, policy and science approaches within the frame of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA)—National Report The United Kingdom. Napoli, Italy: Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO). http://www.espressoproject.eu/images/deliverables/ESPREssO_D2.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[5] Amaratunga, D., R. Haigh, N. Dias, and C. Malalgoda. 2017b. ESPREssO project, synthesis report of existing legal, policy and science approaches in relation to DRR and CCA. Napoli, Italy: Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO). http://www.espressoproject.eu/images/deliverables/ESPREssO_D2.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[6] Antofie TE, Doherty B, Ferrer M. Mapping of risk web-platforms and risk data: Collection of good practices. Publications Office of the European Union, 2018

[7] Aitsi-Selmi A, Murray V, Wannous C, Dickinson C, Johnston D, Kawasaki A, Stevance A-S, Yeung T. Reflections on a science and technology agenda for 21st century disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(1): 1-29.

[8] Barberi F, Davis MS, Isaia R, Nave RE, Ricci T. Volcanic risk perception in the Vesuvius population. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2008, 172(3–4): 244-258.

[9] Birkland T. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 1998, 18(1): 53-74.

[10] Birkland T. Lessons of disaster, policy change after catastrophic events, 2006, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press

[11] Booth, L., A. Scolobig, and J. Jorin. 2017. Synthesis report of legal, policy and science approaches within the frame of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA)—National Report Switzerland. Napoli, Italy: Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO). http://www.espressoproject.eu/images/deliverables/ESPREssO_D2.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[12] Crescimbene M, La Longa F, Camassi R, Pino NA, Peruzza L. What’s the seismic risk perception in Italy?. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, 2014, 7: 69-75.

[13] De Groeve T, Valles AC. Science policy interfaces in disaster risk management in the EU: Mapping the support provided by science in the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, 2015, Brussels: European Commission

[14] Dolce M, Di Bucci D. Probabilità e protezione civile. Ambiente Rischio Comunicazione, 2012, 4: 34-39 (in Italian)

[15] Dolce M, Di Bucci D. Wyss M, Peppoloni S. Risk management: Roles and responsibilities in the decision-making process. Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth science, 2015, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier 212-221.

[16] Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture. An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers, 1982, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press

[17] Ettinger, S., F. Gerard, G. Le Cozannet, M. Fontaine, G. Grandjean, and A. Baills. 2017. Synthesis report of legal, policy and science approaches within the frame of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA)—National Report France. Napoli, Italy: Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO). http://www.espressoproject.eu/images/deliverables/ESPREssO_D2.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[18] Gaillard J, Mercer J. From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 2013, 37(1): 93-114.

[19] Gluckman P. The science–policy interface. Science, 2016, 353(6303): 969

[20] GFDRR (Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery). 2014a. Managing risks for a resilient future. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/gfdrr/files/publication/GFDRR_Strategy_Endorsed_2012.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[21] GFDRR (Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery). 2014b. Understanding risk in an evolving world—Emerging best practices in natural disaster risk assessment. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/Understanding_Risk-Web_Version-rev_1.8.0.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[22] Hinkel J. “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: Towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 21(1): 198-208.

[23] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P.M. Midgley. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

[24] Irwin A, Wynne B. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology, 2003, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[25] Jasanoff S. The fifth branch: Science advisors as policymakers, 1990, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

[26] Jasanoff S. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order, 2013, London: Routledge

[27] Kelman I. Lost for words amongst disaster risk science vocabulary?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(3): 281-291.

[28] Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge, 1999, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

[29] Krüger F, Bankoff G, Cannon T, Orlowski B, Schipper ELF. Cultures and disasters, understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction, 2015, New York: Routledge

[30] Lahsen M. Seductive simulations? Uncertainty distribution around climate models. Social Studies of Science, 2005, 35(6): 895-922.

[31] Lauta KC. Disaster law, 2014, Oxon: Routledge

[32] Lauta KC. New fault lines? On responsibility and disasters. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2014, 5(2): 137-145.

[33] Lauta, K., E. Raju, N.O. Erno, H.R. Kerr, and M.F. Kielberg. 2017a. Synthesis report of legal, policy and science approaches within the frame of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA)—National Report Denmark. Napoli, Italy: Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO). http://www.espressoproject.eu/images/deliverables/ESPREssO_D2.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[34] Lauta, K., E. Raju, N.O. Erno, H.R. Kerr, and M.F. Kielberg. 2017b. Synthesis report of legal, policy and science approaches within the frame of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA)—EU review. Napoli, Italy: Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO). http://www.espressoproject.eu/images/deliverables/ESPREssO_D2.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[35] Lavell A, Maskrey A. The future of disaster risk management. Environmental Hazards, 2014, 13(4): 267-280.

[36] Marx, S., G. Barbeito, K. Fleming, B. Petrovic, and A. Thieken. 2017. Synthesis report on disaster risk reduction and climate change Adaptation in Germany—National Report Germany. Napoli, Italy: Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO). http://www.espressoproject.eu/images/deliverables/ESPREssO_D2.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[37] Marzocchi W. Seismic hazard and public safety. EOS, 2013, 94(27): 240-241.

[38] Meier P. Digital humanitarians, 2015, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press

[39] O’Keefe P, Westgate K, Wisner B. Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 1976, 260(5552): 566-567.

[40] Oliver-Smith A. Oliver-Smith A, Hoffman S. What is a disaster?. The angry earth: Disaster in anthropological perspective, 1999, New York and London: Routledge 18-34.

[41] Pearson, L., and M. Pelling. 2015. The UN Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030: Negotiation process and prospects for science and practice. Journal of Extreme Events 2(1): Article 1571001.

[42] Perkin H. The rise of professional society: England since 1880, 1989, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

[43] Pidgeon NE, Kasperson R, Slovic P. The social amplification of risk, 2003, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[44] Poblet M, García-Cuesta E, Casanovas P. Casanovas P, Pagallo U, Palmirani M, Sartor G. Crowdsourcing tools for disaster management: A review of platforms and methods. AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems, 2014, Berlin: Springer 261-274.

[45] Poljanšek K, Marín Ferrer M, De Groeve T, Clark I. Science for disaster risk management 2017: Knowing better and losing less, 2017, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union

[46] Raju E, Van Niekerk D. Intra-governmental coordination for sustainable disaster recovery: A case-study of the Eden District Municipality, South Africa. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2013, 4: 92-99.

[47] Rayner S. Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making. Science and Public Policy, 2003, 30(3): 163-170.

[48] Reuter C, Hughes AL, Kaufhold M. Social media in crisis management: An evaluation and analysis of crisis informatics research. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, 34(4): 280-294.

[49] Sarkki S, Niemelä J, Tinch R, Van den Hove S, Watt A, Young J. Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science–policy interfaces. Science and Public Policy, 2014, 41(2): 194-206.

[50] Schreve CM, Kelman I. Does mitigation save? Reviewing cost-benefit analyses of disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2014, 10(part A): 213-235.

[51] Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science, 1987, 236(4799): 280-285.

[52] Southgate, R.J., C. Roth, J. Schneider, P. Shi, T. Onishi, D. Wenger, and V. Murray et al. 2013. Using science for disaster risk reduction. Report of the UNISDR Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee. Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.

[53] Spruijt P, Knol A, Vasileiadou E, Devilee J, Lebret E, Petersen A. Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, 2014, 40: 16-25.

[54] Steinberg T. Acts of God: The unnatural history of natural disaster in America, 2006, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[55] Tierney K. The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience, 2014, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

[56] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2009. Terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. https://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_UNISDRTerminologyEnglish.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

[57] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, 2015, Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction

[58] Van den Hove S. A rationale for science-policy interfaces. Futures, 2007, 39(7): 807-826.

[59] Vogel C, Moser SC, Kasperson RE, Dabelko GD. Linking vulnerability adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 17(3–4): 349-364.

[60] Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C. The risk perception paradox—Implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 2013, 33(6): 1049-1065.

[61] Weichselgartner J, Pigeon P. The role of knowledge in disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(2): 107-116.

[62] Weichselgartner J, Kasperson R. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(2): 266-277.

[63] Weingart P. Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy, 1999, 26(3): 151-161.

[64] Wesselink A, Buchanan KS, Georgiadou Y, Turnhout E. Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science-policy interface. Environmental Science and Policy, 2013, 30: 1-9.

[65] Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2004, London: Routledge

[66] Woo G, Marzocchi W. Previsione operativa dei terremoti e decisioni. Ambiente Rischio Comunicazione, 2012, 4: 21-25 (in Italian)

[67] Zuccaro, G., A. Criscuolo, D. De Gregorio, A. Di Ruocco, F. Gallinella, M. Leone, and C. Martucci. 2017. Synthesis report of legal, policy and science approaches within the frame of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA)—National Report Italy. Napoli, Italy: Enhancing Synergies for Disaster Prevention in the European Union (ESPREssO). http://www.espressoproject.eu/images/deliverables/ESPREssO_D2.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.