Inherent Complexities of a Multi-stakeholder Approach to Building Community Resilience

Abstract

Enhancing community resilience has increasingly involved national and regional governments adopting a multi-stakeholder approach because of the potential interagency benefits. This has led to questions about how best to involve stakeholder groups in translating community resilience policies into practice. This exploratory study contributes to this discussion by addressing two key areas that are fundamental in the concerted effort to build community resilience to natural hazards: (1) stakeholder understanding of community resilience as a concept; and (2) the difficulties associated with the processes of risk assessment and preparedness that stakeholders face locally in building community resilience. Data were collected through semistructured interviews with 25 practitioners and experts within Scotland’s resilience community, and were analyzed through an inductive approach to thematic analysis. These data show how the interpretation of community resilience differs across stakeholder groups. Analysis of the data reveals challenges around the nature of the risk assessment and its role in shaping risk perception and communication. Significant complications occur in communicating about low probability-high consequence events, perceived territoriality, competing risk prioritizations, and the challenges of managing hazards within a context of limited resources. The implications of these issues for policy and practice are also discussed.

Keywords

Community disaster preparedness / Community resilience / Multi-stakeholder approach / Natural hazards / Risk assessment

References

[1] Adekola J. Resilience from a lived-experience perspective in the regional context of Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 31: 441-448.

[2] Anderson A. Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 2012, 6(2): 191-206.

[3] Barrett G. Deconstructing community. Sociologia Ruralis, 2015, 55(2): 182-204.

[4] Bonfield, P. 2016. The Property Flood Resilience Action Plan. Report prepared for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). https://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/Centre-for-Resilience/Property-Flood-Resilience-Action-Plan.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2019.

[5] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3(2): 77-101

[6] Chandler D. Beyond neoliberalism: Resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience, 2014, 2(1): 47-63.

[7] Chmutina K, von Meding J. A dilemma of language: “Natural disasters” in academic literature. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2019, 10(3): 283-292.

[8] Cohen, D., and B. Crabtree. 2006. Qualitative research guidelines project. https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/COHEN%202006%20Semistructured%20Interview.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2018.

[9] Collingridge D, Reeve C. Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making, 1986, London: Pinter

[10] Crow G. Community studies: Fifty years of theorization. Sociological Research Online, 2002, 7(3): 1-10.

[11] DFID (Department for International Development). 2011. Defining disaster resilience: A DFID approach paper. London and Glasgow: DFID. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/186874/defining-disaster-resilience-approach-paper.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2019.

[12] Fischbacher-Smith D. Destructive landscapes—(Re) framing elements of risk. Risk Management, 2011, 13(1–2): 1-15.

[13] Fischbacher-Smith D, Fischbacher-Smith M. The changing nature of risk and risk management: The challenge of borders, uncertainty and resilience. Risk Management, 2009, 11(1): 1-12.

[14] Fischer A, McKee A. A question of capacities? Community resilience and empowerment between assets, abilities and relationships. Journal of Rural Studies, 2017, 54: 187-197.

[15] Fischhoff B. Applying the science of communication to the communication of science. Climatic Change, 2011, 108(4): 701-705.

[16] Gimenez R, Labaka L, Hernantes J. A maturity model for the involvement of stakeholders in the city resilience building process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 121: 7-16.

[17] Gould K, Garcia M, Remes J. Beyond “natural-disasters-are-not-natural”: The work of state and nature after the 2010 earthquake in Chile. Journal of Political Ecology, 2016, 23(1): 93-114.

[18] Grove K. Security beyond resilience. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2017, 35(1): 184-194.

[19] Hickman P. A flawed construct? Understanding and unpicking the concept of resilience in the context of economic hardship. Social Policy and Society, 2018, 17(3): 409-424.

[20] Irwin A. Schiele B, Marec JL, Baranger P. Citizen science and scientific citizenship: Same words, different meanings?. Science communication today: Current strategies and means of action, 2015, Nancy: Nancy Université 29-38.

[21] Irwin A, Dale A, Smith D. Irwin A, Wynne B. Science and Hell’s kitchen: The local understanding of hazard issues. Misunderstanding science, 1996, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 47-64.

[22] Kelman, I. 2019. Axioms and actions for preventing disasters. Progress in Disaster Science 2: Article 100008.

[23] Kelman I, Gaillard JC, Mercer J. Climate change’s role in disaster risk reduction’s future: Beyond vulnerability and resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(1): 21-27.

[24] Magis K. Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society and Natural Resources, 2010, 23(5): 401-416.

[25] Mannarini T, Fedi A. Multiple senses of community: The experience and meaning of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 2009, 37(2): 211-227.

[26] Maskrey A. Revisiting community-based disaster risk management. Environmental Hazards, 2011, 10(1): 42-52.

[27] Manyena, B. 2009. Disaster resilience in development and humanitarian interventions. Doctoral dissertation, Northumbria University. http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/661/1/manyena.siambabala_phd.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2019.

[28] Manyena B, O’Brien G, O’Keefe P, Rose J. Disaster resilience: A bounce back or bounce forward ability. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 2011, 16(5): 417-424.

[29] Neville KJ, Weinthal E. Scaling up site disputes: Strategies to redefine ‘local’ in the fight against fracking. Environmental Politics, 2016, 25(4): 569-592.

[30] Newig J, Koontz TM. Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: The EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 2014, 21(2): 248-267.

[31] Ntontis E, Drury J, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Williams R. Community resilience and flooding in UK guidance: A critical review of concepts, definitions, and their implications. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2019, 27(1): 2-13.

[32] Pate J, Fischbacher M, Mackinnon J. Health improvement: Countervailing pillars of partnership and profession. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2010, 24(2): 200-217.

[33] Patel SS, Rogers MB, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ. What do we mean by “community resilience”? A systematic literature review of how it is defined in the literature. PLoS Currents, 2017

[34] Rennie F, Billing SL. Changing community perceptions of sustainable rural development in Scotland. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2015, 10(2): 35-46.

[35] Scottish Government. 2011. National census 2011. https://www.scotlandscensus.gov.uk/ods-web/area.html. Accessed 8 Oct 2019.

[36] Scottish Government. 2017a. Resilience communities: Resilience division’s strategic framework and delivery plan 2017–2021. https://www.readyscotland.org/media/1411/resilient-communties-leaflet.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2018.

[37] Scottish Government. 2017b. National Records of Scotland. Projected population of Scotland (2016-based). https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files/statistics/population-projections/2016-based-scot/pop-proj-2016-scot-nat-pop-pro-pub.pdf. Accessed Aug 2019.

[38] Scottish Government. 2019a. Preparing Scotland: Building community resilience 2019. https://www.readyscotland.org/media/1495/publications-preparing-scotland-building-community-resilience_.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2019.

[39] Scottish Government. 2019b. National Records of Scotland. Mid-year population estimates Scotland, mid-2018. https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files//statistics/population-estimates/mid-18/mid-year-pop-est-18-pub.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2019.

[40] Skerratt S. Enhancing the analysis of rural community resilience: Evidence from community land ownership. Journal of Rural Studies, 2013, 31: 36-46.

[41] Srikandini A, Hilhorst D, van Voorst R. Disaster risk governance in Indonesia and Myanmar: The practice of co-governance. Politics and Governance, 2018, 6(3): 180-189.

[42] Singh-Peterson L, Salmon P, Baldwin C, Goode N. Deconstructing the concept of shared responsibility for disaster resilience: A Sunshine Coast case study, Australia. Natural Hazards, 2015, 79(2): 755-774.

[43] Smith D. Beyond contingency planning: Towards a model of crisis management. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 1990, 4(4): 263-275.

[44] Smith D, McCloskey J. Risk communication and the social amplification of public sector risk. Public Money and Management, 1998, 18(4): 41-50.

[45] Steiner A, Markantoni M. Unpacking community resilience through Capacity for Change. Community Development Journal, 2014, 49(3): 407-425.

[46] Steiner A, Woolvin M, Skerratt S. Measuring community resilience: Developing and applying a “hybrid evaluation” approach. Community Development Journal, 2016, 53(1): 99-118.

[47] Stephens N. Collecting data from elites and ultra-elites: Telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists. Qualitative Research, 2007, 7(2): 203-216.

[48] Streeton R, Cooke M, Campbell J. Researching the researchers: Using a snowballing technique. Nurse Researcher, 2004, 12(1): 35-47.

[49] Tanner, T., A. Bahadur, and M. Moench. 2017. Challenges for resilience policy and practice. Working Paper 519. London: Overseas Development Institute.

[50] ‘t Hart P. After Fukushima: Reflections on risk and institutional learning in an era of mega-crises. Public Administration, 2013, 91(1): 101-113.

[51] Tiepolo M, Braccio S. Tiepolo M, Pezzoli A, Tarchiani V. Local and scientific knowledge integration for multi-risk assessment in rural Niger. Renewing local planning to face climate change in the tropics, 2017, Cham: Springer 227-245.

[52] Titz, A., T. Cannon, and F. Krüger. 2018. Uncovering ‘community’: Challenging an elusive concept in development and disaster related work. Societies 8(3): Article 71.

[53] Twigg, J. 2015. Disaster risk reduction. Good Practices Review 9. London: Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute. https://goodpracticereview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/GPR-9-web-string-1.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2019.

[54] Twigger-Ross, C. 2005. The impact of flooding on urban and rural communities. Bristol: Environment Agency, Department of Environment, Food and Environment (DEFRA). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290750/scho1005bjtg-e-e.pdf. Accessed Nov 2017.

[55] Thomas D. A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 2006, 27(2): 237-246.

[56] Tongco MDC. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 2007, 5: 147-158.

[57] United Kingdom. 1996. The Pipelines Safety Regulations 1996 No. 825. London: The National Archives. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/825/contents/made. Accessed 5 Apr 2019.

[58] United Kingdom. 1999. The Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999 No. 743. London: The National Archives. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/743/contents/made. Accessed 5 Aug 2019.

[59] United Kingdom. 2001. The Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public Information) Regulations 2001 No. 2975. London: The National Archives http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2001/2975/contents/made. Accessed 5 June 2019.

[60] United Kingdom. 2004. Civil Contingencies Act c. 36. London: The National Archives. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/36/contents. Accessed 6 May 2018.

[61] United Kingdom. 2005. The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 (Contingency Planning) (Scotland) Regulations 2005 no. 494. London: The National Archives. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/2005/494?title=Civil%20Contingencies%20Act%20%28contingency%20planning%29. Accessed 6 May 2018.

[62] United Kingdom. 2015. Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015 asp 6. London: The National Archives. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2015/6/contents/enacted. Accessed 5 Mar U2019.

[63] UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2019. Web site. https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/disaster-statistics. Accessed 6 Aug 2019.

[64] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015. Terminology. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology. Accessed 8 June 2019.

[65] Van Niekerk D, Nemakonde LD, Kruger L, Forbes-Genade K. Rodriguez H, Quarantelli E, Dynes R. Community-based disaster risk management. Handbook of disaster research, 2018, Cham: Springer 411-429.

[66] Walsh-Dilley M, Wolford W. (Un)Defining resilience: Subjective understandings of “resilience” from the field. Resilience, 2015, 3(3): 173-182.

[67] Wilson G. Community resilience and environmental transitions, 2012, New York: Routledge

[68] Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2004, New York: Routledge

[69] Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I. Handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction, 2012, New York: Routledge

[70] Wynne B. Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology, 1996, London: Sage 44-83.