The Organizer Dilemma: Outcomes from a Collaboration Exercise

Abstract

In crisis management, cross-sector collaboration exercises are perceived as improving preparedness and develop team-integration efforts. However, studies show that exercises may tend to produce results with limited learning and usefulness. The purpose of this nonexperimental, survey-based study was to measure the difference in perceived exercise effect between participants belonging to the exercise planning organizations and participants belonging to other participating groups. Surveys were distributed and collected from participants in a 2017 chemical oil-spill exercise set off the southern coast of Norway. The target population was operational staff, excluding exercise management and directing staff. The sample population consisted of operatives associated with the exercise organizer organization and others belonging to external public and nongovernmental emergency organizations. The data collection instrument was the “Collaboration, Learning, and Utility Scale” (CLU-scale). Findings indicated that the levels of CLU were higher among external participants than among those individuals who belong to the exercise planning organizations. This study recommends the development and adoption of a national maritime collaboration exercise framework. A practical implication is a recommendation to evaluate exercises to secure the outcome regarding collaboration skill using the same instrument.

Keywords

Collaboration exercise / Collaboration, Learning, and Utility Scale / Crisis management / Maritime emergencies and crises / Norway

References

[1] Accident Investigation Board Norway. 2011. Report on investigation into marine accident M/V Godafoss V2pm7 grounding in Løperen, Hvaler on 17 February 2011. https://www.aibn.no/Sjofart/Rapporter/2012-09-eng. Accessed 4 Jun 2018.

[2] Andersson A, Carlström ED, Ahgren B, Berlin JM. Managing boundaries at the accident scene – A qualitative study of collaboration exercises. International Journal of Emergency Services, 2014, 3(1): 77-94

[3] Andersson A, Carlström E, Berlin JM. Organizing a simulated reality: On exercises with public safety organizations (Organisering Av En fingerad Verklighet: Om ovningar mellan blåljusorganisationer). Nordic Organization Studies, 2013, 15(3): 34-64 (in Swedish)

[4] Argyris C. Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21(3): 363-375

[5] Argyris C, Schön D. Organizational learning: A theory of action approach, 1978, Reading, MA: Addision Wesley

[6] Axelsson R. The organizational pendulum: Healthcare management in Sweden 1865–1998. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2000, 28(1): 47-53.

[7] Bahri A, Corebima AD. The contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcomes of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2015, 14(4): 487-500.

[8] Barker J. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38(3): 408-437

[9] Berlin JM, Carlström ED. The 90-Second collaboration: A critical study of collaboration exercises at extensive accident sites. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2008, 16(4): 177-185

[10] Berlin J, Carlström E. Collaboration at the accident scene (Samverken på olyksplassen), 2009, Gothenburg: University West (in Swedish)

[11] Berlin JM, Carlström ED. The dominance of mechanistic behaviour: A critical study of emergency exercises. International Journal of Emergency Management, 2013, 9(4): 327-350

[12] Berlin JM, Carlström ED. Collaboration exercises: What do they contribute? A study of learning and usefulness. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2015, 23(1): 11-23

[13] Borell J, Eriksson K. Learning effectiveness of discussion-based crisis management exercises. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2013, 5: 28-37

[14] Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 1988 2 St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company

[15] Dirks KT, Ferrin D. The role of trust in organizational setting. Organization Science, 2002, 12(4): 450-467

[16] Drucker P. Management challenges for the 21st Century, 2007, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann

[17] Ekman O. Parallel chains of command in European Union operation headquarters: An experimental study of the drivers behind national perspectives. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2012, 20(2): 66-76

[18] George D, Mallery M. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 2010, Boston: Pearson

[19] Jung K, Song M. Linking emergency management networks to disaster resilience: Bonding and bridging strategy in hierarchical or horizontal collaboration networks. Quality and Quantity, 2015, 49(4): 1465-1483

[20] Kauser S, Shaw V. The influence of behavioural and organizational characteristics on the success of international strategic alliances. International Marketing Review, 2004, 21(1): 17-52

[21] Kim H. Improving simulation exercises in Korea for disaster preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2013, 22(1): 38-47

[22] Kim H. Learning from UK disaster exercises: Policy implications for effective emergency preparedness. Disasters, 2014, 38(4): 846-857

[23] Klabbers J. The exercises planners guide, 1999, London: HMSO

[24] Kouzes J, Posner B. The leadership challenge, 2003 3 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

[25] Kristiansen E, Sørensen JL, Carlström E, Magnussen LI. Time to rethink Norwegian maritime collaboration exercises. International Journal of Emergency Services, 2017, 6(1): 14-28

[26] Lu X, Xue L. Managing the unexpected: Sense-making in the Chinese emergency management system. Public Administration, 2016, 94(2): 414-429

[27] Magnussen LI, Carlstrøm E, Sørensen JL, Torgersen G-E, Hagenes EF, Kristiansen E. Learning and usefulness stemming from collaboration in a maritime crisis management exercise in northern Norway. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2018, 27(1): 129-140

[28] McCusker K, Gunaydin S. Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 2015, 30(7): 537-542

[29] Murphy M, Arenas D, Batista J. Value creation in cross-sector collaborations: The roles of experience and alignment. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 130(1): 145-162

[30] Norwegian Coastal Administration. 2017. About SCOPE 2017. https://www.kystverket.no/Beredskap/kurs-og-ovelser/scope2017/. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.

[31] Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security. 2012. White paper 29 (2011–2012) civil preparedness (Melding til Stortinget 29 (20112012) Samfunnssikkerhet). https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/bc5cbb3720b14709a6bda1a175dc0f12/no/pdfs/stm201120120029000dddpdfs.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2018 (in Norwegian).

[32] Norwegian Official Report. 1981. Alexander Kielland accident (Alexander Kielland ulykken). Norwegian official report. http://www.nb.no/nbsok/nb/601672726ddba2d9395163ef46e67c5f.nbdigital?lang=no#10. Accessed 6 Jun 2018 (in Norwegian).

[33] Norwegian Official Report. 1991. Scandinavian Star accident (Scandinavian Star ulykken). Norwegian official report. http://scandinavian-star.vg.no/bonus-material/NOU1991.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2018 (in Norwegian).

[34] Norwegian Official Report. 2012. Report from the July 22 Commission (Rapport fra 22. Juli-kommisjonen). Norwegian official report. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/bb3dc76229c64735b4f6eb4dbfcdbfe8/no/pdfs/nou201220120014000dddpdfs.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2018 (in Norwegian).

[35] Paton D, Johnston D, Houghton B. Organisational response to a volcanic eruption. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 1998, 7(1): 5-13

[36] Pramanik R, Ekman O, Hassel H, Tehler H. Organizational adaptation in multi-stakeholder crisis response: An experimental study. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2015, 23(4): 234-245

[37] Questback. 2018. Security statement (Sikkerhetserklæring). https://www.questback.com/no/sikkerhetserklaering. Accessed 6 Jun 2018 (in Norwegian).

[38] Research Council of Norway. 2013. People do not longer respond (Folk svarer ikke lenger). http://www.forskningsradet.no/bladetforskning/Nyheter/Folk_svarer_ikke_lenger/1253986892964. Accessed 6 Jun 2018 (in Norwegian).

[39] Ross WH, LaCroix J. Multiple meanings of trust in negotiation theory and research: A literature review and integrative model. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 1996, 7(4): 314-360

[40] Rutty GN, Rutty JE. Did the participants of the mass fatality exercise Operation Torch learn anything?. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 2012, 8(2): 88-93

[41] Salman Sawalha IH. Collaboration in crisis and emergency management: Identifying the gaps in the case of storm “Alexa”. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning, 2014, 7(4): 312-323.

[42] Schmider Emanuel, Ziegler Matthias, Danay Erik, Beyer Luzi, Bühner Markus. Is It Really Robust?. Methodology, 2010, 6(4): 147-151

[43] Sommer M, Njå O. Dominant learning processes in emergency response organizations: A case study of a joint rescue coordination centre. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2012, 20(4): 219-230

[44] Sommer M, Braut GS, Njå O. A model for learning in emergency response work. International Journal of Emergency Management, 2013, 9(2): 151-169

[45] Sørensen JL. Norwegian maritime crisis collaboration exercises: Are they useful? Doctoral dissertation, 2017, USA: Northcentral University

[46] Sørensen JL, Carlström ED, Magnussen LI, Kim T, Christiansen AM, Torgersen GE. Old dogs, new tricks? A Norwegian study on whether previous collaboration exercise experience impacted participant’s perceived exercise effect. International Journal of Emergency Services, 2018

[47] Sørensen JL, Magnussen LI, Torgersen GE, Christiansen AM, Carlström ED. Perceived usefulness of maritime cross-border collaboration exercises. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 2018, 9(4): 361

[48] Stein J. How institutions learn: A socio-cognitive perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 1997, 31(3): 729-740

[49] Sullivan H, Williams P, Jeffarens S. Leadership for collaboration. Public Management Review, 2012, 14(1): 41-66

[50] Torgersen GE. Pedagogic for the Unforeseen (Pedagogikk for det uforutsette), 2015, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget (in Norwegian)