Vulnerability Factors of Afghan Rural Women to Disasters

Abstract

Disaster management is a global challenge, but disasters do not affect men and women equally. In most of the world’s disasters, more females are impacted than males, and in Afghanistan the disparity between female and male victims is even greater. This study identifies and maps the relationships between the factors that make Afghan rural women more vulnerable to natural hazard-induced disasters. Data for this study were obtained through focus group discussions with rural women and men, as well as person-to-person interviews with employees of government and nongovernmental organizations at the national and local levels in Afghanistan. The study uses Grounded Theory and Interpretive Structural Modeling, not widely used before for this type of study, to analyze the data collected and to map the factors of vulnerability identified and their relationships. In agreement with previous studies, our findings show that insufficient disaster education, inadequate protection measures, and powerful cultural issues, both pre- and post-disaster, increase women’s vulnerability during and after disasters. In particular, cultural issues play a role after disasters by affecting women’s security, access to disaster aid, and health care. The study also found that perception regarding these cultural issues and how they affect women during disasters differs among men and women. Finally, by using Interpretive Structural Modeling, we show how the importance of the factors and their interrelationships change in pre-disaster and post-disaster situations. We conclude the article with some policy recommendations such as finding ways to allow women to participate in disaster planning activities and decision-making processes related to disaster risk reduction, as well as securing dedicated funds for the mainstreaming of gender in disaster risk reduction policies in Afghanistan.

Keywords

Afghanistan / Disaster vulnerability / Gender roles / Grounded Theory / Rural area / Women’s vulnerability

References

[1] Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of. 2007. The national risk and vulnerability assessment 2005: Afghanistan. Kabul: Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development and the Central Statistics Office. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/BF0DA64F0CCA5CE4C1257648004551AC-Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2019.

[2] Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of. 2008a. Afghanistan national development strategy (ANDS) (2008–2013). https://www.undp.org/content/dam/afghanistan/docs/ANDS_Full_Eng.pdf. Accessed 10 Jun 2019.

[3] Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of. 2008b. National action plan for the women of Afghanistan, 2008–2018. Kabul: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. http://ago.gov.af/Content/Media/Documents/NAPWA382016145514117553325325.pdf. Accessed 10 Jul 2018 (in Dari and English).

[4] Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, Ministry of Justice. 2012. Afghanistan disaster mitigation law. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Ministry of Justice Official Gazette. Issue No. 1089 (in Dari and Pashto languages). Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, Ministry of Women’s Affairs. 2017. National action plan for the women of Afghanistan 2007–2017 (NAPWA). http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/afg149120.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2108.

[5] ANDMA (Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority). 2010. Afghanistan national disaster management strategic plan. http://www.andma.gov.af. Accessed 10 Jun 2019.

[6] Ariyabandu M. Enarson E, Chakrabarti PGD. Sex, gender and gender relations in disasters. Women, gender, and disaster: Global issues and initiatives, 2009, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 5-17

[7] Ariyabandu, M., and D. Foenseka. 2006. Do disasters discriminate? In South Asia network for disaster mitigation: Tackling the tides and tremors, ed. D. Nivaran, 23–40. South Asia disaster report, 2005, Islamabad.

[8] Asia Foundation. 2016. A survey of the Afghan people 2016. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2016_Survey-of-the-Afghan-People_full-survey.Apr2017.pdf. Accessed 28 Jun 2019.

[9] Attri R, Dev N, Sharma V. Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: An overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2013, 2(2): 3-8.

[10] Barakat S, Wardell G. Capitalizing on capacities of Afghan women: Women’s role in Afghanistan’s reconstruction and development, 2001, Geneva: International Labour Organization

[11] Bowen GA. Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts, 2006, Cullowhee, North Carolina, USA: Western Carolina University

[12] Dupree NH. Cultural heritage and national identity in Afghanistan. Journal Third World Quarterly, 2002, 23(5): 977-989

[13] Enarson, E. 2010. A gendered human rights approach to rebuilding after disaster. In Rebuilding sustainable communities for children and their families after disasters: A global survey, 13–28. Cambridge Scholars Publishing in association with GSE Research.

[14] Enarson E, Morrow BH. Enarson E, Morrow BH. Why gender? Why women? An introduction to women and disaster. The gender terrain of natural disasters: Through women’s eyes, 1998, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers 1-8.

[15] Enarson E, Meyreles L. International perspectives on gender and disaster: Differences and possibilities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2004, 24(10/11): 49-93

[16] Enarson E, Fothergill A, Peek L. Rodríguez H, Donner W, Trainor JE. Gender and disaster: Foundations and new directions for research and practice. Handbook of disaster research, 2007, New York: Springer 205-223.

[17] Erikson C. Gender and wildfire: Landscapes of uncertainty, 2014, New York: Routledge

[18] Evans, G.L. 2013. A novice first author’s first walk through the maze of grounded theory: Rationalization for classical grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal 12(1): Article 37.

[19] Fothergill A. Gender, risk and disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1996, 14(1): 33-56.

[20] GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit) Afghanistan. 2010. Gender standards in disaster risk management in Badakhshan, Afghanistan, 2010. http://www.solutionexchange-un.net/repository/af/gen/DRMGenderStandardBadakhshan-GovernorOffice-01Aug2013.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2019.

[21] Glaser BG, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, 1967, New York: Aldine

[22] Gokhale, V. 2008. Role of women in disaster management: An analytical study with reference to Indian society. In Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, 12–17 October 2008, Beijing, China.

[23] Griffin C. Wilkinson S. Qualitative methods and female experience: Young women from school to the job market. Feminist social psychology: Development theory and practice, 1986, Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press 173-191.

[24] Hashimi, S.K. 2011. A case study on Horticulture and Livestock Project, Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock. University of Applied Science, the Netherland.

[25] Horton L. After the earthquake: Gender inequality and transformation in post-disaster Haiti. Gender and Development, 2012, 20(2): 295-308

[26] Ikeda K. Gender differences in human loss and vulnerability in natural disasters: A case study from Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 1995

[27] IFAD (International Fund for Agriculture Development). 2012. Afghanistan: Rural microfinance and livestock support programme—Mid-term review report. https://operations.ifad.org/documents/654016/2d474d2a-e32a-4cc6-8670-a5d4172cae1a. Accessed 22 Feb 2018.

[28] IOM (International Organization for Migration). 2015. Humanitarian response. http://afg.humanitarianresponse.info/. Accessed Jul 2016.

[29] Irshad H, Mumtaz Z, Levay A. Long-term gendered consequences of permanent disabilities caused by the 2005 Pakistan earthquake. Disasters, 2012, 36(3): 452-464

[30] Isik O, Ozer N, Ozcep F. Are women in Turkey both risks and resources in disaster management?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2015, 12(6): 5758-5774

[31] Janes FR. Interpretive structural modelling: A methodology for structuring complex issues. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control Journal, 1988, 10(3): 145-154

[32] Jones M, Alony I. Guideline to use of Grounded theory in doctoral studies: An example from the Australian film industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2011, 6: 95-114

[33] Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: A practical guide to applied research, 2000 3 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

[34] Krüger, F., G. Bankoff, T. Cannon, B. Orlowski, and E.L.F. Schipper. 2015. Cultures and disasters. Understanding cultural framing in disaster risk reduction. London: Routledge.

[35] Madriz E. Denzin N, Lincoln YS. Focus groups in Feminist research. Collecting and interpreting qualitative data, 2003, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 363-384.

[36] Mileti DS. Disaster by design: A reassessment of natural hazards and disasters in the United States, 1999, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press

[37] Nelson V, Meadows K, Cannon T, Morton J, Martin A. Uncertain predictions, invisible impacts, and the need to mainstream gender in climate change adaptations. Gender & Development Journal, 2002, 10(2): 51-59

[38] Neumayer E, Plümper T. The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2007, 97(3): 551-566

[39] Parkinson, D. 2014. Women’s experience of violence in the aftermath of the black Saturday bushfires. Doctoral dissertation. Monash University, Australia. https://au-east.erc.monash.edu.au/fpfiles/7682236/monash_153836.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2018.

[40] Plan International. 2013. In double jeopardy: Adolescent girls and disasters. The seventh report in Plan International’s annual State of the World’s Girls series. Surrey, UK: Plan International.

[41] Plummer M, Young LE. Grounded theory and feminist inquiry: Revitalizing links to the past. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 2010, 32(3): 305-321

[42] Reuters. 2018. Reuters world news. 15 June 2011. Afghanistan is most dangerous country for women. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-women-danger/afghanistan-is-most-dangerous-country-for-women-idUSTRE75E31R20110615. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.

[43] Reyes DD, Lu JL. Gender dimension in disaster situations: A case study of flood prone women in Malabon city, Metro Manila. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 2015, 18(4): 69-86.

[44] Saad SG. Enarson E, Chakrabarti PGD. Environmental management and disaster mitigation: Middle Eastern gender perspective. Women, gender and disaster: Global issues and initiatives, 2009, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 89-98

[45] Sahu, G.P. 2008. Interpretive structural modeling. Allahabad, India: School of Management Studies, Motilala Nehro National Institute of Technology.

[46] Samiullah Rahman A, Shaw R. Rahman A, Khan AN, Shaw R. Gender and disaster risk reduction in Pakistan. Disaster risk reduction approaches in Pakistan, 2015, Tokyo: Springer 379-394.

[47] Sherraden, M. 1995. How to do focus groups. In IDA evaluation handbook: A practical guide and tools for evaluation of pioneering IDA projects, ed. M. Sherraden, D. Page-Adams, S. Emerson, S. Beverly, E. Scanlon, L.C. Cheng, M.S. Sherraden, K. Edwards, and L. Johnson, Section 5.1. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.591.2297&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 10 Jun 2019.

[48] Strauss A, Corbin J. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Grounded theory in practice: Data management and analysis methods. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 259-310.

[49] Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2012, 13(2): 87-106

[50] UNESCO (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2018. Afghanistan. Montreal, Canada: UNESCO Institute of Statistics. http://uis.unesco.org/country/AF. Accessed 16 Apr 2019.

[51] UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). 2002. Afghanistan is among worst places on globe for women’s health. Press release. https://www.unicef.org/newsline/02pr59afghanmm.htm. Accessed 10 Jun 2019.

[52] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2009a. The disaster risk reduction process: A gender perspective. Geneva, Switzerland: Gender and Disasters Network. https://www.preventionweb.net/search/pw#query=the+disaster+risk+reduction+process:+gender+perspective%26hits=20%26sortby=default%26view=pw. Accessed 24 May 2019.

[53] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2009b. Making disaster risk reduction gender sensitive. https://www.unisdr.org/files/9922_MakingDisasterRiskReductionGenderSe.pdf. Accessed 24 Jul 2017.

[54] UNISDR/UNDAW (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction/United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women). 2001. Environmental management and the mitigation of natural disasters: A gender perspective. Report of the Expert Group Meeting, Ankara, Turkey, 6–9 November 2001. New York: Division for the Advancement of Women, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

[55] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/43291. Accessed 9 May 2019.

[56] United Nations General Assembly. 2005. GA/10384. Steps to reform UN should unite, not divide, international community. https://www.un.org/press/en/2005/ga10384.doc.htm. Accessed 20 May 2019.

[57] Wakefield S. Gender and local level decision making: Findings from a case study in Mazar-e Sharif, 2005, Kabul, Afghanistan: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit

[58] Warfield John N.. Developing Interconnection Matrices in Structural Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1974, SMC-4(1): 81-87

[59] Warfield John N.. Implication Structures for System Interconnection Matrices. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1976, SMC-6(1): 18-24

[60] Watson R. Interpretive structural modeling-A useful tool for technology assessment?. Journal of Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1978, 11(2): 165-185

[61] WHO (World Health Organization). 2011. Gender, climate change and health. Geneva: Public Health & Environment Department (PHE), Health Security and Environment Cluster (HSE), World Health Organization (WHO).

[62] Wuest J. Feminist grounded theory: An exploration of the congruency and tension between two traditions in knowledge discovery. Qualitative Health Research, 1995, 5(1): 125-137