Challenges to Coordination: Understanding Intergovernmental Friction During Disasters

Abstract

While idealized crisis response involves smooth coordination between relevant actors, friction between levels of government and between the state and civil society in responding to catastrophe may be more common. This article builds a theory of cross-level friction during and after crisis by analyzing the conditions when discord is most likely. With a medium-N dataset (N = 18) of disaster responses from, among other countries, Chile, Haiti, Japan, North America, the Philippines, and Somalia, I carry out quantitative and qualitative analysis of cases with a variety of levels of friction to investigate the conditions that lead to misalignment. Tobit regression, qualitative comparative analysis, and case studies that take into account levels of economic development, government structure, nongovernmental organization density, and levels of damage demonstrate that low levels of development, lower levels of economic costs from the crisis, and poor planning and logistical infrastructure correlate with a higher likelihood of friction between disaster response stakeholders. Although not definitive, these findings come with theoretical and practical implications as climate change makes extreme weather events and future disasters more likely and more powerful.

Keywords

Bottom up culture / Case studies / Disaster coordination / Qualitative comparative analysis / Tobit regression analysis / Top down institutions

References

[1] Alcantra P. Lessons learned from the Philippine government’s response to Typhoon Haiyan. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning, 2014, 7(4): 335-347.

[2] Aldrich DP. Localities that can say no? Autonomy and dependence in Japanese local government. Asian Journal of Political Science, 1997, 7(1): 60-76

[3] Aldrich DP. Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery, 2012, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[4] Aldrich DP. Black wave: How networks and governance shaped Japan’s 3/11 disasters, 2019, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[5] Aldrich DP, Sawada Y. The physical and social determinants of mortality in the 3.11 tsunami. Social Science and Medicine, 2015, 124: 66-75

[6] BCLC (Business Civic Leadership Center). 2010. What a successful disaster recovery looks like. https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/sites/default/files/publication/ccc/WhatDoesaSuccessfulRecoveryLookLike.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2019.

[7] Below, R., and P. Wallemacq. 2018. Natural disasters 2017. Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED).

[8] Benson C, Clay E. Economic and financial impacts of natural disasters: An assessment of their effects and options for mitigation, 2003, Washington, DC: World Bank

[9] Blakeman, B. 2017. Local governments must lead from the front during disasters. The Hill. 28 August 2017. https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/economy-budget/348311-municipalities-must-lead-from-front-during-natural. Accessed 17 Jun 2019.

[10] Boin A, Bynander F. Explaining success and failure in crisis coordination. Geografiska Annaler, Series A, Physical Geography, 2014, 97(1): 123-135

[11] Boin, A., and J. Richardson. 2015. Crisis management in Katrina’s immediate aftermath: Lessons for a national response to a super disaster. Paper presented at the Katrina @ 10 Conference, 25 August 2015, Louisiana State University.

[12] Boin A, McConnell A, Hart P. Governing after crisis: The politics of investigation, accountability and learning, 2008, New York: Cambridge University Press

[13] Butler JRA, Wise RM, Skewes TD, Bohensky EL, Peterson N, Suadnya W, Yanuartati Y, Handayani HP Integrating top-down and bottom-up adaptation planning to build adaptive capacity: A structured learning approach. Coastal Management, 2015, 43(4): 346-364

[14] Clarke L. Mission improbable: Using fantasy documents to tame disaster, 1999, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[15] CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters). 2019. EM-DAT (Emergency Events Database). The international disaster database. Brussels, Belgium: Université catholique de Louvain, School of Public Health, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. https://www.emdat.be/. Accessed 20 Apr 2019.

[16] De Bruin K, Dellink RB, Ruijs A, Bolwidt L, Buuren AV, Graveland J, Groot RSD, Kuikman PJ Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: An inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Climatic Change, 2009, 95(1–2): 23-45

[17] DHS (Department of Homeland Security). 2016. National disaster recovery framework, 2nd edn. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1466014998123-4bec8550930f774269e0c5968b120ba2/National_Disaster_Recovery_Framework2nd.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2019.

[18] Dimmer C. Yan W, Gallloway W. Japan after March 11th 2011: Between Swift reconstruction and sustainable restructuring. Rethinking resilience, adaptation, and transformation in a time of change, 2017, New York: Springer 23-40

[19] Dy P, Stephens T. The typhoon Haiyan response: Strengthening coordination among Philippine government, civil society, and international actors, 2016, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School Program on Crisis Leadership

[20] Edgington D. Reconstructing Kobe: The geography of crisis and opportunity, 2010, Toronto: University of British Columbia Press

[21] Eyra A, Fertel N, Fisher JM, Gunn SW, Hampton D, Lederman B, Posner Z, Preobrajensky VN Disaster coordination and management: Summary and action plans. Prehospital Disaster Medicine, 2001, 16(1): 22-25

[22] Faraj S, Xiao Y. Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science., 2006, 52(8): 1115-1169

[23] Fastenrath S, Braun B. Sustainability transition pathways in the building sector: Energy efficient building in Freiburg. Applied Geography, 2017, 90(1): 339-349.

[24] Gall, M., S. Cutter, and K. Nguyen. 2014. Governance in disaster risk management (IRDR AIRDR publication No. 3). Beijing: Integrated Research on Disaster Risk.

[25] Girdwood, J. 2013. Top down and bottom up approaches within implementation. Political Pipeline Blog 21 February.

[26] GNDR (Global Network of Civil Society Organizations for Disaster Reduction). 2009. “Clouds but little rain…” Views from the Frontline; A local perspective of progress towards implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action. Teddington, United Kingdom: GNCSODR. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/9822_9822VFLfullreport06091.pdf. Accessed 18 Jun 2019

[27] Johnson L, Olshansky R. After great disasters: An in-depth analysis of how six countries managed community recovery, 2017, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy

[28] Kendra JM, Wachtendorf T. American Dunkirk: The waterborne evacuation of Manhattan on 9/11, 2016, Philadelphia: Temple University Press

[29] Legewie N. An introduction to applied data analysis with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Forum on Qualitative Social Research, 2013, 14(3): 1-45.

[30] Manandhar R, McEntire DA. Kapucu N, Liou KT. Disasters, development, and resilience: Exploring the need for comprehensive vulnerability management. Disaster and development: Examining global issues and cases, 2014, Cham, Switzerland: Springer 19-37

[31] Metaxa-Kakavouli, D., P. Maas, and D.P. Aldrich. 2018. How social ties influence hurricane evacuation behavior. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2(CSCW): Article 122.

[32] Mearns R, Norton A. Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world, 2010, Washington, DC: The World Bank

[33] Muir-Wood R. The cure for catastrophe, 2016, New York: Basic Books

[34] Muller R, Sankaran S, Drouin N, Vaagaasar AL, Bekker M, Jain K. A theory framework for balancing vertical and horizontal leadership in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 2018, 36(1): 83-94

[35] Naderpajouh N, Yu DJ, Aldrich DP, Linkov I, Matinheikki J. Engineering meets institutions: An interdisciplinary approach to the management of resilience. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2018, 38(3): 306-317

[36] Oden, R., L.G. Militello, K. Ross, and C. Lopez. 2012. Four key challenges in disaster response. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, 22–26 October 2012, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

[37] Peregrine P. Social resilience to climate-related disasters in ancient societies: A test of two hypotheses. Weather, Climate, and Society, 2018, 10(1): 145-161

[38] Ragin C. Fuzzy set social science, 2000, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[39] Rumbach, A., and D. Foley. 2014. Indigenous institutions and their role in disaster risk reduction and resilience: Evidence from the 2009 tsunami in American Samoa. Ecology and Society 19(1): Article 19.

[40] Schmuck-Widmann, H. 1998. Floods in Bangladesh: Disaster or part of the lifeworld? Unpublished paper.

[41] Shaw R, Godao K. From disaster to sustainable civil society: The Kobe experience. Disasters, 2004, 28(1): 16-40

[42] Shaw, R., Y. Takeuchi, N. Uy, and S. Sharma. 2009. Indigenous knowledge: Disaster risk reduction policy note. Bangkok, Thailand: UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction for Asia and the Pacific. www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?id=8853. Accessed 19 Aug 2019.

[43] Shi PJ, Jaeger C, Ye Q. Integrated risk governance: Science plan and case studies of large-scale disasters, 2013, Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press and Springer

[44] Siembieda WJ. Transactions and friction as concepts to guide disaster recovery policy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2012, 3(1): 38-44

[45] Spillman, M., and A. Cottrell. 2004. Indigenous communities, peri-urbanism and bushfire issues in Northern Australia. Briefing paper No 1. Centre for Disaster Studies, Tropical Environment Studies and Geography, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia. https://www.jcu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/123631/jcutst_056280.pdf. Accessed 18 Jun 2019.

[46] Stoner, J.H. 2009. Connecting the world’s collections: Making the case for the conservation and preservation of our cultural heritage. Washington, DC: Institute of Museum and Library Services. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=lB5FgRMAAAAJ&hl=en#d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DlB5FgRMAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3DlB5FgRMAAAAJ%3AzYLM7Y9cAGgC%26tzom%3D240. Accessed 19 Aug 2019.

[47] Suzuki, I., and Y. Kaneko. 2013. Japan’s disaster governance: How was the 3.11 crisis managed? New York: Springer.

[48] Takase H, Yoshida K, Kumagai W. Warnings from the shrines (Jinja wa keikoku suru), 2012, Tokyo: Kodansha

[49] Takezawa S. The aftermath of the 2011 east Japan earthquake and tsunami: Living among the rubble, 2016, New York: Lexington Books

[50] Thomas, J., A.O. Mara-Eves, and G. Brunton. 2014. Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: A worked example. Systematic Reviews 3: Article 67.

[51] Walch C. Typhoon Haiyan: Pushing the limits of resilience?. Critical Asian Studies, 2018, 50(1): 122-135

[52] Watarai A. Lessons learnt from the triple disaster in East Japan, 2012, Kanagawa: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies

[53] WHO (World Health Organization). 2013. Disaster coordination: The key to an effective response. Disasters issue 120. Geneva: WHO. https://www.paho.org/disasters%20%20/newsletter/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=523%3Adisaster-coordination-the-key-to-an-effective-response&catid=247%3Aissue-120-november-2013-editorial&Itemid=319&lang=en. Accessed 18 Jun 2019.

[54] Wood BD, Waterman RW. The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 1991, 85(3): 801-828

[55] Yamada S. Hearts and minds: Typhoon Yolanda/Haiyan and the use of humanitarian assistance/disaster relief to further strategic ends. Social Medicine, 2017, 11(2): 76-82.