Integrating Systemic Risk and Risk Analysis Using Copulas

Abstract

Systemic risk research is gaining traction across diverse disciplinary research communities, but has as yet not been strongly linked to traditional, well-established risk analysis research. This is due in part to the fact that systemic risk research focuses on the connection of elements within a system, while risk analysis research focuses more on individual risk to single elements. We therefore investigate how current systemic risk research can be related to traditional risk analysis approaches from a conceptual as well as an empirical point of view. Based on Sklar’s Theorem, which provides a one-to-one relationship between multivariate distributions and copulas, we suggest a reframing of the concept of copulas based on a network perspective. This provides a promising way forward for integrating individual risk (in the form of probability distributions) and systemic risk (in the form of copulas describing the dependencies among such distributions) across research domains. Copulas can link continuous node states, characterizing individual risks, with a gradual dependency of the coupling strength between nodes on their states, characterizing systemic risk. When copulas are used for describing such refined coupling between nodes, they can provide a more accurate quantification of a system’s network structure. This enables more realistic systemic risk assessments, and is especially useful when extreme events (that occur at low probabilities, but have high impacts) affect a system’s nodes. In this way, copulas can be informative in measuring and quantifying changes in systemic risk and therefore be helpful in its management. We discuss the advantages and limitations of copulas for integrative risk analyses from the perspectives of modeling, measurement, and management.

Keywords

Copulas / Individual risk / Risk analysis / Systemic risk

References

[1] Allen F, Gale D. Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 108(1): 1-33

[2] Allen F, Babus A, Carletti E. Asset commonality, debt maturity and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 104(3): 519-534

[3] Aven T. What defines us as professionals in the field of risk analysis?. Risk Analysis, 2016, 37(5): 854-860

[4] Bak P, Paczuski M. Complexity, contingency, and criticality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1995, 92(15): 6689-6696

[5] Battiston S, Gatti DD, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Stiglitz JE. Liaisons dangereuses: Increasing connectivity, risk sharing, and systemic risk. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2012, 36(8): 1121-1141

[6] Battiston, S., M. Puliga, R. Kaushik, P. Tasca, and G. Caldarelli. 2012. Debtrank: Too central to fail? Financial networks, the FED and systemic risk. Scientific Reports 2(8): Article 541.

[7] Bedford T, Cooke R. Vines: A new graphical model for dependent random variables. Annals of Statistics, 2002, 30(4): 1031-1068

[8] Borgomeo E, Pflug G, Hall JW, Hochrainer-Stigler S. Assessing water resource system vulnerability to unprecedented hydrological drought using copulas to characterize drought duration and deficit. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(11): 8927-8948

[9] Borrvall C, Ebenman B, Jonsson T. Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs. Ecology Letters, 2000, 3(2): 131-136

[10] Boss, M., M. Summer, and S. Thurner. 2004. Contagion flow through banking networks. In Computational Science—ICCS 2004, Proceedings, Part III, ed. M. Bubak, G.D. van Albada, P.M.A. Sloot, and J. Dongarra, 1070–1077. Berlin: Springer.

[11] Centeno MA, Nag M, Patterson TS, Shaver A, Windawi AJ. The emergence of global systemic risk. Annual Review of Sociology, 2015, 41(1): 65-85

[12] Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2004, 35(1): 557-581

[13] Gai P, Kapadia S. Contagion in financial networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2010, 466: 2401-2423

[14] Gardner MR, Ashby WR. Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: Critical values for stability. Nature, 1970, 228(5273): 784

[15] Grossi P, Kunreuther H. Catastrophe modeling: A new approach to managing risk, 2005, Boston, MA: Springer

[16] Haefeli D, Liedtke PM. Insurance and resolution in light of the systemic risk debate, 2012, Geneva, Switzerland: The Geneva Association

[17] Haldane AG, May RM. Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 2011, 469(7330): 351-355

[18] Hanel, R., S.A. Kauffman, and S. Thurner. 2007. Towards a physics of evolution: Critical diversity dynamics at the edges of collapse and bursts of diversification. Physical Review E 76: Article 030101.

[19] Helbing D. Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature, 2013, 497(7447): 51-59

[20] Hochrainer-Stigler, S., G. Boza, C. Colon, S. Poledna, E. Rovenskaya, and U. Dieckmann. 2018. Resilience of systems to individual risk and systemic risk. In Resource guide on resilience, Volume 2, ed. M.-V. Florin, and I. Linkov. Lausanne, Switzerland: EPFL International Risk Governance Center (IRGC).

[21] Hochrainer-Stigler S, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Lorant A. The European Union Solidarity Fund: An assessment of its recent reforms. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2017, 22(4): 547-563

[22] Hofert M, Mächler M. Nested Archimedean copulas meet R: The nacopula package. Journal of Statistical Software, 2011, 39(9): 1-20

[23] Jain S, Krishna S. A model for the emergence of cooperation, interdependence, and structure in evolving networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2001, 98(2): 543-547

[24] Joe, H. 2014. Dependence modeling with copulas. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

[25] Jeong, B., W. Lee, D.S. Kim, and H. Shin. 2016. Copula-based approach to synthetic population generation. PLoS ONE 11(8): Article e0159496.

[26] Jongman B, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Feyen L, Aerts JCJH, Mechler R, Botzen WJW, Bouwer LM Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(4): 264-268

[27] Kessler D. Why (re)insurance is not systemic. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2014, 81(3): 477-488

[28] Kovacevic RM, Pflug GC, Pichler A. Baker HK, Filbeck G. Measuring and managing risk. Investment risk management, 2014, Oxford: Oxford University Press 17-41.

[29] Kurowicka D, Cooke R. Uncertainty analysis with high dimensional dependence modelling, 2006, West Sussex, UK: Wiley

[30] Kurowicka D, Joe H. Dependence modeling: Vine copula handbook, 2010, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co

[31] Little RG. Controlling cascading failure: Understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Urban Technology, 2002, 9(1): 109-123

[32] May RM. Will a large complex system be stable?. Nature, 1972, 238(5364): 413-414

[33] May RM, Arinaminpathy N. Systemic risk: The dynamics of model banking systems. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2010, 7(46): 823-838

[34] McCann KS. The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 2000, 405(6783): 228-233

[35] McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P. Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools, 2015, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

[36] Nelsen RB. An introduction to copulas, 2006, New York: Springer

[37] Page SE. What sociologists should know about complexity. Annual Review of Sociology, 2015, 41(1): 21-41

[38] Pimm SL, Lawton JH. On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature, 1978, 275(5680): 542-544

[39] Pflug G, Pichler A. Systemic risk and copula models. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2018, 26(2): 465-483

[40] Pflug GC, Römisch W. Modeling, measuring and managing risk, 2007, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co

[41] Poledna S, Thurner S. Elimination of systemic risk in financial networks by means of a systemic risk transaction tax. Quantitative Finance, 2016, 16(10): 1599-1613

[42] Scheffer M, Carpenter SR. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: Linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003, 18(12): 648-656

[43] Sklar, A. 1959. Distribution functions with n dimensions and their margins (Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges). Publications de l’Institut Statistique de l’Université de Paris 8: 229–231 (in French).

[44] Sklar A. Random variables, bivariate distribution functions and copulas. Kybernetika, 1973, 9: 449-460.

[45] Thurner, S., and S. Poledna. 2013. DebtRank-transparency: Controlling systemic risk in financial networks. Scientific Reports 3(5): Article 1888.

[46] Tilman D, Downing JA. Samson FB, Knopf FL. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Ecosystem management, 1996, New York: Springer 3-7

[47] Timonina A, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Pflug G, Jongman B, Rojas R. Structured coupling of probability loss distributions: Assessing joint flood risk in multiple river basins. Risk Analysis, 2015, 35(11): 2102-2119

[48] WEF (World Economic Forum) The global risk report, 2018, Geneva, Switzerland: WEF