Risk Governance: Application to Urban Challenges

Abstract

Urban areas face multiple risks: they range from natural hazard-induced disasters, fires, and building code violations to social risks such as vandalism, crime, and social disorientation, among others. These risks often interact with each other and cannot be dealt with in isolation. As a means to identify, assess, and manage multiple risks, the concept of “risk governance” has been developed, which promises to provide integrative and comprehensive tools to deal with the many manifestations of risks. In this article, risk governance concept has been specifically applied to complex risk situations in urban areas. The concept of risk governance pertains to the many ways in which multiple actors, individuals and institutions, public and private, deal with risks. It includes formal institutions and regimes and informal arrangements. The article first develops an adaptive and integrative model of risk governance and applies this model to the urban environments. After a short summary of the roots of risk governance, key concepts, such as simple, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous risks, are discussed. The main emphasis is on each of the five phases of risk governance: pre-estimation, interdisciplinary assessment, risk evaluation, risk management, and risk communication.

Keywords

Ambiguity / Complexity / Coping strategies / Integrated urban risk management / Risk assessment / Risk evaluation / Risk governance / Uncertainty

References

[1] Abels G. Citizen involvement in public policymaking: Does it improve democratic legitimacy and accountability? The case of pTA. Interdisciplinary Information Science, 2007, 13(1): 103-116

[2] Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N. Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning and multilevel governance, 2007, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press

[3] Arvai JL, Gregory R, McDaniels T. Testing a structured decision approach: Value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication. Risk Analysis, 2001, 21(6): 1065-1076

[4] van Asselt MBA. Perspectives on uncertainty and risk: The PRIMA approach to decision support, 2000, Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic

[5] van Asselt MBA, Renn O. Risk governance. Risk Research, 2011, 14(4): 431-449

[6] Aven T, Renn O. The role of quantitative risk assessments for characterizing risk and uncertainty and delineating appropriate risk management options, with special emphasis on terrorism. Risk Analysis, 2009, 29(4): 587-600

[7] Beierle TC, Cayford J. Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions, 2002, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future

[8] Berkhout F, Hertin J, Gann DM. Learning to adapt: Organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Climate Change, 2006, 78(1): 135-156

[9] Brooks M, Adger WN. Chopra K, Leemans R, Kumar P, Simons H. Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity. Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies, policies and measures, 2005, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 165-181.

[10] Burns WJ, Slovic P, Kasperson RE, Kasperson JX, Renn O, Emani S. Incorporating structural models into research on the social amplification of risk: Implications for theory construction and decision making. Risk Analysis, 1993, 13(6): 611-623

[11] Charnley G. Democratic science: Enhancing the role of science in stakeholder-based risk management decision-making. Report of health risk strategies, 2000, Washington, DC: Health Risk Strategies

[12] Daft RL, Weick KE. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 92(2): 284-295

[13] Earle TC, Cvetkovich G. Brehmer B, Sahlin NE. Risk communication: The social construction of meaning and trust. Future risks and risk management, 1994, Amsterdam: Kluwer 243-267.

[14] Feldman MS. Order without design: Information production and policy making, 1989, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

[15] Filar JA, Haurie A. Uncertainty and environmental decision making, 2010, New York: Springer

[16] Functowicz SO, Ravetz JR. Krimsky S, Golding D. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. Social theories of risk, 1992, Westport and London: Praeger 251-273.

[17] Hagendijk R, Irwin A. Public deliberation and governance: Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva, 2006, 44(2): 167-184

[18] Higo E, Okada N, Hipel KW, Fang L. Cooperative survival principles for underground flooding: Vitae system based multi-agent simulation. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 83: 379-395

[19] Hirsch-Hadorn G, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Hoffmann-Riem H, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E. Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E. The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. Handbook of transdisciplinary research, 2008, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer 19-42

[20] Hooghe L, Marks G. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 2003, 97(2): 233-243.

[21] IRGC (International Risk Governance Council) Risk governance: Towards an integrative approach. White paper No.1, 2005, Geneva: IRGC

[22] Jasanoff S. Jasanoff S. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order, 2004, London: Routledge 13-45

[23] Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow, 2011, New York: Penguin

[24] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames, 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[25] Keeney R. Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making, 1992, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

[26] Keeney R, McDaniels T. A framework to guide thinking and analysis regarding climate change policies. Risk Analysis, 2002, 21(6): 989-1000

[27] Keller, D. 2000. The Risk Commission assesses the acceptability of risks since 10 years (Seit 10 Jahren beurteilt die RISKO die Tragbarkeit von Risiken). RISKO: Mitteilungen für Kommission für Risikobewertung des Kantons Basel–Stadt. Bulletin 3: 1. http://www.aue.bs.ch/dam/jcr:71e2e305-fcd9-490a-9952-488612e857c1/fu_5_3_bulletin3_00.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2018 (in German).

[28] Klinke A, Renn O. Erisksson J, Gilek M, Ruden Ch. Risk governance: Contemporary and future challenges. Regulating chemical risks: European and global challenges, 2010, Heidelberg: Springer 9-28

[29] Klinke A, Renn O. Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 2012, 15(3): 273-292

[30] Klinke A, Renn O. Wilderer PA, Renn O, Grambow M, Molls M, Mainzer K. Distributed responsibility in risk governance. Sustainable risk management, 2018, Heidelberg: Springer 19-32

[31] Konishi H, Mun S. Carpooling and congestion pricing: HOV and HOT lanes. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2010, 40(4): 173-186

[32] Laudan L. Laudan L. The pseudo–science of science? The demise of the demarcation problem. Beyond positivism and relativism: Theory, method and evidence, 1996, Boulder: Westview Press 166-192.

[33] Löfstedt, R.E. 1997. Risk evaluation in the United Kingdom: Legal requirements, conceptual foundations, and practical experiences with special emphasis on energy systems. Working paper No. 92. Stuttgart: Center of Technology Assessment.

[34] Löfstedt R. Risk management in post trust societies, 2005, London: Palgrave Macmillan

[35] Marti K, Ermoliev Y, Makowski M. Coping with uncertainty: Robust solutions, 2010, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer

[36] Nelson TE, Oxleay ZM, Clawson RA. Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 1997, 19(3): 221-246

[37] Okada N. Adaptive process for SMART community governance under persistent disruptive risks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018

[38] Okada N, Na J-L, Fang L. The Yonmenkaigi System Method: An implementation–oriented group decision support approach. Journal of Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22(1): 45-52

[39] Okada N, Fang L, Kilgour DM. Community–based decision making in Japan. Journal of Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22(1): 57-69.

[40] Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D. Shadow spaces for social learning: A relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2008, 40(4): 867-884

[41] Reese SD, Gandy OH Jr Grant AE. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, 2003, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

[42] Renn O. Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world, 2008, London: Earthscan

[43] Renn O. Stakeholder and public involvement in risk governance. International Journal for Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(1): 8-20

[44] Renn O. Kasperson RE. Risk governance: Concept and application to systemic risk. Risk conundrums: Solving unsolvable problems, 2017, London and New York: Routledge 243-259

[45] Renn O, Klinke A. Müller-Mahn D. Space matters! Impacts for risk governance. The spatial dimension of risk: How geography shapes the emergence of riskscapes, 2013, Milton Park and New York: Routledge 1-21.

[46] Renn O, Klinke A. Risk governance. Application to urban planning. ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 2014, 11(1): 5-19.

[47] Renn O, Klinke A. Burgess A, Alemanno A, Zinn JO. Risk governance: Concept and application to technological risk. Routledge handbook of risk studies, 2016, London and New York: Routledge 204-215.

[48] Renn O, Klinke A. Andersen TJ. Complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in inclusive risk governance. The Routledge companion to strategic risk management, 2016, Milton Park and New York: Routledge 13-30.

[49] Renn O, Klinke A, van Asselt M. Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. AMBIO, 2011, 40(2): 231-246

[50] Renn O, Schweizer P-J. Inclusive risk governance: Concepts and application to environmental policy making. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2009, 19(3): 174-185

[51] Renn O, Walker K. Renn O, Walker K. Lessons learned: A re–assessment of the IRGC framework on risk governance. The IRGC risk governance framework: Concepts and practice, 2008, Heidelberg and New York: Springer 331-367

[52] Renn O, Walker K. The IRGC risk governance framework: Concepts and practice, 2008, Heidelberg and New York: Springer

[53] Rose A. Distributional considerations for transboundary risk governance of environmental threats. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018

[54] Rowe G, Frewer LJ. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2000, 25(1): 3-29

[55] Skelcher C. Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance, 2005, 18(1): 89-110

[56] Stoll-Kleemann S, Welp M. Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management: Theory and practice, 2006, Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer

[57] Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness, 2009, New York: Penguin

[58] Underdal A. Complexity and challenges of long–term environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 2009, 20(3): 386-393

[59] Waldrop MM. Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos, 1992, London: Penguin

[60] Webster DG. Adaptive governance: The dynamics of Atlantic fisheries management, 2009, Cambridge: MIT Press

[61] Zahariadis N. Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies, 2003, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press