Taking Time, Sharing Spaces: Adaptive Risk Governance Processes in Rural Japan

Abstract

Rural and peri-urban communities in Japan, as well as in many other regions of the world, face risks of discrete event natural phenomena, including earthquakes, floods, and landslides. They also face persistent disruptive stress due to risks that remain active over long durations, such as the loss of community capacities due to an aging population. This article describes my observations of and subsequent reflections on adaptive risk governance and community resilience building processes in two areas of western and southern Japan—Chizu in Tottori Prefecture and towns near Kumamoto City in Kumamoto Prefecture. Four aspects of adaptive risk governance from this limited set of observations stood out: (1) the importance of establishing a durable, patient process, (2) initiated and facilitated by a trusted figure, in (3) a space or venue accessible and open to the community, and (4) augmented by boundary objects that facilitate role playing, iteration, and ownership by the community of solutions generated in these dialogues.

Keywords

Boundary objects / Case Station-Field Campuses (CASiFiCA) / Community resilience / Knowledge, Learning, and Societal Change Alliance (KLASICA) / Japan / Risk governance / Yonmenkaigi System Method (YSM)

References

[1] Higo E, Okada N, Hipel KW, Fang LP. Cooperative survival principles for underground flooding: Vitae system based multi-agent simulation. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 83: 379-395

[2] Li H, Chabay I, Renn O, Weber A, Mbungu G. Exploring smart grids with simulations in a mobile science exhibition. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 2015, 5: 37

[3] Okada N, Fang LP, Kilgour DM. Community-based decision making in Japan. Journal of Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22(1): 45-52

[4] Okada N, Na J-L, Fang L, Teratani A. The Yonmenkaigi system method: An implementation-oriented group decision support approach. Journal of Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22(1): 53-67

[5] Paton D, Bajek R, Okada N, McIvor D. Predicting community earthquake preparedness: A cross-cultural comparison of Japan and New Zealand. Natural Hazards, 2010, 54(3): 765-781

[6] Samaddar S, Okada N, Choi J, Tatano H. What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat. India. Natural Hazards, 2017, 85(1): 111-138

[7] Sato, T., I. Chabay, and J. Helgeson (eds.). 2018. Transformations of social-ecological systems: Studies in co-creating integrated knowledge toward sustainable futures. In Ecological research monographs. Singapore: Springer.

[8] Xu W, Li Y, Okada N, Takeuchi Y, Kajitani Y, Shi PJ. Collaborative modelling-based shelter planning analysis: A case study of the Nagata Elementary School community in Kobe City, Japan. Disasters, 2014, 38(1): 125-147