Life-Cycle and Seismic Fragility Assessment of Code-Conforming Reinforced Concrete and Steel Structures in Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

In this article, the fragility of reinforced concrete and steel structures in Bucharest, a city of high seismic hazard, designed using the recent building codes in Romania, is assessed. A total of 24 reinforced concrete and steel structures with heights varying from five stories to 13 stories were analyzed. Their seismic fragility was evaluated using two procedures from the literature. In the first procedure (SPO2FRAG), the fragility was derived based on the pushover curves using the SPO2IDA algorithm, while in the second procedure (FRACAS), the fragility was derived from nonlinear time-history analyses. The analyzed structures were designed for three levels of peak ground accelerations, corresponding to mean return periods of 100, 225, and 475 years. Subsequently, the damage assessment of the analyzed structures was performed using ground motions generated from a Monte-Carlo simulated earthquake catalogue for the Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic source. The damage degrees that were estimated using the SPO2FRAG approach are higher than those estimated using the FRACAS approach. The life-cycle analysis of the structures shows that a further increase of the design peak ground acceleration for Bucharest is feasible from an economic point of view using the SPO2FRAG results. However, based on the FRACAS results, the opposite conclusion can be drawn. Finally, generic lognormal fragility functions are proposed as a function of building height and structural system.

Keywords

Bucharest / Building damage degree / Building life-cycle analysis / Monte-Carlo simulated earthquake catalogue / Seismic risk / Vrancea seismic source

References

[1] Baltzopoulos G, Baraschino R, Iervolino I, Vamvatsikos D. SPO2FRAG: Software for seismic fragility assessment based on static pushover. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15(10): 4399-4425

[2] FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2012. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. Earthquake model—HAZUS MH 2.1. 2012. Technical manual. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[3] Kappos AJ, Dimitrakopoulos EJ. Feasibility of pre-earthquake strengthening of buildings based on cost-benefit and life-cycle cost analysis, with the aid of fragility curves. Natural Hazards, 2008, 45(1): 33-54

[4] Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Panagiotopoulos C, Penelis G. A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 4(4): 391-413

[5] Luco N, Cornell CA. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra, 2007, 23(2): 357-392

[6] Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration P100–1/2013, Code for seismic design—Part I—Design prescriptions for buildings, 2013, Bucharest: Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration (in Romanian)

[7] Olteanu P, Coliba V, Vacareanu R, Pavel F, Ciuiu D. Vacareanu R, Ionescu C. Analytical seismic fragility functions for dual RC structures in Bucharest. The 1940 Vrancea earthquake: Issues, insights and lessons learnt, 2016, New York: Springer 463-480

[8] Pavel F, Vacareanu R, Calotescu I, Sandulescu AM, Arion C, Neagu C. Impact of spatial correlation of ground motions on seismic damage for residential buildings in Bucharest, Romania. Natural Hazards, 2017, 87(2): 1167-1187

[9] Pavel F, Vacareanu R, Coliba V, Calotescu I. Bucher C, Ellingwood BR, Frangopol DM. Life-cycle seismic loss assessment for RC frame structures in Bucharest, Romania. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Structural Safety & Reliability, 2017, Vienna: TUVerlag 318-327.

[10] Rossetto T, Gehl P, Minas S, Galasso C, Duffour P, Douglas J, Cook O. FRACAS: a capacity spectrum approach for seismic fragility assessment including record-to-record variability. Engineering Structures, 2016, 125: 337-348

[11] Vacareanu R, Radulian M, Iancovici M, Pavel F, Neagu C. Fore-arc and back-arc ground motion prediction model for Vrancea intermediate depth seismic source. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 19(3): 535-562

[12] Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35(9): 1097-1117