Why People Live in Flood-Prone Areas in Akuressa, Sri Lanka

Abstract

To investigate why people live in areas at high risk of floods, a qualitative case study was carried out in the areas around Akuressa, in southwest Sri Lanka. Data collection consisted mainly of semistructured interviews with local residents and government officials. The purpose was to study why people live in areas at high risk of floods, by looking beyond the purely physical aspects of living with hazards and exploring the underlying social factors. Four main factors were identified: an overall good living situation; a sense of place; difficulties relocating; and being well-adapted to the situation. The analysis also examined whether government officials shared the views of local residents. The findings highlighted both areas of consensus and discrepancies related to risk awareness, and the efficiency of risk reduction measures that had been implemented by the government. The case study identified and explored underlying social factors, such as risk normalization, risk trade-offs, and push-and-pull processes, which seem to influence the decision to live in a high-risk area.

Keywords

Flood risk / Risk awareness / Risk perception / Sri Lanka

References

[1] Adger NW. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16: 268-281

[2] Becker P. Sustainability science: Managing risk and resilience for sustainable development, 2014, Amsterdam: Elsevier

[3] Bernard RH. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 2006, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield

[4] Bonaiuto M, Alves S, De Dominicis S, Petruccelli I. Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research review and agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, 48: 33-53

[5] Burton, I., R.W. Kates, and G.F. White. 1968. The human ecology of extreme geophysical events. Natural hazard research working paper No.1. Tampa, FL: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.

[6] Burton I, Kates RW, White GF. The environment as hazard, 1978, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press

[7] Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, 2006, London: SAGE Publications

[8] Chawla, L. 1992. Childhood place attachments. In Place attachment, ed. I. Altman, and S.M. Low, 63–86. New York: Springer US.

[9] Coppola DP. Introduction to international disaster management, 2011 2 Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann

[10] Cox RS, Perry K-ME. Like a fish out of water: Reconsidering disaster recovery and the role of place and social capital in community disaster resilience. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2011, 48(3–4): 395-411

[11] CRED (Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters). 2016. EM-DAT: The international disasters database. http://www.emdat.be. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

[12] Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 1978, 9(2): 127-152

[13] Freed A. Interviewing through an interpreter. Social Work, 1988, 33(4): 315-319.

[14] Hearn Morrow B. Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters, 1999, 23(1): 1-18

[15] Hewitt K. Hewitt K. The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. Interpretations of calamity, 1983, London and Winchester: Allen & Unwin 3-32.

[16] Höst M, Regnell B, Runeson P. To complete the degree project (Att genomföra examensarbete), 2006, Lund: Studentlitteratur (in Swedish)

[17] Johnson D, Levin S. The tragedy of cognition: Psychological biases and environmental inaction. Current Science, 2009, 97(11): 1593-1603.

[18] Kates RW. Experiencing the environment as hazard, 1976, New York and London: Plenum Press

[19] Lima ML. On the influence of risk perception on mental health: Living near an incinerator. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004, 24(1): 71-84

[20] Longhurst R. Rojek R. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Key methods in geography, 2016, London: SAGE Publications 143-156.

[21] Luìs S, Pinho L, Lima M, Roseta-Palma C, Cardoso Martins F, de Almeida A. Is it all about awareness? The normalization of coastal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 2016, 19(6): 810-826

[22] McEntire DA. Why vulnerability matters: Exploring the merit of an inclusive disaster reduction concept. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2005, 14(2): 206-222

[23] Ministry of Disaster Management Sri Lanka. 2012. Hazard profiles of Sri Lanka. Colombo: Nanila Publication (Pvt). http://www.dmc.gov.lk/hazard/hazard/Report.html. Accessed 3 Oct 2016.

[24] Ministry of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs. 2012. Census of population and housing 2012. Department of Census and Statistics. Battaramulla: Ministry of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs.

[25] Nighswonger Kraus N, Slovic P. Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: Modeling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains. Risk Analysis, 1988, 8(3): 435-455

[26] O’Keefe P, Westgate K, Wisner B. Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 1976, 260: 566-567

[27] Oliver-Smith A. Successes and failures in post-disaster resettlement. Disasters, 1991, 15(1): 12-23

[28] Perry RW, Lindell MK. Preparedness for emergency response: Guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters, 2003, 27(4): 336-350

[29] Politz A. The dilemma of creative advertising. Journal of Marketing, 1960, 25(2): 1-6

[30] Quarantelli E. Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. Disasters, 1997, 21(1): 39-56

[31] Raaijmakers R, Krywkow J, van der Veen A. Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: An exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 2008, 46(3): 307-322

[32] Renn O. The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1998, 59(1): 49-62

[33] Scolobig A, De Marchi B, Borga M. The missing link between flood risk awareness and preparedness: Findings from case studies in an Alpine Region. Natural Hazards, 2012, 63(2): 499-520

[34] Silver A, Grek-Martin J. “Now we understand what community really means”: Reconceptualizing the role of sense of place in the disaster recovery process. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, 42: 32-41

[35] Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2000, 20(1): 1-11

[36] Slovic P. The risk game. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2001, 86: 17-24

[37] Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychologica, 1984, 56(1–3): 183-203

[38] Smith K. Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster, 2013 6 New York: Routledge

[39] Sooriyabandara, L. 2016. Chief irrigation engineer at the district irrigation department. Interview by O. Nilsson, and J. Askman, 9 September 2016, Matara, Sri Lanka.

[40] Turner BL II Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Schiller A. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2003, 100(14): 8074-8079

[41] Twigger-Ross CL, Uzzell DL. Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1996, 16: 205-220

[42] UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development, 2004, New York: UNDP

[43] Wester-Herber M. Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts: The role of place-identity in risk perception. Environmental Science and Policy, 2004, 7(2): 109-116

[44] White, G.F. 1945. Human adjustment to floods: A geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Paper No. 29.

[45] White, G.F. 1964. Choice of adjustment to floods. University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Paper No. 93.

[46] Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2003, New York: Routledge

[47] Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods, 2002 3 Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications

[48] Zajonc RB. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9(2): 1

[49] Zubair L. May 2003 disaster in Sri Lanka and cyclone 01-B in the bay of Bengal. Natural Hazards, 2004, 33(3): 303-318