Gender, Intra-Household Dynamics, and Household Hurricane Preparedness: An Exploratory Study Employing a Dyadic Interview Approach

Abstract

This exploratory study targets married, heterosexual couples living in Sarasota County, Florida and uses a dyadic interview approach to understand how the interactions of married couples, or intra-household dynamics, could affect household hurricane preparedness. Interview results reveal that couples consider household hurricane preparedness to be a joint process between husband and wife, but in many cases, partners do not have the same opinions about these preparations. This study also shows the relations between household hurricane preparedness and household division of labor, and how the tendency of wives to prioritize relational preparedness activities could be an answer to understanding why some quantitative studies show that females have lower preparedness levels than males. Other potential problems with this previous research, including the selection of survey participants and the measurement of household hurricane preparedness, are likewise discussed.

Keywords

Dyadic interviews / Gender / Household decision making / Household hurricane preparedness / Intra-household dynamics

References

[1] Allen KM. Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: Local capacity-building in the Philippines. Disasters, 2006, 30(1): 81-101

[2] Baker EJ. Household preparedness for the aftermath of hurricanes in Florida. Applied Geography, 2011, 31(1): 46-52

[3] Basolo V, Steinberg LJ, Burby RJ, Levine J, Cruz AM, Huang C. The effects of confidence in government and information on perceived and actual preparedness for disasters. Environment and Behavior, 2009, 41(3): 338-364

[4] Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR. A model of household preparedness for earthquakes: How individuals make meaning of earthquake information and how this influences preparedness. Natural Hazards, 2012, 64(1): 107-137

[5] Belch GE, Belch MA, Ceresino G. Parental and teenage child influences in family decision making. Journal of Business Research, 1985, 13(2): 163-176

[6] Blood RO, Wolfe DM. Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living, 1960, Glencoe, IL: Free Press

[7] Caldwell K. Dyadic interviewing: A technique valuing interdependence in interviews with individuals with intellectual disabilities. Qualitative Research, 2014, 14(4): 488-507

[8] Campbell KM. Geology of Sarasota County, Florida, 1985, Tallahassee: Florida Geological Survey

[9] Carter-Pokras O, Zambrana RE, Mora SE, Aaby KA. Emergency preparedness: Knowledge and perceptions of Latin American immigrants. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 2007, 18(2): 465-481

[10] Commuri S, Gentry JW. Opportunities for family research in marketing. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2000, 8: 1-34.

[11] Davis HL. Decision making within the household. Journal of Consumer Research, 1976, 2(4): 241-260

[12] Davis HL, Rigaux BP. Perception of marital roles in decision processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 1974, 1(1): 51-62

[13] DeBastiani SD, Strine TW, Vagi SJ, Barnett DJ, Kahn EB. Preparedness perceptions, sociodemographic characteristics, and level of household preparedness for public health emergencies: Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2006–2010. Health Security, 2015, 13(5): 317-326

[14] Eisikovits Z, Koren C. Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 2010, 20(12): 1642-1655

[15] FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2005. Mitigation assessment team report: Hurricane Charley in Florida. FEMA Report No. 488. Washington, DC: FEMA.

[16] Grothmann T, Reusswig F. People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 2006, 38(1–2): 101-120

[17] Horney J, Snider C, Malone S, Gammons L, Ramsey S. Factors associated with Hurricane preparedness: Results of a pre-hurricane assessment. Journal of Disaster Research, 2008, 3(2): 1-7

[18] Hung, L.-S. 2016. Gender, household decision-making, and hurricane preparedness. Ph.D. dissertation. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

[19] Hung L-S. Married couples’ decision-making about household natural hazard preparedness: A case study of hurricane hazards in Sarasota County, Florida. Natural Hazards, 2017, 87(2): 1057-1081

[20] Jóhannesdóttir G, Gísladóttir G. People living under threat of volcanic hazard in southern Iceland: Vulnerability and risk perception. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2010, 10(2): 407-420

[21] Kang SK, Hsu CHC. Dyadic consensus on family vacation destination selection. Tourism Management, 2005, 26(4): 571-582

[22] Kim Y-C, Kang J. Communication, neighbourhood belonging and household hurricane preparedness. Disasters, 2010, 34(2): 470-488

[23] Kirschenbaum A. Families and disaster behavior: a reassessment of family preparedness. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 2006, 24(1): 111-143.

[24] Kohn S, Eaton JL, Feroz S, Bainbridge AA, Hoolachan J, Barnett DJ. Personal disaster preparedness: An integrative review of the literature. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2012, 6(3): 217-231

[25] Lee CKC, Beatty SE. Family structure and influence in family decision making. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2002, 19(1): 24-41

[26] Lemyre L, Lee JEC, Turner MC, Krewski D. Terrorism preparedness in Canada: A public survey on perceived institutional and individual response to terrorism. International Journal of Emergency Management, 2007, 4(2): 296-315

[27] Levac J, Toal-Sullivan D, O’Sullivan TL. Household emergency preparedness: A literature review. Journal of Community Health, 2012, 37(3): 725-733

[28] Lindell MK. Disaster studies. Current Sociology, 2013, 61(5–6): 797-825

[29] Lindell MK, Hwang SN. Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Analysis, 2008, 28(2): 539-556

[30] Lindell MK, Perry RW. Household adjustment to earthquake hazard. A review of research. Environment and Behavior, 2000, 32(4): 461-501

[31] Lindell MK, Prater CS. Risk area residents’ perceptions and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002, 32(11): 2377-2392

[32] Mahdaviazad H, Abdolahifar G. Assessing household natural disaster preparedness in Shiraz, Iran, 2011: Results of a knowledge, attitude, and practices survey. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2014, 8(4): 349-352

[33] McGee TK, Russell S. “It’s just a natural way of life…” an investigation of wildfire preparedness in rural Australia. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 2003, 5(1–2): 1-12.

[34] McIvor D, Paton D. Preparing for natural hazards: normative and attitudinal influences. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2007, 16(1): 79-88

[35] Morgan DL, Ataie J, Carder P, Hoffman K. Introducing dyadic interviews as a method for collecting qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research, 2013, 23(9): 1276-1284

[36] Morris SM. Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 2001, 11(4): 553-567

[37] Mottiar Z, Quinn D. Couple dynamics in household tourism decision making: women as the gatekeepers?. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 2004, 10(2): 149-160

[38] Mulilis J-P. Gender and earthquake preparedness: a research study of gender issues in disaster management: differences in earthquake preparedness due to traditional stereotyping or cognitive appraisal of threat?. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 1999, 14(1): 41-50.

[39] Neuman WL. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 2000 4 Boston: Allyn & Bacon

[40] O’Brien PW, Atchison P. Enarson E, Morrow BH. Gender differentiation and aftershock warning response. The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women’s eyes, 1998, New York: International Hurricane Center. Laboratory for Social and Behavioral Research 173-180.

[41] Parsizadeh, F., M. Ibrion, M. Mokhtari, H. Lein, and F. Nadim. 2015. Bam 2003 earthquake disaster: On the earthquake risk perception, resilience and earthquake culture—Cultural beliefs and cultural landscape of Qanats, gardens of Khorma trees and Argh-E Bam. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 14(Part 4): 457–469.

[42] Paton D. Disaster preparedness: A social-cognitive perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2003, 12(3): 210-216

[43] Paton D. Collins AE, Samantha J, Manyena B, Jayawickrama J. Risk, resilience, and readiness: developing an all-hazards perspective. Hazards, risks, and disasters in society, 2014, Amsterdam: Elsevier 307-323.

[44] Paton D, Houghton BF, Gregg CE, Gill DA, Ritchie LA, McIvor D, Larin P, Meinhold S Managing tsunami risk in coastal communities: Identifying predictors of preparedness. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 2008, 23(1): 4-9.

[45] Paton D, Kelly G, Burgelt P, Doherty M. Preparing for bushfires: Understanding intentions. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2006, 15(4): 566-575

[46] Paton D, Smith L, Johnston D. When good intentions turn bad: Promoting natural hazard preparedness. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 2005, 20(1): 25-30.

[47] Proudley M. Fire, families and decisions. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 2008, 23(1): 37-43.

[48] Ronan KR, Alisic E, Towers B, Johnson VA, Johnston DM. Disaster preparedness for children and families: A critical review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2015

[49] Russell LA, Goltz JD, Bourque LB. Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environment and Behavior, 1995, 27(6): 744-770

[50] Thompson L, Walker AJ. The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and Family, 1982, 44(4): 889-900

[51] U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Profile of general population and housing characteristics: 2010. 2010 census summary file 1. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t. Accessed 1 Jan 2017.