Convergent Agency: Encouraging Transdisciplinary Approaches for Effective Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract

Three recent global agreements have been established to facilitate the implementation of global-level responsibilities to deal with disaster risk reduction (DRR), human development, and climate change adaptation (CCA) respectively. While these agreements have a common goal of reducing social, economic, and environmental vulnerability, they have been developed by largely independent communities of practice. This has limited cross-fertilization despite the inherent multidimensional nature of global challenges and the considerable thematic overlap. We argue that developing a transdisciplinary strategy that effectively integrates disciplines, approaches, and knowledge systems will lead to greater and more sustainable impacts, together with a more efficient use of financial resources. Hybrid approaches should be encouraged during planning of future development efforts so that risk reduction is conducted simultaneously with CCA. Transdisciplinary processes are central to generating context-sensitive knowledge to support decisions on CCA and DRR options that minimize trade-offs and maximize synergies and complementarities required to guide sustainable development trajectories. Finally, building codes together with climate and risk-smart research, education, and awareness raising, are identified as priority entry points to materialize the blending of DRR and CCA approaches and effectively reduce risk while mitigating and adapting to climate change.

Keywords

Building codes / Climate change adaptation / Disaster risk reduction / Sustainable development goals / Transdisciplinary knowledge

References

[1] Barrios, E., H.L.C. Coutinho, and C.A.B. Medeiros. 2012. InPaC-S: Participatory knowledge integration on indicators of soil quality—Methodological guide. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Embrapa, and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/publications/PDFs/B17459.PDF. Accessed 8 April 2016.

[2] Bendito A, Gutiérrez A. Can building codes stop the vicious cycle of recurrent disaster?. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 9: 226-235.

[3] Bendito A, Rozelle J, Bausch D. Assessing potential earthquake loss in Mérida State, Venezuela using Hazus. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2014, 5(3): 176-191

[4] Bendito A, Twomlow S. Promoting climate-smart approaches to postharvest challenges in Rwanda. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2014, 13(3): 222-239

[5] Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali L, Knight TM, Pullin AS. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 97(3): 147-155

[6] Briceño S. Looking back and beyond Sendai: 25 years of international policy experience on disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(2): 202-204

[7] Clark WC, Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Guston D, Catacutan D, Dickson NM, McNie E. Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 113(17): 4615-4622

[8] CCAFS (Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security). 2015. Change for the better: The CCAFS annual report. https://ccafs.cgiar.org/research/annual-report/2015. Accessed 7 May 2016.

[9] Coe R, Sinclair F, Barrios E. Scaling up agroforestry requires research ‘in’ rather than ‘for’ development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2014, 6: 73-77

[10] Danielsen F, Sorensen MK, Olwig MF, Selvam V, Parish F, Burgess ND, Hiraishi T, Karunagaran VM, Rasmusse MS, Hansen LB, Quarto A, Suryadiputra N. The Asian tsunami: A protective role for coastal vegetation. Science, 2005, 310(5748): 643

[11] Doswald, N., and M. Estrella. 2015. Promoting ecosystems for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: Opportunities for integration. Discussion paper, United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva. http://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/44969. Accessed 7 July 2016.

[12] EEA (European Environment Agency). 2015. Exploring nature-based solutions—the role of green infrastructure in mitigating the impacts of weather- and climate change-related natural hazards. EEA technical report No 12/2015, Copenhagen. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/exploring-nature-based-solutions-2014. Accessed 7 Feb 2016.

[13] EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute). 2009. Learning from earthquakes: The M7.3 September 2, 2009, West Java Quake. EERI special earthquake report. http://www.eeri.org/site/images/lfe/pdf/WestJavaEQ-9-2-09.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2010.

[14] FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2013. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building Science Branch. http://www.fema.gov/building-science. Accessed 17 May 2014.

[15] Geneletti D, Zardo L. Ecosystem-based adaptation in cities: An analysis of European urban climate adaptation plans. Land Use Policy, 2016, 50: 38-47

[16] IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). 2013. Climate Resilient Post-harvest and Agribusiness Support Project (PASP) including blended Adaptation for Smallholder Agriculture Programme Grant (ASAP). http://operations.ifad.org/web/ifad/operations/country/project/tags/rwanda/1497/documents. Accessed 8 Nov 2016.

[17] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ. Report prepared for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by Working Group I. Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment, 1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[18] Kathiresan K, Bingham BL. Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems. Advances in Marine Biology, 2001, 40: 81-251

[19] Kelman I. Climate change and the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(2): 117-127

[20] Manyena B. After Sendai: Is Africa bouncing back or bouncing forward from disasters?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(1): 41-53

[21] Mires, F. 2015. About the correct use of words in politics (Acerca del uso correcto de las palabras en la política). Prodavinci, 16 October 2015. http://prodavinci.com/blogs/acerca-del-uso-correcto-de-las-palabras-en-la-politica-por-fernando-mires/. Accessed 8 Nov 2016 (in Spanish).

[22] Nature Conservancy. 2015. Urban coastal resilience, valuing nature’s role. https://global.nature.org/content/urban-coastal-resilience-valuing-natures-role. Accessed 26 March 2016.

[23] Parkes MW, Bienen L, Breilh J, Hsu LN, McDonald M, Patz JA, Rosenthal JP, Sahani M, Sleigh A, Waltner-Toews D, Yassi A. All hands on deck: Transdisciplinary approaches to emerging infectious disease. EcoHealth, 2005, 2: 258-272

[24] Parker R, Kreimer A, Musinghe M. Informal settlements, environmental degradation, and disaster vulnerability: The Turkey case study, 1995, Washington: World Bank Group

[25] Renaud, F., and R. Murti. 2013. Ecosystems and disaster risk reduction in the context of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami—a scoping study. UNU-EHS Publication Series No.10. https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/import/downloads/kncf_report_final.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2014.

[26] Renaud, F.G., K. Sudmeier-Rieux, M. Estrella, and U. Nehren (eds.). 2016. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction and adaptation in practice. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research 42. Cham: Springer.

[27] Scholz RW, Steiner G. The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: Part II—what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice. Sustainability Science, 2015, 10: 653-671

[28] Stock P, Burton RJF. Defining terms for integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability, 2011, 3(8): 1090-1113

[29] UN (United Nations). 2015. Sustainable development goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/. Accessed 27 Aug 2016.

[30] UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 2015. Adoption of the Paris agreement. Draft decision CP.21. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2016.

[31] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters, 2005, Geneva: UNISDR

[32] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, 2015, Geneva: UNISDR

[33] Wisner B. Risk and the Neoliberal State: Why post-Mitch lessons didn’t reduce El Salvador’s earthquake losses. Disasters, 2001, 25(3): 251-268