Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions for Alternate Food to Address Agricultural Catastrophes Globally
David C. Denkenberger , Joshua M. Pearce
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2016, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3) : 205 -215.
Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions for Alternate Food to Address Agricultural Catastrophes Globally
The literature suggests there is about a 1 % risk per year of a 10 % global agricultural shortfall due to catastrophes such as a large volcanic eruption, a medium asteroid or comet impact, regional nuclear war, abrupt climate change, and extreme weather causing multiple breadbasket failures. This shortfall has an expected mortality of about 500 million people. To prevent such mass starvation, alternate foods can be deployed that utilize stored biomass. This study developed a model with literature values for variables and, where no values existed, used large error bounds to recognize uncertainty. Then Monte Carlo analysis was performed on three interventions: planning, research, and development. The results show that even the upper bound of USD 400 per life saved by these interventions is far lower than what is typically paid to save a life in a less-developed country. Furthermore, every day of delay on the implementation of these interventions costs 100–40,000 expected lives (number of lives saved multiplied by the probability that alternate foods would be required). These interventions plus training would save 1–300 million expected lives. In general, these solutions would reduce the possibility of civilization collapse, could assist in providing food outside of catastrophic situations, and would result in billions of dollars per year of return.
Agricultural catastrophe / Alternate food / Global catastrophic risk / Intervention cost-effectiveness
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Earth Policy Institute Rising meat consumption takes big bite out of grain harvest, 2011, New Brunswick, NJ: Earth Policy Institute, Rutgers University |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2005. Biological diversity. Global forest resources assessment 2005. Progress towards sustainable forest management. http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0400e/a0400e00.htm. Accessed 21 Aug 2016. |
| [16] |
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2015. The state of food insecurity in the world. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: Taking stock of uneven progress. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4646e/index.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2016. |
| [17] |
GiveWell. 2015a. Against Malaria Foundation (AMF). http://www.givewell.org/international/top-charities/amf. Accessed Jul 2015. |
| [18] |
GiveWell. 2015b. Your dollar goes further overseas. Giving 101: The basics. http://www.givewell.org/giving101/Your-dollar-goes-further-overseas. Accessed Jul 2015. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Helfand, I. 2013. Nuclear famine: Two billion people at risk, 2nd edn. International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. https://www.mapw.org.au/files/downloads/two-billion-at-risk.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2016. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
Lazzaro, J. 2013. Bengal famine of 1943—A man-made holocaust. International Business Times, 22 February 2013. |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Unibio. 2014. What is uniprotein®? http://www.unibio.dk/?page_id=47. Accessed Jul 2015. |
| [45] |
UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Emergency Fund) The state of the world’s children, 2006, New York: United Nations Children’s Fund |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |