The Sustainable Procedure Framework for Disaster Risk Management: Illustrated by the Case of the EU Floods Directive in Sweden

Abstract

How can the concrete meaning of the ambiguous and theoretical concept of sustainable development (SD) be defined and implemented, without losing sight of its fundamental principles? This study introduces a theoretical framework that supports studies of SD implementation in the context of strategic disaster risk management, by defining what SD implies with regard to planning procedures. The framework is based on the procedural SD principles of participation and integration. It was originally developed for, and has shown great value in, the field of water resource management. In-depth interviews with senior risk management researchers indicate that the framework is also applicable to and valuable for disaster risk management studies. To illustrate the application of the framework, a study of the EU Floods Directive in Sweden is summarized with the framework as the basis for the analysis.

Keywords

Disaster risk management / EU Floods Directive / Planning / Sustainable development / Sustainable Procedure Framework / Sweden

References

[1] Asplund, E., and T. Hilding-Rydevik. 1996. Knowledge, environment and the future. Plan-EIA—case studies in two municipalities. Stockholm: Department of Regional Planning, Royal Institute of Technology (in Swedish).

[2] Becker P. Sustainability science−Managing risk and resilience for sustainable development, 2014, Amsterdam: Elsevier

[3] Bellamy JA, McDonald GT, Syme GJ, Butterworth JE. Evaluating integrated resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 1999, 12(4): 337-353

[4] Born SM, Sonzogni WC. Integrated environmental management: Strengthening the conceptualization. Environmental Management, 1995, 19(2): 167-181

[5] Bradshaw GA, Bekoff M. Ecology and social responsibility: The re-embodiment of science. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 2001, 16(8): 460-465

[6] Clarke WC, Dickson NM. Sustainability science: The emerging research paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003, 100: 8059-8061

[7] Dahlgren L, Khakee A. Values in societal planning, 1990, Stockholm: Byggforskningsrådet (in Swedish)

[8] Dahl RA. On democracy, 1998, New Haven: Yale University Press

[9] Diduck A, Sinclair AJ. Public involvement in environmental assessment: The case of the non-participant. Environmental Management, 2002, 29(4): 578-588

[10] Dryzek JS. The politics of the Earth: Environmental discourse, 1997, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[11] Dryzek JS. Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations, 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[12] EU (European Union) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2000, 43: 1-72.

[13] EU (European Union) Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Official Journal of the European Union, 2007, 50: 27-34.

[14] Evers, M. 2008. Decision support systems for integrated river basin management. Requirements for appropriate tools and structures for a comprehensive planning approach. Ph.D. thesis. Germany: Leibniz University.

[15] Flyvbjerg B. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice, 1998, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press

[16] Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson O, Norberg J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 2005, 30: 441-473

[17] Gamper CD, Turcanu C. Can public participation help managing risks from natural hazards?. Safety Science, 2009, 47(4): 522-528

[18] Ginson RB. Beyond the pillars: Sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2006, 8(3): 259-280

[19] Government of Sweden Flood risk ordinance (SFS 2009:956), 2009, Stockholm: Swedish Government (in Swedish)

[20] Gregersen HM, Folliott PF, Brooks KN. Integrated watershed management: Connecting people to their land and water, 2007, Cambridge: CABI

[21] Grote R, Gbikpi B. Participatory governance: Political and social implications, 2002, Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

[22] Healey P. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies, 2006, Palgrave: Macmillan

[23] Hedelin B. Criteria for the assessment of sustainable water management. Environmental Management, 2007, 39(2): 151-163

[24] Hedelin, B. 2008a. Planning for sustainable use of water. Ph.D. thesis. Sweden: Karlstad University.

[25] Hedelin B. Criteria for the assessment of processes for sustainable river basin management and their congruence with the EU water framework directive. European Environment, 2008, 18: 228-242

[26] Hedelin B. The EU floods directive in Sweden: Opportunities for integrated and participatory flood risk planning. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2015

[27] Hedelin B. Further development of a sustainable procedure framework for strategic natural resources and disaster risk management. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2015, 7(4): 247-266.

[28] Hedelin B, Lindh M. Implementing the EU water framework directive – Prospects for sustainable water planning in Sweden. European Environment, 2008, 18(6): 327-344

[29] Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Hojberg AL, Ferrand N, Gijsbers P, Scholten H. Harmonised principles for public participation in quality assurance of integrated water resources modelling. Water Resources Management, 2009, 23(12): 2539-2554

[30] Hemmati M. Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: Beyond deadlock and conflict, 2002, London: Earthscan

[31] Holling CS. Adaptive environmental management and assessment, 1978, Chichester: Wiley

[32] Ikeda S, Sato T, Fukuzono T. Towards an integrated management framework for emerging disaster risks in Japan. Natural Hazards, 2008, 44(2): 267-280

[33] Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F. Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 2012, 79: 1-10

[34] Jepson EJ. Sustainability and planning: Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of Planning Literature, 2001, 15(4): 499-510

[35] Kirkevold M. Bjerkreim T, Mathisen J, Nord R. Review articles – A way to strengthen the integration of nursing research. Vision, Knowledge and Work, 1996, Oslo: University Press 100-118 (in Norwegian)

[36] Klosterman RE. Fact and value in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1983, 49(2): 216-225

[37] Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A. Dynamic sustainabilities, 2010, London and Washington, DC: Earthscan

[38] Levin S, Xepapadeas T, Crépin AS, Norberg J, de Zeeuw A, Folke C, Hughes T, Arrow K, Barrett S, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Kautsky N, Mäler KG, Polasky S, Troell M, Vincent RJ, Walker B. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: Modeling and policy implications. Environment and Development Economics, 2013, 18(2): 111-132

[39] Lidskog R. Siting conflicts—democratic perspectives and political implications. Journal of Risk Research, 2005, 8(3): 187-206

[40] Lubchenco J. Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science, 1998, 279(5350): 491-497

[41] Ludwig D, Mangel M, Haddad B. Ecology, conservation, and public policy. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 2001, 32: 481-517

[42] Margerum RD. Integrated environmental management: The foundations for successful practice. Environmental Management, 1999, 24(2): 151-166

[43] McMichael AJ, Butler CD, Folke C. New visions for addressing sustainability. Science, 2003, 302(5652): 1919-1920.

[44] Novakowski N, Wellar B. Using the Delphi technique in normative planning research: Methodological design considerations. Environment and Planning A, 2008, 40(6): 1485-1500.

[45] Nyberg L, Evers M, Dahlström M, Pettersson A. Sustainability aspects of water regulation and flood risk reduction in Lake Vänern. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Society, 2014, 17(4): 331-340.

[46] Olsson P, Folke C. Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: A study of Lake Racken Watershed. Sweden. Ecosystems, 2001, 4(2): 85-104

[47] Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecogical systems. Science, 2009, 325(5939): 419-422

[48] Palerm JR. Public participation in EIA in Hungary: Analysis through three case studies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1999, 19: 201-220

[49] Pelling M. Learning from others: The scope and challenges for participatory disaster risk assessment. Disasters, 2007, 31(4): 373-385

[50] Pretty J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 2003, 302(5652): 1912-1914

[51] Rayner S. Mapping institutional diversity for implementing the Lisbon principles. Ecological Economics, 1999, 31: 259-274

[52] Renn O. Stakeholder and public involvement in risk governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(1): 8-20

[53] Ribarova I, Kalinkov P, Assimacopoulos D, Jeffrey P, Inman D, Daniell KA, Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia LS, Melin T, Tarnaki K, Ferrand N. Research-supported participatory planning for water stress mitigation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2011, 54(2): 283-300

[54] Robinson J. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2004, 48: 369-384

[55] Robson C. Real world research, 2002 2 Oxford: Blackwell Publishers

[56] Sawhney P, Kobayashi M, Takahashi M, King PN, Mori H. Participation of civil society in management of natural resources. International Review for Environmental Strategies, 2007, 7(1): 117-131.

[57] Shannon SE, Hsieh HF. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 2005, 15(9): 1277-1288

[58] Sneddon C, Harris L, Dimitrov R, Özesmi U. Contested waters: Conflict, scale and sustainability in aquatic socio-ecological systems. Society & Natural Resources, 2002, 15(8): 663-675

[59] Söderbaum P. Ecological economics, a political economics approach to environment and development, 2000, London: Earthscan

[60] van Herk S, Zevenbergen C, Rijke J, Ashley R. Collaborative research to support transition towards integrating flood risk management in urban development. Journal of Flood Risk management, 2011, 4(4): 306-317

[61] Vaidya A, Mayer AL. Use of the participatory approach to develop sustainability assessments for natural resource management. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2014, 21(4): 369-379

[62] Vinet F. Proverbs D, Brebbia CA, Penning-Roswell E. From hazard reduction to integrated risk management: Toward adaptive flood prevention in Europe. Flood recovery, innovation and response, 2008, Southampton, UK: WIT Press 113-122

[63] Wiklund, H. 2002. Arenas for democratic deliberation: Decision-making in an infrastructure project in Sweden. Ph.D. thesis. Sweden: Jönköping International Business School.

[64] Wisner B. Are we there yet? Reflections on integrated disaster risk management after ten years. Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management, 2011, 1(1): 1-14