A New Method for Resource Allocation Optimization in Disaster Reduction and Risk Governance

Xiao-Bing Hu , Ming Wang , Tao Ye , Peijun Shi

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2016, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 138 -150.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2016, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 138 -150. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-016-0089-2
Article

A New Method for Resource Allocation Optimization in Disaster Reduction and Risk Governance

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

How to allocate and use resources play a crucial role in disaster reduction and risk governance (DRRG). The challenge comes largely from two aspects: the resources available for allocation are usually limited in quantity; and the multiple stakeholders involved in DRRG often have conflicting interests in the allocation of these limited resources. Therefore resource allocation in DRRG can be formulated as a constrained multiobjective optimization problem (MOOP). The Pareto front is a key concept in resolving a MOOP, and it is associated with the complete set of optimal solutions. However, most existing methods for solving a MOOPs only calculate a part or an approximation of the Pareto front, and thus can hardly provide the most effective or accurate support to decision-makers in DRRG. This article introduces a new method whose goal is to find the complete Pareto front that resolves the resource allocation optimization problem in DRRG. The theoretical conditions needed to guarantee finding a complete Pareto front are given and a practicable, ripple-spreading algorithm is developed to calculate the complete Pareto front. A resource allocation problem of risk governance in agriculture is then used as a case study to test the applicability and reliability of the proposed method. The results demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method in terms of both solution quality and computational efficiency when compared with traditional methods.

Keywords

Disaster reduction / Multiobjective optimization / Pareto front / Resource allocation / Risk governance / Ripple-spreading algorithm

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiao-Bing Hu, Ming Wang, Tao Ye, Peijun Shi. A New Method for Resource Allocation Optimization in Disaster Reduction and Risk Governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(2): 138-150 DOI:10.1007/s13753-016-0089-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aljazzar H, Leue S. K: A heuristic search algorithm for finding the k shortest paths. Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 175(18): 2129-2154

[2]

Ball P. Why society is a complex matter—Meeting twenty-first century challenges with a new kind of ccience, 2012, Heidelberg: Springer

[3]

Barr N. Economics of the welfare state, 2004, New York: Oxford University Press

[4]

Black F, Litterman R. Global portfolio optimization. Financial Analysts Journal, 1992, 48(5): 28-43

[5]

Castro F, Gago J, Hartillo I, Puerto J, Ucha JM. An algebraic approach to integer portfolio problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 210(3): 647-659

[6]

Craft D, Halabi T, Shih H, Bortfeld T. Approximating convex Pareto surfaces in multiobjective radiotherapy planning. Medical Physics, 2006, 33(9): 3399-3407

[7]

Das I, Dennis JE. Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 1998, 8(3): 631-657

[8]

Deb K. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197

[9]

Erfani T, Utyuzhnikov SV. Directed search domain: A method for even generation of the Pareto frontier in multiobjective optimization. Journal of Engineering Optimization, 2011, 43(5): 467-484

[10]

Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgottc M. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, 2005, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers

[11]

Helbing D. Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature, 2013, 497(7447): 51-59

[12]

Hu XB, Wang M, Di Paolo E. Calculating complete and exact Pareto front for multi-objective optimization: A new deterministic approach for discrete problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, 2013, 43(3): 1088-1101.

[13]

Hu XB, Wang M, Ye Q, Hang ZG, Leeson MS. Multi-objective new product development by complete Pareto front and ripple-spreading algorithm. Neurocomputing, 2014, 142: 4-15

[14]

Hu XB, Wang M, Leeson MS, Di Paolo E, Liu H. Deterministic agent-based path optimization by mimicking the spreading of ripples. Evolutionary Computation, 2016

[15]

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed.C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D.H. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.K.Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P.M. Midgley. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

[16]

Jones DF, Mirrazavi SK, Tamiz M. Multiobjective meta-heuristics: an overview of the current state-of-the-art. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 137(1): 1-9

[17]

Jonkman SN, Brinkhuis-Jak M, Kok M. Cost benefit analysis and flood damage mitigation in the Netherlands. Heron, 2004, 49(1): 95-111.

[18]

Knowles JD, Corne DW. Approximating the nondominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy. Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 8(2): 149-172

[19]

Konak A, Coit DW, Smith AE. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006, 91(9): 992-1007

[20]

Kull D, Mechler R, Hochrainer-Stigler S. Probabilistic cost-benefit analysis of disaster risk management in a development context. Disasters, 2013, 37(3): 374-400

[21]

Lei XJ, Shi ZK. Overview of multi-objective optimization methods. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 15(2): 142-146.

[22]

Li Y. Assessment of damage risks to residential buildings and cost-benefit of mitigation strategies considering hurricane and earthquake hazards. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2012, 26(1): 7-16

[23]

Liel AB, Deierlein GG. Cost-benefit evaluation of seismic risk mitigation alternatives for older concrete frame buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 2013, 29(4): 1391-1411

[24]

Markowitz HM. Portfolio Selection. The. Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1): 77-91.

[25]

Marler RT, Arora JS. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 26(6): 369-395

[26]

Mechler, R. 2005. Cost-benefit analysis of natural disaster risk management in developing countries. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).

[27]

Messac A, Ismail-Yahaya A, Mattson CA. The normalized normal constraint method for generating the Pareto front. Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2003, 25(2): 86-98

[28]

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. Future global shocksImproving risk governance. OECD reviews of risk management policies. OECD Publishing. http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/governance/future-global-shocks_9789264114586-en#page1. Accessed 3 June 2016.

[29]

Ray PK. Agricultural insurance: Theory and practice and application to developing countries, 1980 2 New York: Pergamon Press

[30]

Rose A, Porter K, Dash N, Bouabid J, Huyck C, Whitehead J, Shaw D, Equchi R Benefit-cost analysis of FEMA hazard mitigation grants. Natural Hazards Review, 2007, 8(4): 97-111

[31]

Sawaragi, Y., H. Nakayama, and T. Tanino. 1985. Theory of multiobjective optimization. Mathematics in science and engineering, 176. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

[32]

Srinivas N, Deb K. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2(3): 221-248

[33]

Stadler WD, Dauer JP. Kamat MP. Multicriteria optimization in engineering: A tutorial and survey. Structural optimization: Status and promise, 1992, Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 211-249.

[34]

Steuer RE. Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computations, and application, 1986, New York: Wiley

[35]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Making development sustainable: The future of disaster risk management, 2015, UNISDR: Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Geneva

[36]

Van Veldhuizen DA, Lamont GB. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 8(2): 125-147

[37]

World Bank World development report 2014 – Managing risk for development, 2014, Washington, DC: World Bank

[38]

Ye T, Shi PJ, Wang JA, Liu LY, Fan YD, Hu JF. China’s drought disaster risk management: Perspective of severe droughts in 2009–2010. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2012, 3(2): 84-97

[39]

Yen JY. Finding the k shortest paths in a network. Management Science, 1971, 17(11): 712-716

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

181

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/