Charting Disaster Recovery via Google Street View: A Social Science Perspective on Challenges Raised by the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

Abstract

There is increasing interest in using Google Street View (GSV) for research purposes, particularly with regard to “virtually auditing” the built environment to assess environmental quality. Research in this field to date generally suggests GSV is a reliable means of understanding the “real world” environment. But limitations around the dates and resolution of images have been identified. An emerging strand within this literature is also concerned with the potential of GSV to understand recovery post-disaster. Using the GSV data set for the evacuated area around the Fukushima Dai’ichi nuclear power plant as a case study, this article evaluates GSV as a means of assessing disaster recovery in a dynamic situation with remaining uncertainty and a significant value and emotive dimension. The article suggests that GSV does have value in giving a high-level overview of the post-disaster situation and has potential to track recovery and resettlement over time. Drawing on social science literature relating to Fukushima, and disasters more widely, the article also argues it is imperative for researchers using GSV to reflect carefully on the wider socio-cultural contexts that are often not represented in the photo montage.

Keywords

Digital representation of place / Fukushima nuclear disaster / Google Street View / Post-disaster recovery / Social dimensions of energy

References

[1] Asahi Shimbun. 2014. Google Maps shows state of disaster recovery along Tohoku coastline, 20 October 2014. http://newsonjapan.com/html/newsdesk/article/109939.php. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[2] Asanuma-Brice C. Beyond reality—or—An illusory ideal: Pro-nuclear Japan’s management of migratory flows in a nuclear catastrophe. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 2014, 12(47): 1

[3] Badland H, Opit S, Witten K, Kearns R, Mavoa S. Can virtual streetscape audits reliably replace physical streetscape audits?. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2010, 87(6): 1007-1016

[4] Bahre CJ. A legacy of change: Historic human impact on vegetation in the Arizona borderland, 1991, Tucson, AZ: Arizona Press

[5] Blowers A. Nuclear waste and landscapes of risk. Landscape Research, 1999, 24(3): 241-264

[6] Curtis A, Mills JW, Kennedy B, Fotheringham S, McCarthy T. Understanding the geography of post-traumatic stress: An academic justification for using a spatial video acquisition system in the response to Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 2007, 15(4): 208-219

[7] Curtis A, Mills J. Spatial video data collection in a post-disaster landscape: The Tuscaloosa Tornado of April 27th 2011. Applied Geography, 2012, 32(2): 393-400

[8] Curtis JW, Curtis A, Mapes J, Szell AB, Cinderich A. Using Google Street View for systematic observation of the built environment: Analysis of spatio-temporal instability of imagery dates. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2013, 12: 53

[9] Curtis A, Curtis JW, Shook E, Smith S, Jefferis E, Porter L, Schuch L, Felix C, Kerndt PR. Spatial video geonarratives and health: Case studies in post-disaster recovery, crime, mosquito control and tuberculosis in the homeless. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2015, 14: 22

[10] Davies T. A visual geography of Chernobyl: Double exposure. International Labour and Working-Class History, 2013, 84: 116-139

[11] Endo, Y. 2012. Situation in Kawauchi-mura after the earthquake and effort toward recovery. https://www.oecd-nea.org/rp/meetings/ISTC-STCU/docs/5-feb-fukushima/15%20Endo(Kawauchi_Village)_English.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[12] Exeter DJ, Rodgers S, Sabel CE. “Whose data is it anyway?” The implications of pitting small area-level health and social data online. Health Policy, 2014, 114(1): 88-96

[13] Fukushima Minpo. 2012. Futaba town dissatisfied with national radiation dose standards. Fukushima Minpo News, 24 August 2012. http://www.fukushimaminponews.com/news.html?id=79. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[14] Fukushima Minpo. 2015. Futaba town to accept construction of temporary nuke waste storage facility. Fukushima Minpo News, 14 January 2015. http://www.fukushimaminponews.com/news.html?id=456. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[15] Fukushima Prefecture. n.d. Fukushima prefecture radioactivity measurement map. http://fukushima-radioactivity.jp/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[16] Gill T. Gill T, Steger B, Slater D. This spoiled soil: Place, people and community in an irradiated village in Fukushima prefecture. Japan copes with calamity: Ethnographies of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disasters of March 2011, 2013, Oxford: Peter Lang 201-234

[17] Google. n.d. About the memories for the future project in Japan, Google memories for the future project. http://www.miraikioku.com/streetview/en/about. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[18] Google. 2014. Google official blog, 23 April 2014: Go back in time with Street View. https://googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/go-back-in-time-with-street-view.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[19] Google, and T. Baba. 2013. Google official blog, 27 March 2013: Imagery on Google Maps of Fukushima exclusion zone town Namie-machi. http://googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/imagery-on-google-maps-of-fukushima.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[20] Gregson N. Projected futures: The political matter of UK higher activity radioactive waste. Environment and Planning A, 2012, 44(8): 2006-2022

[21] Hastings JR, Turner RM. The changing mile: An ecological study of vegetation change with time in the lower mile of an arid and semiarid region of Arizona, 1965, Tucson, AZ: Arizona Press

[22] Kasperson RE, Jhaveri N, Kasperson JX. Flynn J, Slovic P, Kunreuther H. Stigma and the social amplification of risk: Towards a framework of analysis. Risk, media and stigma, 2001, London: Earthscan 9-27.

[23] Kawai, K. 2011. Google official blog, 12 December 2011: Experience the tsunami-affected areas of Japan through Street View. http://googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/experience-tsunami-affected-areas-of.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[24] Kawai, K. 2012. Google official blog, 6 December 2012: Explore digital archives of buildings in Japan affected by the 2011 tsunami. http://googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/explore-digital-archives-of-buildings.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[25] Kelly CM, Wilson JS, Baker EA, Miller DK, Schootman M. Using Google Street View to audit the built environment: Inter-rater reliability results. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 2013, 45(18): 108-112

[26] Kibounobokujyo–Fukushima. 2015. Ranch of hope—Fukushima (Kibounobokujyo–Fukushima). http://blog.goo.ne.jp/kibouno-bokujyou. Accessed 11 Nov 2015 (in Japanese).

[27] Kirsch S. Watching the bombs go off: Photography, nuclear landscapes, and spectator democracy. Antipode, 1997, 29(3): 227-255

[28] Less EL, McKee P, Toomey T, Nelson T, Erickson D, Xiong S, Jones-Webb R. Matching study areas using Google Street View: A new application for an emerging technology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2015, 53: 72-79

[29] McNeill D, Quintana M. Mission impossible: What future Fukushima?. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 2013, 11(39): 1

[30] Ministry of the Environment. 2015. Progress on offsite cleanup efforts in Japan. http://josen.env.go.jp/en/pdf/progressseet_progress_on_cleanup_efforts.pdf?141022.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[31] Morris-Suzuki T. Touching the grass: Science, uncertainty and everyday life from Chernobyl to Fukushima. Science, Technology and Society, 2014, 19: 331-362

[32] Nakamura A, Kikuchi M. What we know, and what we have not yet learned: Triple disasters and the Fukushima nuclear fiasco in Japan. Public Administration Review, 2011, 71(6): 893-899

[33] National Geophysical Data Center. 2015. March 11, 2011 Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. National Geophysical Data Center. ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazards/publications/2011_0311.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2016.

[34] Odgers CL, Caspi A, Bates CJ, Sampson RJ, Moffitt TE. Systematic social observation of children’s neighbourhoods using Google Street View: A reliable and cost-effective method. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2012, 53(10): 1009-1017

[35] Parkhill K, Butler C, Pidgeon N. Landscapes of threat? Discourses of stigma around large energy developments. Landscape Research, 2014, 39(5): 566-582

[36] Perkins C. Plotting practices and politics: (Im)mutable narratives in OpenStreetMap. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2014, 39: 304-317

[37] Pezullo P, Depoe SP. Brouwer DC, Asen R. Everyday life and death in a nuclear world: Stories from Fernald. Public modalities: Rhetoric, culture, media, and the shape of public life, 2010, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press 85-108.

[38] Pink S. Pink S. Visual ethnography and the internet: Visuality, virtuality and the spatial turn. Advances in visual methodology, 2012, London: Sage 113-130

[39] Power MJ, Neville P, Devereux E, Haynes A, Barnes C. ‘Why bother seeing the world for real?’: Google Street View and the representation of a stigmatised neighbourhood. New Media & Society, 2013, 15(7): 1022-1040.

[40] Reconstruction Agency. 2015. The status in Fukushima. https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/english/topics/2013/03/the-status-in-fukushima.html. Accessed 3 Feb 2015.

[41] Rieu A-M. Thinking after Fukushima. Epistemic shift in social sciences. Asia-Europe Journal, 2013, 11(1): 65-78

[42] Rose G. An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, 2001, London: Sage

[43] Rousselet J, Imbert C-E, Dekri A, Garcia J, Goussard F, Vincent B, Denux O, Robinet C, Dorkeld F, Roques A, Rossi J-P. Assessing species distribution using Google Street View: A pilot study with the pine processionary moth. PLOS One, 2013, 8(10): e74918

[44] Rundle A, Bader M, Richards C, Neckerman K, Teitler J. Using Google Street View to audit neighbourhood environments. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 2011, 40(1): 94-100

[45] Saito K, Tanihata I, Fujiwara M, Saito T, Shimoura S, Otsuka T, Onda Y, Hoshi M, Ikeuchi Y, Takahashi F, Kinouchi N, Saegusa J, Seki A, Takemiya H, Shibata T. Detalied deposition density maps constructed by large-scale soil sampling for gamma-ray emitting radioactive nuclides from the Fukushima Da’ichi nuclear power plant accident. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2015, 139: 308-319

[46] Sato A. Issues related to nuclear accident evacuees: What has been observed while attending town hall meetings. Proceedings of the pre-congress conference on sustainability and environmental sociology, 12–13 July 2014, Yokohama, 2014, Tokyo: Hosei University 21-28.

[47] Sekiguchi, T. 2014. Fukushima refugees wary of returning home. Wall Street Journal, 23 October 2014. http://www.wsj.com/articles/fukushima-refugees-wary-of-returning-home-1414099802. Accessed 3 Feb 2015.

[48] Smith, N. 2006. There’s no such thing as a natural disaster. Understanding Katrina: Perspectives from the social sciences. New York: Social Science Research Council. http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Smith/. Accessed 15 Oct 2015.

[49] Sugai M. How do we make TEPCO and the government take responsibility?. Human, 2012, 17: 8-14.

[50] The Japan Times. 2014. National trains resume runs in hot zone, 01 June 2014. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/06/01/national/trains-resume-runs-hot-zone/#.VhUzfsltWZR. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[51] The Japan Times. 2015. Town near wrecked Fukushima No. 1 plant to host 30-year radioactive dump, 14 January 2015. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/01/14/national/futaba-accept-radioactive-soil-storage-facilities/#.VOXO-8m0KZT. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.

[52] Vandeviver C. Applying Google Maps and Google Street View in criminological research. Crime Science: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2014, 3: 13

[53] van Wolleghem G, van Dyck D, Ducheyne F, de Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G. Assessing the environmental characteristics of cycling routes to school: A study on the reliability and validity of a Google Street View-based audit. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2014, 13: 19

[54] Wakeford R. And now. Fukushima. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2011, 31(2): 167-176

[55] Zook MA, Graham M. Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2007, 34: 466-482